Approximate schedule for implementation of work. Sample schedule for completing the final qualification work. Plan schedule for completing the final qualifying work.

Appendix D.1

(required)

Planned learning outcomes in OOP (bachelor's degree)

Result code
Professional competencies
P 1	Apply humanitarian and natural science knowledge in professional activities. Conduct theoretical and applied research in the field of modern management achievements in Russia and abroad under conditions of uncertainty using modern scientific methods
R 2	Apply professional knowledge in the field of organizational and management activities
R Z	Apply professional knowledge in the field of information and analytical activities
R 4	Apply professional knowledge in the field of entrepreneurial activity
R 5	Develop strategies for the development of the organization using strategic management tools; use methods for making strategic, tactical and operational decisions in managing the activities of organizations
R 6	Systematize and obtain the necessary data to analyze activities in the industry; assess the impact of the macroeconomic environment on the functioning of industry enterprises, analyze consumer behavior in different types of markets and the competitive environment of the industry. Develop a marketing strategy for organizations, plan and implement activities aimed at its implementation
R 7	Develop a financial strategy using basic financial management methods; assess the impact of investment decisions on the financial condition of the enterprise
R 8	Develop a personnel management strategy and implement activities aimed at its implementation. Apply modern personnel management technologies, procedures and methods of control and self-control, team building, basic theories of motivation, leadership and power
Universal competencies
R 9	Learn independently and continuously improve your skills throughout the entire period of professional activity.
R 10	Actively speak a foreign language at a level that allows you to develop documentation and present the results of professional activities.
R 11	Work effectively individually and in a team, demonstrate responsibility for work results and a willingness to follow the corporate culture of the organization.

Appendix D.2

(required)

Planned learning outcomes in OOP (master's degree)

Result code	Learning outcome (graduate must be ready)
General professional and professional competencies
P 1	Ability to apply theoretical knowledge related to the basic processes of managing the development of an organization, division, group (team) of employees, projects and networks; using corporate finance management methods, including modern approaches to the formation of a comprehensive enterprise development strategy, including under conditions of risk and uncertainty
R 2	The ability to perceive, process, analyze and critically evaluate the results obtained by domestic and foreign management researchers; identify and formulate current scientific problems in various areas of management; formulate the topics and program of scientific research, justify the relevance, theoretical and practical significance of the chosen topic of scientific research; conduct independent research in accordance with the developed program; present the results of the research in the form of a scientific report, article or report
R Z	Ability to analyze the behavior of economic agents and markets in a global environment; use methods of strategic analysis to manage an enterprise, corporate finance, organization, group; formulate and implement basic management technologies to solve strategic problems
R 4	The ability to develop training programs and methodological support for management disciplines, the ability to apply modern methods and techniques in the process of teaching management disciplines
General cultural competencies
R 5	The ability to understand the need and be able to independently study and improve qualifications throughout the entire period of professional activity, to develop one’s general cultural, creative and professional potential
R 6	The ability to work effectively and act in non-standard situations individually and lead a team, including an international one, on interdisciplinary topics, having the skills of language, public business and scientific communications, as well as bear social and ethical responsibility for decisions made, tolerantly perceiving social, ethical, confessional issues and cultural differences

Appendix E.1

(required)

Example of a title page for a bachelor's thesis

higher education

Institute_______

BACHELOR'S THESIS

CONSULTANTS:

Standard control

ALLOW FOR PROTECTION:

Head department	Full name	Academic degree, title	Signature	date

Tomsk - 2016

Appendix E.2

(required)

An example of the title page of a thesis

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

federal state autonomous educational institution

higher education

"NATIONAL RESEARCH

TOMSK POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY"

Institute______

Speciality

Department__________________________________________________________________________

GRADUATE WORK

CONSULTANTS:

Under the section “Social responsibility”

Standard control

ALLOW FOR PROTECTION:

Head department	Full name	Academic degree, title	Signature	date

Tomsk - 2016

Appendix E.3

(required)

Example of a title page for a master's thesis

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

federal state autonomous educational institution

higher education

"NATIONAL RESEARCH

TOMSK POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY"

Direction of training_______________________________________________________________

Department__________________________________________________________________________

MASTER'S DISSERTATION

CONSULTANTS:

Under the section “Social responsibility”

Standard control

ALLOW FOR PROTECTION:

Head department	Full name	Academic degree, title	Signature	date

Tomsk - 2016

Appendix G

(required)

Sample abstract for the thesis

ABSTRACT

The final qualifying work contains ____ pages, ____ drawings, ____ tables, _____ used sources, ____ applications.

Keywords: ________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

The object of the study is (are) ___________________________

_________________________________________________________________

The purpose of the work is ________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

During the research, _____________________________________ was carried out

_________________________________________________________________

As a result of the study_______________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

Main design, technological and technical-operational characteristics__________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

Degree of implementation: _____________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

Application area: ___________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

Economic efficiency/significance of work___________________________

__________________________________________________________________

In the future it is planned to __________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

Appendix I

(informative)

Sample table of contents


	Abstract…………………………………………………………………….
	Introduction………………………………………………………………………………
1.	Title of the first section………………………………………………………………..
	1.1 Title of the subparagraph of the first section……………………………..
	1.2 Title of the subparagraph of the first section……………………………..
2.	Title of the second section……………………………………………………………….
	2.1 Title of the sub-clause of the second section………………………………...
	2.2 Title of the sub-clause of the second section………………………………...
3.	Title of the third section………………………………………………………………
	3.1 Title of the sub-clause of the third section……………………………….
	3.2 Title of the sub-clause of the third section……………………………….
	Social responsibility
	Conclusion………………………………………………………………..
	List of student publications…………………………………………….
	List of sources used……………………………………………………….
	Appendix A Name of the appendix…………………………………..
	Appendix B Appendix name………………………………………………………

Appendix K

(required)

Assignment form for the section “Social responsibility”

ASSIGNMENT FOR THE SECTION “SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY”

Student

Initial data for the section “Social responsibility”
1. Description of the workplace (work area, technological process, equipment used) for the occurrence of: - harmful manifestations of factors in the working environment (weather conditions, harmful substances, lighting, noise, vibration, electromagnetic fields, ionizing radiation) - dangerous manifestations of industrial environment factors (mechanical nature, thermal nature, electrical nature, fire nature) - negative impact on the natural environment (atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere) - emergency situations (man-made, natural, environmental and social)
2. List of legislative and regulatory documents on the topic
List of issues to be researched, designed and developed
1. Analysis of factors of internal social responsibility: - principles of corporate culture of the organization under study; - labor organization and safety systems; - development of human resources through training programs and training and advanced training programs; - systems of social guarantees of the organization; - providing assistance to employees in critical situations.
2. Analysis of factors of external social responsibility: - promoting environmental protection; - interaction with the local community and local authorities; - sponsorship and corporate charity; - responsibility to consumers of goods and services (production of quality goods); -readiness to participate in crisis situations, etc.
3. Legal and organizational issues of ensuring social responsibility: - analysis of legal norms of labor legislation; - analysis of special (characteristic for the field of activity under study) legal and regulatory legislative acts; - analysis of internal regulatory documents and regulations of the organization in the field of activity under study.
List of graphic material:
If necessary, submit sketch graphic materials for the design assignment (required for specialists and masters)

The consultant gave the assignment:

The student accepted the task:

Group	Full name	Signature	date

Appendix L

(informative)

RULES FOR REGISTRATION OF SETTLEMENT AND EXPLANATORY NOTE OF VKR

The work must be done on white A4 paper (210x297 mm) on one side of the sheet.

The font used is Times New Roman 14 (Arial 12 is allowed), font color is black, line spacing is 1.5, text alignment is justified.

Field sizes:

Left - 30 mm,

Right - 10 mm,

Top and bottom - 20 mm.

The paragraph indentation of 15 mm is the same throughout the entire text of the document.

Abbreviations and abbreviations should not be used in the title of the WRC topic.

In the text of the document not allowed:

Use colloquial expressions, technicalities, and professionalisms;

Apply for the same concept various scientific and technical terms that are similar in meaning (synonyms), as well as foreign words and terms if there are equivalent words and terms in the Russian language;

Use arbitrary word formations;

Use abbreviations of words other than those established by the rules of Russian spelling, relevant state standards, and also in this document;

Abbreviate the designations of physical quantities if they are used without numbers, with the exception of units of physical quantities in the heads and sides of tables, and in the decoding of letter designations included in formulas and drawings;

Apply indexes of standards (GOST, GOST R, OST, etc.), technical specifications (TU) and other documents without a registration number;

Use the mathematical minus sign (-) in the text before negative quantities (the word “minus” should be written);

Apply sign Ø to indicate diameter (the word “diameter” should be written);

Use mathematical symbols № (number) or % (percentage), > (more than) in the text< (меньше), ≥ (больше или равно), ≤ (меньше или равно), = (равно) без числовых значений;

Use different systems for designating physical quantities.

The author of the thesis must necessarily indicate references to literary and other sources from which the information and results of the work of other authors given in the explanatory note were borrowed. Otherwise, this information and results will be recognized as plagiarism.

In the text of the calculation and explanatory note, the numerical values of physical quantities with the designation of units of physical quantities and units of counting should be written in numbers, and numbers without designation of units of physical quantities and units of counting from one to nine - in words.

Examples:

1. Conduct tests five pipes, each 5 m long.

2. Select 15 pipes for pressure testing.

If the text contains a number of numerical values expressed in the same unit of physical quantity, then the designation of the unit of physical quantity is indicated after the last numerical value, for example, 1.50; 1.75; 2.00 m.

If the text of the document provides a range of numerical values of a physical quantity expressed in the same unit of a physical quantity, then the designation of the unit of the physical quantity is indicated after the last numerical value of the range.

Examples:

1. From 1 to 5 mm.

2. From 10 to 100 kg.

3. From 10 minutes to plus 40 °C.

It is unacceptable to separate a unit of physical quantity from a numerical value (transfer them to different lines or pages).

Fractional numbers must be given as decimals, except for inch measurements, which should be written 1/2″. If it is impossible (inappropriate) to express a numerical value as a decimal fraction, it is allowed to write it as a simple fraction on one line separated by a slash, for example, 5/32.

Numerical values of quantities in the text should be indicated with the degree of accuracy necessary to ensure the required properties of the product, while in a series of quantities the number of decimal places is equalized. Rounding numerical values of quantities to the first, second, third, etc. decimal place for various sizes, brands, etc. products of the same name must be identical.

For example, if the thickness gradation of a hot-rolled steel strip is 0.25 mm, then the entire range of thicknesses must be indicated with the same number of characters: 1.50; 1.75; 2.00 mm.

Ordinal numbers are written with the words: fifth, thirtieth, two hundred and sixtieth. Ordinal numbers, indicated by Arabic numerals, do not have case endings if they appear after the noun to which they refer, for example, in Ch. 11, in Fig. 9, and have case endings if they come before a noun, for example, 2nd experiment.

If the calculation and explanatory note contains inscriptions applied directly to the manufactured product (for example, on strips, plates for control elements, etc.), they are highlighted in font (without quotation marks), for example, ON, OFF, or quotation marks, if the inscription consists of numbers and (or) signs. Names of commands, modes, signals, etc. in the text should be highlighted in quotation marks, for example, “Signal +27 is on.”

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

FEDERAL STATE AUTONOMOUS EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

"NATIONAL NUCLEAR RESEARCH UNIVERSITY "MEPhI"

INSTITUTE OF FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC SECURITY NRNU MEPhI

DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND AUDIT

"APPROVED"

Deputy Director of the Institute of Financial and

economic security of National Research Nuclear University MEPhI

__________________/ A.N. Norkina

"____"______________ 2018

FOR PREPARATION OF GRADUATE QUALIFICATION WORK

by SPECIALTY 05/38/01 “ECONOMIC SECURITY”

SPECIALIZATION "FORENSIAN ECONOMIC EXAMINATION"

Compiled by:

Doctor of Economics, Professor Komissarova I.P., Ph.D., Associate Professor Belogina N.S., associate professor Krasheninnikova M.S., engineer Smirnova G.V.

Reviewer: Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor Kogdenko V.G.

Responsible editor: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Komissarova I.P.

Guidelines for preparing for the state final certification were reviewed and approved at the meeting of the Department of Accounting and Auditing on May 8, 20178, Minutes No. 10.

Regulation SMK-PL-8.2-03 “Regulations on final qualifying works of a bachelor, specialist, master and scientific qualification work of a graduate student,” approved by the rector of NRNU MEPhI M.N. Strikhanov on March 16, 2017.

1. General provisions ……………………………………………………………………………… 4

2. Selection of topic…………………………………………………………………………………..…… 4

3. Main stages and schedule for the implementation of the WRC ……………………………. 5

4. Requirements for the content of the research project ………………………………………………………………………………… 5

5. Requirements for registration of application documents……………………………………………………………… 6

6. Preparation for the defense of the research and development work………………………………………………………………….. 9

Topics of final qualifying works in specialty 38.05.01 “Economic Security”, specialization “Forensic Economic Expertise”..10

Annex 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………. 12

Appendix 2…………………………………………………………………………………. 13

Appendix 3…………………………………………………………………………………. 14

Appendix 4…………………………………………………………………………………. 15

Appendix 5………………………………………………………………………………. 16

Appendix 6…………………………………………………………………………………. 17

GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. Defense of the final qualifying work is a form of state final certification provided for by the OS NRNU MEPhI.

Preparation of the final qualifying work is carried out by the student during the final year of study; it is a test of the quality of the theoretical knowledge acquired by the student, practical skills, and developed general cultural and professional competencies that allow solving professional problems.

In the final qualifying work, based on materials from industrial (pre-graduation) practice, an analysis and description of the problem is given using the example of a specific organization (group of organizations), and ways to solve it are described.

Final qualifying papers may be based on a summary of coursework and projects previously completed by the student.

1.2. Preparation of a final qualifying thesis begins with choosing a topic. The topic should have practical significance, as a rule, take into account the needs of a specific organization, and meet modern trends in the development of the financial and economic sphere.

A list of approximate topics for final qualifying works is developed by teachers of the department:

Together with representatives of organizations on the basis of which students work and (or) undergo industrial (pre-graduation) practice and who are interested in developing these topics;

Taking into account the practical and (or) scientific interests of students, including their participation in scientific research work of the departments.

Approximate topics for final qualifying works are considered at a meeting of the department and approved by the head of the department.

The choice of the topic of the final qualifying work by the student is carried out before the start of practical training (pre-graduation), since during its completion the student must collect practical material for completing the final qualifying work.

1.3. Highly qualified teachers of the department are involved in the supervision of final qualifying work.

The responsibilities of the scientific supervisor include:

§ assistance in developing a plan for final qualifying work;

§ development of assignments for the preparation of final qualifying work;

§ assisting the student in developing an individual work schedule for the entire period of completing the final qualifying work;

§ advising the student on the selection of literature sources and factual material;

§ conducting systematic consultations with the student on work issues, providing him with the necessary methodological assistance;

§ monitoring the progress of work in accordance with the established schedule;

§ report at department meetings on the progress of graduates’ preparation of work;

§ providing assistance (consulting the student) in preparing a presentation and report to defend the work;

§ providing written feedback on the work.

Preparation of the thesis by a student is carried out during the final year of study and is a test of the quality of the theoretical knowledge, practical skills and abilities acquired by the student, and the development of competencies for solving professional problems.

SELECTION OF THE TOPIC OF THE WRC

The student is given the right to independently choose the topic of his final qualifying work based on the sample topic. The final qualifying work must be carried out using real financial information, so the title of the topic should end with the phrase “... using the example of OJSC ABC.” In this case, the name of the organization may be conditional.

In agreement with the supervisor and the head of the department, the student can choose a topic for his final work that is not included in the recommended list, as well as slightly change its name, giving it the desired focus. At the same time, he must justify the feasibility of developing the chosen topic.

Assignment of the topic of the final qualifying work to the student is made on the basis of his personal written application and the consent of the scientific supervisor (see Appendix 1), and, upon the recommendation of the department, is formalized by order at NRNU MEPhI.

MAIN STAGES AND SCHEDULE OF WRC IMPLEMENTATION

The student, together with the supervisor, fill out the Application forms for the thesis and the Assignments for the final qualifying work (see Appendix 1 and Appendix 4). The application and Assignment for the final qualifying work must be submitted to the Department of Accounting and Auditing within the deadlines specified by the department at the general meeting.

The Assignment contains a detailed plan and schedule of work on the WRC. The schedule is approved by the supervisor.

The manager is responsible for the timely execution of the assignment for the preparation of the final qualifying work and its timely completion. The head of the graduate school is obliged to notify the management of the graduating department in cases of a student falling behind the planned schedule.

Preparation and defense of the final work consists of the following sequential stages:

1. Selection of the topic for the WRC and development of a work schedule. Drawing up a plan for final work.

2. Selection and familiarization with literature on the chosen topic. Collection and processing of factual material.

3. Writing the text of the final work, submitting individual chapters for review to the supervisor. Revision of individual chapters based on the supervisor’s comments.

4. Completion and registration of the final work, submitting it for external review.

5. Submission of the completed and stitched thesis to the department no less than ten days before the defense of the thesis. Preparation for defense of final work.

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTENT OF THE WRC

The volume of final qualifying work must be within 60 – 100 pages typewritten text (without attachments). The thesis should consist of an introduction, three chapters and a conclusion. Each chapter should contain no more than 3-4 paragraphs (a paragraph should not contain less than 3-5 pages of text). If necessary, you can highlight subparagraphs. Numbering of chapters, paragraphs and subparagraphs in Arabic numerals.

The structure of the final qualifying work should include the following sections:

Title page 1 (Appendix 2)

Title page 2 (Appendix 3)

Introduction

Main part

Conclusion;

List of sources used;

Applications.

In Administered the main content and purpose of the graduation work, the theoretical and practical significance of the chosen topic should be revealed, and its relevance should be shown. In this case, the tasks that the student sets for himself when writing the work must be determined. The volume of the introduction should not exceed 3-4 pages of typewritten text.

First chapter contains theoretical aspects of the problem under study. It contains an overview of the sources of information used on the topic of the final qualifying work, a description of the object and subject of research, various theoretical concepts, accepted concepts and their classifications, as well as its own reasoned position on this issue. Statistical data constructed in scientific tables and graphs may find a place in this chapter.

Chapter two is devoted to the analysis of practical material selected during industrial (pre-graduation) practice. It contains: analysis of specific material on a selected topic (using the example of a specific organization); comparative analysis with current practice (using the example of a number of organizations, industry (industries), region (regions), country; description of identified patterns, problems and trends in the development of the object and subject of research; assessment of the effectiveness of decisions made (using the example of a specific organization, industry, region, countries) During the analysis, analytical tables, calculations, formulas, diagrams, diagrams and graphs are used.

Chapter Three The WRC is of a design nature. Depending on the chosen direction of work, measures should be proposed to improve the economic security system; risk management, finance; increasing the efficiency of the organization and reducing threats; anti-crisis management, etc. Proposed measures must be justified on the basis of the organization’s data, their effectiveness must be confirmed by calculations.

Stages of work completion	Deadlines	Well	Responsible
Formation of the topic	February-May		Head department
Justification of the topic of work	Summer viewing
Approval of the topic, performer, director, consultants of the project Issuance of an order for the university with approval of the subject matter	September October		Head department Vice-Rector for Educational Management
Approval of work schedule	No later than October		Leader, graduate
Monitoring the completion of the thesis	At least once a month or on a separate schedule		Supervisor Head department
Submission of work to the department, admission to defense, appointment of a reviewer	2 weeks before defense		Graduate, supervisor, manager department
Issuance of an order on admission to defense	2 weeks before defense		Directorate
Defense of work at a meeting of the State Attestation Committee	According to the work schedule of the SAC		Student leader

Defense of final qualification work

Persons who have successfully passed all state exams are allowed to defend their final qualifying work. Graduates who have not passed the state exam are not allowed to take subsequent state exams and defend their thesis.

Final qualifying works are subject to review. If several graduates complete their final qualifying work, a general review of the entire work is written. The graduate must be familiar with the review before defending his final qualifying work.

The defense of the final qualifying work is carried out at an open meeting of the state certification commission with the participation of at least two-thirds of its members in accordance with the procedure for conducting the defense, approved by the rector of the university. In the process of defending the final qualifying work, members of the state certification commission must be familiar with the feedback from the head of the final qualifying work and the review.

The protection procedure includes the following steps:

student report on the topic of the thesis (up to 10 minutes are allotted for the report);

the graduate’s answers to questions from members of the commission and those present at the defense on the topic of the work;

announcement of the review of the final work and the speaker’s answers to the reviewer’s questions and comments; in this case, the graduate either agrees with them or raises reasonable objections;

announcement of the review of the head of the research and development committee;

free discussion;

student's final word.

The decision of the state certification commission is made at a closed meeting by a simple majority of votes of the members of the commissions participating in the meeting, with the obligatory presence of the chairman of the commission or his deputy. In case of an equal number of votes, the presiding officer has the casting vote. The results of the defense of the thesis are announced on the same day after the minutes of the commission meeting are drawn up.

Graduates who did not pass the defense of the thesis for a good reason (for medical reasons or in other exceptional documented cases) should be given the opportunity to pass this type of final state certification without expulsion from the university, but no later than six months starting from the date indicated on the document , presented by the graduate.

Graduates who did not pass the defense of the thesis for an unexcused reason or received unsatisfactory grades during the defense have the right to pass this type of final state certification again no earlier than six months and no later than five years after passing the final state certification for the first time.

Criteria for assessing VKR

Evaluation of final qualifying works is carried out by a commission based on the following general criteria:

– validity of the choice and relevance of the research topic;

– level of understanding of theoretical issues and generalization of the collected material, validity and clarity of the formulated conclusions;

– clarity of the structure of the work and consistency of presentation of the material;

– methodological validity of the study;

– application of independent experimental research skills;

– volume and level of analysis of scientific literature on the problem under study;

– mastery of a scientific style of presentation, spelling and punctuation literacy;

– compliance of the form of presentation of the thesis with all the requirements for the preparation of these works;

The overall assessment of the work is determined by the commission taking into account:

– the quality of the oral report made by the graduate at the defense of the thesis;

– depth and accuracy of answers to questions, comments and recommendations during the defense of the work.

Final qualifying works are graded “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory”, “unsatisfactory”.

Grade "Great" is set if VKR:

– reflects a broad outlook, erudition, independence of research position and conclusions, takes into account modern scientific achievements, demonstrates fluency in the material, the ability to illuminate it from a theoretical perspective;

– demonstrates the skills of analyzing material and the ability to use the conceptual apparatus of the chosen field of study;

– demonstrates the ability to correctly use scientific literature, strictly follow the tasks set in the work, and carefully apply the chosen research methodology;

– distinguished by logic, validity of conclusions, clear presentation, clarity of assessment of results.

At the same time, during the defense process the student demonstrates:

the ability to present content in a concise form;

ability to operate with illustrative material;

Confidence and consistency in responding to questions and comments.

Grade "Fine" is placed if in the VKR:

there were some inaccuracies in the choice of justification for the research methodology, formulation of problems, and formulation of conclusions;

the student showed uncertainty in answering questions and comments;

There are minor omissions in the bibliographic apparatus and/or in the design of the work.

Grade "satisfactorily" is placed if in the VKR:

analysis of theoretical literature on the problem is poorly presented;

a significant number of errors were made in the interpretation of the source material and the results obtained;

demonstrated poor command of the terminological base of the problem;

there are repeated content and language errors;

There are significant omissions in the bibliographic apparatus and/or in the design of the work.

Grade "unsatisfactory" is placed if in the VKR:

the theoretical and methodological basis of the study is unsatisfactorily presented;

there is a discrepancy between the theoretical concept and practical results;

numerous gross errors were made in the interpretation of the material being studied;

demonstrated poor command of terminology;

The list of criteria for assessing the graduate qualifications can be supplemented or changed taking into account the specifics of the graduate’s qualification (specialization) obtained.

The final qualifying work is an independent and logically completed study of the problem posed. The specialist's graduate work qualification reveals the level of theoretical and practical preparedness of a graduate to work in educational institutions of various types in the following types of professional activities specified in the state educational standard:

– scientific research;

– organizational and educational;

– teaching;

– correctional and developmental;

– cultural and educational;

– creative.

A successfully completed thesis testifies that the graduate is ready to continue his education in master’s programs, as well as to engage in professional activities.

The specialist's research and development work is performed on the basis of theoretical knowledge and practical skills acquired by the student during the training period. At the same time, it should be primarily focused on the knowledge acquired in the process of studying disciplines of specialized training. Research work can be monodisciplinary or interdisciplinary (complex) in nature. Monodisciplinary research and development work can be performed in one of the disciplines of general professional or specialized training. Interdisciplinary academic research can be performed based on the integration of educational material from various disciplines.

The thesis of a fine arts specialist is focused on solving problems of theoretical and practical significance, and should include the following sections:

– an introduction justifying the relevance of the research, indicating its purpose and objectives, practical significance, characteristics of the subject and object and description of research methods, research problems;

– theoretical (text) part, reflecting the results of the graduate’s study of the chosen topic (issues of pedagogy, psychology of artistic creativity, psychology of students’ visual activity, methods of teaching fine and decorative arts, theory and history of fine and decorative arts, etc.) ;

– a practical (creative) part, made in one of the types (genres) of fine or decorative arts and design in accordance with the chosen topic;

– the methodological part, represented by preparatory sketches or sketches, reflecting the course of the artistic and creative process of performing work on the topic, or the works of students, reflecting the methodology of conducting art classes tested by the graduate student during teaching practice or during independent teaching work in an educational institution.

– list of used literature;

– application (if necessary).

The volume of the text part of the work is determined depending on the chosen topic and can average 50-70 pages (without an appendix).

The volume and ratio of the main parts of the thesis, including the volume and content of materials that the graduate must present in the methodological part of the work, is determined by the graduating (base) department together with the head of the thesis.

Requirements for the content of the main parts of the WRC

The introduction should provide a rationale for the relevance of the research topic, identify the practical need for its implementation, provide an analysis of the state of development of the problem in theory and practice, and determine the significance of its development for science and/or practice. The introduction formulates the scientific apparatus of scientific research: the identified contradiction, problem, topic, hypothesis (for research work), object, subject, purpose, research objectives. Then the methods of scientific, search and research and/or project activities are determined, the research base is indicated, and the structure of the research project is described.

The theoretical part presents material on the topic, provides an analysis of information sources, a review and analysis of the state of knowledge of this problem, compares different points of view on the problem, and solves the main problems formulated in the introduction. It is necessary to emphasize the research aspects of the problem and define the concepts used in the work.

In the practical (creative) part, the progress of the creative project and its results are analyzed, and a description of the main stages and methods of performing the work is given. The methodological part can be a description of the conducted scientific and pedagogical research: characteristics of the research base, description of methods and means of collecting and processing data, comparison of control and experimental groups, analysis of research results.

The thesis devoted to the issues of teaching methods must contain a scientific, methodological, psychological justification for the development carried out by the author. The content of this part can be based on the experience gained by the student during the period of teaching practice when conducting classroom and extracurricular forms of work with students.

The conclusion provides generalized results of the theoretical and/or practical (creative) development of the topic, reflects the results of solving the problems posed in the introduction, and formulates conclusions, suggestions and recommendations for using the results of the work.

Those auxiliary or additional materials that cannot be included in the main text are included in the appendices.

Requirements for the design of the text part of the proposal

The work begins with a title page, which should indicate: the full name of the university, information about the author and supervisor (a sample title page is given below).

The text of the WRC must be printed on sheets of white paper in A4 format (210 x 297 mm). Portrait orientation. Page settings in the “File” menu (margins: left – 30 mm, right – 10 mm, top – 20 mm and bottom – 20-25 mm). The binding position is on the left.

Font Times New Roman, font size – 14, line spacing one and a half. Width alignment. Paragraph indent (red line) – 1.25 cm. Text color – Auto or Black. The text is printed on one side of the sheet.

The headings of the structural parts of the WRC (TABLE OF CONTENTS, INTRODUCTION, CHAPTER, CONCLUSION, LIST OF SOURCES AND LITERATURE) are written in capital letters, centered.

The terms of the scientific apparatus of research in the introduction (object, subject, goal, objectives, hypothesis) are highlighted in bold.

Page counting starts from the title page. The page number is placed in the center of the bottom margin of the sheet, starting from the “Table of Contents” sheet, which is numbered 2. The page number is not placed on the title page. The page numbering in the appendix continues the numbering of the main text.

Chapters are numbered throughout the work in Arabic numerals; the chapter number is separated from the title by a dot. A new chapter, like other structural elements of the work (except for individual parts within a chapter), begins on a new sheet.

Chapter parts (paragraphs) are numbered in Arabic numerals within each chapter. The paragraph number consists of the chapter number and its own paragraph number, separated by a dot. The paragraph number is separated from the title by a dot. The "§" sign is not used.

Paragraph headings are written in lowercase (except for the first letter - uppercase) letters, the font is bold. There is no period at the end of the title. Underlining headings and hyphenating words in headings is not allowed. Center alignment.

It is not allowed to leave headings at the bottom of the page while placing text on the next one.

When creating tables placed both within the text and on separate sheets, the line “Table 1” is aligned to the right edge of the sheet. The next line contains the name of the table without quotes and a period at the end. The table title is not bolded and is centered. If there is only one table in the text, it is not assigned a number. If the table does not fit on one page, its columns are numbered, and on the next page the line with column numbers is repeated without repeating their names.

In table cells:

– it is allowed to use a font size smaller than in the main text (12-13);

– single spacing is used;

– there should be no paragraph indentation;

– digital values are aligned in the center, alphabetic values are aligned to the left;

– alignment is carried out horizontally and vertically;

– table column and row headings are written with a capital letter, and column subheadings – with a lowercase letter (if they form one sentence with the heading).

When designing illustrative material (graphs, diagrams, photographs), placed both inside the text and on separate sheets, the word “Fig.” is written under the illustrative material, its number is indicated in Arabic numeral, followed by a dot, and the name is written in capital letter and, if necessary, explanatory text. The title of the picture is centered. There is no period at the end of the title of the figure. If there is only one picture in the text, it is not assigned a number.

For tables and figures placed in the main text of the work, only continuous numbering (separate for tables and separate for figures) in Arabic numerals throughout the text is allowed. After the title of the figure and after the table, one line is always skipped.

Tables and figures should be placed immediately after the reference (first mention) to them in the text on this sheet or (if this is not possible) at the beginning of the next one. The link is given as “Fig. 1” with or without parentheses, depending on the context of the sentence. In all subsequent references to a table or figure, these references are given with the abbreviated word “look”. For example: “(see Fig. 2).” Abbreviations "table" and "fig." used in cases where tables and figures have numbers.

The appendices include materials explaining the main text, breaking this text into more than one sheet. Each appendix begins on a new sheet with the word "APPENDIX" in capital letters in bold in the upper right corner. The application must have a title that is placed symmetrically with the application material and is written in capital letters and bold. If there is more than one application, they are all numbered in Arabic numerals without the No. sign. For example: "APPENDIX 1". In the next line, the name of the application is written in capital letters. The title is bold and centered. There is no period after the application name.

Illustrative material and tables placed in the application (for example, a series of photographic materials) have their own (only for this application) numbering. For example: “Fig.1, Fig.2, etc.”

When formatting texts in applications, it is allowed to use a smaller font size than in the main text (11-13) and single spacing.

A link to the source used is provided at the end of the sentence in square brackets, indicating the number of the book (source) in the list of sources and literature, and when quoting verbatim, indicating the page number from which the quotation was taken. For example: "". A period in a sentence with reference to sources is placed after the reference behind square brackets.

Bibliographic description of sources is carried out in accordance with GOST 7.1-2003 SIBD “Bibliographic record. Bibliographic description".

Documents in the list of sources and literature should be arranged in the following sequence:

– government documents at the federal level (laws, regulations, orders, directives);

– government documents of the regional and regional level (laws, regulations, orders, instructions);

– standards and technical regulations;

– books and articles in Russian (alphabetically by the last names of the authors or titles in the absence of an author);

– books and articles in a foreign language (alphabetically by the names of the authors or titles in the absence of an author);

– electronic resources of local access,

– electronic resources of remote access.

The final qualifying work is presented for defense in bound form (bound).

Stages of preparation of qualifying work	Reporting form	Planned deadline for completing the work	Actual deadline for completing the work	Supervisor's comments	Supervisor's signature
Determining the topic of qualifying work. Drawing up a plan for qualifying work. Preparation of the manuscript for the theoretical part of the work. Development of an experiment plan, its organization. Preparation of the manuscript for the experimental part of the work Correction of the work, making edits, development of the methodological part (for works involving non-pedagogical research) Preliminary defense of the qualifying work at the department. Providing qualifying work for review to the supervisor. Defense of qualifying work at a meeting of the State Examination Committee.	Application Individual work plan Draft introduction and theoretical Experimental plan Draft experimental chapter	Last month of the VI semester September November December January April May July

Admission to VKR protection

8.4.1. Completed WRC:

– signed by the student and presented to the supervisor;

– undergoes a pre-defense procedure, as a result of which the commission makes a decision to recommend or not recommend the work for defense;

– signed by the supervisor who writes the review. Revocation requirements are presented in Section 10 of these Regulations;

– by decision of the scientific supervisor and/or head of the department, it is sent for review. The reviewer writes the review. Review requirements are presented in section 10 of these Regulations;

– is presented to the head of the department, who signs the title page of the thesis, recording its completeness;

8.4.2. The results of the pre-defense are recorded and submitted to the faculty dean's office. Non-admission of the thesis to defense is not an obstacle to participation in the final state certification.

8.4.3. The final decision on the admission of the work to defense is made by the head of the department, making an appropriate entry on the title page of the work.

8.4.4. The thesis and documentation for it must be prepared no later than 2 working days before the defense, stored in the dean’s office and made available to members of the State Examination Committee for review. The student must be familiar with the feedback and review of his work no later than 5 days before the defense.

8.4.5. The dean's office provides the following documents to the State Examination Committee along with the academic examination: a certificate from the dean on the student's completion of the curriculum and grades received in theoretical disciplines, coursework, educational and teaching practice, a review from the head of the academic examination, a review (if available). If one of the documents (except for the review) is missing, the work will not be accepted for defense. In addition, the State Examination Committee may provide other materials characterizing the scientific and practical value of the completed research work: publications by the author of the research work on the topic; documents indicating the practical application of the work.

VCR protection

8.5.1. A person who has successfully completed the full mastery of the main educational program in the areas of higher education, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard for Higher Education, and has successfully passed all other types of final certification tests, is allowed to defend the thesis.

8.5.2. 8The defense of the work is carried out at a meeting of the State Examination Committee, organized at the university for the purpose of checking the scientific, theoretical and practical training of graduating specialists and assigning them the appropriate qualifications. In addition to the members of the commission, the scientific supervisor of the thesis and the reviewer, as well as students and teachers of the university may be present at the defense.

8.5.3. The date, time, and place of defense of the work are established by the dean of the faculty and the chairman of the State Examination Committee, and approved by the rector of the university. Participation of the reviewer in the meeting of the State Examination Committee for the defense of works is not necessary. Duration of the report – no more than 15 minutes, Recommended time – 7 minutes. Duration of protection in general – no more than 30 minutes, recommended – no more than 20 minutes.

8.5.4. The State Examination Committee is headed by a chairman who organizes and controls the activities of the defense procedure and ensures the unity of the requirements for graduates.

8.5.5. The procedure for protecting VKR:

– before the start of the meeting of the State Examination Committee, all its members are given summary information about those being certified, whose defense of the thesis is planned at this meeting, criteria and assessment forms;

– the secretary of the State Examination Committee transmits the examination paper together with the manager’s review and review to the chairman of the State Examination Committee, brings to the attention of the members of the State Examination Committee and those present the topic of the examination paper, the last name, first name, patronymic of the person being certified and the last name, first name, patronymic of the head;

– presentation by a graduate of the graduate work (up to 15 minutes). The student’s presentation should reflect: the relevance of the topic, theoretical and methodological principles on which the thesis is based; the results of the analysis of the phenomenon being studied; specific proposals to solve the problem. Particular attention should be focused on your own developments and research results. During the speech, it is necessary to use visual aids that illustrate the student’s speech.

– questions from members of the State Examination Committee and those present to the author of the presentation (questions must be related to the topic of the work being defended, briefly and clearly formulated);

– the person being certified’s answers to these questions;

– review of the manager (speech by the manager; in his absence, the review is read out by the chairman or one of the members of the State Examination Committee);

– review (if any) (read out by the chairman or one of the members of the State Examination Committee; if a reviewer is present, then he is given the floor for the review);

– the person being certified is given the floor to respond to the reviewer’s comments;

– discussion of work;

– the speaker’s closing remarks;

– the presiding officer announces the end of the defense of the thesis.

8.5.6. The decision of the State Examination Committee on the final assessment is based on the assessments of the reviewer and members of the State Examination Committee. At the defense of the thesis, an assessment is made of the formation of the set of competencies defined by the Regulations on the thesis for the educational program, according to the levels: know, be able to, master. To calculate the coefficient of competence development, the expert assessment method is used. Experts (chairman, deputy chairman, members of the State Examination Committee) enter their assessments into the expert assessment sheet (Appendix 1). The Secretary of the State Examination Committee calculates the coefficient of development of competencies of each student.

8.5.7. Taking into account the coefficient of competence development, each member of the State Examination Committee gives an overall assessment of the VKR. Approximate criteria and a scale for assessing VKR are presented in Appendix 2.

8.5.8. Members of the State Examination Committee sign the protocol and student record books, in which a record is made in the appropriate place about the results of defending the work. In the State Examination Protocol, a corresponding entry is made about the defense of qualifying works: last name, first name, patronymic of the student; faculty, topic of the thesis, questions asked to the student during the defense; The advantages and disadvantages of the work noted by the speakers are briefly indicated.

8.5.9. The results of the defense of the work and the decision of the State Examination Committee on awarding the title of teacher are announced on the same day after the preparation of the protocols by the State Examination Commission.

8.5.10. If the defense of the thesis is considered unsatisfactory, the State Examination Committee establishes the possibility of re-defending this work or the need to develop and defend a new final qualifying work, the topic of which is determined by the graduating department.

8.5.11. Persons who did not pass the defense of the thesis for a good reason (documented) are given the opportunity to defend the thesis without expulsion from the university. Additional meetings of the State Examination Committee are organized within the time limits established by the university, but no later than four months after the application is submitted by a person who has not passed the defense of the academic examination for a good reason.

8.5.12. After the defense of the thesis, they are stored in the department’s offices for five years, where they can be used (on a common basis with other literature and manuals) by students, teachers, and school teachers. By decision of the departments, the shelf life of theses may be changed. After the expiration of the storage period, the works are transferred to the archive.

8.5.13. University departments recommend for publication the best qualifying works of students that have established theoretical and practical value (in special collections, separate brochures, articles, etc.). In the course of working on the thesis, the department organizes presentations by students who are successfully working on the thesis at scientific, theoretical, and practical conferences of students, university teachers, and school teachers.

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTENT OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF WRC

9.1. The WRC must contain the following structural elements:

- title page;

– definitions, designations and abbreviations (if necessary);

– introduction;

– main part;

- conclusion;

– list of sources used;

– applications;

Title page

The title page is drawn up in accordance with Appendix 3.

Definitions, notations and abbreviations

9.4.1. The structural element “Definitions, designations and abbreviations” contains definitions necessary to clarify or establish terms, and a list of designations and abbreviations used in the WRC.

9.4.2. The list of definitions begins with the words: “In this final qualifying work, the following terms with the corresponding definitions are used.”

9.4.3. Recording of symbols and abbreviations is carried out in the order they appear in the text of the VKR with the necessary decoding and explanations.

9.4.4. The decision on the advisability of introducing this element into the work is made by the student together with the supervisor.

Introduction

9.5.1. The introduction reflects: the relevance of the topic, problem, object, subject of research; the purpose and objectives of the study, hypothesis, scientific novelty and practical significance, structure of the research work, information about approbation of the results of the work, etc. In terms of volume, the introduction should not exceed 10% of the total volume of the research work.

9.5.2. The introduction to the scientific research work should contain an assessment of the current state of the scientific problem being solved in the field of professional training, including a short list of scientists who contributed to the solution of the problem under consideration, the basis and initial data for performing the scientific research work.

9.5.3. The relevance of the study characterizes the significance of the problem under study for the present moment, its importance, modernity and topicality.

9.5.4. The research problem reflects the contradiction that this work must resolve. Can be formulated as a question.

9.5.5. An object is a process or phenomenon that gave rise to a problem situation. Subject – a side, part of an object being studied within the framework of this specific work.

9.5.6. The goal is the result expected to be obtained as a result of the research work. Objectives are the goal of an activity given in certain specific conditions, steps to achieve the goal.

9.5.7. A hypothesis is a position put forward as a preliminary, conditional explanation of a certain phenomenon or group of phenomena. A hypothesis in a bachelor's research paper can be both descriptive and explanatory in nature. A descriptive hypothesis contains an assumption about the existence of a certain phenomenon, a pattern (dependence), an assumption about the state of the system being studied. An explanatory hypothesis must also contain assumptions about the causes of the phenomenon (patterns), an assumption about what needs to be done to solve the problem.

9.5.8. Scientific novelty reflects what new the work introduces, what theoretical principles presented in the work were previously unknown. Practical significance shows in which areas and for solving which problems the results obtained can be applied.

9.5.9. The introduction may contain information about the testing of the WRC. This section provides information about scientific publications on the topic, presentations at conferences, meetings of methodological associations, participation in scientific competitions or creative skills competitions (for creative projects), receiving grants, etc.

9.5.10. The introduction should not contain figures, formulas or tables. Epigraphs are not allowed.

Main part

9.6.1. The main part, as a rule, consists of two or three sections (chapters), with two to four subsections (paragraphs) in each.

9.6.3. The main part contains:

· theoretical justification of the chosen research problem;

· analysis of known theoretical and (or) experimental studies, which is the basis for conducting your own research;

· description of your own research and the results obtained;

· assessment of the reliability of the results obtained, their comparison with similar results of other studies.

The structuring of the work remains at the discretion of the graduating department and depends on the specifics of the scientific field. For works, the experimental part of which is non-pedagogical in nature, the presence of a methodological chapter is mandatory.

9.6.4. Research and development work can be carried out in the form of a creative project. The main part of this type of research and development work includes a practical part. The practical part is designed in the form of a product made of material; developed project or sketch; organized event; a prepared performance by a creative team, etc. The practical part reveals the level of applied professional training of the student and is the main one for the graduate work, carried out in the form of a creative project. The methodological part of the thesis, executed in the form of a creative project, should contain options for using the materials of the main part of the essay in order to improve modern education.

Conclusion

9.7.1. The conclusion in volume should not exceed 5% of the VCR. Recommended length: 1.5 – 2 pages. It summarizes the results of your own research, summarizes and formulates conclusions. The conclusion should contain brief conclusions characterizing the implementation of the assigned tasks, a conclusion on the confirmation of the hypothesis, the completeness of the solution to the problem posed and recommendations for the practical and scientific application of the results of the work.

Duration of pre-graduation internship
Approval of the theme of the WRC
Completing the assignment on the topic of the WRC
Providing a practice report to the manager
Practice certification
Preparation of the WRC	____ (weeks) from “___” _____ 20__ to “__” ___ 20__
Approval of the assignment for the technical work
Selection and analysis of initial information
Preparation and approval of the plan (table of contents) of the WRC
Work on sections and elimination of comments from the head of the research and development work
Coordination of the content of the WRC, elimination of comments
Preparation and presentation of the full text of the work to the manager. Receiving feedback from the head of the research and development work
Submission by the student of the finished thesis to the reviewer
Submission by the student of the completed research and development work to the normative inspector

Appendix No. 3

I approve

Head of department

FULL NAME__________________

EXERCISE

Speciality __________________________________________________________

Group _________________________________________________________________

FULL NAME. student __________________________________________________________

Theme of the WRC ______________________________________________________________

The date of issue of the task for completing the WRC “____” is ___________ 20___.

The deadline for the student to submit the completed thesis is “_____” ___________ 20 ____.

Initial data on VKR (type of activity, professional competencies)

Introduction ______________________________________________________________________________

Main sections of the topic and list of tasks/questions to be developed ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

List of graphic/illustrative/practical material ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion __________________________________________________________________

List of recommended literature ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Applications __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Head of the Research and Development Committee __________________ (_____________________)

The task was accepted for execution by __________________ (_____________________)

(student signature) (signature transcript)

Agreed

Chairman of the MPCC ____________________ (_______________________)

(signature) (signature decryption)

"___"___________ 20__

Appendix No. 4

Feedback from the manager

For final qualifying work

_____________________________________________________________________________

(Full Name)

Group ____________________________________

Speciality___________________________________________________________

Select a topic in agreement with the employer (agreed - not agreed) indicate the employer ___________________________________________________________________ The work was completed (indicate the base of pre-graduation practice) ____________________ Assessment of the developed general competencies:

№	Name OK	Level of formation of the OC in the final qualifying work
	OK……	high
average
short
	OK……	high
average
short
	OK	high
average
short
	OK	high
average
short
	OK	high
average
short

Distinctive positive aspects of work

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Disadvantages and comments

Supervisor _____________________________________________________________

(Full Name)

____________________ ______________________________________

"___"___________20__

Appendix No. 5

Review

For final qualifying work

(topic of final qualifying work)

_____________________________________________________________________________

student(s) ___________________________________________________________________

(Full Name)

Group __________________________

Speciality__________________________________________________________

Relevance of the work:__________________________________________________________

Distinctive positive aspects of work

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Practical meaning ______________________________________________________________

Disadvantages and comments

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Assessment of the development of professional competencies:

Reviewer _____________________________________________________________________

(Full Name)

_________________ __________________________________________________________

(signature) (academic degree, position)

"___"___________20__

Appendix No. 9

EVALUATION PAPER

1. Member of the State Examination Committee (full name)_________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Date_______________________

3. Group No. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Specialty_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

№	Student's name	Theme of the WRC	Relevance of the topic of the WRC	Degree of achievement of set goals	Presented visual material	Student report	Answers on questions	final grade	Signature

Appendix No. 6

GOVERNMENT OF ST. PETERSBURG COMMITTEE FOR SCIENCE AND HIGHER SCHOOL St. Petersburg state budgetary educational institution of secondary vocational education "PETROVSKY COLLEGE" (SPb GBOU SPO "Petrovsky College")
Department of International Programs, Tourism and Service
Replace
DIPLOMA THESIS/PROJECT
Leave the required option
CONCEPT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE MUNICIPALITY
Replace
	Completed:
Full Name
student		Groups
	group number
speciality
	name of specialty in capital letters without quotation marks
Supervisor:
	I.O.Last name
personal signature
Consultant:	If you have a consultant(s)!
	I.O.Last name
personal signature
	Standard controller
		AND ABOUT. Surname

St. Petersburg, 20__

Appendix No. 7 (Contents=Table of Contents)

Introduction........................................................ ........................................................ .......... 3

1. Theoretical foundations of economic analysis.................................................... 5

1.1. Subject, goals and objectives of the analysis................................................................. .................................. 5

1.2. Methods of analysis................................................... ........................................................ .... 9

2. Characteristics of JSC “Polynom”.................................................. .................... 17

2.1. Organizational and legal form and history of creation.................................................... .......... 17

2.2. Characteristics of the enterprise's activities................................................................... ...................... 18

2.3. Characteristics of the current state of the enterprise.................................................... ..... 20

3. Assessment of the efficiency of economic activities of CJSC Polinom.... 23

3.1. Analysis of capital use................................................................... ........................... 23

3.2. Analysis of the efficiency of use of labor resources.................................... 28

4. Analysis of the financial condition of CJSC Polynom.................................................... 37

4.1.Assessment of the composition and structure of the balance sheet.................................................... ......... 37

4.2.Analysis of financial stability.................................................... ............ 42

4.3.Analysis of liquidity and solvency of the enterprise.................................. 47

5. Analysis of the financial results of the activities of CJSC “Polynom”.................................. 50

5.1.Analysis of enterprise profitability.................................................... ....... 50

5.2.Possible ways to increase profits.................................................... ..... 54

Conclusion................................................. ........................................................ ..... 56

List of accepted abbreviations................................................................... ....................... 59

Bibliography............................................... .................... 60

Applications: 1. Profit and loss indicators.

2. Balance sheet indicators.

3. Indicators of financial condition.

Introduction

Chapter 1.

Appendix No. 8

(Bibliography)

Regulations

1. Constitution of the Russian Federation [text]. – M.: Prior, – 32, p.

2. Civil Procedure Code of the RSFSR [text]: [adopted by the third session. Verkhov. Council of the RSFSR of the sixth convocation June 11, 1964]: official. text: as of 15 Nov. 2001 / Ministry of Justice of Russia. Federation. – M.: Marketing, 2001. – 159, p.

3. GOST 7.53-2001. Editions. International Standard Book Numbering [text]. – Instead of GOST 7.53-86; input 2002-07-01. – Minsk: Interstate. Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certification; M.: Publishing house of standards, 2002. – 3 p.

Scientific literature

4. Agafonova, N.N. Civil law [text]: textbook. manual for universities / N. N. Agafonova, T.V. Bogacheva, L.I. Glushkova; under. total ed. A. G. Kalpina; auto entry Art. N.N. Polivaev; M-in general and prof. Education of the Russian Federation, Moscow. state legal acad. – Ed. 2nd, revised and additional – M.: Lawyer, 2002. – 542 p.

5. Gilyarovsky, V. A. Moscow and Muscovites [text]; Friends and meetings; People of the theater / V. A. Gilyarovsky; entry Art. and note. A. Petrova; artist I. Lykov. – M.: EKSMO-press, 2001. – 638, p.

6. History of Russia [text]: textbook, manual for students of all specialties / V. N. Bykov [etc.]; rep. ed. V.N. Sukhov; Ministry of Education Ros. Federation, St. Petersburg.

state forestry engineering academic - 2nd ed., revised. and additional \ with the participation of T.A. Sukhova.- St. Petersburg: SPbLTA, 2001.-221 p.

7. Artistic encyclopedia of foreign classical art [Electronic resource]. - Elekoron. text, graphics, sound Dan. and application program (546 MB).- M.: Bolshaya Ros. encycl. [etc.], 1996

8. Ten tips for those taking the exam [Electronic resource].- http://www.Iss.stthomas/edu/Russian/tsttakl/htm

Note.Examples of designing sources in accordance

with GOST 7.1 – 2003 This section lists not only those sources referred to by the author of the work, but also those that were studied during the research and preparation for writing.

The bibliography consists of 3 parts:

Regulatory legal acts that are ranked in descending order of their legal force in the following order:

- Constitution of the Russian Federation;

- Codes - in alphabetical order;

- Laws of the Russian Federation - chronologically;

- Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation - chronologically;

- Acts of the Government of the Russian Federation - chronologically, regardless of the type of act;

- Acts of ministries and departments - chronologically, regardless of departmental affiliation;

- Decisions of other state bodies and local self-government bodies - alphabetically, and then - chronologically;

- Regulatory acts of foreign states that are not valid on the territory of the Russian Federation.

The list indicates the full name of the act, date, number, and official source of publication.

After the listed acts, legal practice materials are indicated in chronological order.

2. Scientific literature - monographs, textbooks, articles, etc. are distributed in alphabetical order by the author's last name or by the title of the book.

Approval sheet

To Regulations onfinal qualifying work of students