Accession of Estonia to the USSR 1939 1940. Republic of Latvia

Introduction
1 Background. 1930s
2 1939. War begins in Europe
3 Mutual Assistance Pacts and Treaty of Friendship and Borders
4 Entry of Soviet troops
5 Ultimatums of the summer of 1940 and the removal of the Baltic governments
6 Entry of the Baltic states into the USSR
7 Consequences
8 Modern politics
9 Opinion of historians and political scientists
Bibliography
Annexation of the Baltic states to the USSR

Introduction

Annexation of the Baltic states to the USSR (1940) - the process of including the independent Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia and most of the territory of modern Lithuania - into the USSR, carried out as a result of the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the Treaty of Friendship and Border by the USSR and Nazi Germany in August 1939, the secret protocols of which recorded the delimitation of the spheres of interest of these two powers in Eastern Europe.

Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania consider the actions of the USSR to be occupation followed by annexation. The Council of Europe in its resolutions characterized the process of the Baltic states joining the USSR as occupation, forced incorporation and annexation. In 1983, the European Parliament condemned it as an occupation, and subsequently (2007) used such concepts as “occupation” and “illegal incorporation” in this regard.

Text of the preamble to the Treaty on Fundamentals interstate relations between the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and the Republic of Lithuania 1991 contains the lines: “relating to the past events and actions that prevented the full and free exercise by each High Contracting Party of its state sovereignty, being confident that the elimination Union of Soviet Socialist Republics the consequences of the 1940 annexation violating the sovereignty of Lithuania will create additional conditions of trust between the High Contracting Parties and their peoples"

Official position The Russian Foreign Ministry is that the accession of the Baltic countries to the USSR complied with all norms of international law as of 1940, and also that the entry of these countries into the USSR received official international recognition. This position is based on the de facto recognition of the integrity of the borders of the USSR as of June 1941 at the Yalta and Potsdam conferences by the participating states, as well as on the recognition in 1975 of the inviolability of European borders by the participants in the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe.

1. Background. 1930s

In the period between the two world wars, the Baltic states became the object of the struggle of the great European powers (England, France and Germany) for influence in the region. In the first decade after Germany's defeat in World War I, there was a strong Anglo-French influence in the Baltic states, which was subsequently hampered by the growing influence of neighboring Germany from the early 1930s. The Soviet leadership, in turn, tried to resist him. By the end of the 1930s, the Third Reich and the USSR had actually become the main rivals in the struggle for influence in the Baltic states.

In December 1933, the governments of France and the USSR put forward a joint proposal to conclude an agreement on collective security and mutual assistance. Finland, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were invited to join this treaty. The project, called the “Eastern Pact,” was seen as a collective guarantee in the event of aggression by Nazi Germany. But Poland and Romania refused to join the alliance, the United States did not approve of the idea of a treaty, and England put forward a number of counter conditions, including the rearmament of Germany.

In the spring and summer of 1939, the USSR negotiated with England and France on joint prevention of Italian-German aggression against European countries and on April 17, 1939, invited England and France to undertake obligations to provide all kinds of assistance, including military assistance, to the Eastern European countries located between the Baltic and the Black Seas and bordering the Soviet Union, as well as to conclude for a period of 5-10 years an agreement on mutual assistance, including military assistance, in the event of aggression in Europe against any of the contracting states (USSR, England and France).

The failure of the Eastern Pact was caused by the difference in interests of the contracting parties. Thus, the Anglo-French missions received detailed secret instructions from their general staffs, which defined the goals and nature of the negotiations - a note from the French general staff said, in particular, that along with a number of political benefits that England and France would receive in connection with by joining the USSR, this would allow it to be drawn into the conflict: “it is not in our interests for it to remain outside the conflict, keeping its forces intact.” The Soviet Union, which considered at least two Baltic republics - Estonia and Latvia - as a sphere of its national interests, defended this position in the negotiations, but did not meet with understanding from its partners. As for the governments of the Baltic states themselves, they preferred guarantees from Germany, with which they were bound by a system of economic agreements and non-aggression treaties. According to Churchill, “The obstacle to the conclusion of such an agreement (with the USSR) was the horror that these very border states experienced of Soviet help in the form of Soviet armies that could pass through their territories to protect them from the Germans and simultaneously include them in the Soviet-communist system. After all, they were the most vehement opponents of this system. Poland, Romania, Finland and the three Baltic states did not know what they feared more - German aggression or Russian salvation."

Simultaneously with negotiations with Great Britain and France, the Soviet Union in the summer of 1939 intensified steps towards rapprochement with Germany. The result of this policy was the signing of a non-aggression treaty between Germany and the USSR on August 23, 1939. According to secret additional protocols to the agreement, Estonia, Latvia, Finland and eastern Poland were included in the Soviet sphere of interests, Lithuania and western Poland - in the German sphere of interests); by the time the treaty was signed, the Klaipeda (Memel) region of Lithuania was already occupied by Germany (March 1939).

2. 1939. Beginning of the war in Europe

The situation worsened on September 1, 1939 with the outbreak of World War II. Germany launched an invasion of Poland. On September 17, the USSR sent troops into Poland, declaring the Soviet-Polish non-aggression pact of July 25, 1932, no longer in force. On the same day, states that had diplomatic relations with the USSR (including the Baltic states) were handed a Soviet note stating that “in relations with them the USSR will pursue a policy of neutrality.”

The outbreak of war between neighboring states gave rise to fears in the Baltics of being drawn into these events and prompted them to declare their neutrality. However, during the hostilities, a number of incidents occurred in which the Baltic countries were also involved - one of them was the entry of the Polish submarine Orzel into the port of Tallinn on September 15, where it was interned at the request of Germany by the Estonian authorities, who began dismantling her weapons. However, on the night of September 18, the crew of the submarine disarmed the guards and took it out to sea, while six torpedoes remained on board. The Soviet Union claimed that Estonia had violated neutrality by providing shelter and assistance to the Polish submarine.

On September 19, Vyacheslav Molotov, on behalf of the Soviet leadership, blamed Estonia for this incident, saying that the Baltic Fleet was tasked with finding the submarine, since it could threaten Soviet shipping. This led to the de facto establishment of a naval blockade of the Estonian coast.

On September 24, Estonian Foreign Minister K. Selter arrived in Moscow to sign a trade agreement. After discussing economic problems, Molotov moved on to problems of mutual security and proposed “concluding a military alliance or treaty on mutual assistance, which at the same time would provide Soviet Union rights to have on the territory of Estonia strong points or bases for navy and air force.” Selter tried to avoid the discussion, citing neutrality, but Molotov said that “the Soviet Union needs to expand its security system, for which it needs access to the Baltic Sea. If you do not wish to conclude a pact of mutual assistance with us, then we will have to look for other ways to guarantee our security, perhaps steeper, perhaps more complex. I ask you, do not force us to use force against Estonia.”

3. Mutual assistance pacts and the Treaty of Friendship and Borders

As a result of the actual division of Polish territory between Germany and the USSR, the Soviet borders moved far to the west, and the USSR began to border on the third Baltic state - Lithuania. Initially, Germany intended to turn Lithuania into its protectorate, but on September 25, 1939, during Soviet-German contacts “on the settlement of the Polish problem,” the USSR proposed to begin negotiations on Germany’s renunciation of claims to Lithuania in exchange for the territories of the Warsaw and Lublin voivodeships. On this day, the German Ambassador to the USSR, Count Schulenburg, sent a telegram to the German Foreign Ministry, in which he said that he had been summoned to the Kremlin, where Stalin pointed out this proposal as a subject for future negotiations and added that if Germany agreed, “the Soviet Union would immediately will take on the solution of the problem of the Baltic states in accordance with the protocol of August 23 and expects full support in this matter from German government».

The situation in the Baltic states themselves was alarming and contradictory. Against the background of rumors about the impending Soviet-German division of the Baltic states, which were refuted by diplomats of both sides, part of the ruling circles of the Baltic states was ready to continue rapprochement with Germany, while many others were anti-German and counted on the USSR’s help in maintaining the balance of power in the region and national independence, while the left forces operating underground were ready to support joining the USSR.

Meanwhile on Soviet border A Soviet military group was created with Estonia and Latvia, which included the forces of the 8th Army (Kingisepp direction, Leningrad Military District), the 7th Army (Pskov direction, Kalinin Military District) and the 3rd Army ( Belorussian Front).

In conditions when Latvia and Finland refused to provide support to Estonia, England and France (who were at war with Germany) were unable to provide it, and the Third Reich recommended accepting the Soviet proposal, the Estonian government entered into negotiations in Moscow, which resulted in 28 In September 1939, a Mutual Assistance Pact was concluded, providing for the creation of Soviet military bases on the territory of Estonia and the deployment of a Soviet contingent of up to 25 thousand people on them. On the same day, the German-Soviet Treaty “On Friendship and Border” was signed. According to the secret protocol to it, the conditions for the division of spheres of influence were revised: Lithuania moved into the sphere of influence of the USSR in exchange for Polish lands east of the Vistula, which went to Germany. At the end of negotiations with the Estonian delegation, Stalin told Selter: “The Estonian government acted wisely and for the benefit of the Estonian people by concluding an agreement with the Soviet Union. It could work out with you like with Poland. Poland was a great power. Where is Poland now?

On October 2, 1939, similar Soviet-Latvian negotiations began. The USSR also demanded access to the sea from Latvia - through Liepaja and Ventspils. As a result, on October 5, 1939, a mutual assistance agreement was signed for a period of 10 years, which provided for the deployment of a 25,000-strong contingent of Soviet troops to Latvia.

On October 5, 1939, the USSR invited Finland to also consider the possibility of concluding a mutual assistance pact with the USSR. Negotiations began on October 11, 1939, but Finland rejected the USSR's proposals both for a pact and for the lease and exchange of territories, which led to the Maynila Incident, which became the reason for the USSR's denunciation of the non-aggression pact with Finland and the Soviet-Finnish war of 1939-1940 gg.

On October 10, 1939, the “Agreement on the transfer of the city of Vilna and the Vilna region to the Lithuanian Republic and on mutual assistance between the Soviet Union and Lithuania” was signed with Lithuania for a period of 15 years, which provided for the deployment of a 20,000-strong contingent of Soviet troops.

Almost immediately after the signing of mutual assistance agreements, negotiations began on the basing of Soviet troops in the Baltic states.

On October 18, 1939, units of the 65th Special Forces began entering Estonia. rifle corps and the Special Air Force Group, whose deployment areas were Paldiski, Haapsalu, the islands of Saaremaa and Hiiumaa (while the Baltic Fleet received the right to be based in Rohuküla and Tallinn for the period of construction of the bases).

In Latvia, the base points were Liepaja, Ventspils, Priekule and Pitrags. On October 23, 1939, the cruiser Kirov arrived in Liepaja, accompanied by the destroyers Smetlivy and Stremitelny. On October 29, the introduction of units of the 2nd Special Rifle Corps and the 18th Air Brigade began.

In Lithuania, Soviet troops were stationed in the areas of New Vileika, Alytus, Prienai, Gaizhunai during November - December (they had been in Vilnius and on the territory of the Vilna region since the time of the Polish campaign), while they were withdrawn from Vilnius at the insistence of the Lithuanian side. Parts of the 16th Special Rifle Corps, the 10th Fighter and 31st Medium Bomber separate air regiments were stationed in Lithuania.

On April 1, 1940, the Third Reich published geographical maps on which the territories of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were designated as part of the Soviet Union.

Winston Churchill, who at that time held the post of First Lord of the Admiralty, in his radio speech on October 1, 1939, said:

The fact that the Russian armies were to stand on this line was absolutely necessary for the security of Russia against the Nazi threat. Be that as it may, this line exists, and the Eastern Front has been created, which Nazi Germany will not dare to attack. When Mr. Ribbentrop was called to Moscow last week, he had to learn and accept the fact that the implementation of Nazi plans in relation to the Baltic countries and Ukraine must be completely stopped.

The Soviet leadership also stated that the Baltic countries did not comply with signed agreements and were pursuing anti-Soviet policies. For example, the political union between Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (the Baltic Entente) was characterized as having an anti-Soviet orientation and violating mutual assistance treaties with the USSR.

4. Entry of Soviet troops

A limited contingent of the Red Army (for example, in Latvia it numbered 20,000) was introduced with the permission of the presidents of the Baltic countries, and agreements were concluded. Thus, on November 5, 1939, the Riga newspaper “Newspaper for Everyone” published a message in the article “Soviet troops went to their bases”:

On the basis of a friendly agreement concluded between Latvia and the USSR on mutual assistance, the first echelons of Soviet troops passed through the Zilupe border station on October 29, 1939. To welcome the Soviet troops, a guard of honor with a military band was formed...

A little later, in the same newspaper on November 26, 1939, in the article “Freedom and Independence”, dedicated to the celebrations of November 18, the President of Latvia published a speech by President Kārlis Ulmanis, in which he stated:

...The recently concluded mutual assistance treaty with the Soviet Union strengthens the security of our and its borders...

5. Ultimatums of the summer of 1940 and the removal of the Baltic governments

On May 10, 1940, Nazi Germany launched a decisive offensive, after which the Anglo-French bloc was defeated: Paris fell on June 14.

On June 3, the USSR Charge d'Affaires in Lithuania V. Semenov wrote a review note on the situation in Lithuania, in which the Soviet embassy drew Moscow's attention to the desire of the Lithuanian government to “surrender into the hands of Germany” and to the intensification of “the activities of the German fifth column and the arming of members of the rifle union ", preparation for mobilization. It speaks of “the true intentions of the Lithuanian ruling circles,” which, if the conflict is resolved, will only strengthen “their line against the treaty, moving on to a ‘business’ agreement with Germany, waiting only for an opportune moment for a direct attack on the Soviet garrisons.”

On June 4, 1940, under the guise of exercises, the troops of the Leningrad, Kalinin and Belorussian Special Military Districts were alerted and began moving to the borders of the Baltic states.

On June 13, 1940, Marshal Petain and General Weygand demanded that the government immediately surrender France to German troops. Paris declared " open city».

On June 14, 1940, the Soviet government presented an ultimatum to Lithuania, and on June 16 - to Latvia and Estonia. In basic terms, the meaning of the ultimatums was the same - these states were required to bring governments friendly to the USSR to power and allow additional contingents of troops into the territory of these countries. The terms were accepted.

Lithuanian President A. Smetona insisted on organizing resistance to Soviet troops, however, having received a refusal from most of the government, he fled to Germany, and his Latvian and Estonian colleagues - K. Ulmanis and K. Päts - cooperated with the new government (both were soon repressed) , like Lithuanian Prime Minister A. Merkys. In all three countries friendly to the USSR, but not communist governments were formed, headed, respectively, by J. Paleckis (Lithuania), I. Vares (Estonia) and A. Kirchenstein (Latvia).

6. Entry of the Baltic states into the USSR

New governments have lifted bans on activities communist parties and holding demonstrations and called early parliamentary elections. In the elections held on July 14 in all three states, pro-communist Blocs (Unions) won working people- the only electoral lists admitted to the elections. According to official data, in Estonia the turnout was 84.1%, with 92.8% of the votes cast for the Union of Working People, in Lithuania the turnout was 95.51%, of which 99.19% voted for the Union of Working People, in Latvia the turnout was 94.8%, 97.8% of the votes were cast for the Working People's Bloc. The elections in Latvia, according to information from V. Mangulis, were falsified.

The newly elected parliaments already on July 21-22 proclaimed the creation of the Estonian SSR, Latvian SSR and Lithuanian SSR and adopted the Declaration of Entry into the USSR. On August 3-6, 1940, in accordance with the decisions of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, these republics were admitted to the Soviet Union. From the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian armies, the Lithuanian (29th Infantry), Latvian (24th Infantry) and Estonian (22nd Infantry) territorial corps were formed, which became part of the PribOVO.

The entry of the Baltic states into the USSR was not recognized by the USA, the Vatican and a number of other countries. It was recognized de jure by Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands, Australia, India, Iran, New Zealand, Finland, de facto by Great Britain and a number of other countries. In exile (in the USA, Great Britain, etc.), some diplomatic missions of the pre-war Baltic states continued to operate; after World War II, the Estonian government in exile was created.

7. Consequences

After the Baltic states joined the USSR, socialist economic transformations that had already been completed in the rest of the country and repressions against the intelligentsia, clergy, former politicians, officers, and wealthy peasants began here. In 1941, “due to the presence in the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian SSRs of a significant number former members various counter-revolutionary nationalist parties, former police officers, gendarmes, landowners, factory owners, high-ranking officials of the former state apparatus of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia and other persons conducting subversive anti-Soviet work and used by foreign intelligence services for espionage purposes,” deportations of the population were carried out.

In the Baltic republics, just before the start of the war, an operation was completed to evict the “unreliable and counter-revolutionary element” - just over 10 thousand people were expelled from Estonia, about 17.5 thousand from Lithuania, from Latvia - according to various estimates from 15.4 to 16.5 thousands of people. This operation was completed by June 21, 1941.

In the summer of 1941, after the German attack on the USSR, in Lithuania and Latvia in the first days German offensive There were speeches by the “fifth column”, which resulted in the proclamation of short-lived “loyal to Greater Germany” states, in Estonia, where Soviet troops defended longer, this process was almost immediately replaced by the inclusion of Ostland in the Reichskommissariat, like the other two.

In 1944-45, as a result of the Baltic operation, the surrender of German troops in Memel and the Courland Pocket, the territory of the modern Baltic countries was cleared of the troops of the Germans and their allies and the Soviet republics were restored.

In 1949, part of the residents of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia were deported to Siberia - Operation Surf, during which about 100 thousand people were evicted.

8. Modern politics

In 1991, even before the collapse of the USSR, the Baltic republics regained full state sovereignty, recognized by resolutions of the USSR State Council on September 6, 1991. The events of 1940 are considered by the leadership of the Baltic states as an act of occupation that lasted almost half a century. The modern Baltic republics consider themselves the successors of the corresponding states that existed in 1918-1940, and the Soviet Baltic republics consider themselves illegal occupation regimes.

The entry of the Baltic states into the USSR did not receive legal recognition from the United States and Great Britain. In the years cold war Official diplomatic missions of the Baltic countries did not stop working here.

On September 16, 2008, the US Senate unanimously approved a resolution declaring that Russia must recognize the illegality of the Soviet occupation of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.

“Congress requests the President of the United States and the Secretary of State to call on the government Russian Federation acknowledge that the Soviet occupation of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact for the next 51 years was illegal... The US never recognized this illegal and violent occupation, and subsequent US presidents maintained uninterrupted diplomatic relations with these countries throughout the Soviet era occupation, never recognizing them as “Soviet republics”"

In 1960 and 2005, the Council of Europe, in its resolutions, characterized the entry of the Baltic states into the USSR as occupation, forced incorporation and annexation. In 1983 and 2005, the European Parliament condemned it, characterizing the period when these states joined the USSR as Soviet occupation.

The European Court of Human Rights made the following judgment on the events of 1939-1991 (14685/04, PENART v Estonia, pp. 8-9):

“The Court notes that Estonia lost its independence as a result of the Non-Aggression Pact between Germany and the USSR (also known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact), concluded on August 23, 1939, and additional secret protocols. Following the ultimatum on the deployment of Soviet military bases in Estonia in 1939, large forces of the Soviet army were brought in in June 1940. The legitimate government was overthrown and Soviet rule was established by force. The totalitarian communist regime of the Soviet Union carried out widespread and systematic actions against the population of Estonia, including, for example, the deportation of 10 thousand people on June 14, 1941 and more than 20 thousand people on March 25, 1949. After World War II, tens of thousands of people fled to the forests to escape reprisals from the Soviet authorities. Some of them actively resisted the occupation regime. According to security authorities, about 1,500 people were killed and almost 10,000 arrested during the resistance movement 1944-1953."

After independence, Lithuania adopted the concept of "zero option" citizenship. All residents registered in Lithuania at the time of declaration of independence received the right to accept Lithuanian citizenship. At the same time, many issues related to legal status Russian-speaking residents - migrants of the 1940-1991 era. and their descendants (see Non-citizens (Latvia) and Non-citizens (Estonia)), since the citizens of these states were initially recognized only by citizens of the pre-war Republics of Latvia and Estonia, their descendants (in Estonia, citizens of the ESSR who also supported the independence of the Republic of Estonia in the referendum on March 3, 1991 ), the rest could obtain citizenship only after undergoing the naturalization procedure, which created a unique situation for modern Europe of the existence of mass statelessness on its territory.

International organizations recommended that Latvia: grant non-citizens the right to vote in municipal elections; simplify naturalization; reduce the difference between the rights of citizens and non-citizens; do not require those being naturalized to express beliefs that contradict their vision of the history of their cultural community or nation. In Estonia, international organizations recommended simplifying naturalization in general or for older people, as well as more efficiently registering children of non-citizens as citizens.

The fact that law enforcement agencies of the Baltic states initiated criminal cases against those living here received a special public response in Russia. former employees Soviet state security agencies accused of participating in repressions and crimes against local population During the Second World War.

In 2008, the Historical and Documentary Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry wrote in a brief note about the “MOLOTOV-RIBBENTROP PACT”:

From the very beginning, the conclusion of the Soviet-German Pact was perceived ambiguously in the West and caused many comments, mostly of a critical nature. Recently, attacks on Russia on this issue have acquired a special scope. The conclusion of the pact is actively used by our opponents from the Baltic countries and Eastern Europe as a “justification” for some “equal responsibility” of the USSR and Nazi Germany for the outbreak of World War II. However, the actual side looked different, and when assessing the signed documents it would be wrong to take them out of the military-political context of that time.

9. Opinion of historians and political scientists

Some foreign historians and political scientists, as well as some modern Russian researchers, characterize this process as the occupation and annexation of independent states by the Soviet Union, carried out gradually, as a result of a series of military-diplomatic and economic steps and against the backdrop of the Second World War unfolding in Europe. In this regard, journalism sometimes uses the term Soviet occupation of the Baltic states, reflecting this point of view. Modern politicians also talk about incorporation as a softer option for joining. According to the former head of the Latvian Foreign Ministry, Janis Jurkans, “The word incorporation appears in the American-Baltic Charter.” Baltic historians emphasize the facts of violations democratic norms during the holding of early parliamentary elections held at the same time in all three states in the conditions of a significant Soviet military presence, as well as the fact that in the elections held on July 14 and 15, 1940, only one candidate was allowed from the “Labor Bloc” people" list of candidates, and all other alternative lists were rejected. Baltic sources believe that the election results were falsified and did not reflect the will of the people. For example, the text posted on the website of the Latvian Ministry of Foreign Affairs provides information that “In Moscow, the Soviet news agency TASS provided information about the mentioned election results twelve hours before the start of the vote count in Latvia.” He also cites the opinion of Dietrich A. Loeber - a lawyer and one of the former servicemen of the Abwehr sabotage and reconnaissance unit Brandenburg 800 in 1941-1945 - that the annexation of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania was fundamentally illegal, since it was based on intervention and occupation.. From this it is concluded that the decisions of the Baltic parliaments on joining the USSR were predetermined in advance.

Soviet, as well as some modern Russian historians, insist on the voluntary nature of the entry of the Baltic states into the USSR, arguing that it received final formalization in the summer of 1940 on the basis of decisions of the highest legislative bodies of these countries, which received the broadest voter support in the elections for the entire existence of independent Baltic states. Some researchers, while not calling the events voluntary, do not agree with their qualification as occupation. The Russian Foreign Ministry considers the accession of the Baltic states to the USSR as consistent with the norms of international law of that time.

Bibliography:

Secret additional protocol to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact

Historical and Documentary Department of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. ABOUT THE MOLOTOV-RIBBENTROP PACT ( Brief information) 24-07-2008

Semiryaga M.I. - Secrets of Stalin's diplomacy. 1939-1941. - Chapter VI: Troubled Summer, M.: Higher School, 1992. - 303 p. - Circulation 50,000 copies.

Guryanov A. E. The scale of deportation of the population deep into the USSR in May-June 1941, memo.ru

Michael Keating, John McGarry Minority nationalism and the changing international order. - Oxford University Press, 2001. - P. 343. - 366 p. - ISBN 0199242143

Jeff Chinn, Robert John Kaiser Russians as the new minority: ethnicity and nationalism in the Soviet successor states. - Westview Press, 1996. - P. 93. - 308 p. - ISBN 0813322480

Great Historical Encyclopedia: For schoolchildren and students, page 602: "Molotov"

Text of treaties on non-aggression and friendship and borders between Germany and the USSR, Ponomarev M.V. Smirnova S.Yu. New and recent history of European and American countries. vol. 3. Moscow, 2000 ss. 173-175

1940-1941, Conclusions // Estonian International Commission for Investigation of Crimes Against Humanity

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia: The Occupation of Latvia: Aspects of History and International Law

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia: Summary of Conclusions of the International Conference "Soviet Occupation Regime in the Baltic States 1944

president.lt - History

“Resolution regarding the Baltic States adopted by the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe” September 29, 1960

Resolution 1455 (2005) "Honouring of obligations and commitments by the Russian Federation" June 22, 2005

(English) European Parliament (January 13, 1983). “Resolution on the situation in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania.” Official Journal of the European Communities C 42/78.

(English) European Parliament resolution on the sixtieth anniversary of the end of the Second World War in Europe on May 8, 1945

Treaty on the Fundamentals of Interstate Relations between the RSFSR and the Republic of Lithuania - Modern Russia

Russian Foreign Ministry: The West recognized the Baltic states as part of the USSR

Archive of foreign policy of the USSR. The Case of the Anglo-French-Soviet Negotiations, 1939 (vol. III), l. 32 - 33. quoted from: Military literature: Research: Zhilin P. A. How Nazi Germany prepared an attack on the Soviet Union

Archive of foreign policy of the USSR. The Case of the Anglo-French-Soviet Negotiations, 1939 (vol. III), l. 240. quoted from: Military literature: Research: Zhilin P. A. How Nazi Germany prepared an attack on the Soviet Union

Winston Churchill. Memoirs

Meltyukhov Mikhail Ivanovich. Stalin's missed chance. The Soviet Union and the struggle for Europe: 1939-1941

Mutual assistance pact between the USSR and the Republic of Estonia // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 62-64 See also. text online

Mutual assistance pact between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Republic of Latvia // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 84-87 See also. text online

Transfer agreement Republic of Lithuania the city of Vilna and the Vilna region and about mutual assistance between the Soviet Union and Lithuania // Plenipotentiary representatives report ... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 92-98

Baltic operation 1940

FALSIFIERS of HISTORY (Historical Survey) Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow 1948

David Childs. The British Communist Party and the War, 1939-41: Old Slogans Revived. Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Apr., 1977), pp. 237-253

That the Russian armies should stand on this line was clearly necessary for the safety of Russia against the Nazi menace. At any rate, the line is there, and an Eastern front has been created which Nazi Germany does not dare assail. When Herr von Ribbentrop was summoned to Moscow last week it was to learn the fact, and to accept the fact, that the Nazi designs upon the Baltic States and upon the Ukraine must come to a dead stop.

July 2, 1940 responsible leader news agency TASS Ya. Khavinson writes a letter to People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs V. Molotov:

... There can be no doubt that the Baltic Entente is a legal form of Anglo-French influence in the Baltic states, and that even now the Baltic Entente is busy with behind-the-scenes anti-Soviet fuss. It is possible that, given the changes that have taken place in the international situation, the Baltic Entente may try (if it is not already trying) to “reorient” towards Germany.”

He informs the People's Commissar and the Minister of Foreign Affairs about the disloyalty of the Baltic press to the USSR, Khavinson posed the question:

Isn’t it time to take real measures on our part to eliminate the Baltic Entente?

the treaty did not specify the maximum permitted number of contingents, so their number was unknown

Sergei Zamyatin. Fire storm

Recording of a conversation between the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR V. M. Molotov and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Lithuania J. Urbshis, 06.14.1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - p. 372-376

Recording of a conversation between the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR V. M. Molotov and the Latvian envoy to the USSR F. Kocins, 06/16/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 384-387

Recording of a conversation between the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR V. M. Molotov and the Envoy of Estonia to the USSR A. Rey, 06/16/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 387-390

Statement by the Government of Lithuania on the departure abroad of the President of the Republic A. Smetona // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - p. 395

Act and O. President of the Republic of Lithuania A. Merkys, 06/17/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - p. 400

Decree of the President of the Republic of Estonia, 06/21/1940.// Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - p. 413

Message from the Secretariat of the President of Latvia on the creation of a new government, 06/20/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - p. 410

Vlad Bogov “How we chose the USSR”

Report from the Estonian newspaper “Kommunist” on the results of the elections to the State Duma, 07/18/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - p. 474

Message from the Main Election Commission of Lithuania on the results of the elections to the People's Seimas, 07/17/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - p. 473

Smirin G. Basic facts of the history of Latvia - Riga: SI, 1999 - p. 99

Mangulis V. VIII. September 1939 to June 1941//Latvia in the Wars of the 20th Century - Princeton Junction: Cognition Books. ISBN 0-912881-00-3 (English)

Declaration of the State Duma of Estonia on state power, 07/21/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 482-484

Declaration of the People's Seimas of Latvia on state power, 07/21/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 475-476

Declaration of the People's Seimas of Lithuania on state power, 07/21/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 478-480

Declaration of the People's Seimas of Latvia on Latvia's entry into the USSR, 07/21/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 476-478

Declaration of the State Duma of Estonia on Estonia’s accession to the USSR, 07/22/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 484-485

Declaration of the People's Seimas of Lithuania on the entry of Lithuania into the USSR, 07.21.1940 // Plenipotentiary representatives report ... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 480-481

Law of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on the admission of the Republic of Lithuania to the USSR, 08/03/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 496-497

Law of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on the adoption Republic of Latvia to the USSR, 08/05/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - p. 498

Law of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on the admission of the Republic of Estonia to the USSR, 08/06/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 499-500

Order of the People's Commissar of Defense of the USSR S.K. Timoshenko, 08/17/1940. // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 505-508

Mälksoo L. Soviet annexation and state continuity: the international legal status of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in 1940-1991. and after 1991 (inaccessible link) - Tartu, Tartu blikooli Kirjastus, 2005 - pp. 149-154

Baltic: history, society, politics. Historical events

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Parliament/7231/narod/pribalt.htm (inaccessible link)

60th anniversary of Operation Surf

The United States never recognized Soviet sovereignty over Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania. US Department of State

The UK and most other western countries never recognized de jure the Baltic States" incorporation into the USSR. Foreigh and Commonwealth Office

US Senate demands that Russia recognize the illegality of the Baltic occupation - Delfi

IA REGNUM. Prospects for the development of relations between Russia and Lithuania

Ilya KudryavtsevRussian speakers

Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination: Latvia (2003) - Section 12 (English)

OSCE PA Resolution on National Minorities (2004) - Paragraph 16 (see page 28)

Recommendation 257(2008) of the CoE Congress of Local and Regional Authorities - para. 11 b) (English)

Report of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on his visit to Latvia from October 5 to 8, 2003 (2004) - see paragraph. 132.4.

PACE resolution No. 1527 (2006) - Section 17.11.2. (English)

PACE resolution No. 1527 (2006) - Section 17.9. (English)

European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Estonia (2005) - see Paragraph 129, 132 (English)

Second Opinion on Estonia, Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, 2005 - see Para. 189

UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance Report on mission to Estonia (2008) - see Paragraph 91 (English)

Report of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe on the visit to Estonia from 27 to 30 October 2003 - see paragraph. 61

Lebedeva N. S. USSR and the Republic of Lithuania (March 1939 - August 1940), Introductory article, p. 23-68. 2006, 774 pp., ISBN 9986-780-81-0

Yu. Afanasyev. ANOTHER WAR: HISTORY AND MEMORY, May 1995

Interview with historian Alexey Pimenov

Former Latvian Foreign Minister Janis Jurkans “The USA does not recognize the occupation?!”

Feldmanis I. Occupation of Latvia - historical and international legal aspects Portal of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia

Dietrich André Loeber - Internet-Auftritt der BHK

Ryanzhin V. A. Socialist revolution of 1940 in Estonia and the transformation of the State Duma of Estonia into the Supreme Council of the Estonian SSR, Jurisprudence. −1960. - No. 4. - P. 113-122

Chernichenko S.V. About the “occupation” of the Baltic states and violation of the rights of the Russian-speaking population “International Affairs”, August 2004.

In the period between the two world wars, the Baltic states became the object of the struggle of the great European powers (England, France and Germany) for influence in the region. In the first decade after Germany's defeat in World War I, there was a strong Anglo-French influence in the Baltic states, which was subsequently hampered by the growing influence of neighboring Germany in the early 1930s. The Soviet leadership, in turn, tried to resist it, taking into account the strategic importance of the region. By the end of the 1930s. Germany and the USSR actually became the main rivals in the struggle for influence in the Baltic states.

Failure "Eastern Pact" was caused by differences in the interests of the contracting parties. Thus, the Anglo-French missions received detailed secret instructions from their general staffs, which defined the goals and nature of the negotiations - a note from the French general staff said, in particular, that along with a number of political benefits that England and France would receive in connection with the accession of the USSR, this would allow it to be drawn into the conflict: “it is not in our interests for it to remain outside the conflict, keeping its forces intact.” The Soviet Union, which considered at least two Baltic republics - Estonia and Latvia - as a sphere of its national interests, defended this position in the negotiations, but did not meet with understanding from its partners. As for the governments of the Baltic states themselves, they preferred guarantees from Germany, with which they were bound by a system of economic agreements and non-aggression treaties. According to Churchill, “The obstacle to the conclusion of such an agreement (with the USSR) was the horror that these very border states experienced of Soviet help in the form of Soviet armies that could pass through their territories to protect them from the Germans and simultaneously include them in the Soviet-communist system. After all, they were the most vehement opponents of this system. Poland, Romania, Finland and the three Baltic states did not know what they feared more - German aggression or Russian salvation." .

Simultaneously with negotiations with Great Britain and France, the Soviet Union in the summer of 1939 intensified steps towards rapprochement with Germany. The result of this policy was the signing of a non-aggression treaty between Germany and the USSR on August 23, 1939. According to the secret additional protocols to the treaty, Estonia, Latvia, Finland and eastern Poland were included in the Soviet sphere of interests, Lithuania and western Poland - in the German sphere of interests); by the time the treaty was signed, the Klaipeda (Memel) region of Lithuania was already occupied by Germany (March 1939).

1939. The beginning of the war in Europe

Mutual Assistance Pacts and Treaty of Friendship and Borders

Independent Baltic states on the map of Malaya Soviet Encyclopedia. April 1940

As a result of the actual division of Polish territory between Germany and the USSR, the Soviet borders moved far to the west, and the USSR began to border on the third Baltic state - Lithuania. Initially, Germany intended to turn Lithuania into its protectorate, but on September 25, during Soviet-German contacts on resolving the Polish problem, the USSR proposed to begin negotiations on Germany’s renunciation of claims to Lithuania in exchange for the territories of the Warsaw and Lublin voivodeships. On this day, the German Ambassador to the USSR, Count Schulenburg, sent a telegram to the German Foreign Ministry, in which he said that he had been summoned to the Kremlin, where Stalin pointed out this proposal as a subject for future negotiations and added that if Germany agreed, “the Soviet Union would immediately will take on the solution of the problem of the Baltic states in accordance with the protocol of August 23.”

The situation in the Baltic states themselves was alarming and contradictory. Against the background of rumors about the impending Soviet-German division of the Baltic states, which were refuted by diplomats of both sides, part of the ruling circles of the Baltic states was ready to continue rapprochement with Germany, many were anti-German and counted on the USSR’s help in maintaining the balance of power in the region and national independence, while Leftist forces operating underground were ready to support joining the USSR.

Meanwhile, on the Soviet border with Estonia and Latvia, a Soviet military group was created, which included the forces of the 8th Army (Kingisepp direction, Leningrad Military District), 7th Army (Pskov direction, Kalinin Military District) and the 3rd Army (Belarusian Front).

In conditions when Latvia and Finland refused to provide support to Estonia, England and France (who were at war with Germany) were unable to provide it, and Germany recommended accepting the Soviet proposal, the Estonian government entered into negotiations in Moscow, which resulted in September 28 A Mutual Assistance Pact was concluded, providing for the creation of Soviet military bases on the territory of Estonia and the deployment of a Soviet contingent of up to 25 thousand people on them. On the same day, the Soviet-German Treaty “On Friendship and Border” was signed, fixing the division of Poland. According to the secret protocol to it, the conditions for the division of spheres of influence were revised: Lithuania moved into the sphere of influence of the USSR in exchange for Polish lands east of the Vistula, which went to Germany. At the end of negotiations with the Estonian delegation, Stalin told Selter: “The Estonian government acted wisely and for the benefit of the Estonian people by concluding an agreement with the Soviet Union. It could work out with you like with Poland. Poland was a great power. Where is Poland now?

On October 5, the USSR invited Finland to also consider the possibility of concluding a mutual assistance pact with the USSR. Negotiations began on October 11, but Finland rejected the USSR's proposals both for a pact and for the lease and exchange of territories, which led to the Maynila Incident, which became the reason for the USSR's denunciation of the non-aggression pact with Finland and the Soviet-Finnish War of 1939-1940.

Almost immediately after the signing of mutual assistance agreements, negotiations began on the basing of Soviet troops in the Baltic states.

The fact that the Russian armies were to stand on this line was absolutely necessary for the security of Russia against the Nazi threat. Be that as it may, this line exists, and an Eastern Front has been created, which Nazi Germany will not dare attack. When Mr. Ribbentrop was called to Moscow last week, he had to learn and accept the fact that the implementation of Nazi plans in relation to the Baltic countries and Ukraine must be completely stopped.

Original text(English)

That the Russian armies should stand on this line was clearly necessary for the safety of Russia against the Nazi menace. At any rate, the line is there, and an Eastern front has been created which Nazi Germany does not dare assail. When Herr von Ribbentrop was summoned to Moscow last week it was to learn the fact, and to accept the fact, that the Nazi designs upon the Baltic States and upon the Ukraine must come to a dead stop.

The Soviet leadership also stated that the Baltic countries did not comply with the signed agreements and were pursuing anti-Soviet policies. For example, the political union between Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (the Baltic Entente) was characterized as having an anti-Soviet orientation and violating mutual assistance treaties with the USSR.

On the basis of a friendly agreement concluded between Latvia and the USSR on mutual assistance, the first echelons of Soviet troops passed through the Zilupe border station on October 29, 1939. To welcome the Soviet troops, a guard of honor with a military band was formed...

...The recently concluded mutual assistance treaty with the Soviet Union strengthens the security of our and its borders...

Ultimatums of the summer of 1940 and the removal of the Baltic governments

Entry of the Baltic states into the USSR

The new governments lifted bans on communist parties and demonstrations and called early parliamentary elections. In the elections held on July 14 in all three states, the pro-communist Blocs (Unions) of the working people won - the only electoral lists admitted to the elections. According to official data, in Estonia the turnout was 84.1%, with 92.8% of the votes cast for the Union of Working People, in Lithuania the turnout was 95.51%, of which 99.19% voted for the Union of Working People, in Latvia the turnout was 94.8%, 97.8% of the votes were cast for the Working People's Bloc. The elections in Latvia, according to information from V. Mangulis, were falsified.

The entry of the Baltic states into the USSR was not recognized by the USA, the Vatican and a number of other countries. Recognized him de jure Sweden, Spain, Netherlands, Australia, India, Iran, New Zealand, Finland, de facto- Great Britain and a number of other countries. In exile (in the USA, Great Britain, etc.), some diplomatic missions of the pre-war Baltic states continued to operate; after World War II, the Estonian government in exile was created.

Consequences

The annexation of the Baltic states with the USSR delayed the emergence of Hitler's planned allies to the Third Reich Baltic states

After the Baltic states joined the USSR, the socialist economic transformations already completed in the rest of the country and repressions against the intelligentsia, clergy, former politicians, officers, and wealthy peasants moved here. In 1941, “due to the presence in the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian SSR of a significant number of former members of various counter-revolutionary nationalist parties, former police officers, gendarmes, landowners, factory owners, large officials of the former state apparatus of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia and other persons leading subversive anti-Soviet work and used by foreign intelligence services for espionage purposes,” deportations of the population were carried out. . A significant part of those repressed were Russians living in the Baltic states, mainly white emigrants.

In the summer of 1941, after the German attack on the USSR, in Lithuania and Latvia in the first days of the German offensive there were performances of the “fifth column” which resulted in the proclamation of short-lived “loyal to Greater Germany” states, in Estonia, where Soviet troops defended longer, this process almost immediately was replaced by inclusion in the Reichskommissariat Ostland like the other two.

Modern politics

Differences in assessment of the events of 1940 and the subsequent history of the Baltic countries within the USSR are a source of unrelenting tension in relations between Russia and the Baltic states. In Latvia and Estonia, many issues regarding the legal status of Russian-speaking residents - migrants of the 1940-1991 era - have not yet been resolved. and their descendants (see Non-citizens (Latvia) and Non-citizens (Estonia)), since only citizens of the pre-war Latvian and Estonian Republics and their descendants were recognized as citizens of these states (in Estonia, citizens of the ESSR also supported the independence of the Republic of Estonia in the referendum on March 3, 1991) , the rest were deprived of civil rights, which created a unique situation for modern Europe, the existence of discrimination regimes on its territory. .

European Union bodies and commissions have repeatedly addressed Latvia and Estonia with official recommendations, which indicated the inadmissibility of continuing the legal practice of segregation of non-citizens.

The fact that law enforcement agencies of the Baltic states initiated criminal cases against former employees of the Soviet state security agencies living here, accused of participating in repressions and crimes against the local population during World War II, received a special public response in Russia. The illegality of these accusations was confirmed in the international Strasbourg court

Opinion of historians and political scientists

Some foreign historians and political scientists, as well as some modern Russian researchers, characterize this process as the occupation and annexation of independent states by the Soviet Union, carried out gradually, as a result of a series of military-diplomatic and economic steps and against the backdrop of the Second World War unfolding in Europe. In this regard, the term is sometimes used in journalism Soviet occupation of the Baltic states, reflecting this point of view. Modern politicians also talk about incorporation, as a softer version of joining. According to the former head of the Latvian Foreign Ministry Janis Jurkans, “The American-Baltic Charter contains the word incorporation". Baltic historians emphasize the facts of violation of democratic norms during the holding of early parliamentary elections, held at the same time in all three states in the conditions of a significant Soviet military presence, as well as the fact that in the elections held on July 14 and 15, 1940, it was allowed only one list of candidates nominated from the “Bloc of Working People”, and all other alternative lists were rejected. Baltic sources believe that the election results were falsified and did not reflect the will of the people. For example, the text posted on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia provides information that “ In Moscow, the Soviet news agency TASS gave information about the mentioned election results twelve hours before the start of vote counting in Latvia". He also cites the opinion of Dietrich André Loeber - one of the former soldiers of the Abwehr sabotage and reconnaissance unit Brandenburg 800 in 1941-1945 - that the annexation of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania was fundamentally illegal: since it is based on intervention and occupation. . From this it is concluded that the decisions of the Baltic parliaments to join the USSR were predetermined in advance.

Otto Latsis, a famous scientist and publicist, stated in an interview with Radio Liberty - Free Europe in May 2005:

Took place incorporation Latvia, but not occupation"

Notes

Semiryaga M.I.. - Secrets of Stalin's diplomacy. 1939-1941. - Chapter VI: Troubled Summer, M.: Higher School, 1992. - 303 p. - Circulation 50,000 copies.
Guryanov A.E. The scale of deportation of the population deep into the USSR in May-June 1941, memo.ru
Michael Keating, John McGarry Minority nationalism and the changing international order. - Oxford University Press, 2001. - P. 343. - 366 p. - ISBN 0199242143
Jeff Chinn, Robert John Kaiser Russians as the new minority: ethnicity and nationalism in the Soviet successor states. - Westview Press, 1996. - P. 93. - 308 p. - ISBN 0813322480
Great Historical Encyclopedia: For schoolchildren and students, page 602: "Molotov"
Treaty between Germany and the USSR
http://www.historycommission.ee/temp/pdf/conclusions_ru_1940-1941.pdf 1940-1941, Conclusions // Estonian International Commission for Investigation of Crimes Against Humanity]
http://www.am.gov.lv/en/latvia/history/occupation-aspects/
http://www.mfa.gov.lv/en/policy/4641/4661/4671/?print=on
- “Resolution regarding the Baltic States adopted by the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe” September 29, 1960
- Resolution 1455 (2005) "Honouring of obligations and commitments by the Russian Federation" June 22, 2005
(English) European Parliament (January 13, 1983). "Resolution on the situation in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania." Official Journal of the European Communities C 42/78.
(English) European Parliament resolution on the sixtieth anniversary of the end of the Second World War in Europe on May 8, 1945
(English) European Parliament resolution of 24 May 2007 on Estonia
Russian Foreign Ministry: The West recognized the Baltic states as part of the USSR
Archive of foreign policy of the USSR. The Case of the Anglo-French-Soviet Negotiations, 1939 (vol. III), l. 32 - 33. quoted from:
Archive of foreign policy of the USSR. The Case of the Anglo-French-Soviet Negotiations, 1939 (vol. III), l. 240. quoted from: Military literature: Research: Zhilin P. A. How Nazi Germany prepared an attack on the Soviet Union
Winston Churchill. Memoirs
Meltyukhov Mikhail Ivanovich. Stalin's missed chance. The Soviet Union and the struggle for Europe: 1939-1941
Telegram No. 442 of September 25 from Schulenburg to the German Foreign Ministry // Subject to announcement: USSR - Germany. 1939-1941: Documents and materials. Comp. Yu. Felshtinsky. M.: Moscow. worker, 1991.
Mutual assistance pact between the USSR and the Republic of Estonia // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 62-64
Mutual assistance pact between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Republic of Latvia // Plenipotentiary representatives report... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 84-87
Agreement on the transfer to the Lithuanian Republic of the city of Vilna and the Vilna region and on mutual assistance between the Soviet Union and Lithuania // Plenipotentiary representatives report ... - M., International Relations, 1990 - pp. 92-98

Hello! In the blog "Fighting Myths" we will analyze the events of our history, surrounded by myths and falsifications. These will be small reviews dedicated to the anniversary of one or another historical date. Of course, it is impossible to conduct a detailed study of events within the framework of one article, but we will try to outline the main issues and show examples of false statements and their refutations.

In the photo: Railway workers rock Weiss, a member of the plenipotentiary commission of the State Duma of Estonia, after returning from Moscow, where Estonia was admitted to the USSR. July 1940

71 years ago, on July 21-22, 1940, the parliaments of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania transformed their states into Soviet socialist republics and adopted the Declaration of Accession to the USSR. Soon the Supreme Soviet of the USSR adopted laws that approved the decisions of the Baltic parliaments. So it began new page in the history of three states of Eastern Europe. What happened over the course of several months in 1939-1940? How to evaluate these events?

Let's consider the main theses used by our opponents in discussions on this topic. Let us emphasize that these theses are not always outright lies and deliberate falsification - sometimes it is just an incorrect formulation of the problem, a shift in emphasis, or involuntary confusion in terms and dates. However, as a result of the use of these theses, a picture emerges that is far from the true meaning of events. Before you can find the truth, you need to expose the lies.

1. The decision to annex the Baltic states to the USSR was spelled out in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and/or the secret protocols to it. Moreover, Stalin planned to annex the Baltic states long before these events. In a word, these two events are interconnected, one is a consequence of the other.

Examples.

"In fact, if you do not ignore the obvious facts, then of course, it was the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact that sanctioned the occupation of the Baltic states and the occupation eastern territories Poland by Soviet troops. And it’s surprising that the secret protocols to this treaty are mentioned so often here, because, strictly speaking, the role of this treaty is clear even without them.”
Link .

“As a professional, I began to study the history of the Second World War in more or less depth in the mid-80s, working on the now notorious, but then almost unstudied and classified the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the secret protocols accompanying it, which decided the fate of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in 1939".
Afanasyev Yu.N. Another war: History and memory. // Russia, XX century. Under general ed. Yu.N. Afanasyeva. M., 1996. Book. 3. Link.

"The USSR received from Germany the possibility of freedom of action for further" territorial political changes"in the sphere of Soviet influence. Both aggressive powers were of the same opinion on August 23 that "sphere of interest" means the freedom to occupy and annex the territories of their respective states. The Soviet Union and Germany divided their spheres of interest on paper in order to “make the division also a reality.”<...>
"The government of the USSR, which needed treaties on mutual assistance with the Baltic states in order to destroy these states, did not think to be satisfied with the existing status quo. It took advantage of the favorable international situation created by Germany's attack on France, Holland and Belgium to completely occupy the Baltic states in June 1940."
Link .

A comment.

The conclusion of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and its significance in international politics 30s XX century - a very complex topic that requires separate analysis. Nevertheless, we note that most often the assessment of this event is unprofessional in nature, coming not from historians and lawyers, but sometimes from people who have not read this historical document and do not know the realities of international relations of that time.

The realities of the time are that the conclusion of non-aggression treaties was a common practice of those years, which did not imply allied relations (and this pact is often called the “alliance treaty” of the USSR and Germany). The conclusion of secret protocols was also not an extraordinary diplomatic move: for example, the British guarantees to Poland in 1939 contained a secret protocol according to which Great Britain would provide military assistance to Poland only in the event of an attack by Germany, but not by any other country. The principle of dividing a region into spheres of influence between two or more states, again, was very widespread: just remember the delimitation of spheres of influence between countries Anti-Hitler coalition at the final stage of the Second World War. So it would be wrong to call the conclusion of the agreement on August 23, 1939 criminal, immoral, and even more so illegal.

Another question is what was meant by the sphere of influence in the text of the pact. If you look at Germany’s actions in Eastern Europe, you will notice that its political expansion did not always involve occupation or annexation (for example, as in the case of Romania). It is difficult to say that the processes in the same region in the mid-40s, when Romania came into the sphere of influence of the USSR, and Greece into the sphere of influence of Great Britain, led to the occupation of their territory or forced annexation.

In a word, the sphere of influence implied the territory in which the opposite side, according to its obligations, was not supposed to carry out active foreign policy, economic expansion, support for certain political forces beneficial to it. (See: Makarchuk V.S. Sovereign-territorial status of the Western Ukrainian lands during the period of the Other World War (1939 - 1945): historical and legal research. Kiev, 2007. P. 101.) This, for example, happened after the Second world war, when Stalin, according to agreements with Churchill, did not support the Greek communists, who had great chances to win the political struggle.

Relations between Soviet Russia and independent Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania began to develop in 1918, when these states gained independence. However, the Bolsheviks' hopes for victory in these countries by communist forces, including with the help of the Red Army, did not materialize. In 1920, the Soviet government concluded peace treaties with the three republics and recognized them as independent states.

Over the next twenty years, Moscow gradually built a “Baltic direction” of its foreign policy, the main goals of which were to ensure the security of Leningrad and prevent a possible military enemy from blockading the Baltic Fleet. This explains the turn in relations with the Baltic states that occurred in the mid-30s. If in the 20s. The USSR was convinced that the creation of a single bloc of three states (the so-called Baltic Entente) was not beneficial for it, because this military-political alliance can be used by the countries of Western Europe for a new invasion of Russia, then after the Nazis came to power in Germany, the USSR insists on creating a system of collective security in Eastern Europe. One of the projects proposed by Moscow was a Soviet-Polish declaration on the Baltic states, in which both states would guarantee the independence of the three Baltic countries. However, Poland rejected these proposals. (See Zubkova E.Yu. The Baltics and the Kremlin. 1940-1953. M., 2008. P. 18-28.)

The Kremlin also tried to achieve guarantees of independence of the Baltic countries from Germany. Berlin was asked to sign a protocol in which the governments of Germany and the USSR would promise to “constantly take into account in their foreign policy the imperative of maintaining the independence and inviolability” of the Baltic states. However, Germany also refused to meet the Soviet Union halfway. The next attempt to reliably ensure the security of the Baltic countries was the Soviet-French project of the Eastern Pact, but it was not destined to come to fruition. These attempts continued until the spring of 1939, when it became obvious that Great Britain and France did not want to change their tactics of “appeasing” Hitler, embodied by that time in the form of the Munich Agreements.

The head of the Bureau described very well the change in the attitude of the USSR towards the Baltic countries international information Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party /b/ Karl Radek. He stated the following in 1934: “The Baltic states created by the Entente, which served as a cordon or bridgehead against us, today are for us the most important wall of protection from the West.” So what to talk about the goal of “returning territories”, “restoring rights Russian Empire"It is possible only by resorting to speculation - the Soviet Union sought neutrality and independence of the Baltic states for quite a long time for the sake of its security. The arguments given as arguments about the “imperial”, “power” turn in Stalinist ideology that occurred in the mid-30s are unlikely whether it can be transferred to the sphere of foreign policy, there is no documentary evidence of this.

By the way, this is not the first time in Russian history when a security issue was not resolved by joining neighbors. The recipe for “divide and conquer”, despite apparent simplicity, could at times be extremely inconvenient and disadvantageous. For example, in the middle of the 18th century. representatives of the Ossetian tribes sought a decision from St. Petersburg on their inclusion in the empire, because Ossetians for a long time were subjected to pressure and raids from the Kabardian princes. However, the Russian authorities did not want possible conflict with Turkey, and therefore did not accept such a tempting offer. (For more details, see Degoev V.V. Rapprochement along a complex trajectory: Russia and Ossetia in the middle of the 18th century. // Russia XXI. 2011. No. 1-2.)

Let's return to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, or rather, to the text of paragraph 1 of the secret protocol: “In the event of territorial and political transformations in the areas belonging to the Baltic states (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern border of Lithuania will be the line dividing the spheres of influence Germany and the USSR. In this regard, Lithuania’s interest in the Vilna region is recognized by both parties.” (Link.) On September 28, 1939, by an additional agreement, Germany and the USSR will adjust the border of their spheres of influence, and in exchange for the Lublin and part of the Warsaw Voivodeship of Poland, Germany will not lay claim to Lithuania. So, we are not talking about any annexation, we are talking about spheres of influence.

By the way, on these same days (namely September 27), Ribbentrop, the head of the German foreign policy department, in a conversation with Stalin asked: “Does the conclusion of a pact with Estonia mean that the USSR intends to slowly penetrate into Estonia, and then into Latvia?” Stalin replied: “Yes, that means. But temporarily the existing state system, etc., will be preserved there.” (Link.)

This is one of the few pieces of evidence that suggests that the Soviet leadership has intentions to “Sovietize” the Baltic states. As a rule, these intentions were expressed in specific phrases by Stalin or representatives of the diplomatic corps, but intentions are not plans, especially when it comes to words thrown out during diplomatic negotiations. Confirmations in archival documents there is no connection between the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and plans to change the political status or “Sovietization” of the Baltic republics. Moreover, Moscow prohibits plenipotentiaries in the Baltic states not only from using the word “Sovietization”, but also from communicating with left-wing forces in general.

2. The Baltic states pursued a policy of neutrality; they would not fight on the side of Germany.

Examples.

"Leonid Mlechin, writer: Please tell me, witness, there is a feeling that the fate of your country, as well as Estonia and Latvia, was sealed in 1939-40. Either you become part of the Soviet Union, or part of Germany. And there wasn’t even a third option. Do you agree with this point of view?
Algimantas Kasparavičius, historian, political scientist, researcher at the Institute of History of Lithuania: Of course I don't agree, because before the Soviet occupation, until 1940, all three Baltic countries, including Lithuania, professed a policy of neutrality. And they tried to defend their interests and their statehood in just such a neutral way during the war that began.”
Judgment of time: The accession of the Baltic states to the USSR - loss or gain? Part 1. // Channel Five. 08/09/2010. Link .

A comment.

In the spring of 1939, Germany finally occupied Czechoslovakia. Despite the obvious contradiction to the Munich agreements, Great Britain and France limited themselves to diplomatic protests. However, these countries, together with the USSR, Poland, Romania and other states of Eastern Europe, continued to discuss the possibility of creating a collective security system in this region. The most interested party was, naturally, the Soviet Union. Its fundamental condition was the neutrality of Poland and the Baltic states. However, these countries were against guarantees from the USSR.

This is how Winston Churchill wrote about it in his work “The Second World War”: “The negotiations seemed to have reached a hopeless dead end. Accepting the English guarantee (for assistance in case of war - Note), the governments of Poland and Romania did not want to accept a similar commitment in the same form from the Russian government. The same position was adhered to in another important strategic region - in the Baltic states. The Soviet government clarified that it would accede to the mutual guarantee pact only if Finland and the Baltic states were included in the general guarantee.

All four of these countries have now refused such a condition and, out of horror, would probably refuse to agree to it for a long time. Finland and Estonia even argued that they would consider as an act of aggression a guarantee that was given to them without their consent. On the same day, May 31, Estonia and Latvia signed non-aggression pacts with Germany. Thus, Hitler was able to easily penetrate into the depths of the weak defenses of the belated and indecisive coalition directed against him. "(Link.)

Thus, one of the last opportunities for collective resistance to Hitler’s expansion to the East was destroyed. At the same time, the governments of the Baltic states willingly cooperated with Germany, never ceasing to talk about their neutrality. But isn't this an obvious indicator of politics? double standards? Let's look once again at the facts of cooperation between Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania with Germany in 1939.

At the end of March this year, Germany demanded that Lithuania transfer the Klaipeda region to it. Just two or three days later, the German-Lithuanian agreement on the transfer of Klaipeda was signed, according to which the parties assumed an obligation not to use force against each other. At the same time, rumors appeared about the conclusion of a German-Estonian treaty, according to which German troops received the right of passage through Estonian territory. It was unknown how true these rumors were, but subsequent events increased the Kremlin’s suspicions.

On April 20, 1939, the chief of staff of the Latvian army M. Hartmanis and the commander of the Kurzeme division O. Dankers arrived in Berlin to participate in the celebrations dedicated to the 50th anniversary of Hitler, and were personally received by the Fuhrer, who presented them with awards. The Chief of the Estonian General Staff, Lieutenant General Nikolai Reek, also arrived for Hitler's anniversary. Following this, Estonia was visited by the head of the General Staff of the German Ground Forces, Lieutenant General Franz Halder, and the head of the Abwehr, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris. This was a clear step towards military cooperation between the countries.

And on June 19, the Estonian Ambassador to Moscow August Ray, at a meeting with British diplomats, said that USSR assistance would force Estonia to take the side of Germany. What is this? Blind faith in the sincerity of treaties with Germany after the annexation of Austria and Czechoslovakia, and even more so after the annexation of a small part of the Baltic lands (i.e. the Klaipeda region)? The reluctance to cooperate (and at that time we were talking only about cooperation) with the Soviet Union, apparently, was much stronger than the fear of losing one’s own sovereignty. Or perhaps the reluctance to cooperate was so strong that some of them did not have their own sovereignty political elite value.

On March 28, People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR Litvinov presented statements to the Estonian and Latvian envoys in Moscow. In them, Moscow warned Tallinn and Riga that allowing “political, economic or other domination of a third state, providing it with any exclusive rights or privileges" may be considered by Moscow as a violation of previously concluded agreements between the USSR, Estonia and Latvia. (Link.) Sometimes some researchers view these statements as an example of Moscow's expansionist aspirations. However, if you pay attention to the foreign policy of the Baltic countries, this statement was quite a natural action of a state concerned about its security.

At the same time, in Berlin on April 11, Hitler approved the “Directive on unified training armed forces for the war in 1939-1940." It indicated that after the defeat of Poland, Germany should take control of Latvia and Lithuania: "The position of the limitrophe states will be determined exclusively by the military needs of Germany. With the development of events, it may become necessary to occupy the limitrophe states up to the border of old Courland and incorporate these territories into the empire." (Link.)

In addition to the above facts, modern historians make assumptions about the existence of secret treaties between Germany and the Baltic states. This is not just guesswork. For example, the German researcher Rolf Amann discovered in the German archives an internal memorandum from the chief of the German Foreign News Service Dörtinger dated June 8, 1939, which states that Estonia and Latvia agreed to a secret article requiring both countries to coordinate with Germany all defensive measures against the USSR. The memorandum also stated that Estonia and Latvia had been warned of the need to intelligently apply their policy of neutrality, which required the deployment of all defensive forces against " Soviet threat". (See Ilmjärv M. Hääletu alistumine. Eesti, Läti ja Leeedu välispoliitilise orientatsioni kujunemine ja iseseisvuse kaotus 1920. aastate keskpaigast anneksioonini. Tallinn, 2004. lk. 558.)

All this suggests that the “neutrality” of the Baltic states was only a cover for cooperation with Germany. And these countries deliberately cooperated, hoping with the help of a powerful ally to protect themselves from the “communist threat.” It is hardly necessary to say that the threat from this ally was much more terrible, because threatened real genocide against the Baltic peoples and the loss of all sovereignty.

3. The annexation of the Baltic states was violent, it was accompanied by mass repressions (genocide) and military intervention by the USSR. These events can be considered "annexation", "forced incorporation", "illegal incorporation".

Examples.

“Because - yes, indeed, there was a formal invitation, or rather, there were three formal invitations, if we talk about the Baltic states. But the point is that these invitations were made already when Soviet troops were stationed in these countries, when all three Baltic countries were overrun by NKVD agents, when in fact repressions against the local population were already being carried out... And, of course, it must be said that this action was prepared well by the Soviet leadership, because in fact everything was completed by the year 1940, and governments were created already in July 1940.”
Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Interview with historian Alexey Pimenov. // Russian service of the Voice of America. 05/08/2005. Link .

"We did not support forced incorporation of the Baltic countries into the USSR", US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told the three Baltic foreign ministers yesterday."
Eldarov E. The USA does not recognize the occupation?! // News today. 06/16/2007. Link .

“The Soviet side also confirmed its aggressive position and decision not to comply with international law and to use force at the Moscow negotiations with representatives of Latvia during the conclusion of a mutual assistance agreement, which began on October 2, 1939. The next day, Latvian Foreign Minister V. Munters informed government: I. Stalin told him that “because of the Germans we can occupy you,” and also threateningly pointed out the possibility of the USSR taking “territory with a Russian national minority.” The Latvian government decided to capitulate and agree to the demands of the Soviet Union, allowing its troops into its territory."<...>
“Given the aspects of international law, treaties that were concluded on mutual assistance between such unequally powerful parties (power and small and weak states) are difficult to evaluate as legitimate. Several opinions have been expressed in the historical and legal literature on how one could characterize concluded basic agreements between the USSR and the Baltic states. Some authors believe that these agreements, in accordance with international law, are not valid from the moment of their signing, because they were simply imposed on the Baltic states by force".
Feldmanis I. Occupation of Latvia - historical and international legal aspects. // Website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia. Link .

A comment.

"Annexation is the forcible annexation of the territory of another state (all or part) to a state. Before the Second World War, not every annexation was considered illegal and invalid. This is due to the fact that the principle prohibiting the use of force or the threat of its use, which became one of the main principles of modern international law, was first enshrined in 1945 in the UN Charter,” writes Doctor of Law S.V. Chernichenko.

Thus, speaking about the “annexation” of the Baltic states, we are again faced with a situation where modern international law does not work in relation to historical events. After all, the expansion of the British Empire, the USA, Spain and many other states that at one time annexed territory that belonged to other countries can just as easily be called annexation. So even if we call the process of annexation of the Baltic states annexation, then considering it illegal and invalid (which is what a number of researchers, journalists and politicians want to achieve) is legally incorrect, because the corresponding laws simply did not exist.

The same can be said about specific mutual assistance pacts concluded between the USSR and the Baltic countries in September - October 1939: September 28 with Estonia, October 5 with Latvia, October 10 with Lithuania. They were concluded, of course, under strong diplomatic pressure from the USSR, but strong diplomatic pressure, very often applied in conditions of constant military threat, does not make these pacts illegal. Their content was almost the same: the USSR had the right to lease military bases, ports and airfields agreed upon with the states and introduce a limited contingent of troops into their territory (20-25 thousand people for each country).

Can we consider that the presence of NATO troops on the territories of European countries limits their sovereignty? Of course you can. One can also say that the United States, as the leader of NATO, is going to use these troops to put pressure on the political forces of these countries and change the political course there. However, you must admit that this would be a very dubious assumption. The statement about treaties between the USSR and the Baltic states as the first step towards the “Sovietization” of the Baltic states seems to us to be the same dubious assumption.

Soviet troops stationed in the Baltic states were given the strictest instructions regarding behavior towards the local population and authorities. Contacts of the Red Army soldiers with local residents were limited. And Stalin in a confidential conversation with general secretary The Executive Committee of the Comintern G. Dimitrov said that the USSR needed to “strictly comply with them (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - Note) internal mode and independence. We will not seek their Sovietization." (See USSR and Lithuania during the Second World War. Vilnius, 2006. Vol. 1. P. 305.) This suggests that the factor of military presence was not decisive in relations between states, and therefore, the process was not annexation and military takeover. It was precisely the agreed entry of a limited number of troops.

By the way, sending troops into the territory of a foreign state in order to prevent it from going over to the enemy’s side was used more than once during the Second World War. The joint Soviet-British occupation of Iran began in August 1941. And in May 1942, Great Britain occupied Madagascar to prevent the Japanese from capturing the island, although Madagascar belonged to Vichy France, which maintained neutrality. In the same way, the Americans occupied French (i.e. Vichy) Morocco and Algeria in November 1942. (Link.)

However, not everyone was happy with the current situation. The left forces in the Baltic states clearly counted on the help of the USSR. For example, demonstrations in support of the mutual assistance pact in Lithuania in October 1939 turned into clashes with the police. However, Molotov telegraphed to the plenipotentiary and the military attaché: “I categorically forbid interfering in inter-party affairs in Lithuania, supporting any opposition movements, etc.” (See Zubkova E.Yu. The Baltics and the Kremlin. P. 60-61.) The thesis about the fear of world public opinion is very doubtful: Germany, on the one hand, France and Great Britain, on the other, at that time entered the Second World War, and it is unlikely that any of them wanted the USSR to join the other side of the front. The Soviet leadership believed that by sending in troops it had secured the northwestern border, and only strict compliance with the terms of the agreements would ensure, in turn, compliance with these agreements on the part of the Baltic neighbors. It was simply unprofitable to destabilize the situation by military takeover.

We also add that Lithuania, as a result of the mutual assistance pact, significantly expanded its territory, including Vilna and the Vilna region. But despite the impeccable behavior of the Soviet troops noted by the Baltic authorities, in the meantime they continued cooperation with Germany and (during " Winter War") with Finland. In particular, the radio intelligence department of the Latvian army provided practical assistance to the Finnish side, forwarding intercepted radiograms from Soviet military units. (See Latvijas arhivi. 1999. Nr. 1. 121., 122. lpp.)

The allegations about mass repressions carried out in 1939-1941 also look unfounded. in the Baltic states and began, according to a number of researchers, in the fall of 1939, i.e. before the Baltic states joined the USSR. The facts are that in June 1941, according to the May resolution of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR "On measures to cleanse the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian SSR from anti-Soviet, criminal and socially dangerous element“The deportation of about 30 thousand people from the three Baltic republics was carried out. It is often forgotten that only some of them were deported as “anti-Soviet elements”, while some were banal criminals. It must also be taken into account that this action was carried out on the eve of war.

However, more often the mythical NKVD order No. 001223 “On operational measures against anti-Soviet and socially hostile elements”, which wanders from one publication to another, is cited as evidence. It was first mentioned... in the book "Die Sowjetunion und die baltische Staaten" ("The Soviet Union and the Baltic States"), published in 1941 in Kaunas. It is not difficult to guess that it was written not by painstaking researchers, but by employees of Goebbels’ department. Naturally, no one was able to find this NKVD order in the archives, but its mention can be found in the books “These Names Are Accused” (1951) and “The Baltic States, 1940-1972” (1972), published in Stockholm, as well as in numerous modern literature up to the study of E.Yu. Zubkova “The Baltics and the Kremlin” (see this edition, p. 126).

By the way, in this study, the author, considering Moscow’s policy in the annexed Baltic lands for one pre-war year (from the summer of 1940 to June 1941), over the course of 27 pages of the corresponding chapter, writes only two paragraphs (!) about repressions, one of which is a retelling of the myth mentioned above. This shows how significant the repressive policies of the new government were. Of course, it brought fundamental changes in political and economic life, the nationalization of industry and large property, the elimination of capitalist exchange, etc. Part of the population, shocked by these changes, switched to resistance: this was expressed in protests, attacks on the police and even sabotage (arson of warehouses, etc.). What did the new government need to do so that this territory, taking into account the not overwhelming but still existing social resistance, would not become easy “prey” for the German occupiers, who were planning to start a war soon? Of course, to fight “anti-Soviet” sentiments. That is why, on the eve of the war, a resolution of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR appeared on the deportation of unreliable elements.

4. Before the inclusion of the Baltic states into the USSR, communists came to power in them, and the elections were rigged.

Examples.

"Illegal and illegal change of government occurred on June 20, 1940. Instead of the cabinet of K. Ulmanis, a Soviet puppet government headed by A. Kirchenstein came, which was officially called the government of the Latvian people.”<...>
“In the elections held on July 14 and 15, 1940, only one list of candidates nominated by the “Bloc of Working People” was allowed. All other alternative lists were rejected. It was officially reported that 97.5% of the votes were cast for the mentioned list. The election results were falsified and did not reflect the will of the people. In Moscow, the Soviet news agency TASS gave information about the mentioned election results twelve hours before the start of the vote count in Latvia."
Feldmanis I. Occupation of Latvia - historical and international legal aspects. // Website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia. Link .

"July 1940 In the elections in the Baltics, the Communists received: Lithuania - 99.2%, Latvia - 97.8%, Estonia - 92.8%."
Surov V. Icebreaker-2. Mn., 2004. Ch. 6.

and Estonia) into the Soviet Union with the rights of Soviet Socialist Republics.

Background

Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia gained independence in 1920 as a result of the territorial collapse of the former Russian Empire. In the next two decades, they became the scene of intense political struggle between the leading European powers - France, Great Britain, Germany and the USSR. On August 23, 1939, the division of spheres of interests in Eastern Europe was signed between the Soviet Union and Germany, according to which the USSR laid claim to all three Baltic states. Joining the Soviet Union Western Belarus extended the State border directly to all these states.

The annexation of the Baltic states to the USSR was an important military-strategic task of the Soviet Union, for which a whole range of diplomatic and military measures were taken. Officially, any accusations of Soviet-German collusion were rejected by diplomats on both sides. However, already in September 1939, the USSR began to create a military group on the border with Estonia and Latvia, which included the 3rd, 7th and 8th armies.

Accession of Estonia

On September 28, 1939, a Mutual Assistance Pact was concluded between the USSR and Estonia. This document was the result of political pressure on the republic - the USSR brought accusations of violating neutrality in favor of Poland. Finland refused to support Estonia, Great Britain and France, which were tied up in the war with Germany, also did not come to her aid. As a result, a Pact was concluded, on the basis of which Soviet military bases and a contingent of 25 thousand soldiers and commanders were stationed in Estonia. The treaty was ratified by the Estonian parliament in early October.

On June 16, 1940, the Soviet Union presented Estonia with an ultimatum, accusing it of flagrantly violating the terms of a previously concluded agreement and demanding the formation of a new, pro-Soviet government. On June 19, 1940, the Estonian government headed by J. Uluots resigned. The President of the Republic, K. Päts, accepted it and entrusted the formation of the new main executive body to General J. Laidoner. June 21, 1940 as a result coup d'etat A government led by the writer J. Barbarus (Vares) came to power. In July-August, a radical restructuring of the entire state system. On July 21, 1940, Soviet power was officially proclaimed in Estonia with the formation of the Estonian SSR. The next day, the Declaration of Accession to the USSR was adopted. On August 6, 1940, at the VII session of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, a resolution was adopted on the admission of Estonia to the Soviet Union as a Soviet Socialist Republic.

Accession of Latvia

On October 5, 1939, a mutual assistance agreement was signed between the Soviet Union and Latvia for a period of ten years. The USSR was allowed to have its own naval bases in and Ventspils on the territory of the republic, as well as several airfields and a coastal defense base to guard the Irbene Strait. As in the case of Estonia, the maximum number of Soviet troops in Latvia was supposed to be 25 thousand people. The transfer of troops began at the end of October 1939.

On June 16, 1940, on the same day as Estonia, Latvia was presented with an ultimatum for violating the agreement and containing a demand for the formation of a pro-Soviet government and the admission of an additional contingent of Soviet troops into the country. These conditions were accepted, and on June 17, 1940, new troops entered Latvia. The head of the pro-Soviet government was the microbiologist A. Kirchenstein.

The new government held elections to the People's Seimas, which were won by the Bloc of Working People, a pro-communist political organization. On July 21, 1940, at its first meeting, the new Seimas proclaimed Soviet power in the country and sent a request to accept Latvia into the USSR as a Soviet Socialist Republic. On August 5, 1940, this request was granted.

Accession of Lithuania

On October 10, 1939, a Mutual Assistance Treaty was signed between the USSR and Lithuania. In accordance with this document, the Vilna region, previously part of Poland and occupied by Soviet troops during the Polish campaign, was transferred to the republic. The Soviet Union received military bases and the possibility of deploying a 25,000-strong contingent on Lithuanian territory.

On June 14, 1940, Lithuania received an ultimatum from the Soviet Union demanding the admission of additional troops into the territory, the dissolution of the government and its replacement with a pro-Soviet one, as well as the arrest of several ministers. The country's president, A. Smetona, was inclined to the need to organize armed resistance to Soviet troops, but he was not supported by either the leaders of Latvia and Estonia, or the army commander-in-chief, General V. Vitkauskas. As a result, the next day the ultimatum was accepted, and Smetona fled the country. Journalist and writer J. Paleckis became the new head of government.

The Union of Working People of Lithuania bloc won the elections to the People's Seimas. On July 21, 1940, the Sejm proclaimed Soviet power in the country and sent a request to Moscow to accept it as part of the USSR as the Soviet Socialist Republic. On August 3, 1940, this request was granted. On January 10, 1941, an agreement was signed between the USSR and Germany on the renunciation of the Third Reich's claims to the border areas of Lithuania.

results

The vast majority of the local population supported joining the Soviet Union. After the annexation of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to the Soviet Union, Moscow began the Sovietization of the Baltic region. Lands and enterprises were nationalized, a radical restructuring of the economy was carried out, and repressions began against the clergy, intelligentsia, former politicians, officers, police officers, and wealthy peasants. Mass deportations were carried out.

All this led to increased discontent among the local population. An armed opposition arose, which finally took shape during the Great Patriotic War, when many anti-Soviet formations collaborated with the occupiers and participated in war crimes.

Many countries and international organizations did not officially recognize the entry of the Baltic republics into the Soviet Union, but in accordance with the agreements reached with the USA and Great Britain at conferences, the borders of the USSR as of June 1941 were recognized. In addition, the inviolability of post-war borders was subsequently confirmed at.

All treaties and declarations of 1940 were canceled by the Baltic republics in 1989-1991, which was recognized by the State Council of the USSR on September 6, 1991.

Soviet historians characterized the events of 1940 as socialist revolutions and insisted on the voluntary nature of the entry of the Baltic states into the USSR, arguing that it received final formalization in the summer of 1940 on the basis of decisions of the highest legislative bodies of these countries, which received the broadest voter support in the elections for the entire existence of the independent Baltic states. Some Russian researchers also agree with this point of view, who also do not qualify the events as occupation, although they do not consider entry voluntary.

Most foreign historians and political scientists, as well as some modern Russian researchers, characterize this process as the occupation and annexation of independent states by the Soviet Union, carried out gradually, as a result of a series of military-diplomatic and economic steps and against the backdrop of the Second World War unfolding in Europe. Modern politicians also talk about incorporation as a softer option for joining. According to the former head of the Latvian Foreign Ministry, Janis Jurkans, “The word incorporation appears in the American-Baltic Charter.”

Most foreign historians consider this an occupation

Scientists who deny the occupation point to the absence of military action between the USSR and the Baltic countries in 1940. Their opponents counter that the definition of occupation does not necessarily imply war; for example, Germany's seizure of Czechoslovakia in 1939 and Denmark in 1940 is considered occupation.

Baltic historians emphasize the facts of violation of democratic norms during the holding of early parliamentary elections held at the same time in 1940 in all three states in the conditions of a significant Soviet military presence, as well as the fact that in the elections held on July 14 and 15, 1940 , only one list of candidates nominated by the “Bloc of Working People” was allowed, and all other alternative lists were rejected.

Baltic sources believe that the election results were falsified and did not reflect the will of the people. For example, in an article posted on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia, historian I. Feldmanis provides information that “In Moscow, the Soviet news agency TASS provided information about the mentioned election results twelve hours before the start of vote counting in Latvia.” He also cites the opinion of Dietrich André Loeber - a lawyer and one of the former soldiers of the Abwehr sabotage and reconnaissance unit Brandenburg 800 in 1941-1945 - that the annexation of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania was fundamentally illegal, since it was based on intervention and occupation. From this it is concluded that the decisions of the Baltic parliaments on joining the USSR were predetermined in advance.

Signing of the Non-Aggression Pact between Germany and the Soviet Union

This is how Vyacheslav Molotov himself spoke about it (quote from the book by F. Chuev « 140 conversations with Molotov » ):

« Question about the Baltics, Western Ukraine, Western Belarus and Bessarabia we decided with Ribbentrop in 1939. The Germans were reluctant to allow us to annex Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Bessarabia. When a year later, in November 1940, I was in Berlin, Hitler asked me: “Well, okay, you unite Ukrainians, Belarusians together, well, okay, Moldovans, this can still be explained, but how will you explain the Baltics to the whole world?”

I told him: “We’ll explain.”

Communists and the peoples of the Baltic states spoke out in favor of joining the Soviet Union. Their bourgeois leaders came to Moscow for negotiations, but refused to sign annexation to the USSR. What were we supposed to do? I must tell you a secret that I followed a very strict course. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Latvia came to us in 1939, I told him: “You will not return back until you sign an accession to us.”

The Minister of War came to us from Estonia, I’ve already forgotten his last name, he was popular, we told him the same. We had to go to this extreme. And, in my opinion, they did it well.

I said: “You will not return back until you sign the accession.”

I presented this to you in a very rude manner. This was true, but it was all done more delicately.

“But the first person to arrive could have warned others,” I say.
“And they had nowhere to go.” You have to somehow protect yourself. When we made demands... We must take action on time, otherwise it will be too late. They huddled back and forth; the bourgeois governments, of course, could not enter the socialist state with great desire. On the other hand, the international situation was such that they had to decide. Located between two large states - Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. The situation is difficult. So they hesitated, but decided. And we needed the Baltic states...

We could not do this with Poland. The Poles behaved irreconcilably. We negotiated with the British and French before talking with the Germans: if they do not interfere with our troops in Czechoslovakia and Poland, then, of course, things will go better for us. They refused, so we had to take at least partial measures, we had to move the German troops away.

If we had not come out to meet the Germans in 1939, they would have occupied all of Poland up to the border. That's why we came to an agreement with them. They had to agree. This is their initiative - the Non-Aggression Pact. We could not defend Poland because she did not want to deal with us. Well, since Poland doesn’t want it, and war is on the horizon, give us at least that part of Poland that, we believe, certainly belongs to the Soviet Union.

And Leningrad had to be defended. We did not pose the question to the Finns in the same way as to the Balts. We only talked about them giving us part of the territory near Leningrad. From Vyborg. They behaved very stubbornly.I had a lot of conversations with Ambassador Paasikivi - then he became president. He spoke Russian somewhat poorly, but it was understandable. He had a good library at home, he read Lenin. I understood that without an agreement with Russia they would not succeed. I felt that he wanted to meet us halfway, but there were many opponents.

— Finland was spared! They acted smartly in not annexing them. They would have a permanent wound. Not from Finland itself - this wound would give reason to have something against Soviet power…

People there are very stubborn, very persistent. A minority there would be very dangerous.
And now, little by little, you can strengthen your relationship. It was not possible to make it democratic, just like Austria.

Khrushchev gave Porkkala-Udd to the Finns. We would hardly give it away.
Of course, it was not worth spoiling relations with the Chinese over Port Arthur. And the Chinese kept within the limits and did not raise their border territorial issues. But Khrushchev pushed..."

Accession of Estonia to the USSR 1939 1940. Republic of Latvia

1939. The beginning of the war in Europe

Mutual Assistance Pacts and Treaty of Friendship and Borders

Ultimatums of the summer of 1940 and the removal of the Baltic governments

Entry of the Baltic states into the USSR

Consequences

Modern politics

Opinion of historians and political scientists

see also

Notes