In which the Soviet Union was the first. The Soviet Union was a slave state

On December 30, 1922, at the First All-Union Congress of Soviets, the formation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was approved.

In December the Union, in July - the government.

Treaty on the Formation of the Union of Soviets Socialist Republics was signed on December 29, 1922 at a conference of delegations from the Congresses of Soviets of the RSFSR, Ukrainian SSR, BSSR and ZSFSR and approved by the First All-Union Congress of Soviets. December 30 is considered the official date of the formation of the USSR, although the government of the USSR and the Union ministries were created only in July 1923.

From 4 to 16.



IN different years the number of union republics within the USSR ranged from 4 to 16, but most long time The Soviet Union consisted of 15 republics - the RSFSR, the Ukrainian SSR, Byelorussian SSR, Moldavian SSR, Armenian SSR, Georgian SSR, Azerbaijan SSR, Kazakh SSR, Uzbek SSR, Kirghiz SSR, Turkmen SSR, Tajik SSR, Latvian SSR, Lithuanian SSR and Estonian SSR.

Three Constitutions in 69 years.



Over the nearly 69 years of its existence, the Soviet Union has replaced three Constitutions, which were adopted in 1924, 1936 and 1977. According to the first, the highest body of state power in the country was the All-Union Congress of Soviets, according to the second - a bicameral The Supreme Council THE USSR. In the third constitution, there was also initially a bicameral parliament, which in the 1988 edition gave way to the Congress people's deputies THE USSR.

Kalinin led the USSR the longest.



Legally, the head of state in the Soviet Union in different years was considered the Chairman of the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR, the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR and the President of the USSR. Formally, the longest-serving head of the USSR was Mikhail Ivanovich Kalinin, who for 16 years served as Chairman of the Presidium of the USSR Central Executive Committee, and then for eight years was Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR.

The flag was approved later by the Constitution.



The Treaty on the Formation of the USSR stipulated that the new state had its own flag, but no clear description was given of it. In January 1924, the first Constitution of the USSR was approved, however, it did not indicate what the flag looks like new country. And only in April 1924, the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR approved a scarlet cloth with a red five-pointed star, hammer and sickle as the flag.

In America - stars, in the USSR - slogans.



In 1923, the coat of arms of the Soviet Union was approved - an image of a hammer and sickle in the background globe, in the rays of the sun and framed by ears of corn, with the inscription in the languages ​​of the union republics “Workers of all countries, unite!” The number of inscriptions depended on the number of republics within the USSR, just as the number of stars on the US flag depends on the number of states.

Universal anthem.



From 1922 to 1943, the anthem of the Soviet Union was “The Internationale” - a French song with music by Pierre Degeyter and lyrics by Eugene Potier translated by Arkady Kotz. In December 1943, a new national anthem was created and approved with text by Sergei Mikhalkov and Gabriel El-Registan and music by Alexander Alexandrov. Alexandrov's music with modified text by Mikhalkov is currently the anthem of Russia.

The country is the size of a continent.



The Soviet Union occupied a territory of 22,400,000 square kilometers, being by this indicator the most big country on the planet. The size of the USSR was comparable to the size North America, including the territories of the United States, Canada and Mexico.

The border is one and a half equators.



The Soviet Union had the longest border in the world, over 60,000 kilometers, and bordered 14 states. It is curious that the length of the border modern Russia almost the same - about 60,900 km. At the same time, Russia borders on 18 states - 16 recognized and 2 partially recognized.

The highest point of the Union.



Most high point The Soviet Union was a mountain in the Tajik SSR with a height of 7495 meters, which in different years was called Stalin Peak and Communism Peak. In 1998, the Tajik authorities gave it a third name - Samani Peak, in honor of the emir who founded the first Tajik state.

A unique capital.



Despite the tradition in the USSR of renaming cities in honor of prominent Soviet figures, this process actually did not affect the capitals of the union republics. The only exception became the capital of Kyrgyzstan SSR city Frunze, renamed in honor Soviet military leader Mikhail Frunze, who was a local native. At the same time, the city was first renamed and then became the capital union republic. In 1991, Frunze was renamed Bishkek.

In the mid-1950s – early 1960s, the Soviet Union accomplished a kind of “scientific and technical hat-trick” - in 1954 it created the world’s first nuclear power plant, in 1957 it launched the world’s first nuclear power plant into orbit. artificial satellite Earth, and in 1961 launched the world's first spaceship with a person on board. These events occurred respectively 9, 12 and 15 years after the end of the Great Patriotic War, in which the USSR suffered the greatest material and human losses from participating countries.

The USSR did not lose wars.



During its existence, the Soviet Union officially participated in three wars - Soviet-Finnish war 1939–1940, Great Patriotic War 1941–1945 and in Soviet-Japanese war 1945. All these armed conflicts ended in victory for the Soviet Union.

1204 Olympic medals.



During the existence of the USSR, athletes of the Soviet Union took part in 18 Olympics (9 summer and 9 winter), winning 1204 medals (473 gold, 376 silver and 355 bronze). According to this indicator, the Soviet Union still ranks second, second only to the United States. For comparison, Great Britain, which is third, has 806 Olympic medals with 49 participations in Olympic Games. As for modern Russia, it ranks 9th - 521 medals after 11 Olympics.

The first and last referendum.



In the entire history of the USSR, the only all-Union referendum was held, which took place on March 17, 1991. It raised the question of the continued existence of the USSR. More than 77 percent of referendum participants were in favor of preserving the Soviet Union. In December of the same year, the heads of the RSFSR, Ukrainian SSR and Byelorussian SSR announced the termination of the existence of a single country.

Happy New Year 2017 to all users of the USSR website. I wish all the best and prosperity to you and your family and friends. Let New Year will bring only good, kind, eternal!

Nomenclature. Ruling class Soviet Union Voslensky Mikhail Sergeevich

1. Is there any in the Soviet Union Soviet authority?

Even asking such a question seems inconvenient: what other power could there be in the Soviet state? Whether it’s good or bad, it’s Soviet power! Let us nevertheless allow ourselves to check this statement for the sake of scientific thoroughness.

What is Soviet power? Any power in the state called the Soviet Union? No. Soviet power is definite shape power, the concept of which has been carefully developed.

According to the expression adopted in the USSR, Lenin discovered the Soviets as a state form of dictatorship of the proletariat. Although there was no dictatorship of the proletariat, this expression still has a certain meaning: the Soviets really arose, and Lenin really paid attention to them as a form of state power. Before the 1905 revolution in Russia, Lenin, like all Bolsheviks, following Marx and Engels, believed that in the period from the socialist revolution to the communist society there would exist a state like Paris Commune 1871. When in 1905 in revolutionary Russia not according to the plan of any party, but spontaneously, Soviets began to be created, Lenin saw in them a birth historical pattern the form of such a state. The power of the Soviets, Lenin wrote, is “the power the same type what the Paris Commune of 1871 was like. The main features of this type, Lenin continues, are 1) the source of power is not the law, previously discussed and passed by parliament, but the direct initiative of the masses from below and locally... 2) the replacement of the police and army as institutions separated from the people and opposed to the people, direct arming of the entire people; public order with such power they protect themselves armed workers and peasants, myself armed people; 3) bureaucracy, bureaucracy are either replaced, again, by the direct power of the people themselves, or at least placed under special control, turned not only into elected officials, but also into replaceable at the first demand of the people, they are reduced to the position of simple representatives; from a privileged layer with high, bourgeois, wages, “small towns” are transformed into workers of a special “type of weapon”, paid not higher the usual pay of a good worker.

In this and only in that essence the Paris Commune, like special type states."

Well, does it look like the Soviet state?

Something doesn't look the same. To be more precise, the Soviet Union is more than any other existing state, is the direct opposite of what Lenin wrote. Moreover, this is the opposite in all the points he named: 1) the people in the USSR are completely subordinate to orders from above; 2) the country has a huge army and police, but the people are strictly disarmed; 3) the political bureaucracy is not even just a privileged layer with bourgeois pay, but a dominant, exploitative and privileged class with feudal gaits.

But these signs, according to Lenin, basic for a state like the Paris Commune, that is, for the Soviet government, in them and that's the only point this power. So how: is there Soviet power in the Soviet Union?

Now we are back to this question again, but now it seems less strange.

Was created in Soviet time any theory regarding the nature and characteristics of Soviet power?

There was, of course, the question of discrepancies between Lenin’s words and reality Soviet state not affected.

The reasoning of Soviet state scientists, published over the first two decades after October 1917, developed into a coherent and even interesting-sounding theory of the Soviets as a special form of state power, allegedly inherent precisely in the dictatorship of the proletariat. While the bourgeois state is based on the progressive for its time, but now hopelessly outdated idea of ​​​​separation of powers, this theory broadcasts, the Soviets represent at all levels unified bodies of proletarian power, both legislative and executive. Even local Councils are not municipalities, but government bodies, and all together the Councils, from bottom to top, form a single system of homogeneous units of different scales. Such a system is immeasurably more democratic than any parliament with the farce of bourgeois elections; it personifies genuine progress.

These fiery words barely had time to solidify into an established theory when the Constitution of 1936 was adopted in the USSR. The Stalinist Constitution of victorious socialism, as it was called, crossed out the reasoning of the theorists with a bold line. The notorious unity of the system was torn into several parts: into higher and local government bodies and into similar bodies government controlled. Local authorities- The councils and their executive committees turned out to be ordinary municipalities, “ higher authorities state power" - the Supreme Councils - are legislative (more precisely - law-publishing), and the "highest bodies of government" - the Councils of Ministers - are executive bodies.

The Supreme Soviets began to proudly be called “Soviet parliaments,” although, it is true, they did not deserve such a name. This was done despite the fact that Lenin loudly mocked “parliamentary cretinism” and the word “parliament” was in the USSR for a long time a derogatory term.

The parliamentary masquerade went even further. They tried to disguise the absence of any parties other than the ruling one in the elections with the term “bloc of communists and non-party people.” It is assumed that this bloc is being formed, unknown by whom and when, and nominating candidates - to strange proportions, inverse to the numerical ratio of block participants.

Changed exactly nothing in this power structure and Brezhnev Constitution"developed socialism". On the pages of Pravda, theoreticians of Soviet law continued to talk about “a unified system of bodies of people’s power.” But they immediately reported: in it there exist “as relatively independent subsystems the Soviets of the Allied and autonomous republics“, and the Supreme Soviet of the USSR generally plays “a special role in the leadership of all Soviets of the country”; the task put forward is “a clearer, more concrete division of labor between the various links of the Soviet system.”

What is the result - a parliamentary system? Of course not. But not the Soviet government either. Not a single one of its most important characteristics has been preserved: no unified system, there is a clear separation of powers. From the Soviet government in the USSR, only one word remains: “advice”.

But this word is used in state systems many countries. The Council of Ministers is the usual name for governments. Thus, in France, the head of government has long been called the chairman of the council. The word "council" is used in parliaments: Bundesrat - Federal Council in Germany, National Council and the Federal Council in Austria. Everywhere in Europe there are city, municipal and other local councils. Came into political fashion in Eastern Europe The name State Council was also not new: such a council was in Tsarist Russia, and in pre-war Germany Adenauer was chairman of the Prussian state council. But there was not and is not Soviet power in all these countries!

It doesn’t exist in the Soviet Union either.

For those readers who are still ready to be indignant that we suddenly reject the usual thesis about the existence of Soviet power in the USSR, we invite you to answer next question: “What would the leaders of the nomenklatura class themselves have to say about state power in the USSR if they were consistent?”

Let's reason. The power of the Soviets - state uniform dictatorship of the proletariat. In the USSR, according to the CPSU Program, there is a society of developed socialism, and there is no longer a dictatorship of the proletariat. So how can the power of the Soviets remain? Like form without content?

Marxism does not allow this. The power of the Soviets, like the dictatorship of the proletariat and together with it, also fulfilled its historical mission and ceased to exist, turning into new uniform, corresponding to the current nature of power as a national one. All this, word for word, could be included in the report at the CPSU Congress.

Thus, when we say that there is no Soviet power in the Soviet Union, we are only asserting what the nomenklatura ideologists themselves should have said - if they had taken seriously their own reasoning about the dictatorship of the proletariat and the nation-wide state that replaced it. But that is precisely what they do not do. They understand that all this is fiction! And since the idea that in Soviet In the state, of course, Soviet power has become familiar, ideologists take advantage of this and talk about Soviet power in the USSR.

“Soviet power” is a slogan of the revolutionary years, which then turned into a petrified verbal fetish. In fact, in revolutionary years The Bolshevik leadership believed that it was possible to do without Soviet power. Bolshevik slogan “All power to the Soviets!” firmly entered the history of 1917. But this slogan was removed by Lenin after July days 1917, when it became clear that the Soviets did not intend to support the Bolshevik Party. It was restored only after the Bolsheviks took control of the Soviets in the fall of 1917 (“Bolshevisation of the Soviets”). This means that it was not the Soviets as such, but only the Soviets as organs of the Bolshevik dictatorship that interested Lenin.

Maybe everything changed under Gorbachev? No, and this is directly recognized in his promises to transfer power to the Soviets. This means that they do not yet have this power - more than 70 years after the victory of the Bolsheviks under the slogan “All power to the Soviets!”

This fact very clearly shows: the power of the Soviets and the power of the Bolsheviks are by no means identical. Councils are just the simplest and most logical, and therefore spontaneously emerging form of self-government in all cases when government suddenly swept away. Therefore, the Soviets can also be anti-communist. Thus, workers' councils were spontaneously created during the revolution in Hungary in October 1956, during revolutionary events in Poland in December 1970. During the days of the uprising in Novocherkassk in June 1962, not a government council, but a new, rebel council arose in the city.

In the Soviet Union, power is not Soviet, but nomenklatura. This is a dictatorship, but not of the proletariat, but of the nomenklatura class.

From the book ABC of Communism author Bukharin Nikolai Ivanovich

Chapter VI SOVIET POWER $ 46. Soviet power as a form of proletarian dictatorship. §47. Proletarian and bourgeois democracy. § 48. Class and temporary nature of the proletarian dictatorship. § 49. Material possibility of exercising the rights of the working class. § 50. Equality

From the book “Intourist” from the inside author Heinlein Robert

§ 46. Soviet power as a form of proletarian dictatorship Our party was the first to put forward and implement the demand for Soviet power. Under the slogan: “All power to the Soviets!” the Great happened October Revolution 1917. Before this slogan was put forward by our party, it

From the book Intelligence Services Against UFOs author Pervushin Anton Ivanovich

§ 52. The Army and Soviet Power Proletarian democracy, like any state power, has its own armed forces, its own army and navy. In a bourgeois-democratic state, the army serves as a means of strangling the working class and a means of protecting the bourgeois

From book Soviet republic and the capitalist world. Part II. Civil War author Trotsky Lev Davidovich

§ 54. Bureaucracy and Soviet power Soviet power was organized as the power of a new class of the proletariat, on the ruins of the old bourgeois power. Before the proletariat organized its own power, it destroyed someone else's, the power of its opponents. With the help of Soviet power, he

From the book International Problems proletarian revolution. Basic questions of the proletarian revolution author Trotsky Lev Davidovich

From the book Deed and Word. History of Russia from the point of view of the theory of evolution author Kalyuzhny Dmitry Vitalievich

“Palaeocosmonautics” in the Soviet Union In the seventies of the twentieth century, “paleocosmonautics” began to gain popularity - a special branch of ufology that collects evidence that aliens visited our Earth in time immemorial, taught people different

From the book Marxist Anatomy of October and Modernity by Kravets A

VIII. Soviet power and the peasantry L. Trotsky. RUSSIAN PEASANTRY IN THE OCTOBER REVOLUTION (From the lecture “Internal and external tasks Soviet Power”, read in Moscow on April 21, 1918) The main question of the outbreak of the revolution boiled down to who the poor would follow. Behind

From the book Man with a Ruble author Mikhail Khodorkovsky

SOVIET AUTHORITY AND SPECIALISTS “The Bolsheviks initially thought of doing without intellectuals, without specialists,” says Kautsky (p. 128). But then, having become convinced of the need for the intelligentsia, they moved from brutal repression to the path of attracting the intelligentsia to work

From the book Who Sold Socialism: The Shadow Economy in the USSR by Kieran Roger

SOVIET AUTHORITY AND INDUSTRY If in the first period Soviet revolution the main accusations of the bourgeois world were directed against our cruelty and bloodthirstiness, then later, when this argument from frequent use became dull and lost force, they began to make us

From the book The Burning Angel's Creed author Kalashnikov Maxim

Soviet power and the media It is believed that the Bolshevik victory in October 1917 brought qualitative changes in the Russian press. This conclusion flows as if by itself from the decrees directed against the bourgeois and multi-party press to suppress criticism of the new

From the book Bandera and Banderaism author Sever Alexander

What is Soviet power? V.I. Lenin repeatedly called the October Revolution a “workers’ and peasants’ revolution,” and here he was undoubtedly right. However Great October, as already noted, was not socialist revolution, it was the apogee

From the book What Happened... What to Expect... Demographic Studies author Bashlachev Veniamin Anatolievich

SOVIET AUTHORITY PLUS... PROHIBITIONS What is communism? This is Soviet power plus... prohibitions, a great many prohibitions, striking in their senselessness and high cost. The propaganda machine, as far as the world stands, branded the “such-and-such” West, where (we

From the author's book

Chapter 1. The “Underground Economy” in the Soviet Union and its impact on the development of the country At the beginning of the chapter, the authors decided to cite three excerpts from different studies on this phenomenon in the life of Soviet society. Thus we would like to draw attention

From the author's book

I was born in the Soviet Union! A wave of dark despair washed over me. Yes, a country born in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, leaves. You can't be deceived. You can no longer hide from reality. The chances for a better fate that opened up in the early 2000s have been flushed down the toilet. 1991 experiment (speech

From the author's book

When Soviet power returned In July 1944, on the initiative of the OUN and UPA, a united Ukrainian Main Liberation Council (UGVR) was created, headed by Kirill Osmak. He did not hold this post for long. Chekists arrested him on September 13, 1944. Died in Vladimirskaya

From the author's book

What happened in the Soviet Union It would seem that the communist government is eliminating the blatant inequality between the Russian center and the national outskirts. After all, the communists wrote thousands of books about the international friendship of peoples. However, words about equality and friendship of peoples -

Here's the standard summary of the history of the Soviet Union: The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was a socialist state from 1917 to 1991 and was a great rival of the United States from World War II until the late 1980s. But what was the Soviet Union really like? What was it like to live in the Soviet Union? In that same history lesson, you were probably told that life was difficult and sometimes even terrible.

Daily life in the Soviet Union turns out to be much the same as you may have heard, especially during the times of famine and camps forced labor. But, as in any big modern country quality of life in Soviet Russia has varied greatly over the years, depending on many complex factors.

Beer was not considered alcohol

It sounds strange, but only by 2011 was beer recognized alcoholic drink in Russia. Prior to this, legislation classified it as food product, meaning it could be sold as a soft drink. This meant that it could be sold at street stalls.

During the Soviet era, Mikhail Gorbachev learned the hard way not to get involved with the sale of alcohol: historians believe that his attempt to ban alcohol "accelerated his downfall."

Newspapers did not always report murders, plane crashes, or train crashes


Former engineer Hendrik Vartanyan says that Soviet newspapers did not report anything that was not “in favor of the Soviet Union.” Bad news were hidden because "the belief was that nothing bad happens under communist rule because it is always right."

In a stunning 2006 interview, Vartanian said he had no knowledge of the train or plane crashes before he came to the United States in 1990 to retire. He said this cover-up extends to murders and major robberies. It's hard to believe that anyone could live to retire without knowing that plane crashes even existed, but as Vartanyan says, covering up these events was part of the "Soviet code."

Pepsi appeared in the USSR before McDonald's and Coca-Cola


McDonald's and Coca-Cola are often mentioned as two American companies with the largest global influence and reach, but did you know that Pepsi was the very first to enter the USSR?

It's true: Pepsi was already in the Soviet Union: 21 years before McDonald's and 16 years before Coca-Cola. This is largely due to the appearance of Pepsi at an exhibition in Moscow's Sokolniki Park in 1959, where the soda was distributed free of charge in disposable paper cups. Ten years later, the USSR struck a deal with Pepsi that also included distribution rights for Stolichnaya vodka.

Cars have served their owners almost their entire lives.


According to Russian writer Alexandra Kabakova, From the 1930s to the 1950s, car owners in the Soviet Union took pride in the fact that their cars lasted them a long time - and in some cases, a lifetime. Quality control and the very build quality of the car played a huge role in this. Kabakov says the metal frames were so thick that they were "resistant to corrosion."

Grocery shopping took forever


Many people have heard about the long Soviet lines for bread, but that's not even half the story. Even the most "prosperous" American student, who lived in Moscow in the mid-60s, said that getting any food at all was a huge chore. Even buying staples like cheese and rice took forever because you had to wait in long lines for almost every item. Even after waiting, people did not receive the goods immediately: they received coupons at each “station” and gave them to the cashier to finally receive their products.

Stalin wanted everyone to eat in communal canteens


IN Stalin's time the authorities considered private kitchens and even apartments dangerous for the regime, so the idea arose to force people to eat in communal canteens. The so-called “kitchen policy” proposed building new houses without kitchens at all. It was not just about depriving people of the right to privacy: The idea was also to "free the housewife from daily duties, liberate the country from tsarism and bring happiness to the poor classes."

The idea didn't work, and soon widespread industrialization led to "120 different ethnic groups"served" with products such as canned soup, meat and fish.

Hard rock bands were blacklisted in discos


In 1958, party officials accused rock bands such as Iron Maiden and Black Sabbath of "religious obscurantism, violence, racism and anti-communism."

Many pop and indie singers also made it to this list. Groups such as Talking Heads (“the myth of the Soviet military threat”) and The Village People were named in documents that spoke of strengthening control over the activities of discos.

There were no free canteens for the poor


In 1989, the New York Times talked quite a bit about Soviet attitudes toward the poor and homeless. One Western diplomat was quoted as saying that Soviet officials stopped collecting poverty statistics "because they insisted there were none."

When the Soviet Union was presented with the idea of ​​combating the American cafeteria problem, one Soviet official said, "We are against this system... where the poor get a free lunch. We will not consider that option." In 1989, it took a Soviet worker ten times longer to earn even a pound of meat than the average American.

On a winter day on December 30, 1922, the 1st Congress of Soviets adopted the Declaration and Treaty on the Formation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. 90 years have passed since then, and we still cannot decide what “the world’s first state of workers and peasants” was. An unprecedented leap to freedom - or an unprecedented experiment on the people, designed to show the whole world how not to develop the national economy?

Power and justice...

Army. The USSR was one of the world's two superpowers, and Soviet army- the most powerful in the world. There were 63.9 thousand tanks in service - more than in all other countries. Nuclear missile shield included 1,200 land-based ballistic missiles and 62 nuclear submarines on the sea. The size of the Armed Forces after the war reached 3.7 million people.

Equality. The level of well-being of the “bottom” and “top” in the country differed, but not tenfold, the Soviet middle class made up the overwhelming majority of the population. A skilled worker could earn even more than the director of the plant where he worked.

Rest. The right to rest was not an empty phrase for Soviet people. By 1988, there were 16,200 sanatoriums and rest homes operating in the country, where citizens partially paid for accommodation and treatment.

...or beggar slavery?

Decline. Praised universal education and medical care at the end of the twentieth century. hopelessly behind the world level.

Leadership in the defense industry turned into a failure in the production of industrial goods for the population: consumer goods were produced on a residual basis and for the most part were of disgusting quality.

Prisons. From 1921 to 1940 alone, approximately 3 million people were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment.

In 1930 - 1931 More than 380 thousand were dispossessed and evicted. peasant families. At the stage of formation of the USSR, entire groups of the population were repressed: entrepreneurs, priests, etc. The Gulag became one of the symbols of the Soviet system.

Deficit. The Soviet people have never lived in abundance in their entire history. Even in the relatively prosperous 70s, there was a shortage of something toilet paper, then tights, then beer, not to mention sausage.

Censorship. Censorship in the USSR covered all areas of life, including the media, literature, music, cinema, theater, ballet and even fashion. Prominent writers and poets - Solzhenitsyn, Voinovich, Dovlatov, Brodsky and others - were forced to leave their homeland.

USSR was multinational country with the proclaimed principle of friendship of peoples. And this friendship was not always just a declaration. It was impossible to do otherwise in a country inhabited by more than 100 different nations and nationalities. The equality of all peoples in the formal absence of a titular nation is the basis for the propaganda myth of “a single historical community - the Soviet people.”
However, all representatives of a single historical community were required to have passports, which contained the notorious “fifth column” to indicate the citizen’s nationality in the document. How was nationality determined in the USSR?

By passport

Certification of the country's population began in the early 30s and ended shortly before the war. Each passport must indicate social status, place of residence (registration) and nationality. Moreover, then, before the war, according to a secret order of the NKVD, nationality was to be determined not by the self-determination of a citizen, but based on the origin of the parents. The police had instructions to check all cases of discrepancy between the surname and the nationality declared by the citizen. Statisticians and ethnographers compiled a list of 200 nationalities, and when receiving a passport, a person received one of the nationalities from this list. It was on the basis of these same passport data that they were carried out in the 30s and later. mass deportations peoples According to the estimates of historians, representatives of 10 nationalities were subjected to total deportation to the USSR: Koreans, Germans, Ingrian Finns, Karachais, Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, Balkars, Crimean Tatars and Meskhetian Turks. In addition, there was implicit, but quite obvious anti-Semitism, and the practice of repression against representatives of other peoples, such as Poles, Kurds, Turks, etc. Since 1974, nationality has been indicated in the passport based on the application of the person himself. Then jokes like this appeared: “Dad is Armenian, mom is Jewish, who will be their son? Of course, Russian! However, in most cases, nationality was still indicated by one of the parents.

By mom and dad

In the vast majority of cases, your nationality the citizen determined the father's nationality. In the USSR, patriarchal traditions were quite strong, according to which the father determined both the surname and nationality of the child. However, there were other options. For example, many people, if they had to choose between “Jew” and “Russian,” chose “Russian,” even if their mother was Russian. This was done because the “fifth column” made it possible for officials to discriminate against representatives of certain national minorities, including Jews. However, after Jews were allowed to leave for Israel in 1968, there were sometimes reverse situation. Some Russians looked for some Jew among their relatives and made incredible efforts to change the inscription in the “fifth column.” During this period of free national self-identification, nationalities were determined according to lists of officially recognized peoples living in the USSR. In 1959, there were 126 names on the list, in 1979 – 123, and in 1989 – 128. At the same time, some peoples, for example, Assyrians, were not on these lists, while in the USSR there lived people who defined their nationality in this way .

By the face

There is a sad joke about a Jewish pogrom. They beat up a Jew, and his neighbors say to him: “How can this be, you bought yourself a passport with a “fifth column” where it says Russian!” To which he sadly replies: “Yes, but they beat me not on my passport, but on my face!” Actually, this anecdote quite accurately illustrates the situation in the law enforcement agencies, where they were taught to determine nationality this way: not by the passport, but by the face . And if it is, in general, easy to distinguish a Gypsy from a Yakut, then it will be somewhat more difficult to understand where the Yakut is and where the Buryat are. How can you understand where the Russian is, and where the Latvian or Belarusian is? There were entire tables with ethnic types of persons, which allowed police officers, KGB officers and other structures to accurately distinguish people “not by passport.” Of course, this required a good memory for faces and observation, but who said that understanding the nationality of people in a country where more than 100 nations live would be easy?

At the behest of the heart

The "fifth column" was abolished in 1991. Nowadays, nationality is not indicated in the passport and in other documents or is indicated in special inserts, solely at will. And now there are no lists of nationalities from which a citizen must choose. The removal of restrictions on national self-identification led to an interesting result. During the 2010 census, some citizens indicated their affiliation with such nations as “Cossack”, “Pomor”, “Scythian” and even “elf”.