1. For a person serving detention in a disciplinary military unit, forced labor or imprisonment, who has compensated for the damage (in whole or in part) caused by the crime, the court, taking into account his behavior during the entire period of serving the sentence, may replace the remaining unserved part of the sentence with a more lenient punishment. . In this case, the person may be fully or partially released from serving additional type punishments.

2. The unserved part of the sentence may be replaced by a more lenient punishment after the person sentenced to imprisonment has actually served for committing:

crimes of minor or moderate gravity - at least one third of the sentence;

serious crime - not less than half the sentence;

especially serious crime - at least two thirds of the sentence;

crimes against the sexual integrity of minors, as well as crimes provided for in Article 210 of this Code - at least three quarters of the sentence;

crimes against the sexual integrity of minors under fourteen years of age - no less than four-fifths of the sentence.

3. When replacing the unserved part of the sentence, the court may choose any milder type of punishment in accordance with the types of punishments specified in Article 44 of this Code, within the limits provided for by this Code for each type of punishment.

4. When considering a petition from a convicted person or a submission from the administration of an institution or body executing a sentence to replace the unserved part of his sentence with a milder form of punishment, the court takes into account the behavior of the convicted person, his attitude to study and work during the entire period of serving the sentence, the attitude of the convicted person to the committed act and that the convicted person partially or fully compensated for the damage caused or otherwise made amends for the harm caused as a result of the crime. In relation to a convicted person suffering from a disorder of sexual preference (pedophilia), which does not preclude sanity, and who, at the age of over eighteen years, has committed a crime against the sexual integrity of a minor under fourteen years of age, the court also takes into account the application of compulsory medical measures to the convicted person, his attitude towards treatment and results of forensic psychiatric examination.

Commentary on Article 80 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

1. Replacing the unserved part of the punishment with a more lenient type of punishment is among the optional and unconditional species exemption from punishment. The commented article can only apply to persons serving detention in a disciplinary military unit or imprisonment.

The decision on replacing the unserved part of imprisonment with a more lenient type of punishment falls within the competence of the judicial authorities at the location of the institution executing the punishment. In accordance with such issues, such issues are considered by the court on the proposal of the administration of the correctional institution or at the request of the convicted person.

2. The basis for replacing the unserved part of the sentence is the court’s conclusion that the convicted person has firmly taken the path of correction and that, in relation to his goals, the punishment can be achieved by applying a more lenient punishment. In this case, the court takes into account the behavior of the person during the period of serving the sentence, his attitude to study, work, the act committed and other data characterizing the personality of the convicted person.

3. The formal condition for the application of Art. 80 of the Criminal Code is the actual serving by the convicted person of a certain part of the assigned term of imprisonment (at least one third for crimes of minor or moderate gravity; half for a serious crime; two thirds for a particularly serious crime; three quarters for crimes against the sexual integrity of minors and crimes provided for Article 210 of the Criminal Code).

4. The unconditional nature of the analyzed type of exemption from punishment is expressed in the fact that the decision to apply Art. 80 of the Criminal Code is final and cannot be repealed. If a convicted person, in respect of whom imprisonment has been replaced by a more lenient punishment, commits a crime before the end of serving the new sentence, the unserved part of the more lenient punishment is added to the punishment imposed under the second sentence.

5. In accordance with Art. 80 restriction of freedom, detention in a disciplinary military unit or imprisonment can be replaced by one of the main types of punishment specified in Art. 44 of the Criminal Code. In doing so, one must take into account the limits provided by law for the chosen type of punishment, as well as restrictions on the circle of subjects to whom it can be assigned.

6. When deciding to replace the unserved part of restriction of freedom, detention in a disciplinary military unit or deprivation of liberty with a milder form of punishment, the court may fully or partially release the convicted person from serving the additional punishment assigned to him.

7. The application of the commented article does not exclude the possibility of conditionally early release of a person from serving a sentence that was replaced by imprisonment.

Do you think you are Russian? Were you born in the USSR and think that you are Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian? No. This is wrong.

Are you actually Russian, Ukrainian or Belarusian? But do you think that you are a Jew?

Game? Wrong word. The right word"imprinting".

The newborn associates himself with those facial features that he observes immediately after birth. This natural mechanism is characteristic of most living creatures with vision.

Newborns in the USSR saw their mother for a minimum of feeding time during the first few days, and most time we saw the faces of the maternity hospital staff. By a strange coincidence, they were (and still are) mostly Jewish. The technique is wild in its essence and effectiveness.

Throughout your childhood, you wondered why you lived surrounded by strangers. The rare Jews on your way could do whatever they wanted with you, because you were drawn to them, and pushed others away. Yes, even now they can.

You cannot fix this - imprinting is one-time and for life. It’s difficult to understand; the instinct took shape when you were still very far from being able to formulate it. From that moment, no words or details were preserved. Only facial features remained in the depths of memory. Those traits that you consider to be your own.

3 comments

System and observer

Let's define a system as an object whose existence is beyond doubt.

An observer of a system is an object that is not part of the system it observes, that is, it determines its existence through factors independent of the system.

The observer, from the point of view of the system, is a source of chaos - both control actions and the consequences of observational measurements that do not have a cause-and-effect relationship with the system.

An internal observer is an object potentially accessible to the system in relation to which inversion of observation and control channels is possible.

An external observer is an object, even potentially unattainable for the system, located beyond the system’s event horizon (spatial and temporal).

Hypothesis No. 1. All-seeing eye

Let's assume that our universe is a system and it has an external observer. Then observational measurements can occur, for example, with the help of “gravitational radiation” penetrating the universe from all sides from the outside. The cross section of the capture of “gravitational radiation” is proportional to the mass of the object, and the projection of the “shadow” from this capture onto another object is perceived as an attractive force. It will be proportional to the product of the masses of the objects and inversely proportional to the distance between them, which determines the density of the “shadow”.

The capture of “gravitational radiation” by an object increases its chaos and is perceived by us as the passage of time. An object opaque to “gravitational radiation”, the capture cross section of which is larger than its geometric size, looks like a black hole inside the universe.

Hypothesis No. 2. Inner Observer

It is possible that our universe is observing itself. For example, using pairs of quantum entangled particles separated in space as standards. Then the space between them is saturated with the probability of the existence of the process that generated these particles, reaching maximum density at the intersection of the trajectories of these particles. The existence of these particles also means that there is no capture cross section on the trajectories of objects that is large enough to absorb these particles. The remaining assumptions remain the same as for the first hypothesis, except:

Time flow

An outside observation of an object approaching the event horizon of a black hole, if the determining factor of time in the universe is an “external observer”, will slow down exactly twice - the shadow from the black hole will block exactly half possible trajectories"gravitational radiation". If the determining factor is “ internal observer", then the shadow will block the entire trajectory of interaction and the flow of time for an object falling into a black hole will completely stop for a view from the side.

It is also possible that these hypotheses can be combined in one proportion or another.