What should be in the work program. Methodological recommendations for drawing up a work program

About work programs of academic subjects

Department of State Policy in the Sphere of General Education of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia No. 08-1786 dated October 28, 2015.

Work programs of academic subjects and courses are a mandatory component of the content section of the main educational program of an educational organization (EOP OO).

Work programs of academic subjects, courses and courses of extracurricular activities are developed on the basis of the requirements for the results of mastering the PLO, taking into account the main areas of the programs included in the structure of the PLO, and must ensure the achievement of the planned results of mastering the PLO.

Work programs are compiled for: compulsory subjects of the curriculum; elective, optional courses; subject clubs, associations, sections of additional education; extracurricular activities.

The main elements of the work program of an academic subject, course: “Capka” Planned subject results for mastering a specific academic subject, course; The content of the academic subject, course, indicating the forms of organization of training sessions, the main types of educational activities; Calendar and thematic planning.

The main elements of the extracurricular activities course program: “Cap” Personal and meta-subject results of mastering the extracurricular activities course; The content of the course of extracurricular activities, indicating the forms of organization of training sessions, the main types of educational activities; Calendar and thematic planning.

The title page of the work program must contain: the name of the educational organization; the name of the course for which the program is written; indication of the parallel, class in which the course is being studied; level of mastery (basic, specialized); last name, first name, patronymic of the teacher who compiled the work program; program approval stamp; year of the program.

Municipal budgetary educational institution "Mukhanovskaya Secondary School" APPROVED by Director of MBOU "Mukhanovskaya Secondary School" _____________ O.V. Teterina order No. dated "" August 2016 Work program in the Russian language 3rd grade (basic level) Compiled by:_______________________________, teacher of the highest qualification category 2016 .

AGREED at the meeting of the ShMO of primary school teachers on August 2016. Protocol No. 1 Head of ShMO _________S.V.Pechenkina AGREED Deputy Director for Water Resources _____________N.S.Poputchikova "" August 2016

Planned subject results of mastering a specific academic subject, course (1-6 grades “the student will learn” and “the student will have the opportunity to learn”; 8-9 grades “the student must know, be able to”; Criteria for assessing the results obtained).

“Hat” This work program on technology for grade 3 meets the requirements of the federal state educational standard of primary general education and is developed on the basis of: The main educational program of primary general education MBOU "Mukhanovskaya Secondary School" Curriculum for the 2016-2017 academic year MBOU "Mukhanovskaya Secondary School" on the basis of which 1 hour per week is allocated to the Author's work program on technology for grades 1-4 Konysheva N.M. . Smolensk, Publishing house "Association XXΙ century", 2011 UMK "Harmony"

Contents of the academic subject, course, indicating the forms of organization of training sessions, main types of educational activities Contents of the academic subject Russian language. Literacy training. Contents of the subject Russian language. Literacy training. No. Section title Number of hours Forms of organization of training sessions. Main types of educational activities. 1 Introduction 5 Lesson. Isolating sentences from the speech stream. The word as an object of study, material for analysis. Meaning of the word. Distinguishing between words and sentences.

Calendar and thematic planning No. of lessons Name of sections and topics Planned deadlines for completing the topic Actual deadlines for completing the topic Section I. Personality and society (6 hours) 1 2 3 4 5 6 What makes a person a person? Man, society, nature Society as a form of human life Development of society How to become an individual Workshop 01.09 08.09 15.09 22.09 29.09 06.10 08.09 08.09

"Compilation of workers

programs in accordance with Federal State Educational Standards

and approved changes."

15.04.2016 1. “On the work programs of educational subjects” letter from the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated October 28, 2015. No. 08-1786 2. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation No. 1576 dated December 31, 2015 “On amendments to the Federal State Educational Standards of the NEO, approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated October 6, 2009. No. 373" 3. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation No. 1577 dated December 31, 2015 "On amendments to the Federal State Educational Standards of LLC, approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated December 17, 2010. No. 1897" “On the work programs of educational subjects” letter from the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated October 28, 2015. No. 08-1786 1. “... In order to reduce the administrative burden of teaching staff of public education, the Department has prepared changes to the Federal State Educational Standard in terms of requirements for work programs of academic subjects.” 2. “... original curricula of academic subjects, developed in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard and taking into account the approximate educational program of the corresponding level of education, can also be considered as working programs of academic subjects. The decision on the possibility of using them in the structure of the PLO is made at the PA level.”

3. “... changes have been prepared to the Procedure for the formation of the federal list of textbooks, ... It is assumed that the FPU will include textbooks that have a methodological manual for teachers, containing materials on methods of teaching, studying a subject or education; incl. an approximate work program for an academic subject, developed in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard..."

Mandatory elements of the work program of a separate academic subject, course Until 12/31/2015 From 01/01/2016 1) Explanatory note 2) General characteristics of the academic subject, course 3) Description of the place of the subject, course in the curriculum 4) Personal, meta-subject and subject results of mastering the academic subject , course 5) Content of an academic subject, course 6) Thematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities 7) Description of educational, methodological and material and technical support 8) Planned results of studying a separate subject, course 1) Planned results of mastering an academic subject, course 2) Contents of the academic subject, course 3) Thematic planning indicating the number of hours allocated for the development of each topic Mandatory elements of the work program of extracurricular activities courses Until 12/31/2015 (Federal State Educational Standards of NOO) From 01/01/2016 (Federal State Educational Standards of NOO and Federal State Educational Standards of LLC) 1) Explanatory note 2 ) General characteristics of the academic subject, course 3) Description of the place of the subject, course in the curriculum 4) Personal, meta-subject and subject results of mastering the academic subject, course 5) Content of the academic subject, course 6) Thematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities 7) Description educational - methodological and material - technical support 8) Planned results of studying a separate subject, course 1) Results of mastering a course of extracurricular activities. 2) Contents of the course of extracurricular activities, indicating the forms of organization and types of activities; 3) Thematic planning. How are the different components connected? Development of a work program, thematic planning, calendar and thematic planning Preparation for the lesson (lesson flow chart, target settings = planned results) Design (construction) of control and measuring materials (CMM), preparation for various assessment procedures

Work programs for academic subjects (courses) are drawn up for the entire level of education

(grades 1-4, grades 5-9), not per academic year

Each teacher draws up his own work program, taking into account his own specifics and the specifics of specific students.

Programs compiled by different teachers for parallel classes can (and should) differ!

I. Planned results of studying an academic subject, course

The graduate will learn

The graduate will have the opportunity to learn

The planned results of studying an academic subject or course completely repeat the subject part of the section “Planned results of mastering OOP LLC”.

However, since the Work Program is often used as a separate document, it is better to repeat this section here.

The basis for writing this section of the Work Program is the corresponding section in the “Approximate OOP LLC”, where the planned results are described by subject.

Here the column “The graduate will learn” is not changed by the teacher, while in the column “The graduate will have the opportunity to learn” there may be significant changes.

The basis of this section is the content “ Fundamental core» Standard

learning programs

Federal State Educational Standards NOO and Federal State Educational Standards LLC

The program does not in any way reflect the sequence of mastering the course topics

This section of the Work Program describes ONLY the semantic units of the training course by grade!

III. Thematic planning indicating the number of hours allocated to mastering each topic

Approximate lesson thematic planning

Similar thematic plans are created FOR ALL SUBJECTS within the framework of LESSON ACTIVITIES.

Calendar - thematic planning

Each teacher composes his own CTP, taking into account his own specifics and the specifics of specific students.

KTP structure (in accordance with Federal State Educational Standards)

Section topic

Lesson topic

PR (planned result from the section “The graduate will learn”) = content element code

Homework

Calendar and thematic planning

Intended for chronological arrangement of content units that were described in the previous section.

Calendar and thematic planning (CTP) is compiled by the teacher ONLY FOR HIMSELF! THIS IS A TEACHER'S WORKING TOOL!

Therefore, the CTP must contain those columns that the teacher needs for his work.

Therefore, different teachers may have different forms of planning (indicate the required columns in the Regulations)

Thus, the school Regulations on the work program of a teacher implementing the Federal State Educational Standards of NOO and Federal State Educational Standards of LLC stipulates that the teacher has:

Author's program on the subject (course).
Author's work program for the subject (course).
Own calendar and thematic planning containing CMMs or a link to them.

A work program is a tool with which the teacher determines the optimal and most effective content, forms, methods and techniques for organizing educational relations for a given class in accordance with the results determined by the Federal State Educational Standard. A work program is a tool with which the teacher determines the optimal and most effective content, forms, methods and techniques for organizing educational relations for a given class in accordance with the results determined by the Federal State Educational Standard. The subject RP can be uniform for all teachers working at the school or individual. It is the basis for creating a QTP.

exchange rate in accordance with Federal State Educational Standards

In accordance with the requirements of Federal State Educational Standards LLC(clause 18.2.2.):

The programs of individual academic subjects and courses must ensure the achievement of the planned results of mastering the basic educational program of basic general education.

Programs of individual academic subjects and courses are developed based on the requirements for the results of mastering the main educational program, taking into account the main areas of the programs included in the structure of the main educational program.

The programs of individual academic subjects and courses must contain:

1) an explanatory note, which specifies the general goals of basic general education, taking into account the specifics of the academic subject;

2) general characteristics of the academic subject, course;

3) description of the place of the academic subject, course in the curriculum;

4) personal, meta-subject and subject-specific results of mastering a specific academic subject or course;

6) thematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities;

7) description of educational, methodological and logistical support of the educational process;

8) planned results of studying an academic subject or course.

Structure of the work program (FSES LLC)

I . Explanatory note

- regulations and educational and methodological documents on the basis of which the work program was developed(Federal State Educational Standard, corresponding Approximate OOP, approximate program for an academic subject, author’s program);

- general goals of education, taking into account the specifics of the academic subject, course;

- the role of the training course, subject in students achieving the planned results of mastering the main educational program of the school(indicates the focus of the program on the formation of personal, meta-subject and subject-specific results in mastering a specific subject or course);

Justification for choosing the content of a part of the program in an academic subject, formed by participants in the educational process.

II . General characteristics of the academic subject, course

In this section, it is necessary to reveal the role and significance of the subject from the point of view of the goals of general education (based on the concept of the corresponding Federal State Educational Standard), and modern requirements for a graduate. Continuity in the study of this subject, course in primary and secondary schools is shown, emphasis is placed in the implementation of the connection between teaching in the subject and practice and with current problems of our time.

III . Description of the place of the academic subject, course in the curriculum.

The section indicates the number of hours allocated to this subject in accordance with the curriculum.

IV . Personal, meta-subject and subject-specific results of mastering a specific academic subject or course.

It is necessary to include in work programs not the generalized requirements for results formulated in the Federal State Educational Standards, but rather the formulation of results from the original programs of the developers of the teaching materials or an approximate educational program at the appropriate level of general education. This section reflects

personal, meta-subject and subject-specific results of mastering an academic subject, course, consistent with the previously set goals for mastering the work program.

V . Contents of the subject, course

The description of the content indicates the conceptual sections and topics of study of the subject necessary to implement the requirements of the standard.

If the sample or original program does not indicate the distribution of hours by sections and topics, but only the total number of hours, the teacher in the work program distributes the hours by sections and topics independently, focusing on the educational and methodological complexes used. The content of the academic subject, course includes:

Name of sections of the curriculum and characteristics of the main content lines,

List of laboratory and practical work, excursions,

Directions of students’ project activities,

Using reserve study time.

VI . Thematic planning with identification of the main types of educational activities (for the academic year)

A thematic planning option is presented in the appendix. The thematic planning form can repeat the author's with the necessary adjustments made by the teacher.

Thematic planning with the definition of the main types of student activities (at the level of educational activities): sections of the program; topics included in this section; main content by topic; characteristics of the main types of student activities (at the level of educational actions), universal educational actions mastered as part of the study of the topic.

Thematic planning, like the entire work program, is drawn up for one academic year

VII . Description logistical provisioneducational process (per level of study)

The section indicates:

Teaching aids: educational and laboratory equipment and devices, technical and electronic means of teaching and monitoring students' knowledge, educational and reference literature, digital educational resources, demonstration and handout didactic material;

The list of recommended educational and methodological literature must contain the educational and methodological complex (EMC) used by the teacher with the obligatory indication of the textbook, teaching aids for students, and also contain complete output data of the literature;

Additional literature for teachers and students;

List of data centers and digital electronic resources;

List of educational reference and information, monitoring and other computer programs used in the educational process; (a tabular version is possible.)

VIII . Planned results of studying an academic subject, course

(per training level)

Planned results of studying an academic subject, course

In the main educational program of the school’s basic general education, in the paragraph “Planned results of mastering the general education program”, the results at the end of training are given, i.e. for a basic school this is the end of the 9th grade. All wording in this paragraph, as in the work program, is written by year

For the basic level of results “graduate will learn”,

For increased levels of performance, “the graduate will have the opportunity to learn.”

A system for assessing planned results, expressed in forms and types of control, in the definition of control and measurement materials, in indicators of the level of student success (“good/excellent”, rating, portfolio, etc.); features of assessing an individual project and individual achievements of students.

Applications to the program

(per class)

Basic concepts of the course;

Project topics;

Topics of creative works;

KIMs

Description of the presentation by individual slides:

1 slide

Slide description:

“Drawing up work programs in accordance with the Federal State Educational Standards and approved changes.” Seminar 04/15/2016

2 slide

Slide description:

1. “On the work programs of educational subjects” letter from the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated October 28, 2015. No. 08-1786 2. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation No. 1576 dated December 31, 2015 “On amendments to the Federal State Educational Standards of NEO, approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated October 6, 2009. No. 373" 3. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation No. 1577 dated December 31, 2015 "On amendments to the Federal State Educational Standards of LLC, approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated December 17, 2010. No. 1897"

3 slide

Slide description:

“On work programs of educational subjects” letter from the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated October 28, 2015. No. 08-1786 1. “... In order to reduce the administrative burden of teaching staff of public education, the Department has prepared changes to the Federal State Educational Standard in terms of requirements for work programs of educational subjects.” 2. “... original curricula of academic subjects, developed in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard and taking into account the approximate educational program of the corresponding level of education, can also be considered as working programs of academic subjects. The decision on the possibility of their use in the structure of the educational program is made at the level of the public educational institution." educational subject or education; incl. an approximate work program for an academic subject, developed in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard..."

4 slide

Slide description:

5 slide

Slide description:

Mandatory elements of the work program of extracurricular activities courses Until 12/31/2015 (Federal State Educational Standards of NOO) From 01/01/2016 (Federal State Educational Standards of NOO and Federal State Educational Standards of LLC) 1) Explanatory note 2) General characteristics of the academic subject, course 3) Description of the place of the subject, course in the curriculum 4) Personal, meta-subject and subject results of mastering an academic subject, course 5) Content of an academic subject, course 6) Thematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities 7) Description of educational, methodological and logistical support 8) Planned results of studying a separate subject, course 1) Results of mastering a course of extracurricular activities. 2) Contents of the course of extracurricular activities, indicating the forms of organization and types of activities; 3) Thematic planning.

6 slide

Slide description:

How are the different components connected? Development of a work program, thematic planning, calendar and thematic planning Preparation for the lesson (lesson flow chart, target settings = planned results) Design (construction) of control and measuring materials (CMM), preparation for various assessment procedures

7 slide

Slide description:

Work programs for academic subjects (courses) are drawn up for the entire level of education (grades 1-4, grades 5-9), and not for the academic year. Each teacher draws up his own work program, taking into account his own specifics and the specifics of specific students. Programs compiled by different teachers for parallel classes can (and should) differ!

8 slide

Slide description:

I. Planned results of studying an academic subject, course The graduate will learn The graduate will have the opportunity to learn The planned results of studying an academic subject, course completely repeat the subject part of the section “Planned results of mastering OOP LLC”. However, since the Work Program is often used as a separate document, it is better to repeat this section here. The basis for writing this section of the Work Program is the corresponding section in the “Approximate OOP LLC”, where the planned results are described by subject. Here the column “The graduate will learn” is not changed by the teacher, while in the column “The graduate will have the opportunity to learn” there may be significant changes.

Slide 9

Slide description:

II. Content of the academic subject (course) The basis of this section is the content of the “Fundamental Core” of the Standard of the educational programs of the Federal State Educational Standard of NOO and Federal State Educational Standard of the LLC. The content is distributed into semantic blocks for each class separately. The program does not in any way reflect the sequence of mastering the course topics. This section of the Work Program describes ONLY the semantic units of the training course by grade!

10 slide

Slide description:

III. Thematic planning indicating the number of hours allocated to the development of each topic Approximate lesson-by-lesson thematic planning (in author's work programs for academic subjects) Similar thematic planning is created FOR ALL SUBJECTS within the framework of LESSON ACTIVITIES. Calendar - thematic planning Each teacher draws up his own CTP, taking into account his own specifics and the specifics of specific students. Structure of the CTP (in accordance with the Federal State Educational Standard) No. Section topic Lesson topic PR (planned result from the section “The graduate will learn”) = content element code Homework

(3)

Work programs are the main document for teachers of any educational institution for the 2019-2020 academic year, when compiling it it is necessary to take into account the new requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard and methodological recommendations developed for each subject of the variable and invariant components of the educational process.

Relatively recently, the teacher had practically no right to make any changes to the strictly established plan for studying the subject, because almost every lesson was scheduled in the recommended programs. New work programs offered to teachers in the 2019-2020 school year provide greater teacher freedom in scheduling and lesson development.

The work program is the main regulatory document regulating the content of the training course, the number of hours allocated to study the subject, the order and volume of topics, as well as the number of test papers.

In the process of reforming the education system at all levels, new standards were developed in 2015. Instead of the cumbersome 8 points, the document now contains only 3 components:

Contents of the training course.
Expected learning outcomes.
Approximate thematic planning.

In practice, all work programs for subjects for the 2019-2020 academic year are supplemented with an explanatory note, which describes in detail the features of the course, the regulatory documents according to which the program was drawn up, recommendations for teachers and other important aspects.

It is important to know that the teacher has the right not only to use recommended programs, but also to write his own, which will allow him to implement an individual strategy for achieving the desired result.

The essence of innovations for 2019-2020

Every teacher, whether a primary school teacher or a subject teacher, has the right to choose one of the options available today:

Use the recommended program, making your own adjustments to it.
Take one of the existing author's programs as a basis.
Work according to the author's program, adapting it to the characteristics of the educational institution.
Write your own program.

Unfortunately, teachers very rarely choose the fourth option, because when drawing up a program it is necessary not only to take into account all the new requirements for work programs in the 2019-2020 academic year, but also to go through the difficult path of getting it approved.

Innovations are designed to stimulate teachers to be creative. Which will be relevant in the coming academic year, namely:

reducing the amount of materials required to formally approve a new program;
the absence of bureaucratic boundaries, which will allow the teacher to fully realize his ideas and the needs of students;
integration of elements of extracurricular activities into the program.

In the process of developing lessons, teachers are recommended to use the capabilities of IT technologies as widely as possible, filling lessons with audio and video materials, and multimedia presentations. Along with lectures and practical exercises, use non-standard types of work in the classroom: conferences, round tables, discussions, excursions, meetings with interesting people, etc.

Program structure in 2019-2020

The development of new programs can be carried out by a teacher individually or as part of a creative group.

When writing work programs for individual subjects, the following is used as a support base:

Federal State Educational Standards standards;
the school's core educational program and curriculum;
an approximate program (author’s or recommended by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation);
recommended educational literature.

The program submitted for consideration must include the following structural parts:

Title page indicating the main details: data of the author (authors), name of the subject, name of the educational institution, etc.
The tasks that the teacher sets for himself and the expected results.
Elements of adaptation of the program for gifted and retarded students.
Approximate scheduling with recommendations.
Methods for assessing knowledge.

Integration of new programs into the educational process

If the document compiled takes into account the standards of the Federal State Educational Standard and new requirements for work programs, it will be approved for use in 2019-2020. This means that the teacher will be able to implement his individual teaching strategy, developed taking into account the specifics of the educational institution and the level of preparation of students.

Whether to develop proprietary programs or use ready-made options is a matter of choice for a specific teacher and school. Many gymnasiums and lyceums are proud that their students have the opportunity to study according to proprietary programs, which gives them certain advantages over students of regular schools. As a rule, individual educational trajectories are developed for specialized disciplines.

New bill on voluntary learning of national languages in Russia

New bill on voluntary study of national languages in Russia may be considered in the first reading at a State Duma meeting on June 19, said the head of the State Duma Committee on Education and Science Vyacheslav Nikonov at an extended meeting of the working group on this issue.

“The Committee on Education and Science is ready to consider the draft on June 15 in order to submit it for discussion in the first reading at the State Duma meeting on June 19,” TASS quotes the deputy. Nikonov also said that in addition to the bill itself, the lower house will adopt a resolution that will spell out amendments to the second reading, among them - creation of the Native Language Support Fund. In addition, after consideration in the first reading, the bill is planned to be sent to the regions so that they have the opportunity to familiarize themselves with its revised version and make their proposals.

Let us recall that this bill was introduced into the lower house in April of this year by a group of deputies from all factions. One of the reasons for its appearance was appeals from parents of schoolchildren from Tatarstan, where Russian and Tatar are the state languages and are taught equally to all students, regardless of nationality.

“The bill proposes to clarify that the teaching and learning of the state languages of the republics of the Russian Federation is carried out on a voluntary basis without prejudice to the teaching and learning of the state language of the Russian Federation,” the explanatory note says. It also states that the right to study the native language of the peoples of Russia is implemented within the capabilities of the education system and taking into account the needs of students and their parents.

“The proposed changes will help maintain a balance in the implementation of the constitutional right of citizens to freely choose the language of education and training, the possibility of studying the state languages of the republics provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation, and avoid ambiguous interpretation of the provisions of the legislation in law enforcement practice,” the authors of the bill believe.

Let us recall that back in the summer of 2017, Vladimir Putin said that it is unacceptable to force people to learn a language that is not their native language.

The bill proposes to clarify that the teaching of native languages of national republics is carried out on the basis of written statements from parents or legal representatives of students. If the student’s native language is Russian, then he should be able to focus on its in-depth study.

This bill has caused serious debate. During the regional week, State Duma deputies discussed it with the legislative authorities of the constituent entities of the Federation and collected their proposals. A number of parliaments of national republics made comments and objections. For example, some felt that learning their native languages would be optional. Although the authors of the bill obviously did not have this in mind.

It is noted that the school curriculum consists of a mandatory part and a variable part, formed by participants in educational relations. 20% of the time is allocated to the variable part in grades 1-4, 30% in grades 5-9, and 40% in high school. From the moment the curriculum is approved, all subjects included in it become mandatory for both teaching and learning. Subjects of the variable part do not have the status of electives (extracurricular). For electives, separate plans for extracurricular work are approved. According to the draft law, the languages of the national republics remain in the variable part of the educational program.

Nevertheless, to take into account the comments of regional parliaments, it was decided to form a working group, which included the authors of the bill, State Duma deputies representing national republics, the leadership of the State Duma Committee on Education and Science, the head of Rosobrnadzor, and representatives of the Ministry of Education.

What should be in the work program. Methodological recommendations for drawing up a work program

The essence of innovations for 2019-2020

Program structure in 2019-2020

Integration of new programs into the educational process

New bill on voluntary learning of national languages ​​in Russia

New bill on voluntary learning of national languages in Russia