Sedition, s, f. (obsolete). Conspiracy, rebellion, and also (translated) what n. illegal, prohibited. Ozhegov's explanatory dictionary. S.I. Ozhegov, N.Yu. Shvedova. 1949 1992 … Ozhegov's Explanatory Dictionary
Adj. decomposition 1. ratio with noun sedition, associated with it 2. Characteristic of sedition, characteristic of it. Ephraim's explanatory dictionary. T. F. Efremova. 2000... Modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian language by Efremova
Seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious,... ... Forms of words
seditious- edge; briefly linen shape, linen... Russian spelling dictionary
seditious- cr.f. kramo/linen, kramo/linen, flax, flax; edgier/flatter... Spelling dictionary of the Russian language
See Sedition... encyclopedic Dictionary
seditious- see sedition; oh, oh. K y poems. K y speeches. Seductive spirit... Dictionary of many expressions
seditious- sedition... Morphemic-spelling dictionary
Rebellious, rebellious, violent, rebellious, disobedient, stiff-necked, seditious, conspiratorial, revolutionary. Wed. violent... Dictionary of Russian synonyms and similar expressions. under. ed. N. Abramova, M.: Russian Dictionaries, 1999. rebellious... ... Synonym dictionary
Books
- The Anarchist's Dove Book, Ermakov Oleg Nikolaevich. The new novel by Oleg Ermakov, winner of two major Russian literary awards - “Yasnaya Polyana” and “Big Book” - is not a direct continuation of his cult “Rainbow and Heather”. But…
- The Anarchist's Dove Book, Ermakov Oleg Nikolaevich. The new novel by Oleg Ermakov, winner of two major Russian literary awards Yasnaya Polyana and the Big Book, is not a direct continuation of his iconic Rainbow and Heather. But it’s possible...
Satan has various games, tactics and strategies to lead a believer astray from the path of truth. In his design laboratories, Iblis discusses with his henchmen: “How can we knock this man down? How can I cloud his mind? But there are also people who follow on his heels without any coercion. It's like in one parable. One person was passing by the mosque. And then he saw in the courtyard of the mosque standing at the entrance with reins.
Who are you waiting for? - he asked the person standing at the entrance.
In this mosque there are people prostrating themselves before Allah, worshiping Him. As soon as they come out, I will throw these reins around their necks and force them to obey me.
A man who does not go to the mosque says:
Where is my team, my reins?
“And you don’t even need reins, at one sign from me you hurry after me...” Satan answered him.
But not only those who do not go to the mosque lose, they can also lose while they are in the mosque. Losing because of riya, showing off. Because of bad assumptions about a person or people called "su-i zan". Then, when it was possible to find an excuse for his brother or sister, the person thinks badly and thereby commits a sin. Gives a meaning to the spoken words that was not intended, gives as negative an assessment as possible to what he sees. Thus, a person first turns his life into hell and cannot find peace. On the other hand, harboring bad thoughts about others, he begins to defame people in the world of his beliefs, and then this will be reflected on his lips. This will show injustice to yourself and to others. Therefore, the Koran calls those who are unjust to themselves evildoers, and those who are unjust to others are also called evildoers, and both are evildoers who have transgressed boundaries. Sometimes these boundaries reach the brink of disbelief, and the person himself will not notice it. Sometimes riya reaches the borders of disbelief, and sometimes bad thoughts about someone lead to the borders of disbelief. Even today there are people who go to the mosque to provoke discord and enmity between people. They go to the mosque, looking for a way to get it closed.
Each of us has su-i zan (bad assumptions about others) to one degree or another. It results from a lack of good, positive assumptions. But whoever came up with these seditious thoughts, undoubtedly their first inventor is Satan. And his disciples always remain on earth, there are his retinue, assistants, his warriors, following on his heels. He still has his own employees today. Sometimes under the guise of unbelief, sometimes under the guise of hypocrisy, sometimes dressed in envy, sometimes dressed in jealousy, sometimes dressed in rivalry, it ends up forcing people to do the same thing for how many centuries!
Which model should be applied to this or that person, what is his weak point, which side is easier to approach? Iblis knows such things very well; his experience of leading people astray from the truth can be counted in thousands of years. He has faithful disciples among the genies and people. But Allah Almighty taught us how to resist Satan. This antidote is contained in the Qur'an:
“And say, O Muhammad: “Lord! I seek refuge with You from the obsessions, temptations and whisperings of the devils. And I pray to You, Lord, to drive them away from me, so that they do not pollute my atmosphere with theirs, so that even their spirit is not near me” (23:97, 98).
This is what the Koran teaches us. Before starting a good deed, before starting to read the Koran, we say: “Auzu billahi min ashshaytanirrazhim.” We resort to Allah for help from the shaitan driven away by stones. So that he does not mix anything with our worship and good deeds. “Look how beautifully I read the Koran,” “in what a wonderful manner I was able to express it,” “look, I have this book like this, I never get away with it.” By introducing such information into our consciousness, he tries to pollute pure thoughts, pure deeds, he throws in positive things.
There are also those among people who are engaged in stuffing information or cutting it off, so as to create a completely different meaning. Remember, from childhood we were taught that the fate of a person sometimes depends on where to put a comma, as in the sentence: “Execution cannot be pardoned”? In the same way, suppose you oppose someone’s takfir and say: “Do not call him a kaafir.” If you cut out just two letters “not” from these words, what will happen? The result will be completely the opposite effect with terrible consequences. Or it may be that a person says something under certain circumstances in a certain place. By shifting the time and place, these words may turn out to be completely inappropriate and even harmful, but there will always be those who will play on this.
Islam teaches us, as far as possible, to do husn uz-zan (to assume good things about people) about people. Sometimes, in order to make an assessment about a particular person, it is worth looking at him, studying his biography, the environment in which he lives, the worldview of this environment. Look at the belief system and commitment to it. And giving unsubstantiated conclusions based on just one phrase said in just one place, or on just one action is definitely “su-i-zan” and a sin.
The Holy Quran says: “O you who believe! Avoid many assumptions, for some assumptions are sin” (49:12). Please note that the Qur'an speaks of "certain assumptions." This means that you can make husn az-zan, good assumptions are appropriate there, but instead, by focusing on something you are showing su-i zan.
Undoubtedly, husn az-zan does not mean blind trust in everyone you meet. As they say: “Trust, but verify.” But even if you have been let down fifty times, in accordance with the above principle, you will exercise caution, but will avoid unfounded negative assessments, otherwise this may lead to irreparable consequences.
In the Holy Quran in Surah Hujurat there is another verse in this vein: “O you who believe! If a wicked person comes to you with any news, then find out [what is the matter] so as not to strike [innocent people] out of ignorance, otherwise you will have to repent of what you have done” (49:6).
The reason for the revelation of this verse was a story related to the tribe of Bani Mustaliq. Our Prophet (peace be upon him) defeated this tribe, they agreed to accept Islam, and accepted the payment of zakat. And so, after some time, the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) sends to them one companion who had recently accepted Islam, named Walid ibn Uqba. This young man had bad relations in the past between his family and the Banu Mustaliq tribe. There were some factors that could cause one to evaluate positive things as negative. Walid ibn Uqba himself had no bad intentions, but when he approached them, he thought that they were going to attack him with their horses and carts. This awakened memories of the past in him: “They are coming to harm me, they will not pay zakat, I urgently need to return and tell the Prophet about this,” he thought. And he returns and tells the Prophet about this. After this, the Prophet (peace be upon him) receives a corrective revelation. Check, evaluate, is there anything ahead or behind this word? Maybe there's something they're not telling? Was it really like that? In Arabic this is called “tabyin”, clarification of all the circumstances of what happened, bringing to clarity and precision. This process requires effort. Then the Prophet (peace be upon him) sends Khalid ibn Waleed (r.a.). When night falls, he heads there. He arrives during dawn and sees the azan coming from their rooftops. He returns and says: “O Messenger of Allah, I saw such and such.” Then it became clear that these people did not have bad intentions. The person just misunderstood the question. Now, if the Prophet (peace be upon him), without finding out the essence of the issue, would have gathered an army, they say, since you treat my subordinate this way, i.e. with the zakat collector, you go with an army against my subordinate, so as not to pay zakat and to kill him. Do you know how it would all have ended if the Prophet (peace be upon him) had not decided to go to war against Bani Mustaliq? Because of this, such a wound would be created, these people would turn against Islam and begin to harbor hatred that could not be calmed. But with divine warning and the foresight of the Prophet, the problem was resolved without shedding blood, without negative actions.
Similar things, with only a few differences in detail, can happen at any time and in any place. In such cases, we are obliged to find out everything in detail, to perceive any matter in a positive way, as far as possible. And this is very important to prevent harm to public life and common interests.
Rinat Gabbasov
Sedition, seditionist
When studying the history of a word, it is very important to monitor changes in the degree of activity in the use of a word and observe fluctuations in its role and its function in the system of different literary styles. The fact is that many words periodically experience periods of either withering or rising activity. The socio-historical reasons for these increases and decreases in the vital rhythm of words are associated with the general laws of development of a given semantic system. An interesting illustration of these phenomena is the fate of the word sedition and its derivatives - seditious, seditious, seditious. Word sedition – Old Slavonicism. It is already known in the Old Slavonic theaters Mariinsky and Zografsky, in the Gospel of Luke, XXIII, 19. Cf. Bulgarian sedition, Czech kramola. An ancient Church Slavonic pannonism derived from it, often found in hagiographic literature, is also noted - verb sedition ηοπυβουχηαι (for example, in the Life of Niphon, l. 42, in the edition of Rystenko, p. 277). Presence of Old Russian full-vowel forms koromola, koromolovati, koromolnik(letters of the XIII - XIV centuries, chronicles of Ipat. and Novgor.; Sreznevsky, 1, p. 1290) seem to indicate the existence of words of this root among the Eastern Slavs in addition to borrowing from the language of the Old Church Slavic (cf. Ukrainian. Coromola).
Etymology of the word sedition not entirely clear. Bernecker and Lyapunov (cf. also Matzenauer and Miklosic) consider it a borrowing from Middle Latin (cf. carmula, carmulum), where in turn it could have passed from some Germanic dialect (cf. N.-V.-German. karmen "cry"; Anglo-Saxon karm "crying, complaint" and Anglo-Saxon kyrm "noise, cry").
There is reason to assert that this word was little known in living East Slavic dialects. In modern folk regional speech, Russian forms of this word or its descendants are not noted. Therefore, Old Russian forms caromola, caromolovati have to be considered as Russified varieties of the corresponding Old Church Slavonicisms, included in the official business language (cf., however, Ukrainian. Coromola; Sergeevich, 1, p. 470). The same conclusion is also led by the fact that the word sedition in the Old Russian literary language has become especially widespread since the time of the second Yugoslav influence, i.e., the end of the 14th - beginning of the 15th century. Apparently, this word is increasingly replacing the ancient East Slavic in the literary language which and business Coromola. In any case, the fact that in the entry Pskovsk is not without significance. Apostle of 1307, which is a quotation from “The Tale of Igor’s Host”, used the word which, while in the Slavicized text of the “Lay” that has come down to us we find the expression sedition.
Apparently, in the 17th century. word sedition was already officially bookish. In the "Mirror" of the 17th century. word sedition is explained, obviously, as not very common, as not colloquial: “ Sedition This is destruction, rebellion.”
M. F. Vladimirsky-Budanov wrote that in ancient Russian codes of law of the 15th – 16th centuries. " sedition(supreme treason, although snitches are sometimes called seditious)...” refers to the number of political crimes (Vladimirsky-Budanov, p. 289).
Like words of high style, sedition and its derivatives seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious, seditious and others are already used in the literary language of the 18th century. E. F. Budde noted the duality of emphasis in this word: sedition And sedition.
Wed. in the Northern Bulletin:
With an eagle's shield
Weaned sedition hereditary crowns
Having closed it from enemy forces
(1804, 2, p. 228).
In Derzhavin’s ode “On Cunning”: sedition shake the light (Buddha, Essay, p. 128). In New Church Slavonic texts the emphasis is on the last syllable: sedition.
Wed. in Lomonosov's poem "Peter the Great":
The rebels entered the temple in a host
To the face of the saint for harmful discord,
Hiding sedition under the name of the cathedral.
But by the end of the 18th century, and especially by the 30s of the 19th century. most of these words fall out of literary use. It is significant that in the academic dictionary of 1847 the word sedition(as well as seditious) qualifies as ecclesiastical. Its meaning is defined as follows: “popular indignation, unrest, rebellion, unrest.” It is illustrated with a quotation from the Gospel text (fol. 1867–1868, 2, p. 448). Wed. use seditious in Derzhavin, V. Petrov, Merzlyakov and others (words by Grot - Shakhmatov, vol. 4, issue 9, p. 2612).
Wed. in a letter from P. Kaptsevich to Archbishop Eugene of Tobolsk and Siberia (January 15, 1826) “To this day I have not heard any anti-submissive talk from sedition"(Russian antiquity, 1896, February, p. 314).
Obviously, in the 30s of the XIX century. word sedition is perceived as archaic. But at the beginning of the 19th century. sedition, seditious, seditious They were also quite widely used in the styles of poetic language and in historical fiction.
In Neledinsky-Maletsky (“Polish, sung at the ball” 1814):
Son sedition, friend of treason
Smitten by him, he fell from the throne.
In P. A. Vyazemsky’s poem “Petersburg” (1818):
There's a glow in Europe sedition enmity ignited.
Wed. Karamzin’s constant use of this word in “History of the Russian State” (VIII, 3: “The boyars died in sedition" and so on.).
In Pushkin’s “My Genealogy”:
Having humbled sedition and deceit
And the fury of the scolding commanders,
When the Romanovs ascend to the throne
He called the people in his letter -
We had a hand in it.
Fire of strife and sedition
There was a fire everywhere.
In Lermontov’s poem “Criminal” (1829):
Commemoration of forgotten youth
I will also glorify the noise sedition.
In Saltykov-Shchedrin’s essays “Abroad”: “Yes, this is also a kind of sedition. This sedition against humanity, against the image of God embodied in man, against everything that is dear to humanity, with which it lives and develops. And, to horror, this sedition not underground, but clearly and out loud preached.” Wed. from Chekhov in “The Story of an Unknown Man”: “Ah, Mr. seditious! - he said, looking at me with curiosity and laughing. “What destinies?”
The note is published for the first time as a composition from fragments of text preserved in the archive, written at different times on six scattered sheets of old paper, characteristic of the period of Tobolsk exile. – M. L.
You and I, today, are relaxed and liberated. We can discuss each other’s salaries and sex lives for as long as we like. But, strangely enough, almost each of us has thoughts and feelings that we we don't dare demonstrate.
These seditious feelings and desires, which are considered indecent by everyone, still do not guarantee us a ticket to hell.
Let's try to figure them out logically than to drive them into the dark corners of the brain. This is the only way to understand and forgive yourself and move on.
1. Serves her right!
It takes unfeminine courage to admit: in my heart I am glad that my friend was removed from an important project. Nice, isn't it?
“Schadenfreude is one of the most common feelings, although no one flaunts it,” says psychologist Elena Ladonina. – We compare ourselves with others to evaluate our merits. If someone around us can’t afford what we afford, we feel giddy with success.”
Many psychologists believe that schadenfreude is a natural survival strategy. In their opinion, in Africa, where humanity comes from, competition for food supplies required rigidity of morals. Since then, the food supply has gotten a little better, but the ability to rejoice in the misfortune of others is still with us today.
2. I would kill someone!
Admit it, have you ever wanted to harshly rebuke an impudent colleague? But you restrained yourself, right? But, we have learned that anger is a completely positive force.
“With the help of anger, we learn our own motives,” says psychologist Natalya Bulgakova. “True, some don’t know what to do with it. Anger either turns into rage and traumatizes others, or it exhausts you without finding an outlet.” When we say that we are “ready to kill someone,” we are unlikely to really be ready to take up a knife or poison. “Such words, like a road sign, force us to slow down our emotions, cool down, realize the reason for our aggression and refrain from hysteria or something worse,” says Bulgakova.
3. And I would probably be with him...
Have you ever imagined all sorts of obscene things about your neighbor or boss? Do you know that such indecent thoughts creep into the heads of all decent women from time to time?
“Fantasize, it’s normal,” says psychologist Yulia Semenova. – Cheeky thoughts are not at all a signal of a breakdown in your relationship. It's one thing to cheat mentally, and another to flirt in reality. Imagination is a natural human ability.”
But it's better not to share such fantasies with your boyfriend, it will only awaken his jealousy. And one more thing: when you dream about someone who often catches your eye, you risk getting carried away. The prospect of something more is too real.
4. Disasters tickle my nerves.
You didn’t pay attention to the fact that every time after a major incident, many eyewitnesses are found among your acquaintances: some passed by, others know what really happened. Just being close to something significant makes you an important person. Eyewitnesses are admired or looked at with horror - no matter where they were, at football or at a fire.
When we see, for example, a mangled car, we inevitably feel good that we are outside and not in its cabin. In addition, obeying the instinct of self-preservation, we love to learn not only from other people’s mistakes, but also from other people’s misfortunes. Therefore, after gawking at the piles of broken glass and twisted metal, we behave more cautiously behind the wheel for a while.
5. He finally got over it.
The worst has happened. When your great-uncle finally passed away after a long illness, you felt relief as well as despair.
“And there’s nothing terrible,” reassures Natalya Bulgakova. “You have been empathizing for so long that you have every right to breathe freely when you learn that someone’s suffering has finally ended, and yours along with it.” “Accept these emotions as they are and don’t torture yourself, because this is normal,” Denis Pereverzev echoes. “We experience something similar when we stop loving.”
Psychologists agree that these feelings come from a desire to protect oneself and help to see the positive side of what happened. On the sad but light wave of parting, starting a new life: what could be more beautiful?
Well, we’ve sorted out the 5 most powerful feelings that we try to keep taboo. You see, you don’t need to be ashamed of your thoughts. On the contrary, they make our lives better and easier.
" means conspiracy, the machinations of rebels, rebellion, intrigue. The adjective “seditious” derived from it means an action associated with sedition. The word “seditious”, therefore, can be used in speech as “rebellious”, as well as “forbidden”, “illegal”.
How the word “seditious” is interpreted in dictionaries
Sometimes you can come across such phrases as “seditious thoughts”, “seditious actions”. Not all people know exactly what this means - some simply have associations with crime. In the dictionary, the adjective “seditious” is defined as having to do with sedition, that is, something forbidden, reprehensible. Riot or unrest are outdated meanings of the word “seditious.”
Something that is not intended to be generally accessible can also be called seditious. For example, information that is classified or prohibited.
This adjective is used mainly in fiction. Its use in historical works can emphasize the flavor of the era and is used mainly for this purpose. In modern literature it does not occur so often, and in colloquial speech - even less often. Journalists like to use this adjective when talking about any aggressive actions or behavior.
What are seditious thoughts
Previously, illegal acts and thoughts could be called seditious. The phrase “seditious thoughts” was especially frequent, used in relation to various crimes of a political nature. With the emergence of seditious thoughts, various movements against the state system could begin. The very presence of seditious thoughts was already sufficient grounds for punishment if they were expressed out loud and embarrassed citizens.
If in former times the word “sedition” was used to determine the severity of an act, a crime in relation to the state, then in our time, when this phrase is used in speech, it acquires a slightly different meaning. First of all, such thoughts are dissatisfaction with existing or recently occurring circumstances.
In writing (for example, journalistic essays, stories), this can be used to refer to thoughts generated by an unscrupulous attitude towards the work of representatives of certain professions, for example, due to poor quality medical care or an incorrect approach to repairing a car. In colloquial speech, the phrase “seditious thoughts” almost never occurs.