Transport development. Transport system - what is it? Development of the Russian transport system

In accordance with the "Transport Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2030." The main task facing the state is to increase the competitiveness of the domestic economy through the implementation of high-quality transport services and the use of geographical location.

How can you get the desired result? Firstly, it is necessary to develop competition in transport, increase attention to social and environmental factors, use advanced technologies in the industry, and increase the economic security of the country. Such approaches will make it possible to influence internal competition between carriers and individual modes of transport, which will undoubtedly help improve the level of services provided. And this will have a beneficial effect on the country’s competitive position and will allow for an influx of transit cargo and a more effective use of Russia’s geo-economic and geopolitical position.

Secondly, it is necessary to achieve a balanced development of the country’s transport system in order to ensure the entry of regional economic entities into the international arena. The formation of a market for competitive transport services will make it possible to attract transit cargo flows to domestic routes.

Thirdly, integration into the global transport network will allow domestic producers to find new markets for goods and will speed up the delivery of goods to recipients, increasing the competitiveness of Russian products.

We should also not forget about reducing the harmful impact of transport on the environment. However, Russia has experience in this direction, since environmentally friendly modes of transport are traditional for our country, although they need to be modernized in accordance with the global level of development of technology and technology.

The main task of development railway industry is the development of high-speed lines (HSL), which currently in many countries compete even with air transport in a number of parameters. This and reducing the harmful impact on the environment; as is known, railway transport is one of the most environmentally friendly. This includes high speed delivery of goods and passengers. It is also worth mentioning the high level of HSR safety associated with the automation of traffic control and the separation of cargo and passenger flows into different lines. Unfortunately, Russia is twenty years behind the world leaders in the development of high-speed lines and has only now begun to master these technologies. But with proper funding, we can count on the widespread introduction of new generation formulations in the near future.

In accordance with the Transport Strategy of the Russian Federation, the following high-speed traffic directions have been developed and must be implemented by 2030: Moscow - Krasnoe (border with Belarus), Moscow - Suzemka (border with Ukraine), Moscow - Saratov, Ussuriysk - Khabarovsk, Moscow - Adler et al.

The next task is to increase the share of Russian railways in the international transport market and attract transit freight flows to the Russian railway network. This situation directly depends on the development of international transport corridors, the route of which passes through the territory of the Russian Federation, in particular, the pan-European corridor No. 9, the North-South corridor and the Trans-Siberian Railway.

Forecasting the growth in the volume of cargo transportation and the volume of transit cargo transportation by rail and road transport is illustrated in Fig. 9.3 and 9.4.

We should not forget about strengthening our competitive positions in relation to alternative routes of communication. This can be achieved by creating a competitive market for cargo terminal services and freight forwarding services, increasing the speed of cargo delivery.

Rice. 9.3.

Rice. 9.4.

To integrate Russia into the global air transportation industry, it is necessary to increase competitiveness and efficiency domestic aviation industry. Let's name the main indicators of competitiveness in this sector:

  • developed route network;
  • sustainable flight frequency;
  • state of the aircraft fleet;
  • ensuring flight safety;
  • developed ground infrastructure.

Only large airlines can meet the growing needs of the country's economy. The 159 operators currently operating on the Russian air market are not able to provide the listed conditions properly.

According to estimates by the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade and the Ministry of Transport, from 20 to 70 airlines should remain in Russia. Market participants also agree with these data: this is exactly what the industry would have come to naturally. But there is a more radical assessment: only 5-7 companies should remain in the sky. These are the carriers that can independently modernize their fleet and establish a route network.

The state assumes that one largest company should be considered national and be a representative of Russia abroad, another 2-3 can remain on long-haul lines, mainly within the country. The rest will get local transportation - they will only deliver cargo to large transshipment airports.

Let's name the main directions of industry development:

  • development of ground air transport infrastructure within the framework of existing federal target programs;
  • establishing production of highly reliable, cost-effective aircraft in the country;
  • implementation of measures to create an alternative fuel supply system at Russian airports and the availability of these services for airlines;
  • modernization of the air traffic management system, providing for the creation of enlarged control centers, improvement of the structure of the airspace of the Russian Federation, development and implementation of new air traffic control technologies, replacement of outdated systems and means of surveillance, navigation and communications;
  • increasing requirements for flight crew training for civil aviation;
  • improvement and implementation of new information technologies in the process of air transportation of passengers and cargo;
  • implementation of measures provided for by the State Program for Ensuring the Flight Safety of Civil Aviation Aircraft and the Aviation Safety Program of Civil Aviation of the Russian Federation;
  • development and implementation of a set of measures aimed at developing air transportation in the EurAsEC member countries. The forecast for air traffic growth is presented in Fig. 9.5.

Rice. 9.5.

Currently, almost all maritime transport transporting Russian foreign trade cargo is foreign registered, although their owners have Russian citizenship. This is primarily due to the desire of shipowners to register new ships in foreign registers of countries with preferential tax conditions. There are just over thirty countries in the world that provide a “flag of convenience”, including Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, and Panama.

Cargo transportation and cargo turnover of sea transport in international traffic are given in table. 9.7.

Table 9.7

Freight turnover of maritime transport in international traffic

Index

Cargo transported – total, million tons

Including:

between foreign ports

Freight turnover – total, billion tons km

Including in international traffic

Including:

between foreign ports

As a positive trend in recent years, it should be noted that the volume of cargo handled by domestic seaports has increased by 12% over the past five years and exceeded the maximum volume of cargo transshipment in the USSR in 1989. The prospect of increasing the cargo turnover of seaports is given in Table. 9.8.

Table 9.8

Prospects for increasing the volume of cargo turnover of Russian seaports, million tons

The development of maritime transport in Russia has a pronounced regional character. By 2015, it is planned to complete the modernization of ports in the Azov-Black Sea, Caspian and Baltic basins. In the future, the development of the Northern Sea Route and the ports of the Far Eastern basin will continue in connection with the extraction and export of natural resources.

In order to increase the capacity of domestic ports, it would be logical to create a “river-sea” chain. This requires the replacement of outdated equipment that is currently equipped in inland waterway ports and the creation of container terminals on the basis of river ports.

The industry also needs to modernize the Unified Deep-Sea System of the European part of the Russian Federation, create conditions for the delivery of goods to hard-to-reach areas of the Far North, and develop communications and navigation.

  • URL: gks.ru
  • Transport strategy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2030.

Chapter 1. Public passenger transport as a system in the social infrastructure of a metropolis

1.1 Genesis of social infrastructure as a scientific category

1.2. Institutional elements of transport infrastructure

1.3. The role of public passenger transport in the life support of the city

1.4. Quality management of passenger transport services in the 79th metropolis

Conclusions to Chapter 1

Chapter 2. Socio-economic problems of the development of passenger transport in Moscow

2.1. The influence of the transport situation on the movement of the population in the metropolis

2.2. Research of the passenger transportation market 121 2.3. Determination of criteria and method for segmenting consumers of transport services to the population 133 2.4. The main directions of development of the transport system in terms of improving the social infrastructure of Moscow

Conclusions to Chapter 2

Recommended list of dissertations

  • Organization of logistics flows in the system of urban passenger transportation 2000, Candidate of Economic Sciences Malchikova, Alexandra Germanovna

  • Organization of the functioning of the metro transport logistics system 2003, Candidate of Economic Sciences Vorobyova, Irina Borisovna

  • Assessment of the logistics system of transport support for low-mobility groups of the population 2012, Candidate of Economic Sciences Gaidaev, Vladislav Sergeevich

  • Development of models and methods for managing urban passenger transportation based on a logistics approach 2006, Candidate of Economic Sciences Kiryanov, Alexander Lvovich

  • Assessment of the current state and prospects for the development of urban passenger transport in Moscow 2004, candidate of economic sciences Glukhov, Alexey Konstantinovich

Introduction of the dissertation (part of the abstract) on the topic “Development of the passenger transport system as one of the conditions for improving the city’s social infrastructure: Based on materials from Moscow”

Relevance of the research topic. Transport is one of the most important elements of the social infrastructure of a metropolis. Urban passenger transport is one of the life support sectors of the city; both the work of the economic complex and the lifestyle of the population depend on its functioning. In recent years, the socio-economic crisis has affected the work of urban passenger transport (UPT), resulting in a decrease in funding for the industry, a decrease in the volume and quality of passenger transportation, and a significant reduction in rolling stock. All this has led to the fact that the development of urban transport significantly lags behind the population’s needs for movement, which causes socio-economic problems and negatively affects the work of other sectors of the city’s economy.

The greatest demand for transport movements is formed in cities with a population of more than 1 million people. Currently, 13 Russian cities have a population of more than 1 million people. Of those living in Russian cities, 107.3 million people. (73% of the total population of the country), about 60% regularly use urban passenger transport1.

It is in the largest cities that transport problems are especially acute. The functioning of passenger transport largely determines the socio-economic potential of the metropolis and, through the factor of transport accessibility, influences the formation of prices in the real estate market and helps to increase economic activity, therefore the formation of a city order system for transport services to the population is one of the priority tasks of city administrations.

Currently, all types of urban transport in Moscow transport about 8200.6 billion passengers per year, 89% of whom use the four main types of public transport

1 Transport in Russia: Statistical collection. - M., 2005. - P. 12. 3 metro - 29.6%, bus - 24%, tram - 20.8%), trolleybus -15.1%>). Passenger vehicles transport 10% of the total number of passengers. A small part of transportation (about 1%) is carried out by rail and river transport within the city1.

With the reduction in the volume of social transportation by surface urban transport, where passengers are given the right to free and discounted travel, commercial bus transportation is actively developing, satisfying the solvency of the population for transport services of lower quality. Currently, the city has 544 bus routes, 85 trolleybuses, 38 trams, which serve 7,700 units. Commercial carriers operate 871 routes, the total rolling stock fleet is 5.3 thousand units.

However, the problems of passenger transport are far from being effectively resolved. The reasons for the lag remain insurmountable. These include:

1. the gap between the development of the passenger transport system and the potential needs of the population for movement; deterioration in the quality of transport services (the occupancy of the rolling stock is growing, the intervals of ground transport are increasing to 15-20 minutes during peak hours, the time spent on work movements of 60% of the city's population reaches 2.5-3 hours instead of the standard 80-90 minutes per day , which causes significant transport fatigue);

2. inconsistency in the work of various modes of transport in providing passenger transportation;

3. backwardness of the material and technical base, excessive wear and tear of rolling stock, insufficient carrying and throughput capacity of passenger transport (currently, a significant part of the rolling stock has exhausted its service life: 47% of tram cars have a service life of more than 10 years; 40% of trolleybuses have a service life of 5

1 Transport in Russia: Statistical collection. - M., 2005. - P. 10. 4 to 10 years; 46% of subway cars have a service life of over 20 years; 57% of the bus fleet has a service life of over 6 years. Due to a lack of budget funding, the purchase of new rolling stock does not allow replacing the outdated fleet of vehicles);

4. subsidization of urban passenger transport (only 55% of current expenses are provided through the collection of travel fees), insufficient amounts of budget funding to cover losses from the transportation of preferential categories of passengers.

Thus, the problem as a whole and its individual aspects create instability in the social mood of the residents of the metropolis and reduce the rhythm of its life.

The transport system of a metropolis is one of the most important subsystems of social infrastructure, and the management of its development will fully determine the solution of Moscow’s strategic tasks. Balanced and harmonious development of the city is possible only with maximum efficiency in using its labor potential. To achieve sustainable well-being of urban social groups, rapid development of passenger transport is necessary.

The factors determining the requirements for passenger transport in Moscow are:

Social demands of the population;

Compensation for the territorial gap between the production area and residential areas of metropolitan areas;

Significant daily flow of labor and population from the suburbs; transit flow of passengers through the city;

Active housing construction on the periphery of the city;

Planned growth of the city's enterprises.

Conditions of transport services are also one of the indicators of quality of life that affects its duration. To solve Moscow's transport problems, the activities of government bodies, institutions and organizations in the development and implementation of transport policy are of particular importance. The current modern economic conditions require the most complete and high-quality provision of the population's needs for passenger transportation, aimed at achieving the stable functioning of the public transportation system, its safety and efficiency.

The degree of scientific development of the problem. The study of the city's social infrastructure has a long tradition. Already M. Weber, E. Durkheim, G. Simmel, considering the economic, social and psychological problems of urban growth, analyzed the demographic aspects and moral health of citizens1.

Domestic sociologists have made a significant contribution to the development of social infrastructure problems. Various aspects of the influence of material elements on the effective activities of different social groups of the population were analyzed in the works of scientists involved in the problems of social planning, management and forecasting: V.G. Afanasyev, I.V. Bestuzhev-Lada, M.V. Borshchevsky, A. A. Burtnieksa, N. A. Denisova, V. N. Kovalev, L. A. Kovalenko, L. N. Kogan, A. V. Kostinsky, N. V. Kuksanova, V. L. Kurakov, N. I. .Lapina, V.S.Lukina, G.I.Osadchey, Zh.T.Toshchenko, S.F.Frolova, O.V.Yuferova.2

At the same time, there are many unexplored aspects in the structuring of the city’s social infrastructure, among which it should be noted

1 Weber M. The growth of cities in the 19th century. - St. Petersburg, 1903; Simmel G. Big cities and spiritual life // Big cities, their social, political and economic significance. - St. Petersburg, 1905.

2 Afanasyev V.G. Society: consistency, cognition and management. - M., 1981; Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Predictive justification for social innovations. - M., 1993; Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Social forecasting: Course of lectures. - M., 2001; Burtnieks A.A. Social infrastructure planning. -Riga, 1983; Denisov N.A. Social infrastructure of Russia: state, problems and ways of development. - M., 1988; Kovalev V.N. Sociology of social sphere management. - M., 2003; Kovalenko L.A. Planning of social infrastructure of the region (based on materials from the Murmansk region). - L., 1989; Kostinsky A.V. Planning for the comprehensive development of social infrastructure in the regions. - Kyiv, 1989; Kuksanova N.V. Social infrastructure of Siberia. - Novosibirsk, 1993; Kurakov V.A. Resource provision for the social sphere. - M., 1999; Kurakov V.L. Strategic planning for the development of the social sphere: methodology and concept for increasing the effectiveness of its structural components. - St. Petersburg, 2002; Lapin N.I. Theory and practice of social planning - M., 1975; Lukin B.S. Regional planning of social infrastructure. - M., 1986; Osadchaya G.I. Sociology of the social sphere. - M., 1999; Osadchaya G.I. Social sphere of society: theory and methodology of sociological analysis. - M., 1996; Toshchenko Zh.T. Social infrastructure and development paths. - M.: Mysl, 1980; Yuferov O.V. Social infrastructure planning: a sociological approach. -M, 1990. weak management system in the organization of urban passenger transport.

The transport system as a way to overcome space and the most important type of social infrastructure of the city has not yet received proper coverage.

The economic essence of the transport system occupies a more voluminous place; its role in social reproduction is reflected in the works of K. Marx, W. Eucken, J. M. Keynes1. Recently, the problems of transport infrastructure have been embodied in specialized literature and periodicals, in the works of scientific practitioners (F.F. Rybakov, O.S. Belokrylova, etc.), where priority is given to technical aspects.

The study of the spatial aspect of social systems has been the subject of attention of some domestic and foreign researchers. The observation of the connection between economics, history and geographical space can be found among a variety of scientists of the 19th - 20th centuries. in a wide range from Friedrich List (“autarky of large spaces”) to Fernand Braudel (“world-economies”) and Immanuel Wallerstein (“world-system approach”)3. A significant contribution to the study of these issues was made by Russian sociologists and economists of the past - M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky, V.I. Lenin, N.D. Kondratyev4, modern Russian researchers - A.A. Illarionov, V.A. Osipov, Yu.M. Osipov et al.5; outstanding foreign scientists - M. Weber,

1 Marx K. Capital // Marx K., Engels F. Soch. 2nd ed. T.23-25; Oyken V. Fundamentals of national economics.-M.: Economics, 1996; Keynes J.M. General theory of employment, interest and money // Anthology of economic classics. T. 2.- M., 1993.

2Rybakov F.F. North-West of Russia: problems of socio-economic development//Economic science: problems of theory and methodology. St. Petersburg, 2002; Belokrylova O.S. Theory of transition economy. Rostov-on-Don; "Phoenix", 2002.

3 List F. Das nationale System der politiscen Okoromie - Bruges.1968; Braudel F Material civilization, economics and capitalism. XV - XIII centuries. In 3 T. - M.: Progress, 1982-1992; Vaiperstein I. The end of the familiar world: Sociology of the XXI century. - M.: Logos, 2003.

4 Lenin V.I. Development of capitalism in Russia / Collection. Op. v.3; aka Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism // Poly. Collection Op. v. 16; Kondratyev N.D. Selected works M.: Economics, 1993; Tugan-Baranovsky M.I. Periodic industrial crises. History of English crises. General theory of crises. - M, 1923.

5 Osipov Yu.M. The time of economic philosophy. M.: Economy, 2003; Osipov Yu.M. Economic Theory.-M., 1998.

F. Hayek, R. Coase and others1. Their works reflected methodological problems of spatial development of socio-economic systems, individual issues of their structural organization in relation to the conditions of market and other ways of organizing economic life.

Some problems of the development of urban spatial systems were considered in the works of V.A. Chulanova, O.V. Bondarenko and others.

In Russian science, the problems of the city and urbanization began to be considered at the beginning of the 20th century. So, N.P. Antsiferov proposed an integrated approach to understanding the city as a single social organism3. Issues of urban planning and development were dealt with by J1.A. Velikhov, E.O. Cabo, N.A. Milyutin, V. Mikheev, M.A. Okhitovich, S.T. Strumilin, D.S. Samoilov and others. In domestic sociological science, the most actively developed problems of overcoming differences between city and countryside, comprehensive planning of economic and social development of cities (N.A. Aitov, N.N. Baykov, A.G. Lazarev, S.I. Semin , Zh.T.Toshchenko, O.I.Shkaratan, etc.). The most promising and necessary for the development of urban sociology seems to be the direction of an integrated and systematic approach to the study of the process of urbanization and city problems (N.A. Aitov, A.S. Akhlezer, A.V. Dmitriev, L.A. Zelenov, V.M. Zuev, F.S. Faizullin, O.N. Yanitsky, etc.). The study of social problems is devoted to works that reveal the conditions and factors of urban lifestyle, characteristics of the level of satisfaction of needs and interests, changes in the daily activities of citizens (M. Bokiy, L. Shapiro, Y. Kirillov; T. M. Karakhanova, A. A. Neshchadin , N.I. Gorin, V.D. Patrushev, V.V. Khmelev)4.

1 Weber M. Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism. - Ivano-Frankivsk: East View, 2002; Hayek F. Cognition, competition, freedom. St. Petersburg: Pneuma, 1999; Hayek F. Pernicious arrogance. - M.: News, 1992.

2 Chulanov V.A., Bondarenko O.V. and others. Sociology and ecology of cities and urban planning. - Rostov n/D.: Pegasus Publishing House, 1997; Chulanov V.A., Kamynin I.I. and others. Problems of modern society (lectures on sociology). - Rostov n/d.: publishing house RGTTU, 1996;

3 See: Antsiferov N.P. Ways to study the city as a social organism. Experience of an integrated approach, - L., 1926.

4 Bokiy M., Shapiro L., Kirillov Y. Surveys in the city and for the city - Obninsk, 2002; Dmitriev A.V. USSR

USA: social development in cities (Experience of comparative analysis). - L., 1981; Green J1.A. Sociology of the city. - M., 2000; Lifestyle of townspeople in objective and subjective indicators / Responsible. ed.

T.M. Karakhanova. - M., 2002; A. Neshchadin, N. Gorin The city phenomenon: socio-economic analysis. 8

The city is a social unit of society that covers all stages of human life1. It is the city, taken as a whole, that forms the material basis for personal development. If a person spends a certain time in production and only at working age - on average from 18 to 60 years, then the city serves him all his life - from the maternity hospital to the cemetery2.

Integrated and systematic approaches have gained great popularity in domestic sociology, based on the opportunity they provide for the widest coverage and in-depth knowledge of the essence of social phenomena. However, the declaration of these approaches does not guarantee their presence in the study. This deficiency was contained in many works on the study of the city, its social planning, image, and life of the urban population. Some of them did not take into account the objective conditions for the functioning of both the city and its social infrastructure. The main attention was paid to quantitative indicators of urban development, which form the basis for shaping the lifestyle of citizens. At the present stage of development, there is a noticeable tendency towards revealing the role of the “human” factor. In particular, within the framework of the concepts of social planning, there is talk of moving from normative planning to “need-prognostic” planning, when the construction of social infrastructure facilities will be planned not on the basis of abstract norms, but on the direct needs of the urban population, determined by socio-territorial and cultural and historical conditions.

Some concepts within urban sociology refer to terminology directly related to lifestyle: “environmental quality”, “standard of living”, “lifestyle”.

M., 2001; Patrushev V.D. The life of a city dweller - M., 2001; Patrushev V., Karakhanova T., Kushnareva O. Time of residents of Moscow and the Moscow region // SOCIS. - 1992. - No. 6; Fayzulin F. Sociological problems of the city. - Saratov, 1981; Yanitsky O. Urbanization and social contradictions of capitalism. - M., 1975; Khmelev V.V. The true guidelines of the social institution of service in the conditions of Russian society. - M., 1999.

1 See: Toshchenko Zh.T. Social infrastructure: essence and development paths, M., 1980.-P.65.

2 See: Aitov N.A. Problems of planning the social development of cities, - M., 1971.-P.35. 9

Thus, at the intersection of two directions in sociological science - urban sociology and lifestyle sociology - an environment has been formed that is conducive to solving issues of interdependence of the city’s social infrastructure and the lifestyle of citizens.

However, the problem of the relationship between the needs of citizens and the state of the city’s social infrastructure remains open. The study requires the disclosure of mutual connections between such phenomena as the lifestyle of the urban population and the state of the city’s social infrastructure.

In the 90s of the 20th century, based on the interaction of economics and political science, geopolitics arose - a direction of social sciences, the subject of which includes various aspects that combine into a single complex issues of history, economic geography, modern world economy, conflictology, theory of control systems (A. Dugin , A.I. Neklessa, etc.),1 which, one way or another, also affect the problems of transport infrastructure. Works on the problems of globalization also belong to this class of problems: the transition to the post-industrial era (D. Bell, J. Galbraith, V. Inozemtsev, M.L. Sastels, JI. Typoy, etc.), economic and social aspects of globalization (T Faminsky, A. l

Fedotov, A. Shanin, G. Martin, A. Neklessa, V. Obolensky, etc.).

The spatio-temporal positions of social actors, as playing a significant role and influencing the results of their activities, were proposed to be placed at the center of sociological analysis by the American sociologist E. Giddens. This offer is in

1 Dugin A. Fundamentals of geopolitics. Geopolitical future of Russia. Think in Space. - M.: “ARKTOGEYA-center”, 2000; Neklessa A.I. Global Community: Cartography of the Postmodern World. -M., 2002.

2 Bell D. The Coming Post-Industrial Society. Experience in social forecasting. - M.: Academia, 1999; Castells M. Information era: economics, society and culture. - M.: GU VES, 2000; Thurow L. The Future of Capitalism. How today's economic forces shape tomorrow's world. - Novosibirsk, 1999; Inozemtsev V.L. Outside the economic society. M.: “Academia” - “Science”, 1988; Faminsky T. Economic globalization: basis, components, contradictions, challenges for Russia //REZh.-2000.- No. 10; Fedotov A.G. Global studies: the beginnings of the science of the modern world. - M., 2002; Shanin A.S. Localization as a product of globalization // Social and humanitarian knowledge. - 2003. - No. 3; Martin G.P., Schumann X. Western globalization: an attack on prosperity and democracy. - M.: Publishing House "ALYTINA", 2001; Neklessa A.I. Fourth Rome. Global thinking and strategic planning in the last third of the 20th century // Russian Strategic Studies, T. M., 2002; Obolensky V. Globalization of the world economy and Russia // World Economy and International Relations. - 2001. - No. 12. sociology seems innovative and can be applied in the analysis of the social nature and characteristics of the transport system1. Due to insufficient knowledge of this problem, its scientific and practical significance, it is of significant research interest.

The above provisions determined the choice of the topic of the dissertation research, and also determined its purpose and objectives.

The goal is to study and analyze the state and prospects for the development of the passenger transport system as the most important element of the city’s social infrastructure; development of recommendations for improving management aimed at meeting the needs of the population for transport services.

Conduct an analysis and generalization of the main modern approaches to the study of the social infrastructure of the city, highlight the specifics of the sociological approach to the study of urban infrastructure;

Analyze the role of public passenger transport in the life support of the city;

Analyze the state and prospects for the development of services in the transport services market for the population;

Analyze the significance of consumer characteristics of transport services for passengers;

Develop criteria for market segmentation and segmentation analysis of transport services according to selected criteria;

Research trends in the development of the transport system in the metropolis;

1 Giddens A. The Class structure of the advanced Societies. L., 1973; GiddensA. New rules of sociological method.L.1976; Giddens A. Central problems social theory. - L., 1979; Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, 1984; Giddens A. Sociology. Cambridge, 1989.

The goal is to study and analyze the state and prospects for the development of the passenger transport system as the most important element of the city’s social infrastructure in modern conditions; development of recommendations for improving management aimed at meeting the needs of the population for transport services.

Conduct an analysis and generalization of the main approaches to the study of the social infrastructure of the city, highlight the specifics of the sociological approach to the study of urban infrastructure;

Analyze the state, problems and prospects for the development of the market for transport services to the population;

Identify the importance of consumer characteristics of transport services for passengers; summarize and clarify market segmentation criteria and segmentation analysis of transport services according to selected criteria;

To develop a multifactorial model of consumers’ choice of services of different modes of transport.

The object of the study is the urban passenger transport system as the most important element of the social infrastructure of the metropolis.

The subject of the study is the development of the city's passenger transport system based on studying the level of population satisfaction with its services and the process of segmentation of the transport market in Moscow.

The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is the works of domestic and foreign scientists on the problems of general, economic sociology, sociology of management and sociology of the city, and also served as concepts, theories and approaches that allow us to study social processes in the city:

Theory of social management and sociology of management (V.G.

Afanasyev, Yu.I. Averin, N.M. Baykov, G.I. Gribanova, V.N. Ivanov, V.D. Patrushev, V.A. Sologub, Zh.T. Toshchenko and others);

Integrated sociological approach (G.S. Batygin, Yu.E. Volkov, )f E.N. Ozhiganov, M.N. Rubkevich and others).

Empirical basis of the study.

The analysis of the passenger transport system was carried out on the basis of empirical data, which can be divided into four groups.

The main group includes materials from sociological studies at the international, all-Union and municipal levels, conducted in the 80-90s. XX century, as well as at the beginning of the XXI century. The most significant of them are the following:

1 gr. an international study devoted to issues ® of transport organization and quality of services. The measurements were carried out in

1998,1999,2000,2002 (Florence) (N=6 people, express survey). I

2 gr. secondary analysis of empirical data from a number of comparable sociological studies:

Sentsova K.A. - “Management of passenger transportation in railway transport”, Moscow 2003, (N=1560 people; survey);

Vasilenko E.A. - “Providing socially significant services to the city population”, Moscow 2005, (N=3010 people, survey); ^ Rotov M.S. “Management of regional passenger road transportation using the example of the Moscow region)”, Moscow 2004, (N=3010 people, survey);

3 gr. sociological studies to study the dependence of the population's lifestyle on the state of transport services were conducted with the participation of the author in 2003-2006 in Moscow. The study sample is multi-stage. General population - population of Moscow, 10383.0 million people1. Sample population: 1640 ground transport passengers, 1711 metro passengers, 1422 pas. electric train, 443 pas. personal transport. The primary data were subjected to formalized computer processing separately for each district of the city and were presented in the form of linear dependence tables. Correlations and their reliability were determined using the Pearson coefficient. Generalization of the results by district and their extrapolation to the city was made on the basis of a qualitative analysis of the obtained indicators;

4 gr. In addition, the study used international federal, regional and local documents, medium-term and long-term program documents of the Government of the Russian Federation: “Main directions for the formation and development of international transport corridors on the territory of Russia”, (2005); Transport strategy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2020; Strategy for the development of transport of the Russian Federation for the period until 2010; medium-term and long-term forecasts of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, (2005).

Research methods: a) theoretical - structural and functional analysis; comparative method, a systematic approach involving interdisciplinary analysis; content analysis of official statistics, archival materials of previously conducted studies by the State Unitary Enterprise Research and Design Institute of the General Plan of Moscow, reports; b) empirical - selective, survey method (questionnaire “Quality of services provided by Mosgortrans”, “Level of customer satisfaction with OGT” and focused interviewing of a group of experts “Priorities of competitive selection for the provision of transport services”; express surveys: “Public transport: quality, prices, benefits", "Benefits for travel on public transport",

2 Agabekyan R.L. Mathematical methods in sociology. - Rostov-on-Don, 2005. - P.145.

Traffic jams"), observation, methodology for assessing the reliability of UPT services, secondary analysis of empirical data from all-Russian studies "Determination of metro capacity and metro travel speed"; “Structure of time spent on one-way labor movements” (1980, 2000); content analysis of the document “On the implementation of the provisions of the Federal Law of August 22, 2004 No. 122-FZ regarding transport accessibility to preferential categories of citizens in 2005 and January-February 2006.”

The reliability and validity of the research results are confirmed by a combination of theoretical principles with an analysis of official statistics and the results of sociological research. The reliability of scientific statements, conclusions, and practical recommendations is based on the representativeness of sociological and statistical information and the logic of constructing evidence-based conclusions.

The reliability of materials is determined by the use of modern methods of sociological research, the comparability of methods for collecting empirical information, as well as the correct use of methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis when processing data, both from our own research and from research conducted by other authors.

The theoretical significance of the dissertation research lies in the formation and development of a separate direction of research within the framework of the sociology of management, sociology of the city, the substantiation of an integrated sociological approach, the development of the corresponding conceptual apparatus, which generally determines the degree of increment of sociological knowledge. The dissertation can be used in the development of promising sections of management sociology and urban sociology. Generalization of theoretical and empirical material makes it possible to study issues of the social infrastructure of a metropolis from a broader sociological perspective, corresponding to the tasks of bridging the gap between management practice and its scientific understanding. The dissertation introduced empirical

15 data from the sociological study “Socio-economic problems of the development of passenger transport in Moscow in 2003-2006.”

Practical significance of the study. The practical significance of the dissertation work lies in the fact that the theoretical generalizations made by the author, the developed multifactor model and methodological approaches are aimed at increasing the efficiency of managing flow processes in the urban passenger transport system. The development of high-speed and high-speed passenger transportation will help increase business activity and transport mobility of the Moscow population.

The implementation of recommendations for improving the management of urban passenger transport, developed in the dissertation, will help improve the level of transport services to the population and increase the efficiency of the transportation process through the introduction of contractual relations and competitive distribution of orders for servicing the UPT route network.

The dissertation materials can be used in the preparation of courses: “Sociology of Management”, “Sociology of the City”, “Technologies of Social Work”, “State Municipal Administration” in higher and secondary educational institutions that train sociologists, economists, and engineers.

The scientific novelty of the work lies in the following: the place and role of public transport in the social infrastructure as an important factor in shaping the lifestyle of the population is determined;

The specifics of the interaction between lifestyle and transport services in the city are revealed through an analysis of the needs of the urban population;

16 criteria for segmentation of the passenger transportation market and target segment groups of consumers of transport services;

A multifactorial model of consumers’ choice of services of different modes of transport has been developed;

The current state of the Moscow transport system and its untapped resources are analyzed;

Recommendations have been developed for the long-term development of the transport system in order to meet the social needs of the urban population, increase the number and diversity of its facilities; providing the population with sufficient information about transport services; ensuring their availability and improving the quality of service.

Provisions for defense:

1. The social essence of man and production relations determine the need for information exchange and direct contacts of people in various spheres of their activity, which is directly related to transport movements. Transport in the city plays an important role; it ensures the ability of the city to function as an integral system with its administrative, economic, social and other functions. As the city's population increases, people's demands for urban transport are continuously growing.

2. Within the framework of the spatio-temporal extent of social relations, when society is considered as a complex internally structured system, in which each element, including the transport system, can be considered as a subsystem that has connections and intersections with other subsystems, institutional and sociostructural characteristics of each of the subsystems, can be considered in the context of spatio-temporal facets - internal connections and various levels of interdependence. They can be contradictory or symbiotic, differentiating or integrating, but they must have an impact on the results of activities in society.

3. In the development of social infrastructure, one must proceed from the fact that the driving force for the successful development of a metropolis is not only the presence of a developed transport system, but also a favorable local institutional environment, which becomes a powerful factor in stimulating the business and social activity of the urban population.

4. Criteria for segmentation of the passenger transportation market and selection of target segment groups of consumers of transport services.

5. The transport demand of the population is an integral part of the system of human needs and should be studied in conjunction with them.

Approbation of work and implementation of results. Approbation of the dissertation provisions was carried out at the international scientific and practical conference “Lifestyle of various population groups in difficult life situations (Moscow, 2005, 2006), during 2003-2006. at seminars of the Department of Sociology and Social Work of Moscow State University, in the author’s reports at scientific conferences and seminars held at the Moscow State University of the “Science to Service” service (Moscow, 2004, 2005);

The research materials are used in the educational processes of the Moscow State University of Service and the Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (2005-2006).

Structure of the dissertation. The work consists of an introduction, two chapters, a conclusion, a list of references and applications.

Similar dissertations in the specialty “Sociology of Management”, 22.00.08 code VAK

  • Modernization of the passenger transportation system in the Moscow railway junction: organizational and economic aspect 2011, Candidate of Economic Sciences Murashov, Valentin Aleksandrovich

  • Organizational and economic basis for the formation of a competitive environment in the implementation of the municipal order for urban passenger bus transportation 2004, Candidate of Economic Sciences Churilov, Andrey Grigorievich

  • Organizational and economic foundations of managing urban passenger transport: the example of Magadan 2007, Candidate of Economic Sciences Romanova, Natalya Aleksandrovna

  • Features of the formation and development of the regional market for urban passenger road transport services 2009, Candidate of Economic Sciences Zakiullina, Elena Alikovna

  • Regulating the quality of public service by bus transport in the region 2013, Candidate of Economic Sciences Martynov, Denis Aleksandrovich

List of references for dissertation research Candidate of Sociological Sciences Aksenova, Elena Sergeevna, 2006

1. Regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation on the organization of transport services for the population of municipalities

2. Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

3. State standard of the Russian Federation “Services of passenger road transport” (GOST R 51825-2001).

4. Law of the Russian Federation dated July 6, 1991 No. 1550-1 “On local self-government in the Russian Federation.”

5. Federal Law of March 22, 1991 No. 948-1 “On competition and restriction of monopolistic activities in commodity markets.”

6. Federal Law of June 10, 1993 No. 5151-1 “On Certification of Products and Services.”

7. Federal Law of October 6, 2003 No. 131-F3 “On the general principles of organizing local self-government in the Russian Federation”

8. Federal Law of 01/09/1996 No. 2-FZ “On introducing amendments and additions to the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Protection of Consumer Rights” and the RSFSR Code of Administrative Offenses.”

9. Federal Law of September 10, 1997 No. 126-FZ “On the financial foundations of local self-government in the Russian Federation.”

10. Federal Law of October 6, 2003 No. 131-F3 “On the general principles of organizing local self-government in the Russian Federation” (comes into force on January 1, 2006).

11. Order of the Minister of Transport of the Russian Federation dated June 30, 2000 No. 68 “On the introduction of travel documentation for individual entrepreneurs carrying out transportation activities in road transport.”

12. Decree of the Moscow Government No. 852-PP dated December 7, 2004 “On improving the work on adapting the infrastructure of Moscow for the needs of people with disabilities and other categories of citizens with limited mobility.”

13. Abbas H.A. Methodology for maximizing the profit of a transport enterprise during inflation or credit growth //Business in the financial and credit sphere: Materials of scientific and practical conferences of students and young scientists. Rostov-on-Don, 1998.

14. Abysheva Yu.Yu. Problems of forming the image of the city: social and managerial aspect: Author's abstract. dis.c.s.s. N. Novgorod, 2005.

15. Avanesov B.S. Tests in sociological research / Ed. G.V. Osipov. - M.: Nauka, 1982. - 199 p.

16. Ageeva E.Yu. City as a sociocultural formation: Monograph. - N. Novgorod, 2004.

17. Aitov N.A. Problems of planning social development of cities. -M., 1971.-47 p.

18. Akimova T.V. Investment systems for passenger road transport in Russia in modern conditions: Dis. . Ph.D. econ. Sciences - M., 2003.

19. Aksenov I.Ya. Unified transport system. M.: Higher School, 1991.383 p.

20. Alexander K.E. High-speed rail transport in urban planning /K. E. Alexander, N.A. Rudnev. M.: Stroyizdat, 1985. - 138 p.

21. Altynbaev R.Z. Social-infrastructural complex as a factor in improving the lifestyle of a young city. Diss. Ph.D. social sciences Kazan, 1994. - 140 p.

22. Altynbaev R.Z. Social-infrastructural complex as a factor in improving the lifestyle of a young city. Diss. Ph.D. social sciences Kazan, 1994. - 140 p.

23. Anufriev E.A. Socialist way of life (methodological and methodological issues): Monograph. - M.: Higher School, 1980.- 183 p.

24. Antsiferov N.P. Ways to study the city as a social organism: Experience of an integrated approach. - JL, 1926.

25. Harutyunyan J1.A. Socialist way of life: methodological problems of sociological study. / Ed. V.V. Stolyarov. - Yerevan: Yerevan University Publishing House, 1985.

26. Babosov E.M. Sociology of management. Tutorial. - M.: TetraSystems, 2000. - 288 p.

27. Batygin G.S. Lectures on the methodology of sociological research. - M.: Aspect Press, 1995. - 286 p.

28. Bedyuk L. Unified control system for ground passenger transport // Automobile transport. 1993. No. 11-12.

29. Belokrylova O.S. Mechanism for commercialization of the production of socially significant services of urban public transport / Responsible. ed. N. P. Ketova. Rostov-on-Don, 2004.

30. Biryukov V.V. Fundamentals of economic theory: Textbook. allowance / SibADI. Omsk, 1995.- 4.2. Microeconomics. -138 pp.

31. Bliznyuk O.V. Dynamics of the social structure of a modern large Russian city: Author's abstract. dis.c.s.s. Saratov, 2005.

32. Large economic dictionary / Ed. B. Borisova. M., 2000.

33. Borovik E.N. Trends in the development of social connections in large and major cities; Review. - M., 1988. - 28 p. (Problems of big cities: Review information,: MGTSNTI; Issue 30).

34. Brun M. National index of customer satisfaction: construction and use // Problems of management theory and practice. 1999. - No. 4. - P.63-68.

35. Buga P.G. Organization of pedestrian traffic in cities. M.: Higher School, 1980. - 232 p. 51. Buneev V.M. Passenger transport

36. Novosibirsk: Problems of increasing efficiency and development. -Novosibirsk: NGAVT, 1999.

37. Time budget of the urban population / Ed. B.T. Kolpakova, V.D. Patrusheva M.: Nauka, 1971.

38. Vaksman S.A. Problems of development and organization of functioning of transport systems of cities // Socio-economic problems of development of transport systems of cities and zones of their influence. - Ekaterinburg, 2002.- P. 10-15.

39. Vasilenko E. A. Mechanism for commercialization of providing socially significant services to the city population. M., 2005.

40. Vasiliev A. Passenger transport requires an integrated approach. //Automobile transport. 1996. No. 4.

41. Vetrov G.Yu. Indicators of socio-economic development of municipalities. M., 2001.

42. Voronov Yu.P. Methods of collecting information in sociological research. - M.: Statistics, 1974. - 157 p.

43. Ganin A.V. Highways as an infrastructure of a market economy: Theory and practice of development: Dis. . Ph.D. econ. Sci. -Orel, 2000. 166 p.

44. Gatvinsky A.N. Social sphere: forecasts and prospects (using the example of the Saratov region). Saratov, 2001.

45. Geydt A.A. Mechanism and system of strategic planning for the development of road transport infrastructure. St. Petersburg, 2004.

46. ​​Gerami V. D. Methodology for forming a system of urban passenger public transport. M., 2001.

47. Gerasimenko V. Modern economy and public goods // Russian Economic Journal. 1999. No. 9-10.

48. Glukhov A.K. Moscow passenger transport as an object of systemic research: (historical experience, ideology, tools): Monograph. -M.: VISMA, 2005.

49. Glukhov V.V. Organization of urban passenger transport in St. Petersburg: Textbook. allowance. -SPb.: SPbSPU Publishing House, 2002.

50. Golts G.A. Transport and accommodation. M.: Nauka, 1981. - 248 p.

51. Goncharuk A.P. Quality management of transport services in the region based on information technologies: Monograph. - Khabarovsk: Publishing House DVGUPS, 2005.

52. Gorfinkel S.I. Urban environment and public resources: Socio-economic interaction in market conditions. PhD thesis - Saratov, 2005.

53. State report “On the state of road safety in the Russian Federation” // Russian newspaper. 2003. September 11.

54. State and infrastructure sectors in a modern market economy. M., 2001.

55. Grinberg R.S. Theory and methodology of research on social problems: Monograph. M.: Nauka, 2005.

56. Gubenko A.V. Problems of development of passenger transport in the region. -Khabarovsk, 2000.

57. Gudkov V.A. Interaction of modes of transport: Textbook. manual - Volgograd, 1994. -104 p.

58. Dazhin S.O., Sharypov N., Moskii D. On the system of subsidies for passenger transportation // Automobile transport. 1996. No. 4. -P.19-21.

59. Dekind J. European social policy: work and public dialogue are at the center of the discussion // International Journal of Public Transport. 1999. - No. 6. - P. 13 - 18.

60. Denisov N.A. Social infrastructure of Russia: state, problems, ways of development. M., 1988.

61. Deruzhinsky G.V. Transport service and logistics: Textbook. Novorossiysk, 2001.

62. Dmitriev E. Passenger transportation in the USA // Automobile transport. 2002. No. 11.

63. Drobyshevskaya T.V. Fundamentals of urban policy: Monograph. -Donetsk, 2005.

64. Dudnik T. Rostov authorities began to fight traffic jams // City N. 2003. No. 04 (510). February 29-4.

65. Dulina N.V. Living space of a large city in the perception of its residents: methodology and methods of sociological analysis, Volgograd, 2004.

66. Embulaev V.N. Scientific and methodological foundations of managing the transport system of a large city: Monograph. Vladivostok, 2004.

67. Emelyanovich V., Moiseenko V., Zakharova N. Intelligent transport systems // Connect. World of communication. 1999. No. 4.

68. Efremov I.S. and etc. Theory of urban passenger transportation. M.: Higher School, 1980. - 535 p.

69. Zhivoglyadova JI.B. Theory of conflict of transport and pedestrian flows: Monograph. Rostov na/D, 2005.

70. Ilyukhina JI.V. Methodological foundations for the formation of market relations in the transport sector: Dis. . Ph.D. econ. Sciences: Krasnoyarsk, 2005.

71. Istomina O.A. Sea crews: experience of socio-psychological study, - Vladivostok: Marine. state University, 2005.

72. Kazakov Yu.N, Movchan B.S. Development, social: infrastructure of economic regions // Sociological studies. - 1995. -№5.

73. Kallagov M.V. Social infrastructure of a modern Russian city: state and development prospects: Using the example of Vladikavkaz: Dis. Ph.D. sociol. Sci. M., 2004. - 170 p.

74. Karbanovich I.I. Saving automobile fuel: experience and problems. M.: Transport, 1992.-145 p.

75. Kizim A.A. Transport and logistics: organization and planning of services: Monograph. Krasnodar, 2002.

76. Kizim A.A., Batykov I.V., Belousov A.V. Socio-economic aspect of the development of the regional transport and logistics system: Monograph. Krasnodar, 2004.

77. Kirzner Yu.S. On the basics of the theory of urban passenger transport. //Socio-economic problems of development of transport systems of cities and areas of their influence. - Ekaterinburg, 2001. P. 16-22.

78. Kovalev V.N. Sociology of social sphere management: textbook. M., 2003. .

79. Kovalenko JT.A. Planning of the social infrastructure of the region (based on materials from the Murmansk region): Abstract of Ph.D. L., 1989.

80. Kolesnichenko Yu. V. Social infrastructure in the regional life support system of the rural and fishing population of the Northern region: on the example of the Taimyr (Dolgano-Nenets) Autonomous Okrug: Dis. Ph.D. econ. Sciences St. Petersburg, 2005 -201 p.

81. Kondratov V.P. Development of social infrastructure as a factor in improving the quality of life of the urban population: Author's abstract. dis. Ph.D. Kazan, 2004.

82. Konteev V.V. Formation of a strategy for the development of the service sector of the largest city. Ekaterinburg, 2006.

83. Kopchuk N.V. Assessment of the level of development of the social sphere of municipalities (using the example of the Leningrad region). -SPb., 2004.

84. Kosintseva Yu.F. Innovations in the social sphere and problems of innovation: textbook. Stavropol, 2004.

85. Kostinsky A.V. Plan for the comprehensive development of social infrastructure in the regions: Abstract of Candidate of Economic Sciences - Kyiv, 1989.

86. Kostko N.A. Forecast-normative model of social infrastructure of the city of Tyumen: Author's abstract. PhD thesis Tyumen, 1995.

87. Kravchenko A.I., Tyurina I.O. Sociology of management: fundamental course: Textbook.- M.: Academic project; Trixta, 2004.-1136 p.

88. Kravchenko E.A. Fundamentals of quality management of transport services to the population: Textbook. allowance. Krasnodar: KubSTU, 2004.

89. Krysin N.I. Managing the development of a single-industry city: Problems, experience, trends: Author's abstract. dis.c.s.s. -M., 2005.

90. Kuksanova N.V. Social infrastructure of Siberia. -Novosibirsk, 1993.

91. Kurakov B.JI. Resource provision for the social sphere. M., 1999.

92. Kurakov B.JI. Strategic planning for the development of the social sphere: methodology and concept for increasing the effectiveness of structural components. St. Petersburg, 2002.

93. Kurakov B.JI. Social sphere: state and prospects. M., 2003.

94. Lazarev A.G. Fundamentals of urban planning: Textbook. -Rostov-on-Don, 2005.

95. Lobanov E.M. Transport planning of cities. M., 1990. - 240 s.

96. Lola A.M. Fundamentals of urban studies and city theory: Monograph. -M., 2005.

97. Lomanov P.N. Social sphere in market conditions. M., 2004.

98. Mayorov B. Vologda experience in organizing the management of city and regional passenger transportation // Automobile transport. 1996. No. 3.

99. Malchikova A.G. Organization of logistics flows in the system of urban passenger transportation: Author's abstract. dis. .ph.d.e.s. St. Petersburg, 2000.

100. Marchenko V. Effective planning of transportation by public transport // Automobile transport. 1997. No. 3.

102. Mirotin L.B. Transport logistics / L.B.Mirotin, V.I. Nikolin, Y.E. Tashbaev. - M. - Omsk, 1994. 236 p.

103. Mirotin L.B., Tashbaev Y.E., Kasenov A.G. Logistics: consumer service: Textbook. M., 2002. - 190 p.

104. Mirotin L.B. Logistics: public passenger transport. M.: Exam, 2003.

105. Naklonov D.N. An innovative approach to the development of the social sphere. St. Petersburg, 2002.

106. Scientific foundations of regional socio-economic monitoring / Ed. L.V.Ivanovsky, V.E.Rokhchina:.- St. Petersburg, 1998.

107. Neshchadin A., Gorin N. The phenomenon of the city: socio-economic analysis. - M., 2001.

108. On reforming urban passenger transport // Automobile transport. 2003. No. 3.

109. Lifestyle of the population of a large city: Experience of comprehensive social research / Ed. A.S. Pashkova. L., 1988.

110. Orlovsky S.A. Problems of decision making with fuzzy initial information M.: Nauka, 1981. - 208 p.

111. Osadchaya G.I. Sociology of the social sphere: Textbook. -M, 1999.

112. The main objectives of the development of the transport complex for 2000 and for the future until 2005 // www.mintrans.ru.

113. Main indicators of transport activity in Russia: Statistical collection M., 2004.

114. Fundamentals of applied sociology. Volume 1 - 2 /Ed. M.K. Gorshkov and F.E. Sheregi. - M., 1995. - 200 euros; 192 p.

115. Estimated indicators of the quality of service to the population by passenger road transport, 2004.

116. Pavlenok P.D. Sociology: Selected works 1991-2003 - M.: Izdatel'sko Torgov. Corporation and Dashkov and Co., 2003.-584p.

117. Pavlenok P.D. Sociology: Textbook. - M.: Publishing and book trading center. "Marketing", 2002.-1036 p.

118. Pavlova E.N. Ecology of transport / E.N. Pavlova, Yu.V. Buralev. -M.: Transport 1998. -232 p.

119. Patrushev V.D. Life of a city dweller (1965-1998). M., 2001.

120. Penshin N.V. Improving state regulation of motor transport activities in the region: Dis. Ph.D. econ. Sciences: Voronezh, 2005

121. Plotinsky Yu.M. Mathematical modeling of the dynamics of social processes. M., 1992.

122. Plotinsky Yu.M. Theoretical and empirical models of social processes. M., 1998.

123. Subprogram “Road Safety” // www.mintrans.ru.

124. Polozov V.R. Social development: trends in modern Russian society: Monograph. St. Petersburg,

125. Legal basis for organizing transport services for the urban population. M.: Foundation "Institute of Urban Economics", 2000.

126. Prelovskaya A.V. Development of the market for urban passenger transport services in a large city. Irkutsk, 2005.

127. Preston J. View from Great Britain: requirements for public services // International Journal of Public Transport. 2001. -№1. -P.6-8.

128. Problems of development of urban underground transport infrastructure / Umnov V.A., Kharchenko A.V. M., 2004.

129. Pchelkina V.V. Social infrastructure of the village in the concept of human resource renewal: Monograph. Cheboksary, 2005.

130. Radchenko I.S. Organization of the functioning of passenger transport in the city infrastructure. Khabarovsk, 2005.

131. Reforming urban passenger transport. M., 2002.

132. Reform of some sectors of the social sphere of Russia. M.: IET, 1999.

133. Rogozin D.M. Cognitive analysis of a survey instrument. M., 2002.

134. Rodionov A. Yu. Legal principles of organizing transport services for the urban population. M.: Institute of Urban Economics Foundation, 2000.

136. Rodionov. A.Yu. Organization of transport services for the urban population. M.: Institute of Urban Economics Foundation, 2001.

137. Rotov M.S. Analysis and modern management of regional passenger road transportation (using the example of the Moscow region): Author's abstract. PhD in Economics -M., 2004.

138. Rudakova N.V. Social development of large Russian cities: Author's abstract. dis.c.s.s. Irkutsk, 2006.

139. Samoilov D.S. Urban transport. M.: Stroyizdat, 1983.

140. Sanin I.I. Management of the social sphere in the region: Monograph. M., 2003.

141. Safronov E.A. Comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of urban passenger transport systems: Review. M., 1990.-21s.

142. Safronov E.A. Methods for the rational development of urban passenger transport systems / E.A. Safronov, P.B. Heifetz; MGTSNTI.- M., 1991.- Issue 2. 29 p.

143. Safronov E.A. Scientific and methodological foundations for the development of urban passenger transport systems: Author's abstract. dis. application for academic Doctor of Engineering degree Sciences /NIIKTP. - Moscow, 1993. 44 p.

144. Safronov E.A. Optimization of urban passenger transport systems: Accounting manual. Omsk, 1985.- 87 p.

145. Safronov E.A. Social assessment of urban transport systems //Modern project management: Sat. materials of the International Congress. M.: Alan, 1995.- pp. 688 - 690.

146. Safronov E.A. Socio-economic problems of the development of passenger transport in large cities: Textbook. allowance. Ompi. - Omsk, 1990. 86 p.

147. Safronov E.A. Transport systems of cities: Textbook. manual for universities. Omsk, 1996. - 237 p.

148. Segedinov A.A. Problems of economics of urban infrastructure development Stroyizdat, 1987. 216 p.

149. Celine B.C. Problems of organizing transport services for the city population in market economic conditions: Monograph.-Krasnodar: Kub. state technol. University, 2002.

150. Semchugova E.Yu. Operational assessment of the quality of services in the management of urban passenger transport: Author's abstract. .dis. Ph.D. -Khabarovsk, 2003.

151. Sentsova K.A. Development of a marketing management system for passenger transportation in railway transport: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D., - M., 2003.

152. Service in transport: a textbook for university students / Ed. V.M. Nikolashina. M, 2004. - 272 p.

153. Sigaev A.V. Design of the street and road network. M.: Stroyizdat, 1979.

154. Silyanov V.V. Theory of traffic flows in road design and traffic management. M.: Stroyizdat, 1977. - 294 p.

155. Simpson B. Planning for the development of cities and public transport in Great Britain, France and Germany. M.: Transport, 1990. - 96 p.

156. Smelser N. Sociology: Transl. from English - M.: Phoenix, 1994. - 688 p.

157. Smirnov A.V. Conditions for the formation of an international transport complex in the Balkans/A.V. Smirnov, E.A. Safronsv // Collection of reports of the International Conference MOTOAUTO 99. Plovdiv, 13-15 October, 1999.

158. Sokolov A.V. Formation of road service infrastructure in Russia: Author's abstract. dis. Ph.D. M., 2004.

159. Sociological encyclopedia in 2 volumes / Hand. scientific project G.Yu.Semigin M.: Mysl, 2003.

160. Sociology of transport: Research methods: Textbook. -method, complex for universities providing training, retraining and advanced training of transport personnel. -road complex /S. A. Smirnov, I. V. Fedorov, M. N. Vrazhnova and others - M., 1997. - 167 p.

161. Sparmann F., Kellermann P. Public transport: organization and financing in Europe // International Journal of Public Transport. 2001. - No. 5. - pp. 16-19.

162. Stavnichiy Yu.A. Transport systems of cities. - M.: Stroyizdat 1990. - 224 p.

163. Stenbrink P. Optimization of transport networks / Transl. from English /Ed. V. N. Livshits.- M.: Transport, 1981.- 320 p.

164. Strategy for the development of transport of the Russian Federation for the period until 2010 (Draft program). M., 2005.

165. Tarkhov S.A. City passenger transport of Moscow: Krat. ist. essay for the 125th anniversary of the emergence of Moscow, 1997.

166. Trends and prospects for the development of social infrastructure. -M., 1989.

167. Theoretical foundations for improving the quality of service to the population by passenger road transport. M., 2004.

168. Territorial comprehensive scheme for the development of transport in Moscow. M.: NIIiPI General Plan of Moscow, 1997. - 94 p.

169. Toshchenko Zh.T. Social infrastructure: essence and ways of development. M., 1980.

170. Toshchenko Zh.T. Sociology of labor: experience of a new reading. M., 2005.

171. Transport in Russia. 2002: Statistic collection. M., 2003.

172. Transport in Russia. 2005: Statistical collection. M., 2006.

173. Transport of Moscow - 2005: Statistical collection. M., 2006.

174. Transport logistics: Textbook / Ed. L.B. Mirotina. - M., 2002.

175. Transport strategy of Russia: Materials of a scientific and practical conference. Novosibirsk, 2003.

176. Trotskovsky A.Ya. Social-territorial structure of the region: structure and main trends of transformation. -Novosibirsk, 1997.

177. Usichenko N.G. Organizational and economic basis for regulating the urban passenger transport system. St. Petersburg, 2000.

178. Usichenko N.G. Economics and organization of urban passenger transport: Monograph. St. Petersburg, 2001.

179. Ustyantseva N.V. Socio-spatial structures of a large city: urban environment, social strata: Author's abstract. dis. .k.s.n. -Saratov, 1998.

180. Federal target program “Modernization of the transport system of Russia (2002-2010)” // www.mintrans.ru.

181. Federal target program “Improving road safety in Russia” for 2000-2003. M., 1998. - 59 p.

182. Federal target program “Improving road safety in 2006-2012”. - M., 2006.

183. Fishelson M.S. Transport planning of cities. M.: Higher School, 1985.-239 p.

184. Fomin I.A. A city in a system of populated areas. Kyiv: Budivelnik, 1986. - 111 p.

185. Frolov K.V. Formation of indicators and quality standards for urban bus transportation: Dis. Ph.D. econ. Sciences: M., 2005.

186. Hill N., Brierley J. How to measure customer satisfaction? - M., 2005. 2 I. Hefter G. Prestige and London transport // International Journal of Public Transport. 2001. - No. 2. - pp. 14-17.

187. Cherepanov V.A. Transport in urban planning: Textbook. allowance. -M: Stroyizdat, 1981. - 214 p.

188. Chernyshov M.A., Novikov O.A. Megacity infrastructure: Logistics approach /RU. Rostov-on-Don, 1995.

189. Chernyaev A.S. Social foundations of transport communications: Author's abstract. dis. Ph.D. Novocherkassk, 2004.

190. Shabanov A.V. Regional logistics systems of public transport: methodology of formation and management mechanisms. Rostov-on-Don, 2001.

191. Shalenko V.N. Sociological research program. - M.: Publishing house Mosk. University, 1987. - 64 p.

192. Shevelev V.N. Sociology of management. Textbook Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, 2004. - 352 p.

193. Sheremetova T.G. Forecasting the development of the regional transport system: institutional aspect: Using the example of the Krasnoyarsk Territory: Author's abstract. dis. Ph.D. econ. Sciences: Novosibirsk, 2004.

194. Sheshtokas V.V. City and transport. M.: Stroyizdat, 1984.-139 p.

195. Shkaratan O.I. State social policy and behavior strategies of the middle strata. M., 2005.

196. Shlapentokh V.E. Problems of reliability of statistical information in sociological research. - M.: Statistics, 1973.- 141 p.

197. Shlapentokh V.E. Problems of representativeness of sociological information (random and non-random samples in sociology). - M.: Statistics, 1976. - 196 p.

198. Shuisky A. Project management in the development and implementation of federal target programs for the development of the Russian transport system // Modern project management: Collection of materials. Int. congr.

199. M.: Alan, 1995.-S. 691-693.

200. Shulepov V.I. Social infrastructure: theory and methodological aspects of assessment: Monograph. Yoshkar-Ola, 2005.

201. Encyclopedic sociological dictionary / Ed. G.V. Osipova. - M., ISPI RAS, 1995. - 939 p.

202. Yuferov O.B. Planning of social infrastructure: a sociological approach. M., 1990.

203. Yadov V.A. Strategy of sociological research: Methodology, program, methods. - M., 2005. - 330 p.

204. Yakushkin I.M. Passenger transportation on subways. -M. Transport, 1982.- 175 p.

205. Yakshin A.M. Graphic-analytical method in urban planning research and design A.M. Yakshin, T.M. Govorenkova et al.-M, 1979.

206. Yakshin A.M. Prospects for the development of a network of urban highways. M.: Stroyizdat, 1975. - 111 p.

207. Yatsukovich V.I., Dukarevich G.V., Roshchin A.I. Organization of passenger transportation by buses: Textbook. - M.: MADI, 1988.-48p.

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for informational purposes only and were obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). Therefore, they may contain errors associated with imperfect recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

Modern living conditions dictate the need for rapid development of the global transport system. The economy and social sphere of any state directly depend on the rational organization of transport systems, including both passenger and cargo transportation.

It is also necessary to note the personal dependence of each person on transport. The transport system, one way or another, is involved in our daily activities. Not only the mood of the population and the efficiency of work, but sometimes health and even human life depend on the degree of its organization (good roads, absence of traffic jams, accident-free traffic).

Terminology

The transport system is an interconnected association of vehicles, equipment, components of the transport infrastructure and transportation subjects (including control elements), as well as workers employed in this industry. The goal of any transport system is to organize and implement efficient transportation of both goods and passengers.

The components of the transport system are the transport network, complex, products, infrastructure, rolling stock and other technical structures associated with the production, repair and operation of vehicles, as well as various methods and systems for organizing the transportation process. In addition, the system includes organizations and enterprises that are engaged in activities aimed at improving and developing the transport system: industrial engineering, construction, fuel and energy systems, scientific and educational centers.

Infrastructure is a complex of material components of the transport system, fixedly fixed in space, which form a transport network.

Such a network is called a set of connections (segments of highways and railways, pipelines, waterways, etc.) and nodes (road junctions, terminals) that are used in the implementation of the movement of vehicles along networks determines the formation of traffic flows.

When designing networks, it is necessary to take into account the characteristics of the vehicles for which the infrastructure is being created, since its geometric and technical parameters depend on the dimensions, weight, power and some other parameters of the vehicle for which the network being developed is intended.

Ensuring the throughput of transport infrastructure that meets the requirements of passenger and cargo flows passing through them is an important task in the activities of transport complex specialists.

Control Features

Let's consider these systems as a control object. Control of the operation of transport systems is a complex that includes two subsystems: traffic flow management and vehicle management.

The traffic flow management system carries out activities to regulate the movement of transport through light signals (traffic lights), road markings and signs in accordance with a system of rules adopted at the state or international level.

The vehicle management system is specific to the technology of the specific vehicle and is usually an infrastructure component. The driver who directly performs the target tasks is considered a subject of this system. The subjects of the control system for the functioning of vehicles can also include dispatchers (for example, during passenger air or rail transportation).

Human participation in the process of managing the transport system allows us to define it as an organizational, or human-machine, system, and in addition, necessitates taking into account the human factor. The active component of the transport system is a multitude of people who have the ability to adapt to rapidly changing conditions, whose behavior is aimed at achieving their own goals. The presence of the human factor as an active element of the system is the reason for the formation of stable (stationary) operating modes of transport systems, since any external impact on an individual object is compensated by the decision of the active subject (in particular, the driver).

Objectives of the transport system

The main objectives include ensuring the mobility of the population, as well as meeting the economic requirements for transportation processes, which consist in the most efficient movement of goods. Therefore, determining the efficiency of a transport system is establishing a balance between diametrically opposed points: the needs of society and the receipt of economic benefits. An obvious example of the contradiction between the requirements of society and the economy is the public transport system: the passenger wants to save time and get to his destination in comfort, therefore, from his point of view, there should be as many vehicles on the route as possible, and they should travel as often as possible .

However, it is more profitable for the carrier to fully fill as few vehicles as possible in order to obtain maximum income, and the convenience and waiting time of the passenger fade into the background. In this case, a compromise is necessary - establishing a traffic interval that is not too long, as well as ensuring at least minimal comfort for passengers. It follows that for the effective organization and development of the transport system, one should study not only the theory of transport systems and technical sciences, but also economics, geography, sociology, psychology and urban planning sciences.

Global transport system

The transport infrastructures of all countries of the world are united at a higher level into a global system. The global transport network is distributed quite unevenly across continents and countries. Thus, the transport system of Europe (in particular Western), as well as North America, is characterized by the greatest density. The transport network differs most from Asia. The structure of the global transport system is dominated by road transport (86%).

The total length of the global transport network, which includes all modes of transport (except sea), exceeds 31 million km, of which approximately 25 million km are land routes (not counting air lines).

Railway transport

The length of the global railway network is approximately 1.2 million km. The length of Russian railway lines is only about 7% of this number, but they account for 35% of the world's freight traffic and approximately 18% of passenger traffic.

It is obvious that for many countries (including European ones), which have a developed transport system, railway transport is the leading one in terms of cargo transportation. Ukraine ranks first in the use of rail transport, where 75% of freight turnover is carried out by rail.

Automotive

Motor transport is used for 85% of the total volume of cargo transportation in Russia, as well as more than 50% of domestic passenger transportation. Road transport appears to be the main component of the transport system of many European countries.

The development of road transport depends on three key factors: population growth, intensive urbanization and an increase in the number of individual passenger cars. Researchers note that the most likely occurrence of problems with ensuring the capacity of transport infrastructure is in those countries and regions where intensive growth rates of all three of these criteria are observed.

Pipeline

The dependence of modern economies on oil and gas production is driving the rapid development of pipeline systems around the world. Thus, the length of the Russian pipeline system is 65 thousand km, and in the USA - more than 340 thousand km.

Air

The vast territory of Russia, as well as the low level of development of transport networks in some areas in the east and north of the country, contribute to the development of the system. The length of the Russian Federation's air lines is about 800 thousand kilometers, of which 200 thousand kilometers are international routes. Moscow is considered the largest Russian air hub. It carries more than fifteen million passengers every year.

Transport system of Russia

The communications listed above connect all regions of the country together, forming a unified transport system, which is an important condition for ensuring the territorial integrity of the state and the unity of its economic space. In addition, state infrastructure is part of the global transport system, being a means of integrating Russia into the global economic space.

Thanks to its favorable geographical location, Russia receives significant income from the provision of transport services, in particular the implementation of transit cargo transportation through its communications. The share of various elements and characteristics of the transport complex in such aggregate economic indicators as basic state production assets (about one third), gross domestic product (approximately 8%), investments received for the development of industries (more than 20%) and others, reflects the importance and the relevance of the development of the transport system in Russia.

What type of transport is most popular? In the transport system of the Russian Federation, these are cars. Our country's automobile fleet consists of more than 32 million cars and 5 million cargo units, as well as approximately 900 thousand buses.

Prerequisites for the formation of the transport system

The development of transport networks (water, land or air) depends on the following factors:

  • climate features;
  • geographical position;
  • the number and standard of living of the population in the region;
  • intensity of trade turnover;
  • population mobility;
  • the existence of natural communication routes (for example, a river network) and others.

The formation of a unified transport system in Russia is based on several prerequisites, the main ones being:

  • vast area;
  • high population (large population);
  • uneven demographic level in the Federal Districts;
  • intensity of industrial development by industry;
  • uneven distribution of deposits of raw materials and energy resources;
  • geographical location of production centers;
  • the amount of gross output in the state;
  • historically established system of communication routes.

Transport companies of Russia

As mentioned above, organizations whose activities are related to the production of transport or the provision of transport services are also part of the transport system. Let's look at what exactly such companies can do using the example of two organizations.

Transport Systems LLC is a limited liability company registered in Moscow that organizes cargo transportation on almost any type of transport: land, including rail, sea, air and even space. In addition, Transport Systems LLC additionally provides rental of cars and other vehicles, equipment, postal and courier services, cargo processing and storage. As you can see, the range of activities of the company is very wide.

Since 2015, the organization "RT Transport Systems" has been creating, implementing and maintaining a system for collecting fees for damage caused to federal roads by freight vehicles weighing more than 12 tons. The creation of a fee collection system involves the formation of a set of organizational measures, software and hardware, in particular video recording and video surveillance equipment, as well as satellite positioning devices, the operating principle of which is based on the use of GLONASS or GPS sensors. The Platon system will allow you to collect fees by identifying the vehicle and processing information about it, as well as calculating the distance traveled using GPS/GLONASS systems, and debiting funds from the account specified by the owner of the vehicle.

The development of Moscow's transport infrastructure is an important area of ​​modernization not only for the capital region, but for all of Russia. Historically, passenger and cargo flows throughout the country pass through Moscow. For example, the Moscow Ring Road is not so much a city highway as the only possible transit route through Moscow. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin noted that the main task is the effective integration of various modes of transport: further development of the road network and increasing their capacity, including the construction of new overpasses, and in the most difficult sections.

The government body responsible for the development of transport infrastructure is the Department of Transport and Development of Road Transport Infrastructure in Moscow.

Main problem, According to the Department of Transport, This is a significant excess of carrying capacity when traveling to the city center during morning rush hour.

As of 2011, according to the Department of Transportation, excess carrying capacity from 8 to 9 am was:

· Personal vehicles: 42%

· Metro: 21%

Suburban railway transport: 40%

· Ground transport: no excess of carrying capacity

In total, the excess carrying capacity of personal and public transport was 23%. Such an excess of the carrying capacity of the transport infrastructure during the morning rush hour leads to a significant decrease in the comfort of residents. At the same time, the load on ground public transport was 33% below carrying capacity, which opened up the possibility of its more active use to solve the city’s transport problems.

Three main directions for improving the transport situation:

1. Reduce the use of personal vehicles when traveling during morning rush hour by 33% by 2025. This meant that approximately 50 thousand motorists per hour would have to use public transport.

2. Expanding the carrying capacity of public transport (by 2025) by 41%.

3. Improving the level of public transport service. Reducing the average travel time on public transport by 25% by 2025 (from 67 to 50 minutes)

To improve the transport situation, a transport development program for 2012–2016 was developed.

Main objectives of the program:

· Reducing travel time on urban passenger transport during peak hours

· Increasing the carrying capacity of urban passenger transport

· Increasing the level of service and comfort of urban passenger transport, including for people with limited mobility

· Increasing the density of the road network and ensuring timely repairs and regulatory maintenance


· Creation of modern control and traffic control systems

· Construction and placement of pedestrian crossings, bringing them into compliance with established standards

There are 11 subprograms within the framework of the transport development program:

1. Metropolitan. Goals for 2016: a total of 406 km of lines; 38 new stations; 85% of the population is covered by the metro; more than 1000 new generation metro cars; completely updated navigation system.

2. Freight transport. The goal is to reduce the load on the road network from freight transport. The number of truck fleets operating in the city will decrease by 20%.

3. Ground urban passenger transport. Goals for 2016: average intervals during morning rush hour 5-7 minutes; high schedule accuracy; improving the quality of service; more than 70% of the rolling stock are new low-floor trolleybuses, buses, trams; 240 km of dedicated lanes.

4. Bus stations and transport hubs. By 2016, it is planned to complete work on all flat transport hubs and on most capital ones. The time for transfers between modes of transport at all Moscow transfer hubs will not exceed 10 minutes.

5. Intelligent transport system. The goal is to increase the efficiency of traffic flow management, increase the capacity of the road network, prevent traffic congestion, and reduce road accidents. The main effect is that by 2016 the entire territory of the city will be covered by an intelligent transport system.

6. Development of new types of transport. Goals: Reducing the time of arrival of special teams by air to places of emergency incidents, ensuring the possibility of flights for economic and commercial purposes; development of cycling as a means for business travel. Main effect: Introduction of about 80 km of bicycle paths; reducing the arrival time of rescue teams by 50%.

7. Creation of a single parking space. The goal is to organize regulated parking space to increase the capacity of the road network and limit the number of trips by private vehicle to the central part of the city. Main effect - By 2016, a complete absence of illegally parked cars in the city center is expected.

8. Highways and road network. Goals: increasing the capacity and connectivity of the road network; increasing the density of the road network; improving the quality of road repairs and maintenance. The main effect is that the length of the city's road network will increase by 8.5%.

9. Inland water transport. The goal is to increase the operating efficiency and increase the competitiveness of inland water transport enterprises located in the city of Moscow. The main effect is that the annual volume of cargo transportation by water transport will increase by 85%.

10. Rail transport. Goals for 2016: commissioning additional main tracks in 6 directions; increase in carrying capacity during rush hour by 50%; average interval 3-4 minutes (during rush hour on 5 main directions); 300 new carriages.

11. Pedestrian accessibility of infrastructure facilities. Goal - Creation of convenient, short pedestrian connections between urban infrastructure facilities (socio-cultural, household, shopping purposes). The main effect is the construction of 38 km of pedestrian paths, the improvement of the central part of the city.

DOI 10.21661/G-461617

A.A. Kolgin

MANAGEMENT OF TRANSPORT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT (BY THE EXAMPLE OF THE CITY OF MOSCOW)

Abstract: this article discusses the problem of organizing the transport system and government measures that can serve to build a rational transport system in the city.

Key words: transport, transport policy, systems approach, development management.

MANAGEMENT OF TRANSPORT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT (ON GAE EXAMPLE OF MOSCOW CITY)

Abstract: this article describes the problem of the organization of transport system and measures taken by the government. These measures can help to create a rational system of transport in the city.

Keywords: transport, transport policy, systemic approach, development management.

The rapid growth of cities and their populations is, one way or another, associated with problems and limitations. Any resident or guest of the Russian capital notes problems in the Moscow transport system. You don’t need to be a great scientist in the field of urbanism or a great city planner to understand that the transport collapses that happen in the city every day are the result of the wrong policies of the Moscow authorities.

One can, of course, speak about the irrational planning that spontaneously developed during the historical development of the city, and say that the reason for congestion in winter is a large amount of precipitation or the excitement before the holiday.

kami. You can throw up your hands and say that nothing can be done about traffic jams in Moscow. But it is impossible to deny the experience of megacities in the field of transport policy, which have managed to overcome the problems of planning that does not take into account a large number of road transport. Tokyo and Beijing, Munich and Berlin, Paris and London, New York, Vienna - this is not a complete list of cities that have successfully overcome their transport problems no matter what.

Many cities can cope with transport problems (Moscow is one of them) if you approach them wisely. One has only to turn to the works of great urbanists dealing with the problem of transport and pay attention to a reasonable systematic approach to managing the city’s transport system.

A systematic approach to solving transport problems is the implementation at the state (local) level of a complex integrated policy based on the synthesis of management systems for transport, urban planning, land use and traffic management, implemented through the relevant industry and legal frameworks. Only such a synthesis of management becomes a necessary condition for eliminating transport collapse in large cities.

One of the reasons for traffic congestion is ill-conceived urban planning policies of both public spaces and residential areas. as well as the transport network and infrastructure. Therefore, city governments should be more attentive to the construction of new areas that would initially provide a large demand for parking spaces among the population and road capacity, taking into account the growing needs of society; control over infill development, which should also meet the needs of the population.

Researchers of urban transport systems identify two radically different directions in the implementation of the city’s transport policy. Within the framework of the first - automobile-oriented direction - the question is raised about “radical reconstruction of cities, allowing to adapt urban space

2 www.interactive-plus.ru

Scientific Cooperation Center "Interactive plus"

to the unlimited use of private cars through the construction of extensive networks of expressways (freeways, autobahns) and adequate parking facilities. An alternative to this direction is the idea of ​​“livable cities” with an intermodal transport system, which is formed from the balanced and coordinated use of different types of public transport.

Note that when using a car-oriented direction, a fundamental restructuring of the urban environment will be required, which will create a significant burden on the city budget and lead to “car dependence” and dissatisfaction on the part of pedestrians. This is what happened in Detroit, Phoenix and Los Angeles (USA), where at one time a very extensive freeway system was built. The second approach puts public transport and pedestrian convenience at the forefront, implementing sustainable transport policies. By using the idea of ​​a “convenient city”, chronic congestion is prevented and damage to the urban environment is minimized.

Towards the formation of a balanced transport policy within the framework of the “convenient city” direction, two sets of policy measures should be used: promotion and counteraction.

The essence of facilitating, or encouraging, the use of public transport by ensuring the independence of the operation of public transport routes and lines from the level of load of the road network, as well as improving the quality of services provided. An example of encouraging the use of public transport is the construction of the metro and the organization of dedicated lanes for buses, city minibuses, laying tracks for the LRT (light metro in Germany) and BRT (bus rapid transit) systems.

Countermeasures, or disincentives for car travel, are implemented by limiting and paying for parking in the city center, introducing tolls for travel on certain sections of roads, and providing benefits

Center for Scientific Cooperation "Interactive Plus"

in public transport, the use of quotas for car purchases (Singapore) and other anti-automobile measures are unpopular among fairly large masses of the population, so their implementation is associated with inevitable opposition from public institutions and requires the government to exercise strict control aimed at long-term prospects.

Another problem of the transport system is the disintegration of various modes of transport within the boundaries of one city or agglomeration. It is expressed in the ill-conceived government policy in the use of suburban railway lines and intra-city public transport systems, the lack of convenient transport interchange hubs (TPU), uniform tariffs and transport cards.

As for the policy of the Moscow authorities in the field of transport, in recent years the city has taken the path of improvement; it is becoming more pedestrian-oriented. For example, exclusively pedestrian zones are being established in the city center, parking regimes are being introduced in the central districts of Moscow, and a unified transport card “Troika” has been introduced, with which you can pay for almost all types of transport.

It cannot be said that the process of improving the transport situation in the city is going smoothly and without hitches. Mistakes are made, for example, the process of obtaining a resident parking space is not fully streamlined, or interceptor parking lots have not yet been built everywhere near transport hubs or outer metro stations. But Moscow was not built right away, so there is still hope for improving the transport situation in the city. This may not happen in the next few years, but better late than never.

Bibliography

1. Vukan R. Vucik. Transport in cities convenient for living. - M., 2011.

2. Igor Pugachev. The problem of urban transport systems and possible solutions. Coordination Council for the Organization of Road Traffic [Electronic resource]. - Access mode:

4 www.interactive-plus.ru

Content available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (CC-BY 4.0)

Scientific Cooperation Center "Interactive plus"

http://www/ksodd/ru/bdd/publication/the_problem_of_transport_systems_of_cities_a nd_possible_solutions.php (access date: 04/07/2017).

Kolgin Alexander Andreevich - master's student of the department of "State and Municipal Administration" of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "State University of Management", Russia, Moscow.

Kolgin Aleksandr Andreevich - graduate student of the "State and Municipal Management" Department FSBEI of HE "State University of Management", Russia, Moscow.