Studying historical facts and events that were carefully hushed up and kept secret, we can definitely say that PETER 1 was replaced on the throne by an impostor.

The substitution of the real Peter 1 and his capture occurred during his trip to Amsterdam along with the Grand Embassy. I tried, by copying, to bring together in this post various sources confirming this tragic fact in the history of Russia.

A young man of twenty-six years old, above average height, thickly built, physically healthy, with a mole on his left cheek, with wavy hair, well-educated, loving everything Russian, an Orthodox (or more correctly, orthodox) Christian, who knows the Bible by heart, is leaving with the embassy. etc. and so on.

Two years later, a man returns who practically does not speak Russian, who hates everything Russian, who never learned to write in Russian until the end of his life, having forgotten everything he knew before leaving for the Grand Embassy and miraculously acquired new skills and abilities, without a mole on his face. left cheek, with straight hair, a sickly man who looked forty years old.

Isn't it true that somewhat unexpected changes occurred with the young man during his two years of absence.

What is curious is that the papers of the Grand Embassy do not mention that Mikhailov (under this name young Peter went with the embassy) fell ill with a fever, but for the embassy officials it was no secret who “Mikhailov” actually was.

A man returns from a trip, sick with chronic fever, with traces of long-term use of mercury drugs, which were then used to treat tropical fever.

For reference, it should be noted that the Grand Embassy traveled along the northern sea route, while tropical fever can be “earned” in southern waters, and even then only after being in the jungle.

In addition, after returning from the Grand Embassy, ​​Peter 1, during naval battles, demonstrated extensive experience in boarding combat, which has specific features that can only be mastered through experience. Which requires personal participation in many boarding battles.

All this together suggests that the man who returned with the Great Embassy was an experienced sailor who participated in many naval battles and sailed a lot in the southern seas.

Before the trip, Peter 1 did not take part in naval battles, if only because during his childhood and youth, Muscovy or Moscow Tartaria did not have access to the seas, with the exception of the White Sea, which simply cannot be called tropical. And Peter 1 did not visit it often, and only as an honorary passenger.

During his visit to the Solovetsky Monastery, the longboat he was on was miraculously saved during a storm, and he personally made a memorial cross for the Archangel Cathedral, on the occasion of salvation in the storm.

And if we add to this the fact that his beloved wife (Queen Eudokia), whom he missed and often corresponded with when he was away, upon returning from the Grand Embassy, ​​without even seeing her, without explanation, he sent to a nunnery .

The Russian embassy accompanying the Tsar consisted of 20 people, and was headed by A.D. Menshikov. After returning to Russia, this embassy consisted only of the Dutch (including the well-known Lefort), only Menshikov remained from the old composition.

This “embassy” brought a completely different tsar, who spoke Russian poorly, did not recognize his friends and relatives, which immediately betrayed the substitution: This forced Tsarina Sophia, the sister of the real Tsar Peter I, to raise the archers against the impostor. As you know, the Streltsy revolt was brutally suppressed, Sophia was hanged on the Spassky Gate of the Kremlin, the wife of Peter 1 was exiled to a monastery by the impostor, where she never reached, and he summoned his wife from Holland.

False Peter killed “his” brother Ivan V and “his” little children Alexander, Natalya and Lavrenty immediately, although the official history tells us about this in a completely different way. And he executed his youngest son, Alexei, as soon as he tried to free his real father from the Bastille.

=======================

Peter the impostor made such transformations with Russia that it still comes back to haunt us. He began to act like an ordinary conqueror:

- crushed Russian self-government - “zemstvo” and replaced it with a bureaucratic apparatus of foreigners, who brought theft, debauchery and drunkenness to Russia and vigorously instilled it here;

- transferred the ownership of the peasants to the nobles, thereby turning them into slaves (to whiten the image of the impostor, this “event” is blamed on Ivan IV);

- defeated the merchants and began to plant industrialists, which led to the destruction of the former universality of people;

- crushed the clergy, the bearers of Russian culture, and destroyed Orthodoxy, bringing it closer to Catholicism, which inevitably gave rise to atheism;

— introduced smoking, drinking alcohol and coffee;

— destroyed the ancient Russian calendar, rejuvenating our civilization by 5503 years;

- ordered all Russian chronicles to be taken to St. Petersburg, and then, like Filaret, he ordered them to be burned. Called in German “professors”; write a completely different Russian history;

- under the guise of fighting the old faith, he destroyed all the elders who had lived for more than three hundred years;

- banned the cultivation of amaranth and the consumption of amaranth bread, which was the main food of the Russian people, which destroyed longevity on Earth, which then remained in Russia;

- abolished the natural measures: fathom, finger, elbow, vershok, present in clothing, utensils and architecture, making them fixed in the Western manner. This led to the destruction of ancient Russian architecture and art, to the disappearance of the beauty of everyday life. As a result, people ceased to be beautiful, since divine and vital proportions disappeared in their structure;

- replaced the Russian title system with a European one, thereby turning peasants into an estate. Although “peasant” is a title higher than the king, as there is more than one evidence of;

- destroyed Russian writing, which consisted of 151 characters, and introduced 43 characters of the writing of Cyril and Methodius;

- disarmed the Russian army, exterminating the Streltsy as a caste with their wonderful abilities and magical weapons, and in the European manner introduced primitive firearms and piercing weapons, dressing the army first in French and then in German uniforms, although the Russian military uniform was itself a weapon. The new regiments were popularly called “amusing” ones.

But his main crime was the destruction of Russian education (image + sculpture), the essence of which was to create in a person three subtle bodies that he does not receive from birth, and if they are not formed, then consciousness will not have a connection with the consciousnesses of past lives. If in Russian educational institutions a person was made into a generalist who could, from bast shoes to a spaceship, do everything himself, then Peter introduced a specialization that made him dependent on others.

Before Peter the impostor, people in Russia did not know what wine was; he ordered barrels of wine to be rolled out onto the square and given to the townspeople for free. This was done to remove the memory of a past life. During the period of Peter, the persecution of infants born who remembered their past lives and could speak continued. Their persecution began with John IV. The mass destruction of babies who had the memory of a past life placed a curse on all incarnations of such children. It is no coincidence that today, when a talking child is born, he lives no more than two hours.

After all these deeds, the invaders themselves were reluctant to call Peter great for a long time. And only in the 19th century, when the horrors of Peter the Great had already been forgotten, a version arose about Peter the innovator, who did so much useful for Russia, even brought potatoes and tomatoes from Europe, supposedly brought there from America. Nightshades (potatoes, tomatoes) were widely represented in Europe before Peter the Great. Their endemic and very ancient presence on this continent is confirmed by the great diversity of species, which took more than one thousand years. On the contrary, it is known that it was during the time of Peter that a campaign was launched against witchcraft, in other words, food culture (today the word “witchcraft” is used in a sharply negative sense). Before Peter there were 108 types of nuts, 108 types of vegetables, 108 types of fruits, 108 types of berries, 108 types of nodules, 108 types of cereals, 108 spices and 108 types of fruits*, corresponding to the 108 Russian gods.

After Peter, there remained only a few sacred species used for food, which a person can see for himself. In Europe this was done even earlier. Cereals, fruits and nodules were especially severely destroyed, since they were associated with the reincarnation of man. The only thing that Peter the impostor did was to allow the cultivation of potatoes (Orthodox Old Believers do not use them for food), sweet potatoes and earthen pears, which are rarely eaten today. The destruction of sacred plants that were consumed at a certain time led to the loss of the complex divine reactions of the body (remember the Russian proverb “every vegetable has its time”). Moreover, the mixing of nutrition has caused putrefactive processes in the body, and now people, instead of fragrance, exude a stench. Adoptogenic plants have almost disappeared, only weakly active ones remain: “root of life”, lemongrass, zamanikha, golden root. They contributed to a person’s adaptation to difficult conditions and kept a person youthful and healthy. There are absolutely no metamorphosing plants left that promote various metamorphoses of the body and appearance; for about 20 years the “Sacred Coil” was found in the mountains of Tibet, and even that has disappeared today.

* Today, the word “fruit” is understood as a unifying concept, which includes fruits, nuts, berries, which were previously called simply gifts, while gifts of herbs and shrubs were called fruits. Examples of fruits include peas, beans (pods), peppers, i.e. a kind of unsweetened herbal fruit.

The campaign to impoverish our diet continues and at the present time, kalega and sorghum have almost disappeared from consumption, and it is prohibited to grow poppy. Of many sacred gifts, only names remain, which are given to us today as synonyms for famous fruits. For example: gruhva, kaliva, bukhma, lily of the valley, which are passed off as rutabaga, or armud, kvit, pigva, gutey, gun - disappeared gifts that are passed off as quince. Kukish and dulya back in the 19th century meant a pear, although these were completely different gifts; today these words are used to describe the image of a fig (also, by the way, a gift). A fist with an inserted thumb used to denote the mudra of the heart, but today it is used as a negative sign. Dulya, fig and fig were no longer grown because they were sacred plants among the Khazars and Varangians. Already recently, millet began to be called “millet”, barley - barley, and millet and barley cereals disappeared forever from human agriculture.

What happened to the real Peter I? He was captured by the Jesuits and placed in a Swedish fortress. He managed to deliver the letter to Charles XII, King of Sweden, and he rescued him from captivity. Together they organized a campaign against the impostor, but the entire Jesuit-Masonic brethren of Europe, called to fight, together with Russian troops (whose relatives were taken hostage in case the troops decided to go over to Charles’s side), won a victory near Poltava. The real Russian Tsar Peter I was captured again and placed away from Russia - in the Bastille, where he later died. An iron mask was placed over his face, which caused a lot of speculation in France and Europe. The Swedish king Charles XII fled to Turkey, from where he again tried to organize a campaign against the impostor.

It would seem that if you killed the real Peter, there would be no hassle. But that’s the point, the invaders of the Earth needed a conflict, and without a living king behind bars, neither the Russian-Swedish war nor the Russian-Turkish war, which in fact were civil wars that led to the formation of two new states, would have succeeded : Turkey and Sweden, and then a few more. But the real intrigue was not only in the creation of new states. In the 18th century, all of Russia knew and said that Peter I was not a real tsar, but an impostor. And against this background, it was no longer difficult for the “great Russian historians” who arrived from the German lands: Miller, Bayer, Schlözer and Kuhn, who completely distorted the history of Russia, to declare all the Dmitry kings False Dmitrys and impostors, not having the right to the throne, and some not They managed to criticize, they changed the royal surname to Rurik.

The genius of Satanism is Roman law, which forms the basis of the constitutions of modern states. It was created contrary to all ancient canons and ideas about a society based on self-government (self-power).

For the first time, judicial power was transferred from the hands of the priests to the hands of people without clergy, i.e. the power of the best was replaced by the power of anyone

Roman law is presented to us as the “crown” of human achievement, but in reality it is the pinnacle of disorder and irresponsibility. State laws under Roman law are based on prohibitions and punishments, i.e. on negative emotions, which, as we know, can only destroy. This leads to a general lack of interest in the implementation of laws and to the opposition of officials to the people. Even in the circus, work with animals is based not only on the stick, but also on the carrot, but man on our planet is rated lower than animals by the conquerors.

In contrast to Roman law, the Russian state was built not on prohibitory laws, but on the conscience of citizens, which established a balance between incentives and prohibitions. Let us remember how the Byzantine historian Procopius of Caesarea wrote about the Slavs: “They had all the laws in their heads.” Relations in ancient society were regulated by the principles of kon, from which the words “canon” (ancient - konon), “from time immemorial”, “chambers” (i.e. according to kon) came to us. Guided by the principles of kon, a person avoided mistakes and could incarnate again in this life. The principle is always higher than the law, since it contains more possibilities than the law, just as a sentence contains more information than one word. The word “law” itself means “beyond the law.” If a society lives by the principles of law, and not by laws, it is more vital. The commandments contain more than the story and therefore surpass it, just as a story contains more than a sentence. The commandments can improve human organization and thinking, which in turn can improve the principles of law.

As the wonderful Russian thinker I.L. wrote. Solonevich, who knew from his own experience the delights of Western democracy, in addition to the long-lived Russian monarchy, resting on popular representation (zemstvo), merchants and clergy (meaning pre-Petrine times), democracy and dictatorship were invented, replacing each other after 20-30 years. However, let’s give him the floor: “Professor Wipper is not entirely right when he writes that modern humanities are only “theological scholasticism and nothing more”; this is something much worse: it is deception. This is a whole collection of deceptive travel signals, luring us to the mass graves of hunger and executions, typhus and wars, internal ruin and external defeat.

The “science” of Diderot, Rousseau, D’A-Lambert and others has already completed its cycle: there was famine, there was terror, there were wars, and there was the external defeat of France in 1814, in 1871, in 1940. The science of Hegel, Mommsen, Nietzsche and Rosenberg also completed its cycle: there was terror, there were wars, there was famine and there was defeat in 1918 and 1945. The science of the Chernyshevskys, Lavrovs, Mikhailovskys, Milyukovs and Lenins has not yet gone through the entire cycle: there is famine, there is terror, there have been wars, both internal and external, but defeat will still come: inevitable and inevitable, another payment for the verbiage of two hundred years, for the swamp lights , kindled by our rulers of thoughts over the most rotten places of the real historical swamp.”

The philosophers listed by Solonevich did not always come up with ideas that could destroy society: they were often suggested to them.

V.A. Shemshuk “The Return of Paradise to Earth”
======================

“With other European peoples you can achieve goals in humane ways, but with Russians - not so... I am not dealing with people, but with animals, which I want to transform into people” - a similar documented phrase of Peter 1 very clearly conveys his attitude towards the Russian people.

It’s hard to believe that these same “animals,” in gratitude for this, nicknamed him the Great.
Russophobes will immediately try to explain everything by saying that yes, he made people out of animals and that’s the only reason why Russia became Great and the “animals” who became people gratefully called him the Great for this.
Or maybe this is the gratitude of the Romanov owners for the perfectly fulfilled obligations to destroy precisely the traces of the greatness of the Russian People, which haunted the ruling circles of states who wanted to create a Great History for themselves, which until recently were provincial outlying provinces?
And it was precisely this very Greatness of the Russian People that did not allow them to create it?

======================================== ======

One can talk a lot and interestingly about Peter I. For example, today it is already known that his short but intense reign actually cost the Russian people more than 20 million lives (read about this in N.V. Levashov’s article “Visible and Invisible Genocide”). Maybe this is why the man called today Peter I is now declared “great”?

Anyone interested in this topic can also watch the video:

In fact, the impostor false Peter I is the Roman protege Isaac Andre.
He is buried in St. Isaac's Cathedral, which was named after him. Tale about Peter
I was invented by the Latin correctors of the true Slavic history

One of the reasons that gave rise to the version of the substitution of Tsar Peter I was the research of A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky

The beginning of these studies was the discoveries made during the study of an exact copy of the throne of Ivan the Terrible. In those days, the zodiac signs of the current rulers were placed on the thrones. Thanks to the study of the signs placed on the throne of Ivan the Terrible, scientists have found that the actual date of his birth differs from the official version by four years.

Scientists have compiled a table of the names of Russian tsars and their birthdays, and thanks to this table it was revealed that the official birthday of Peter I does not coincide with the day of his angel, which is a blatant contradiction in comparison with all the names of Russian tsars. After all, names in Rus' at baptism were given exclusively according to the calendar, and the name given to Peter breaks the established centuries-old tradition, which in itself does not fit into the framework and laws of that time.

A. Fomenko and G. Nosovsky, based on the table, found out that the real name, which falls on the official date of birth of Peter I, is Isaac. This explains the name of the main cathedral of Tsarist Russia. Thus, the Brockhaus and Efron dictionary says: “St. Isaac’s Cathedral is the main temple in St. Petersburg, dedicated to the name of St. Isaac of Dalmatia, whose memory is honored on May 30, the birthday of Peter the Great.”

Let us consider the following obvious historical facts. Their totality shows a fairly clear picture of the replacement of the real Peter I with a foreigner:

1. An Orthodox ruler was leaving Russia for Europe, wearing traditional Russian clothes. Two surviving portraits of the tsar from that time depict Peter I in a traditional caftan. The Tsar wore a caftan even during his stay at the shipyards, which confirms his adherence to traditional Russian customs. After the end of his stay in Europe, a man returned to Russia who wore exclusively European-style clothes, and in the future the new Peter I never put on Russian clothes, including the attribute obligatory for the tsar - royal vestments. This fact is difficult to explain with the official version of a sudden change in lifestyle and the beginning of adherence to European canons of development.

2. There are quite good reasons to doubt the difference in the body structure of Peter I and the impostor. According to exact data, the height of the impostor Peter I was 204 cm, while the real king was shorter and denser. It is worth noting that the height of his father, Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov, was 170 cm, and his grandfather, Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, was also of average height. The height difference of 34 cm stands out very much from the overall picture of real kinship, especially since in those days people over two meters tall were considered an extremely rare phenomenon. Indeed, even in the middle of the 19th century, the average height of Europeans was 167 cm, and the average height of Russian recruits at the beginning of the 18th century was 165 cm, which fits into the general anthropometric picture of that time. The difference in height between the real Tsar and the false Peter also explains the refusal to wear royal clothes: they simply did not fit the newly minted impostor.

3. In the portrait of Peter I by Godfried Kneller, which was created during the Tsar’s stay in Europe, a distinct mole is clearly visible. In later portraits the mole is missing. This is difficult to explain by the inaccurate works of portrait painters of that time: after all, portraiture of those years was distinguished by the highest level of realism.

4. Returning after a long trip to Europe, the newly-minted tsar did not know about the location of the richest library of Ivan the Terrible, although the secret of finding the library was passed from tsar to tsar. Thus, Princess Sophia knew where the library was located and visited it, and the new Peter repeatedly made attempts to find the library and did not even disdain excavations: after all, the library of Ivan the Terrible contained rare publications that could shed light on many secrets of history.

5. An interesting fact is the composition of the Russian embassy that went to Europe. The number of people accompanying the tsar was 20, and the embassy was headed by A. Menshikov. And the returning embassy consisted, with the exception of Menshikov, only of Dutch subjects. Moreover, the duration of the trip has increased many times over. The embassy went to Europe with the tsar for two weeks, and returned only after two years of stay.

6. Returning from Europe, the new king did not meet with his relatives or his inner circle. And subsequently, in a short period of time, he got rid of his closest relatives in various ways.

7. The Sagittarius - the guards and elite of the royal army - suspected something was wrong and did not recognize the impostor. The Streltsy revolt that began was brutally suppressed by Peter. But the Streltsy were the most advanced and combat-ready military units that faithfully served the Russian tsars. Streltsy became inheritance, which indicates the highest level of these units

It is characteristic that the scale of the destruction of the Streltsy was more global than according to official sources. At that time, the number of Streltsy reached 20,000 people, and after the pacification of the Streltsy rebellion, the Russian army was left without infantry, after which a new set of recruits was made and a complete reformation of the active army. A notable fact is that in honor of the suppression of the Streltsy revolt, a commemorative medal was issued with inscriptions in Latin, which had never before been used in the minting of coins and medals in Rus'.

8. The imprisonment of his legal wife Evdokia Lopukhina in a monastery, which the tsar did in absentia while at the Grand Embassy in London. Moreover, after the death of Peter, Lopukhina, by order of Catherine I, was transferred to the Shlisselburg fortress, which was famous for its harsh conditions of detention. Subsequently, Peter would marry Marta Samuilovna Skavronskaya-Kruse, a native of the lower classes, who after his death would become Empress Catherine.

Now let's look at the greatest steps the newly-minted tsar took for Russia.

All official versions claim that Peter I was the greatest reformer who laid the foundations for the formation of the most powerful Russian Empire. In fact, the main activity of the impostor was to destroy the foundations of the former statehood and spirituality of the people. Among the most famous great “acts” of Peter there are both well-known and little-known facts that testify to the true appearance and reforms of the new king.

Introduction of the Russian form of slavery– serfdom, which completely limited the rights of peasants both on old and conquered lands. In one form or another, the consolidation of peasants has existed since the 15th century, but Peter I carried out a tough reform in relation to the peasants, completely depriving them of their rights. A remarkable fact is the fact that serfdom was not widespread either in the Russian North or in Siberia.

Carrying out tax reform with the introduction of a strict tax system. At the same time, small silver coins began to be replaced with copper ones. Having created the Ingermanland Chancellery, headed by Menshikov, Peter introduced ruinous taxes, which included taxes on private fishing, wearing a beard, and baths. Moreover, adherents of the old rituals were subject to double tax, which served as an additional incentive for the resettlement of the Old Believers to the most remote places of Siberia.

Introduction of a new chronology system in Rus', which put an end to the countdown of time “from the creation of the world.” This innovation had a strong negative impact and became an additional incentive for the gradual eradication of the original Old Believer faith.

Transfer of the capital from Moscow to the newly built St. Petersburg. Mention of Moscow as an ancient sacred place is found in many sources, including Daniil Andreev in his work “Rose of the World”. The change of capital also served to weaken spirituality and reduce the role of the merchants in Rus'.

The destruction of ancient Russian chronicles and the beginning of rewriting the history of Rus' with the help of German professors. This activity acquired a truly gigantic scale, which explains the minimal number of surviving historical documents.

Refusal of Russian writing, which consisted of 151 characters, and the introduction of a new alphabet of Cyril and Methodius, which consisted of 43 characters. With this, Peter dealt a severe blow to the traditions of the people and stopped access to ancient written sources.

Abolition of Russian measures of measurement, such as fathom, elbow, vershok, which subsequently caused dramatic changes in traditional Russian architecture and art.

Reducing the influence of the merchant class and the development of the industrial class, who was given gigantic powers, even to the point of creating his own pocket armies.

The most brutal military expansion into Siberia, which became the precursor to the final destruction of Great Tartary. At the same time, a new religion was implanted in the conquered lands, and the lands were subject to severe taxes. The time of Peter also saw the peak of the looting of Siberian graves, the destruction of holy places and the local clergy. It was under Peter the Great’s rule that numerous detachments of mound workers appeared in Western Siberia, who, in search of gold and silver, opened old burial places and plundered holy and sacred places. Many of the most valuable “finds” made up the famous collection of Scythian gold of Peter I.

Destruction of the system of Russian self-government- Zemstvos and the transition to a bureaucratic system, which, as a rule, was headed by hirelings from Western Europe.

The most severe repressions against the Russian clergy, the virtual destruction of Orthodoxy. The scale of repression against the clergy was global. One of Peter’s most significant punishers was his close associate Jacob Bruce, who became famous for his punitive expeditions to Old Believer monasteries and the destruction of ancient church books and property.

The widespread distribution of narcotic drugs in Rus' that cause rapid and sustained addiction - alcohol, coffee and tobacco.

Complete ban on growing amaranth, from which both butter and bread were made. This plant not only improves human health, but also prolongs life by 20-30%.

Introduction of the provincial system and strengthening of the punitive role of the army. Often the right to collect taxes was given directly to the generals. And each province was obliged to maintain separate military units.

The actual ruin of the population. So, A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky point out that according to the 1678 census, 791,000 households were subject to taxation. And the general census conducted in 1710 showed only 637,000 households, and this despite the fairly large number of lands subordinated to Russia during this period. It is typical, but this only affected the increase in tax taxes. Thus, in provinces where the number of households was decreasing, taxes were collected according to the data of the old census, which led to the actual plunder and destruction of the population.

Peter I distinguished himself for his atrocities in Ukraine. Thus, in 1708, the hetman’s capital, the city of Baturyn, was completely plundered and destroyed. More than 14,000 people out of the city's 20,000 population died in the bloody massacre. At the same time, Baturin was almost completely destroyed and burned, and 40 churches and monasteries were looted and desecrated.

Contrary to popular belief, Peter I was by no means a great military leader: de facto, he did not win a single significant war. The only “successful” campaign can only be considered the Northern War, which was rather sluggish and lasted for 21 years. This war caused irreparable damage to the Russian financial system and led to the virtual impoverishment of the population.

One way or another, all of Peter’s atrocities, called “reform activities” in official versions of history, were aimed at the complete eradication of both the culture and faith of the Russian people, and the culture and religion of the peoples living in the annexed territories. In fact, the newly-minted tsar caused irreparable damage to Russia, completely changing its culture, way of life and customs.

fiction or historical fact?

One of the reasons that gave rise to the version of the substitution of Tsar Peter I was the research of A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky.

The beginning of these studies was the discoveries made during the study of an exact copy of the throne of Ivan the Terrible. In those days, the zodiac signs of the current rulers were placed on the thrones. Thanks to the study of the signs placed on the throne of Ivan the Terrible, scientists have found that the actual date of his birth differs from the official version by four years.

Scientists have compiled a table of the names of Russian tsars and their birthdays, and thanks to this table it was revealed that the official birthday of Peter I does not coincide with the day of his angel, which is a blatant contradiction in comparison with all the names of Russian tsars. After all, names in Rus' at baptism were given exclusively according to the calendar, and the name given to Peter breaks the established centuries-old tradition, which in itself does not fit into the framework and laws of that time.

A. Fomenko and G. Nosovsky, based on the table, found out that the real name, which falls on the official date of birth of Peter I, is Isaac. This explains the name of the main cathedral of Tsarist Russia. Thus, the Brockhaus and Efron dictionary says: “St. Isaac’s Cathedral is the main temple in St. Petersburg, dedicated to the name of St. Isaac of Dalmatia, whose memory is honored on May 30, the birthday of Peter the Great.”

Let us consider the following obvious historical facts. Their totality shows a fairly clear picture of the replacement of the real Peter I with a foreigner:

1. An Orthodox ruler was leaving Russia for Europe, wearing traditional Russian clothes. Two surviving portraits of the tsar from that time depict Peter I in a traditional caftan. The Tsar wore a caftan even during his stay at the shipyards, which confirms his adherence to traditional Russian customs. After the end of his stay in Europe, a man returned to Russia who wore exclusively European-style clothes, and in the future the new Peter I never put on Russian clothes, including the attribute obligatory for the tsar - royal vestments. This fact is difficult to explain with the official version of a sudden change in lifestyle and the beginning of adherence to European canons of development.

2. There are quite good reasons to doubt the difference in the body structure of Peter I and the impostor. According to exact data, the height of the impostor Peter I was 204 cm, while the real king was shorter and denser. It is worth noting that the height of his father, Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov, was 170 cm, and his grandfather, Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, was also of average height. The height difference of 34 cm stands out very much from the overall picture of real kinship, especially since in those days people over two meters tall were considered an extremely rare phenomenon. Indeed, even in the middle of the 19th century, the average height of Europeans was 167 cm, and the average height of Russian recruits at the beginning of the 18th century was 165 cm, which fits into the general anthropometric picture of that time. The difference in height between the real Tsar and the false Peter also explains the refusal to wear royal clothes: they simply did not fit the newly minted impostor.

3. In the portrait of Peter I by Godfried Kneller, which was created during the Tsar’s stay in Europe, a distinct mole is clearly visible. In later portraits the mole is missing. This is difficult to explain by the inaccurate works of portrait painters of that time: after all, portraiture of those years was distinguished by the highest level of realism.

4. Returning after a long trip to Europe, the newly-minted tsar did not know about the location of the richest library of Ivan the Terrible, although the secret of finding the library was passed from tsar to tsar. Thus, Princess Sophia knew where the library was located and visited it, and the new Peter repeatedly made attempts to find the library and did not even disdain excavations: after all, the library of Ivan the Terrible contained rare publications that could shed light on many secrets of history.

5. An interesting fact is the composition of the Russian embassy that went to Europe. The number of people accompanying the tsar was 20, and the embassy was headed by A. Menshikov. And the returning embassy consisted, with the exception of Menshikov, only of Dutch subjects. Moreover, the duration of the trip has increased many times over. The embassy went to Europe with the tsar for two weeks, and returned only after two years of stay.

6. Returning from Europe, the new king did not meet with his relatives or his inner circle. And subsequently, in a short period of time, he got rid of his closest relatives in various ways.

7. The Sagittarius - the guards and elite of the royal army - suspected something was wrong and did not recognize the impostor. The Streltsy revolt that began was brutally suppressed by Peter. But the Streltsy were the most advanced and combat-ready military units that faithfully served the Russian tsars. Streltsy became inheritance, which indicates the highest level of these units

It is characteristic that the scale of the destruction of the Streltsy was more global than according to official sources. At that time, the number of Streltsy reached 20,000 people, and after the pacification of the Streltsy rebellion, the Russian army was left without infantry, after which a new set of recruits was made and a complete reformation of the active army. A notable fact is that in honor of the suppression of the Streltsy revolt, a commemorative medal was issued with inscriptions in Latin, which had never before been used in the minting of coins and medals in Rus'.

8. The imprisonment of his legal wife Evdokia Lopukhina in a monastery, which the tsar did in absentia while at the Grand Embassy in London. Moreover, after the death of Peter, Lopukhina, by order of Catherine I, was transferred to the Shlisselburg fortress, which was famous for its harsh conditions of detention. Subsequently, Peter would marry Marta Samuilovna Skavronskaya-Kruse, a native of the lower classes, who after his death would become Empress Catherine.

Now let's look at the greatest steps the newly-minted tsar took for Russia.

All official versions claim that Peter I was the greatest reformer who laid the foundations for the formation of the most powerful Russian Empire. In fact, the main activity of the impostor was to destroy the foundations of the former statehood and spirituality of the people. Among the most famous great “acts” of Peter there are both well-known and little-known facts that testify to the true appearance and reforms of the new king.

- Introduction of the Russian form of slavery– serfdom, which completely limited the rights of peasants both on old and conquered lands. In one form or another, the consolidation of peasants has existed since the 15th century, but Peter I carried out a tough reform in relation to the peasants, completely depriving them of their rights. A remarkable fact is the fact that serfdom was not widespread either in the Russian North or in Siberia.

- Carrying out tax reform with the introduction of a harsh tax system. At the same time, small silver coins began to be replaced with copper ones. Having created the Ingermanland Chancellery, headed by Menshikov, Peter introduced ruinous taxes, which included taxes on private fishing, wearing a beard, and baths. Moreover, adherents of the old rituals were subject to double tax, which served as an additional incentive for the resettlement of the Old Believers to the most remote places of Siberia.

- Introduction of a new chronology system in Rus', putting an end to the countdown of time “from the creation of the world.” This innovation had a strong negative impact and became an additional incentive for the gradual eradication of the original Old Believer faith.

- Transfer of the capital from Moscow to the newly built St. Petersburg. Mention of Moscow as an ancient sacred place is found in many sources, including Daniil Andreev in his work “Rose of the World”. The change of capital also served to weaken spirituality and reduce the role of the merchants in Rus'.

The destruction of ancient Russian chronicles and the beginning of rewriting the history of Rus' with the help of German professors. This activity acquired a truly gigantic scale, which explains the minimal number of surviving historical documents.

Refusal of Russian writing, which consisted of 151 characters, and the introduction of a new alphabet of Cyril and Methodius, which consisted of 43 characters. With this, Peter dealt a severe blow to the traditions of the people and stopped access to ancient written sources.

- Cancellation of Russian measurements, such as sazhen, kolot, vershok, which subsequently caused dramatic changes in traditional Russian architecture and art.

- Reducing the influence of the merchant class and the development of the industrial class, who was given gigantic powers, even to the point of creating his own pocket armies.

The most brutal military expansion into Siberia, which became the precursor to the final destruction of Great Tartary. At the same time, a new religion was implanted in the conquered lands, and the lands were subject to severe taxes. The time of Peter also saw the peak of the looting of Siberian graves, the destruction of holy places and the local clergy. It was under Peter the Great’s rule that numerous detachments of mound workers appeared in Western Siberia, who, in search of gold and silver, opened old burial places and plundered holy and sacred places. Many of the most valuable “finds” made up the famous collection of Scythian gold of Peter I.

- Destruction of the system of Russian self-government- Zemstvos and the transition to a bureaucratic system, which, as a rule, was headed by hirelings from Western Europe.

- The most severe repressions against the Russian clergy, the virtual destruction of Orthodoxy. The scale of repression against the clergy was global. One of Peter’s most significant punishers was his close associate Jacob Bruce, who became famous for his punitive expeditions to Old Believer monasteries and the destruction of ancient church books and property.

- Widespread distribution of narcotic drugs in Rus', causing rapid and sustained addiction - alcohol, coffee and tobacco.

- Complete ban on growing amaranth, from which both butter and bread were made. This plant not only improves human health, but also prolongs life by 20-30%.

- Introduction of the provincial system and strengthening of the punitive role of the army. Often the right to collect taxes was given directly to the generals. And each province was obliged to maintain separate military units.

- The actual ruin of the population. So, A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky point out that according to the 1678 census, 791,000 households were subject to taxation. And the general census conducted in 1710 showed only 637,000 households, and this despite the fairly large number of lands subordinated to Russia during this period. It is typical, but this only affected the increase in tax taxes. Thus, in provinces where the number of households was decreasing, taxes were collected according to the data of the old census, which led to the actual plunder and destruction of the population.

- Peter I distinguished himself for his atrocities in Ukraine. Thus, in 1708, the hetman’s capital, the city of Baturyn, was completely plundered and destroyed. More than 14,000 people out of the city's 20,000 population died in the bloody massacre. At the same time, Baturin was almost completely destroyed and burned, and 40 churches and monasteries were looted and desecrated.

Contrary to popular belief, Peter I was by no means a great military leader: de facto, he did not win a single significant war. The only “successful” campaign can only be considered the Northern War, which was rather sluggish and lasted for 21 years. This war caused irreparable damage to the Russian financial system and led to the virtual impoverishment of the population.

One way or another, all of Peter’s atrocities, called “reform activities” in official versions of history, were aimed at the complete eradication of both the culture and faith of the Russian people, and the culture and religion of the peoples living in the annexed territories. In fact, the newly-minted tsar caused irreparable damage to Russia, completely changing its culture, way of life and customs.

Associated with the life and death of great Russians. This is the death of the son of Ivan the Terrible, Tsarevich Dimitri, and the execution of the last Russian Emperor Nicholas II, and the poisoning of I.V. Stalin. At the same time, the substitution of Peter I - is it fiction or historical fact, has been repeatedly discussed by historians and has three different options.

The main versions of the substitution of Peter I

The least conspiratorial hypothesis that Tsar Peter I was replaced by a double was put forward by V. Kukovenko, co-founder of the historical society of the city of Mozhaisk, and I. Danilov, head of the “Philosophical Assault” project. According to their assumption, during the second amusing “Semyonovsky” campaign in 1691, the young tsar was mortally wounded during a horse attack or a shootout. A similar accident happened before. A year earlier, during a training exercise, a grenade exploded in the hands of a soldier, burning the face of Peter I himself and his comrade-in-arms, General Patrick Gordon. Those close to Peter, led by the boyar Fyodor Romodanovsky, previously noted the undoubted resemblance to the tsar of the Dutch shipwright Yaan Mush, a Saardam carpenter who arrived in Russia to build an amusing fleet. F. Romodanovsky and the commander of the opposing amusing army, “Generalissimo” I. Buturlin, saving themselves from the death penalty and their relatives from repression, replaced Peter I with a Dutch master, who was 4...5 years younger than the tsar.

The most convincing and justified hypothesis was proposed by the “subverters” of the modern view of historical science and the developers of the “New Chronology” by Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences A.T. Fomenko and associate professor of Moscow State University G.V. Nosovsky. They were the first to note that Peter's official date of birth did not correspond to the day of his angel. If the king had really been born on May 30, 1672, then he should have been named Isaac. It was in honor of this name, the real name of the person who replaced the tsar, that the main church cathedral of the Russian Empire was named. At the same time, the historian P. Milyukov, who wrote an article about the first Russian Emperor for the Brockhaus and Efron encyclopedia, hinted in a veiled form that Russia, starting in 1698 - the year of Peter I’s return from the Great Embassy, ​​was ruled by an impostor.

The following facts support this hypothesis:

• the tsar sent his wife, queen Evdokia, who bore him a son, Alexei, to a monastery during his trip to Europe before returning to Russia;
• before Peter I entered Moscow, the remnants of the Streltsy army were destroyed, and the Streltsy died near Moscow during a battle with an unknown army, under the command of boyar Shein, about whom no more historical records have been preserved;
• before entering Moscow, the Russian autocrat secretly meets with the Polish king and pays him an “indemnity” (according to other sources, a “subsidy”) of 1.5 million gold efimki, which was equal to the annual income of the Moscow state;
• Having returned to Moscow, Peter unsuccessfully tried to find the library of Sophia Paleologus, the location of which was known only to persons of royal blood and which Princess Sophia repeatedly visited;
• shaving of beards, Western European dances and entertainment, and the introduction of Western customs into everyday life began only after the sovereign returned from the Grand Embassy.

There are two versions of the replacement of Peter I with a double during a trip to Western Europe:

• St. Petersburg mathematician Sergei Albertovich Sall believes that the double of the Tsar of Muscovy was a prominent freemason and relative of William of Orange, the first king of England and Scotland and the only representative on the British throne from the Nassau-Oran dynasty;
• according to the historian Evgeniy Trofimovich Baida, the double was either a Swede or a Dane named Isaac (hence the St. Isaac's Cathedral) and professed the Lutheran religion.

However, checking the versions of whether this event was a substitution of Peter, a fiction or a historical fact, can be resolved quite simply. To do this, it is necessary to take, during the next planned restoration of the tomb of Peter in the Peter and Paul Cathedral, a particle of genetic material, and it will immediately become clear that there have been substitutions, and theories about who was the father of the first Russian Emperor - Tsar Alexei Fedorovich or Patriarch Nikon, will be confirmed or refuted. whose connections with Peter’s mother, Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina, were maligned by his contemporaries.

CRITICISM OF THE VERSION ABOUT THE REPLACEMENT OF THE RUSSIAN TSAR PETER THE GREAT WITH HIS DOUBLE

Nowadays, on the world network called the Internet, many materials on past history have appeared that challenge the established point of view and offer new versions of certain events. Since history is a human affair, it could not be compiled without the influence of certain groups of people in power and defending their interests and benefits. That is why it is not surprising that many facts of the past were presented exaggeratedly and distortedly, or even completely invented. HOWEVER, THE GENERAL OUTLOOK STILL STILL CLOSE TO REALITY.

Only the Lord God knows what really happened. Participants in some historical event know this partly. History is happening before our eyes, and sometimes we cannot understand what is happening, why, in whose favor and by whom it is moving. For example, the story of the rise of Joseph the Beautiful in ancient Egypt was conveyed to us by God through the prophet Moses. There is no such story in the Egyptian chronicles and everything is written completely differently. Why? Because the Egyptians did not want to look bad in the eyes of other peoples and states. And what nation or government or church or group of people wants to look bad? That is why history has always been cleaned up and corrected by those interested in it. That is why those who believe in God and the Bible have one story, and those who don’t have another story, different from the biblical one. Most often, it is not the events themselves that are distorted, but their interpretation and motivation. Ultimately, everything is based on the faith and trust of some people (who did not live then and did not participate in the events described in historical books) to other persons, those who recorded these events and their explanation, as their participant or as a listener from the first persons of these events. The reliability of the recording of events depends on the honesty of the persons who conveyed these events to the chronicler. In addition to the testimony of eyewitnesses and participants, additional historical sources are various documents, letters, memoirs, notes of various persons, coins, postage stamps, heraldry, weapons, household items, equipment, scientific works, architectural ensembles, temples, cathedrals, palaces, chambers and others works of architecture, works of art, monuments, chronicles of wars, post-war treaties, later - photographs, audio and video recordings, newsreels and much more.

One of the modern historical myths is the version that Tsar Peter the Great, during his stay in Europe with the Great Embassy, ​​was kidnapped and another person similar to him was installed in his place. The very idea of ​​this version and its technical implementation are valid. Something like this really could have happened, but it didn’t. All the versions of “evidence” offered by the authors are very strained and can only be meaningful for those people who really want to believe in this version. For a thoughtful and impartial look, a number of reasonable objections and questions arise.

So, for now, let’s take on faith this version of the replacement of Tsar Peter the Great with his double and, based on this fact, we will pose a number of questions:

1. Who ordered this action and who needed it and why?
2. What is the motive for this crime?
3. Tsar Peter was not alone in the Great Embassy. There were many people with him who knew him well. If there was a replacement of the king, then how did these people not notice this replacement? Or if they noticed, then why were they silent and this secret waited until the 21st century?
4. In addition to the persons of the Great Embassy, ​​Tsar Peter was also known to other persons in Russia. Why, when he (his double) returned to Russia, did they not raise this issue? Is this really such a commonplace and unimportant matter that it can simply be ignored? For example, Old Believers went into schism and to the stake for smaller reasons. The version that False Peter allegedly managed to neutralize the entire former entourage of Tsar Peter the Great is incredible! A change in the same person, and a dramatic one at that, is a very real thing. This has happened and happens often. But every change in a person’s behavior cannot be explained by his replacement with a double.
5. According to the version, False Peter was a foreigner (i.e., not Russian). Then it is not clear how he could instantly and unnoticed by those around him enter into the atmosphere of Tsar Peter? After all, for him this is a foreign country, a foreign people, a foreign culture, foreign customs, etc. How did he navigate the Kremlin and Moscow, and even more so in the affairs of the Russian state? How could he, unnoticed by those around him, use Peter’s objects without giving himself away? How could people not notice the change in speech style, accent and other features of the double’s speech?
6. How could all the changes visible to others be kept in the strictest confidence? Let’s say people from Tsar Peter’s entourage were afraid of the death penalty and therefore remained silent. But someone could have let it slip before death, during confession, or after moving to another country. It is very difficult to keep such a secret without “leakage” and publicity. Moreover, False Peter was alone, in a strange environment, and had to constantly be afraid of exposure. He could have been blackmailed. He could be manipulated by those who found out that it was not Peter. But nothing like that happened.
7. Regarding the conduct of wars, Peter the Great was never an outstanding commander. The courage he showed in Azov is the ardor of youth, and not a manifestation of the genius of a commander. According to the version, the real Tsar Peter allegedly opposed the double and impostor together with the Swedish King Charles 12. If this were true, it is not clear why the main incentive and motive of this war - the imposture of False Peter and the authenticity of the true Tsar Peter - were not loudly voiced throughout Russia , all of Europe and the whole world? After all, even the true impostors to the Russian throne - False Dmitry, Razin, Pugachev - used this motive! And how could the Russian Tsar achieve his restoration to the throne with the help of foreign troops, through the murders and bloodshed of his subjects? This is complete absurdity!
8. What Peter the Great began to do after returning from Europe could only be done by a genuine Russian Tsar, for no impostor would have been allowed to do this. The impostor would be secretly poisoned or stabbed to death in his sleep, and in the morning his imposture would be discovered!
8. It is known that Tsar Peter, despite his great stature, had small feet for a man of his height (38). This is known from his shoes, descriptions and the wax figure of Tsar Peter. It is impossible to fake this for another person, just as it is impossible to hide the size of a leg, especially its rare disproportionate combination with height.
10. In addition to secular persons, Tsar Peter was well known by representatives of the clergy of the Russian Church. They could not help but notice the substitution of the king or remain silent about it. For example, I know each of my spiritual children and would immediately notice their replacement even with a very similar person. Spirit, peculiarities of speech and behavior, and much more that cannot be described, cannot be faked. Moreover, according to the version, the Orthodox Tsar stopped visiting churches, worship services, fasting, etc.
11. If simple believers or priests were silent out of fear, then God’s saints would not remain silent! According to the version, it turns out that there were no saints in Russia at that time, or that the Lord God did not reveal anything to them about the replacement of their king, or that they were afraid for their lives and therefore were hypocrites? Let this not happen! Saint Mitrophan of Voronezh denounced Tsar Peter for the pagan statues on the royal palace in St. Petersburg and even prepared to be executed for this. But the king called him, talked to him and sent him home. The Venerable Seraphim of Sarov spoke of Tsar Peter as a Great Sovereign, but even with this greatness of the Tsar, God refused him to transfer the relics of the Holy Prince Alexander Nevsky to St. Petersburg.

The tomb was made of silver, but there were no relics in it. According to the version, it turns out that all the Russian saints were deceived and prayed not for the real Tsar Peter, but for a foreign impostor and enemy of Russia. We, faithful to Christ, cannot allow such a situation! The holy saints of God could not help but know about the substitution (if it really happened) and, all the more, treacherously remain silent about it!

This version paints a terrible picture of the state of the Russian people and the Russian kingdom. What kind of kingdom is this and what kind of people are these if under them some foreigner could freely seize power and the royal throne by deception, and fool them all throughout his life, and after his death too! But since someone decided to promote this version to the masses of people, they felt the need to compose the story of the “true Tsar Peter the Great.” Here is an attempt to return the Russian throne by war with Russia on the side of Sweden, and facts that coincide with the facts from the feature film “The Iron Mask,” and other unproven inventions. And finally, just look at the results of the reign of the king with the names Peter the Great and Peter the Great. If, according to the version, the Russian throne was indeed seized by a foreign agent by deception, then he should have pursued a policy that would destroy the country and weaken its state and military power. We find exactly the opposite of this! Let’s say the church and faith somehow suffered due to Peter’s reforms, but that state itself was transformed and became modern, with a strong army and navy. Why did the foreign agent and his puppet masters need this? After all, under False Dmitry, who reigned in Moscow through the intrigues of the Poles, Russia came to disaster and its demise in one year! And here science has advanced, and the education system has improved, and production has improved, and Russia has access to the seas, and the power has grown stronger, and it has won victories over foreign troops, and a new capital has been built, St. Petersburg, which still stands and amazes with its architecture. . Why is all this for foreign agents, masons and conspirators who only wanted the collapse of Russia? It was after Peter that the enemies of Russia came to their senses and began to weave conspiracies and commit murders of the tsars - Paul, Alexander II, Nicholas II, and also contributed to the acceleration of the death of Tsar Alexander III! And at the same time, economically and politically, Russia was developing and growing stronger all the time, which was scary for its enemies and ill-wishers. And what does serfdom and vodka have to do with it? Yes, they were bad things in Russia. But serfdom was still abolished and abolished, and they fought against drunkenness. But Grand Duke Vladimir of Kiev wrote about the love of drinking in Rus'. Peter did not bring drunkenness, but the trade in alcohol, which was economically beneficial to his court and power. And vodka was invented by Lomonosov, not Tsar Peter. But the passion for drinking alcohol is a sinful passion inspired by demons, not people. People can only tempt her and give her a reason.

Summing up, we can confidently say that we do not have any serious grounds or evidence to accept this version. Everything is built on assumptions and assumptions using tailored comparisons of different qualities of the same person. There have been and still are doubles in history. They were and are used by the powers that be, but not enough to give them their power. The strong always insure themselves and keep their counterparts in such a way that none of us would want to be in their place. No matter how anyone liked Tsar Peter the Great, no matter what mistakes he made, it was he and he made them too.

Why did they start circulating this supposedly “patriotic” version? In fact, this version does not resolve issues of history, does not truly explain past events and does not restore the gaps of history, but brings harm to the Russian people and the Russian world in general. By allowing such a substitution, the Russian people are placed in a very humiliating and unfavorable position. Solid ground is being knocked out from under them, albeit a combed, but still true story, and in its place they are presented with shifting sand of conjectures and fortune-telling assumptions, and even deliberately false inventions. This brings confusion into a person’s soul (and all confusion, according to the teachings of the Fathers of the Church of Christ, comes from demons), temptation, disbelief in anyone, despondency and despair. Hence the unsteadiness of views and the complex of constant fear of being deceived, skepticism, mistrust, chaos and loss. And who needs it? To the enemies of salvation!