Institute of System Automation, Information Technologies and Entrepreneurship. In the darkness

CHAPTER 1. SCIENTIFIC AND THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR RESEARCH OF SENIOR STUDENTS’ PROFESSIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION.

1.1. Professional self-determination as a pedagogical phenomenon.

1.2. Formation of readiness for professional self-determination among high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school.

Conclusions on the first chapter

CHAPTER 2. FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING.

2.1. Pedagogical aspects of specialized training in the educational process of the school.

2.2.Opportunities for specialized training in the process of professional self-determination of high school students.

Conclusions on the second chapter

CHAPTER 3. PEDAGOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGING PROFESSIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS.

3.1. The concept of management and its effectiveness in pedagogical science and practice.

3.2. Organization of management of the process of professional self-determination of high school students in a comprehensive school.

Conclusions on the third chapter

CHAPTER 4. ORGANIZATIONAL AND PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR MANAGING PROFESSIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS.

4.1. A model for managing professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education.

4.2. Use of specialized training resources in the system of professional self-determination of high school students.

4.3. An experimental study of the effectiveness of the formation of professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school.

Conclusions on the fourth chapter

Recommended list of dissertations

  • Preparing high school students for professional self-determination in the system of specialized education 2008, candidate of pedagogical sciences Sukhanova, Natalya Aleksandrovna

  • Forming the readiness of high school students for professional self-determination in the context of specialized training 2010, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences Ter-Arakelyan, Eteri Karenovna

  • Psychological prerequisites for professional self-determination of high school students of specialized schools 2013, candidate of psychological sciences Smirnova, Yulia Evgenievna

  • Formation of readiness for professional self-determination among high school students in the context of specialized training 2006, candidate of pedagogical sciences Martina, Nadezhda Konstantinovna

  • Comprehensive support for professional self-determination of high school students: the example of a rural specialized school 2008, candidate of pedagogical sciences Chashchina, Elena Sergeevna

Introduction of the dissertation (part of the abstract) on the topic “Professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school”

The relevance of research. In modern conditions, education is considered as a sociocultural process in which the formation of a worldview and the development of an individual’s life position, value transformations occur, methods of activity are developed that contribute to the formation of a system of life orientations for schoolchildren, and professional and social prospects for personal development are determined.

Increasing interest in the problem of professional self-determination of an individual as a process of choosing a profession and self-realization in it is due to a practical demand formed in the conditions of economic transformations taking place in our country. The turn of Russian education towards personal and professional development in the context of school education has raised the fundamental question of the diversified development of the student’s personality. At the same time, a very important aspect was determined - the schoolchild was assigned the status of a subject of education and his own life, possessing individuality, the right to choose, reflection, and self-actualization.

In the context of modernization of the national education system, one of the most important tasks of an educational institution is the creation of optimal conditions for the professional self-determination of an individual who is able to live fruitfully in modern society and transform it, independently make the right, vital decisions, and positively self-realize in the main areas of life, including professional.

The system-forming factor of personal self-determination is professional self-determination, understood in pedagogical science as the process of formation by an individual of his attitude to the professional work environment (E.A. Klimov). This long process of coordinating intrapersonal and socio-professional needs 4 occurs throughout the entire life and professional path. The effectiveness of professional self-determination of an individual depends on the nature of the pedagogical support of this process, the management of this process, that is, the creation of optimal conditions for independent, conscious choice by schoolchildren of future professional activities.

The period of choosing a profession falls on high school age. It is characterized by self-actualization, making responsible decisions that determine the entire future life of a person. And this is the most important basis for students’ informed choice of quality education that meets their needs and abilities, personal development trajectory, priorities in the professional sphere, value orientations and individually expressed goals. This is due to the fact that the need for self-determination is a central point in the social situation of development of high school students (L.I. Bozhovich, I.S. Kon, E.A. Klimov, D.I. Feldshtein, D.B. Elkonin, etc. ).

Currently, the choice of a future profession and professional self-determination of schoolchildren occurs in an unstable situation in the Russian and global economy. The uncertainty of the prospects for the social development of society and material difficulties lead to the fact that many young people look to the future with anxiety and apprehension and are unable to independently make a decision about their future or make an independent professional choice. In this regard, the problem of managing the professional self-determination of high school students, psychological and pedagogical support in the process of forming an adequate choice of a professional path, as well as the needs of society is now becoming particularly relevant.

The degree of development of the problem.

The problem of professional self-determination is complex and multifaceted. It is structured at philosophical, sociological, psychological and pedagogical levels. Various aspects of the problem of professional self-determination of the individual have been studied by scientists over a number of stages in the development of pedagogical science. Thus, the psychological and pedagogical foundations of personality development are covered in the works of B.G. Ananyeva, A.G. Asmolova, A.A. Bodaleva, L.I. Bozhovich, E.V. Bondarevskaya, B.Z. Vulfova, I.B. Kotova, A.B. Petrovsky, G.N. Filonova and others.

Various aspects of social and socio-pedagogical activities of an educational institution are considered in the works of N.E. Beketova, V.G. Bocharova, M.A. Galaguzova, V.N. Gurova, A.B. Mudrika et al.

The philosophical aspects of the theory of self-determination are deeply reflected in the works of J1.M. Arkhangelsky, L.P. Buevoy, O.G. Drobnitsky, N.D. Zotova, E.V. Ilyenkova and others, who call the moral responsibility of the individual a systematizing property of self-determination.

From a sociological perspective, the concept of “self-determination” is considered in the context of the social development of the individual, his entry into various social spheres, the development of certain norms, values, attitudes accepted in society (M.V. Batyreva, O.I. Karpukhin, I.S. Kon , E.A. Latukha, T.V. Masharova, A.B. Mironov, I.V. Shiryaeva, etc.).

In psychological and pedagogical science, professional self-determination is considered in close connection with the general process of self-determination and self-realization of the individual (K.A. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, A.B. Batarshev, V.P. Bondarev, E.M. Borisova, L.S. Vygotsky, M. R. Ginzburg, N.P. Kapustin, A.N. Leontyev, S.L. Rubinstein, V.F. Safin, D.I. Feldshtein, etc.).

Professional self-determination as a process of assimilation of social roles in the process of socialization was also considered by A.G. Asmolov, T.P. Ekimova, N.E. Kasatkina, E.A. Klimov, I.S. Kohn, T.V. Kudryavtsev, N.S. Pryazhnikov, T.V. Rogacheva, E.V. Titov, S.N. Chistyakova, P.A. Shavir and others.

The study of issues of professional choice, professional suitability, professional selection, personality traits formed in the process of professional self-determination and development was carried out by such authors as E.M. Borisova, A.M.Gazieva, E.S.Zasypkina, E.A. Klimov, L.A. Kravchuk, I.I. Legostaev, S.A. Sidorenko and others. The problems of choosing a profession by high school students are reflected in the studies of A.E. Golonshtok, E.A. Klimova, I.V.Merzlyakova, V.A. Polyakov, N.A. Sukhanova, S.V. Frolova, S.N. Chistyakova and others.

The study of managing professional self-determination of an individual in the form of managerial support is reflected in the scientific works of L.P. Burtseva, E.S. Zueva, L.V. Kondratenko, N.V. Kustova, L.M. Mitina, V.L. Savinykh, A.N.Chistyakova.

Theoretical and empirical studies of the issues of professional self-determination of high school students show that the formation and development of the most important qualities and value orientations associated with the further method of obtaining an education and future profession focuses on specialized training, which, in the process of professional orientation of schoolchildren, creates conditions for the formation of independent, informed choice schoolchildren's future professional activities. That is, specialized training as a pedagogical means, on the one hand, affects the mental formations of the personality of its participants, and, on the other, influencing the social environment (in the framework of our study, the educational environment), creates pedagogical conditions for professional self-determination.

One of the key ideas of specialized education is the development of an individual educational trajectory, since it is aimed at pedagogical support of the student’s individuality, development of his intellectual and emotional-volitional spheres, stimulation of creativity and spirituality in the educational environment.

The individual educational trajectory of a person involves taking into account 7 psychophysiological capabilities of a high school student and resources for mastering educational fields.

In the pedagogical literature, the main approaches to organizing specialized education at school are actively studied (L.K. Artemova, T.P. Afanasyeva, S.G. Bronevshchuk, S.S. Kravtsov, P.S. Lerner, N.V. Nemova, T.G. Novikova, E.E. Fedotova). The works of G.V. are devoted to didactic and methodological support of specialized training. Dorofeeva, T.A. Kozlova, T.M. Matveeva, N.F. Rodicheva, A.M. Shamaeva. Some generalizations and methodological recommendations for the practical implementation of specialized training are presented in the works of O.G. Andriyanova, E.V. Voronina, G.M. Kuleshova, S.A. Pisareva, S.N. Chistyakova and others. However, in all these works, specialized education is considered as a separate, isolated object, outside the context of managing the professional self-determination of senior schoolchildren. In this regard, the problem of organizing professional self-determination of high school students in the conditions of specialized education is of scientific and practical interest.

A huge information flow often not only does not help a high school student when choosing a profession, but also leads him into a state of confusion and uncertainty. In such a situation, it is necessary to identify and create conditions that determine the effectiveness of professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education.

At the same time, as our theoretical analysis shows, a large number of scientific works, which reveal certain aspects of the problem of psychological and pedagogical support and assistance in vocational guidance for senior schoolchildren, do not provide teachers with a clear and holistic understanding of the essence and conditions for effective management of the process of professional development. self-determination of high school students.

This circumstance is confirmed by a number of contradictions between: the social need for the formation of the process of professional self-determination of high school students and the imperfection of the system of career guidance in the educational process of secondary schools; the existing potential of psychological and pedagogical means of managing the professional self-determination of an individual and the insufficient scientific, theoretical and practical development of the system of his pedagogical support in a secondary school; the need for an extensive and effective system of professional self-determination for high school students and the need to improve the educational activities of secondary schools in this direction;

The need to improve the quality of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination of high school students and the insufficient development of means for activating this process.

These contradictions determined the research problem, which consists in the need for a scientifically based determination of the mechanisms of the process of professional self-determination of high school students on the basis of improving the educational, developmental, educational, stimulating aspects of specialized training in the pedagogical process of secondary schools.

The sociocultural, psychological and pedagogical significance and insufficient development of the theoretical and methodological foundations of professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education, which makes it possible to give this process a personally developing orientation and axiological vectors of functioning, determined the choice of the research topic “Professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school.”

The purpose of the study: to develop the theoretical and methodological foundations of professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education, as well as to theoretically substantiate and experimentally test the organizational and pedagogical conditions that ensure the effectiveness of students’ professional self-determination in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school.

The object of the study is the educational process in a secondary school in the aspect of professional self-determination of high school students.

The subject of the study is the professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized training in a comprehensive school.

Research hypothesis: professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a general education school will be effective if: professional self-determination of high school students is considered as one of the main goals of the educational process of the school;

The resource capabilities of the pedagogical process of an educational institution have been updated for the development of professional self-determination of high school students;

The concept of professional self-determination on the basis of specialized training for high school students is formulated;

A model of professional self-determination for high school students has been developed and implemented into the school’s pedagogical process; an operational and procedural component of specialized training has been developed in the context of a comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination

Diagnostic tools have been developed that can provide control over the process of professional self-determination in order to predict and correct it;

Organizational and pedagogical conditions are determined, implemented on the basis of the laws and principles of the holistic educational process.

In accordance with the purpose, object, subject and hypothesis of the study, the following tasks were set:

1. Develop and justify a set of provisions that make up the theoretical and methodological prerequisites for studying the problem of professional self-determination of high school students.

2. To study and update the resource capabilities of the pedagogical process of an educational institution for organizing professional self-determination of high school students; determine the main methodological and conceptual approaches to studying the process of professional self-determination of high school students in the system of specialized education.

3. Formulate the concept of professional self-determination on the basis of specialized training for high school students.

4. Develop and introduce into the teaching process of the school a model of professional self-determination for high school students.

5. Develop and implement a comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination in the system of specialized education, ensuring the adequacy of the subsequent professional choice of high school students.

6. Develop diagnostic tools that can provide control over the process of professional self-determination in order to predict and correct it.

7. Determine, justify and experimentally test the organizational and pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of professional

11 self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school.

The methodological basis of the study was:

At the philosophical level - a dialectical-materialist doctrine about the social essence of man, about personality, its integrity and the possibilities of self-realization; about the role of labor in personal development; about the essence of values, their role in personal development and the functioning of the social sphere (S.F. Anisimov, O.G. Drobnitsky, A.G. Zdravomyslov, M.S. Kagan, E.V. Ilyenkov, A.M. Mironov, V.A. Tugarinov, N.Z. Chavchavadze, etc.)

At the general scientific level: the theory of axiology of education (N.A. Astashova, M.V. Boguslavsky, I.A. Zimnyaya, N.D. Nikandrov, Z.I. Ravkin,

B.A. Slastenin, etc.); system approach, modeling, mathematical statistics (V.P. Bespalko, I.V. Blauberg, V.M. Glushkov, E.V. Ilyenkov, P.S. Nemov, D.A. Novikov, Yu.O. Ovakimyan, E.I. Sokolnikova, E.G. Yudin and DR-)

At the scientific and pedagogical level: theoretical foundations of professional development of personality (K.S. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, B.G. Ananyev, A.G. Asmolov, B.F. Lomov, N.D. Nikandrov, V.D. Shadrikov and etc.); ideas for specialized training (T.P. Afanasyeva, P.S. Lerner, N.V. Nemova, M.A. Pinskaya, T.G. Novikova, A.S. Prutchenkov, A.P. Tryapitsyna, E.E. Fedotova, I D. Chechel and others), the basics of vocational guidance, professional self-determination, the idea of ​​labor training and education (A.Ya. Zhurkina, E.A. Klimov, I.I. Legostaev, A.G. Pashkov, N.S. Pryazhnikov, M.V. Retivykh, A.D. Sazonov, I.A. Sasova, V.V. Serikov, V.D. Simonenko,

S.N. Chistyakova, K.D. Ushinsky and others); formation of professional competence (S.N. Glazachev, E.F. Zeer, A.M. Pavlova, M.V. Retivykh, N.O. Sadovnikova, S.Yu. Senator, V.D. Simonenko, etc.).

At the psychological and pedagogical level: the foundations of personality-oriented learning and the activity approach (B.G. Ananyev, E.V.

Bondarevskaya, L.S. Vygotsky, V.V. Davydov, E.A. Levanova, A.N. Leontyev,

K.K. Platonov, C.Jl. Rubinstein, etc.); ideas of humanistic psychologists (A. Maslow, K. Rogers, etc.) about personal self-realization; provisions of pedagogy and psychology on the humanization of education, the use of active forms, methods and technologies for personal development (A.G. Asmolov, A.A. Bodalev, V.I. Zagvyazinsky, A.K. Markova, G.P. Skamnitskaya, T.S. Komarova, V.A. Slastenin, D.I. Feldshtein, etc.)

In theoretical terms, the study is based on the idea of ​​integral characteristics of activity (B.G. Ananyev, A.G. Asmolov, L.I. Bozhovich, A.A. Verbitsky, N.F. Dobrynin, A.G. Kovalev, A.N. Leontiev , B.C. Merlin, K.K. Platonov, S.L. Rubinstein), about the mechanisms of identification and isolation of personality, professional identification, personality personalization (G. Breakwell, I. Goffman, J. Mead, A.B. Mudrik, V.S. Mukhina , A.V. Petrovsky, N.A. Rybakov, E. Erickson, etc.) and its development in activity (K.A. Abulkhanova, M.S. Kagan, I.S. Kon, A.N. Leontyev, A.K. Markova, A.B. Petrovsky), on the development of activities (L.S. Vygotsky, P.Ya. Galperin, V.V. Davydov, E.A. Klimov, N.F. Talyzina, D.B. Elkonin) , about communication and personal relationships (A.A. Bodalev, V.A. Kan-Kalik, B.F. Lomov, A.B. Mudrik, V.N. Myasishchev, Yu.M. Orlov).

The fundamental prerequisites for our research are created by works that reveal the philosophy and methodology of education (V.G. Afanasyev, L.P. Bueva, B.Z. Vulfov, V.S. Lednev, B.T. Likhachev, N.D. Nikandrov, Z.I. Ravkin, G.N. Filonov, T.I. Shamova); philosophical and ethical theories of values ​​and pedagogical axiology (E.I. Artamonova, B.S. Bratus, V.P. Bezdukhov, S.I. Gessen, M.S. Kagan, M.M. Rokeach, V.A. Slastenin , V.A. Sukhomlinsky, E.H. Shiyanov, etc.).

Various aspects of self-determination are reflected in the works of L.M. Arkhangelsky, M.V. Batyreva, L.P. Buevoy, D.Zh. Valeeva, A.A. Guseinova, O.G. Drobnitsky, N.D. Zotova, E.V. Ilyenkova, O.I. Karpukhina, I.S. Kona, E.A. Latukha, T.V. Masharova, E.I. Sokolnikova, I.V. Shiryaeva and others.

Of fundamental importance for our research are the works of domestic and foreign teachers and psychologists, which reveal the essence and content of the concept of professional self-determination (A.G. Asmolov, S.A. Borovikova, M.R. Ginzburg, E.I.

Golovakha; E.F. Zeer, E.A. Klimov, I.S. Kon, I.M. Kondakov, T.V. Kudryavtsev,

A.K. Markova, J.I.M. Mitina, G.S. Nikiforov, N.S. Pryazhnikov, E.Yu.

Pryazhnikova, A.A. Skamnitsky, A.B. Sukharev, D. Super, E.V. Titov, D.

Holland, S.N. Chistyakova, etc.) and professional guidance (B.C.

Avanesov, V.A. Bodrov, E.M. Borisova, B.I. Bukhalov, A.E. Golomstock, K.M.

Gurevich, N.H. Zakharov, JT.M. Mitina, M.M. Parkhomenko, V.A. Polyakov, A.D.

Sazonov, V.D. Simonenko, I.T. Senchenko, B.L. Fedorishin and others).

Fundamental research on the problem of professional guidance for senior schoolchildren and professional self-determination is reflected in the studies of A.E. Golonshtok, E.A. Klimova, A.B. Polyakova,

E.H. Proshchitskaya, N.S. Pryazhnikova, G.V. Rezankina, N.F. Rodicheva, A.D.

Sazonova, S.N. Chistyakova and others. The study of managing professional self-determination of the individual in the form of managerial support was reflected in the scientific works of L.V. Kondratenko,

L.M. Mitina, V.L. Savinykh, A.N. Chistyakova and others.

The principles of organizing specialized training in the education system are considered by such scientists as O.G. Andrianov, T.P. Afanasyeva, V.P.

Bespalko, L.N. Bogolyubova, G.V. Dorofeev, D.S. Ermakov, E.N. Zhukova, I.S.

Idilova, A.A. Karakotova, T.A. Kozlova, S.S. Kravtsov, O.V. Kuzin, L.V.

Kuznetsov, M.G. Kuleshov, B.A. Lanin, V.P. Lebedeva, P.S. Lerner, K.I.

Lipnitsky, L.Yu. Lyashenko, T.M. Matveeva, N.V. Nemova, V.N. Nikitenko,

T.G. Novikova, T.A. Oleinik, A.A. Pinsky, M.A. Pinskaya, E.M.

Pavlyutenkov, N.F. Rodichev, G.K. Selevko, A.P. Tryapitsyna, S.B. Turovskaya,

HER. Fedotova, I.D. Chechel, S.N. Chistyakova, T.I. Shamova and others.

To solve the problems, the following research methods were used: theoretical: method of classification and systematization,

14 method of generalization and systematization, comparative method; empirical: experimental method, expert assessment method, assessment and analysis of activity products; diagnostic: differential diagnostic questionnaire by E.A. Klimov (DDO); methodology for identifying the leading motives of professional activity; repertoire method for diagnosing the professional orientation of students; Terminal Values ​​Questionnaire (OTeV) (author I.G. Senin); method “Structure of Interests” by V. Henning; a methodology for identifying graduates’ awareness of the “world of professions”, assessing their professional prospects, professional readiness, the content of the educational process from the point of view of its focus on professional guidance; methodology for identifying the formation of a professional plan, motives for choosing a profession and professional orientation. The obtained data were subjected to comparative analysis and mathematical processing.

Base and organization of the study. The experimental base for the study was secondary schools No. 1902,1039,1965, 1968, 2012, education centers No. 1423, 1477, 775, gymnasium 1566, lyceum 1547 in Moscow. 1,164 high school students, school administrators and teachers were involved in the empirical work.

The study was carried out in several stages.

The first stage (2001-2004) is search and analytical. At this stage, the current state of the problem was studied, an analysis of the available psychological, pedagogical and methodological literature, legislative and regulatory acts on research issues, program and methodological documentation of secondary schools was carried out, and the experience of developing readiness to choose a profession among senior schoolchildren in a secondary school was studied. As a result, the initial parameters of the study, its subject, boundaries, hypothesis, methodology and methods, and conceptual apparatus were determined.

The second stage (2004-2009) is experimental. At this stage, the model for managing professional self-determination of high school students in the context of specialized education was empirically tested, a comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination in the system of specialized education was implemented, ensuring the adequacy of the subsequent professional choice of high school students, the operational and procedural side of specialized education in the context of the process of professional self-determination was revealed. high school students with the help of didactic forms, methods and means of pedagogical interaction, capable of modeling the subject and social content of the future professional activities of high school students, which were annually tested, adjusted and improved in the educational process.

The third stage (2009-2011) is generalizing. It is associated with the correction of conclusions obtained at previous stages, systematization and processing of research results, their testing, implementation and publication, and literary design of dissertation materials.

The most significant results obtained personally by the applicant and their scientific novelty. In the study:

A set of provisions that make up the theoretical and methodological prerequisites for studying the problem of professional self-determination of high school students has been developed and justified;

The resource capabilities of the pedagogical process of an educational institution for managing the professional self-determination of high school students have been studied and updated; the main methodological and conceptual approaches to studying the process of professional self-determination of high school students in the system of specialized education have been identified, facilitating the modeling of the subject and social content of students’ future professional activities;

The Concept of professional self-determination on the basis of specialized training for high school students has been formulated. It determines the nature of interaction between subjects of the process of specialized educational and labor activity in the conditions of differentiation of the educational process, effective ways to implement the complex of socio-economic and psychological-pedagogical requirements of society and education for the individual. The concept is based on a systems approach. The concept includes:

Experimentally tested methodological support has been created aimed at implementing a model of professional self-determination for high school students during specialized training;

A comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination in the system of specialized education has been developed and implemented, ensuring the adequacy of the subsequent professional choice of high school students;

Diagnostic tools have been developed that can provide control over the process of professional self-determination in order to predict and correct it; organizational and pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school have been identified, substantiated and experimentally tested, which combine all its elements: goal setting, content development, design and planning, organization of educational space, pedagogical and diagnostic analysis.

The theoretical significance of the study is that:

The provisions identified and substantiated during the theoretical analysis that make up the theoretical and methodological prerequisites for studying the problem of professional self-determination of high school students make a certain contribution to the theory of general pedagogy; Theoretical and methodological ideas about professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of school, examined in dynamics, complement the history of pedagogy and education;

The described main methodological and conceptual approaches to studying the process of professional self-determination of high school students in the system of specialized education make a certain contribution to the methodology of pedagogy; the concept of professional self-determination of high school students in the context of specialized education, developed in the study, makes a real contribution to the development of pedagogical theory;

A comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination in the system of specialized education opens up a corresponding direction of scientific research related to theoretical and methodological support for the process of professional self-determination of students;

The developed diagnostic tools for monitoring the process of professional self-determination complement the didactics of secondary school;

The theoretical principles and conclusions contained in the study deepen the conceptual understanding of the strategies of professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school; The predictive potential of the conducted research determines the fundamental possibility of organizing, on its basis, further study of various aspects of professional and personal self-determination of high school students.

The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that it is aimed at improving teaching activities in the aspect of professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education; a model of professional self-determination for high school students was introduced into the school’s pedagogical process; a comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination in the system of specialized education has been implemented; diagnostic tools developed; The set of organizational and pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school was experimentally substantiated.

In accordance with the experimentally tested provisions of the dissertation, adjustments were made to the content of the pedagogical process in secondary schools. Experimental concepts, programs, teaching aids, monographs published based on research materials are directly used in the practical activities of school leaders and teachers.

Main provisions submitted for defense:

1. Professional self-determination of a high school student is considered as a process of education, development and formation of personal maturity, manifested in the independent process of planning their professional future. The conditions that ensure the optimal level of professional self-determination of high school students are: personal maturity, the adequacy of self-assessment of abilities for mastering a future profession, the degree of completeness of ideas about the content of future professional activity, the effectiveness of psychological and pedagogical support for the process of their professional self-determination.

2. The educational space of the school, as a necessary condition promoting the professional self-determination of high school students. Its basis is specialized training as a system for organizing the educational process, ensuring successful specialized and professional self-determination of students by means of variability and individualization of the educational process, expanding the social situation of development, and involving the professional context. At the same time, professional self-determination is considered not only as a dynamic process of formation of personal qualities, but also as a result of specialized training, as a student’s readiness to choose his future profession on the basis of pre-professional training and self-determination, self-realization and professional improvement.

3. The key point in the professional self-determination of high school students is their readiness to choose a profession that specifies their goals and preferences, being a solution focused on the near future, and including personal-target, information-gnostic and reflective-evaluative components that meet the requirements of the content and conditions of future professional activity.

4. Taking into account the potential opportunities of specialized training (implementation of the ideas of national security in education; adaptation of education to the current and future needs of the labor market; use of a flexible system of profiles; development of competencies of high school students; creation of an individual educational trajectory; inclusion of active pedagogical technologies in the educational process) has been implemented the need to develop pedagogical foundations for managing the process of professional self-determination of high school students.

5. The pedagogical foundations of managing the professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education include a theoretical aspect (modeling the management of professional self-determination) and an organizational and pedagogical aspect (the operational and procedural side of specialized training in the context of the process of professional self-determination of high school students using didactic forms, methods and means of pedagogical interactions capable of modeling the subject and social content of future professional activities of high school students).

6. The Concept of professional self-determination on the basis of specialized training for high school students has been formulated. It determines the nature of interaction between subjects of the process of specialized educational and labor activity in the conditions of differentiation of the educational process, effective ways to implement the complex of socio-economic and psychological-pedagogical requirements of society and education for the individual. The concept is based on a systems approach. The concept includes:

At the organizational and methodological level - management functions and information support for the educational process, scientific and methodological activities and the activities of teachers and heads of various departments of the educational institution;

At the educational and methodological level - the goals and content of self-determination of high school students, determined from the position of the personally and socially significant value of work on the basis of specialized training, psychological theory of activity; tasks, forms and methods of profile-oriented training of students are built in the unity of intellectual, physiological and social aspects. The personal level in this concept is determined through the priority choice of a specific training profile, the basis for which is the features of the multi-level development of the abilities and needs of the individual.

Developed on methodological grounds, the concept of professional self-determination in the process of specialized training and the model for managing professional self-determination make it possible to design educational activities in conditions that ensure its qualitative change in accordance with modern requirements of society and the individual.

8. We understand the comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for the professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education as a set of measures that ensure the professional self-determination of students in the form of operational assistance in

22 choosing the optimal professional field, taking into account individual abilities, capabilities, and the socio-economic situation in the labor market. They involve the unification of the efforts of all subjects of the educational space and representatives of the social environment, the goal of which is to develop in students the ability to make a conscious, independent and responsible choice of profession, the ability to project an image of a professional future, to understand their professional, educational and personal capabilities necessary for the practical implementation of choice and identifying ways of professional growth through the development of reflection.

9. Management of professional self-determination of high school students in the educational process of a general education school will be effective if pedagogical support for this process is implemented under the following organizational and pedagogical conditions: professional self-determination of high school students is considered as one of the main goals of the educational process; the resource capabilities of the pedagogical process of an educational institution have been updated to manage the professional self-determination of high school students; a model for managing the professional self-determination of high school students was developed and introduced into the educational process of the school; a comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination in the system of specialized education has been developed and implemented, ensuring the adequacy of the subsequent professional choice of high school students; the operational-procedural side of specialized education has been developed in the context of the process of professional self-determination of high school students with the help of didactic forms, methods and means of pedagogical interaction that can model the subject and social content of the future professional activities of high school students; developed

23 diagnostic tools capable of providing control over the management of the process of professional self-determination for the purpose of its prediction and correction.

The reliability and reliability of the results obtained is ensured by the methodological validity of the initial positions of the study, the use of a set of methods adequate to the purpose, object, subject and objectives of the study, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis, the long-term nature of the experimental work, the representativeness and statistical significance of the sample size, control comparison of the results obtained with the mass pedagogical experience.

Testing and implementation of research results. The main theoretical principles and conclusions are reflected in monographs, textbooks, scientific and practical recommendations, program and methodological documents and materials. Reported and received approval at scientific conferences of teachers and graduate students of Moscow State Pedagogical University named after. M.A. Sholokhov, at interuniversity conferences in Moscow (2002), at meetings of the laboratory of the Institute of Public Education of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, at various conferences and forums (Moscow, Cheboksary).

The work was tested at meetings of pedagogical councils of schools, methodological associations of teachers, parent meetings of schools, at seminars for deputy principals and principals of Moscow schools (2001-2010), dedicated to the formation of the readiness of senior schoolchildren to choose a profession, at annual meetings of the laboratory of the system center approach to education of the Association "Education".

The implementation of the research results was carried out during the direct professional activities of the author. The research materials have been introduced into the pedagogical process of secondary schools in Moscow.

24 theoretical development of the main conceptual ideas and provisions of the study. The dissertation research is the result of many years of scientific and pedagogical work of the author in the system of teacher education.

The structure of the dissertation follows the logic of the study and includes an introduction, four chapters, a conclusion, a bibliography including 504 sources, and appendices.

Similar dissertations in the specialty "General Pedagogy, History of Pedagogy and Education", 13.00.01 code VAK

  • Pedagogical conditions for professional self-determination of high school students in specialized education 2003, candidate of pedagogical sciences Gaponenko, Albina Vyacheslavovna

  • Vocational guidance for senior schoolchildren in the context of specialized education 2009, candidate of pedagogical sciences Ogerchuk, Albina Alievna

  • Psychological features of professional self-determination of high school students 2009, candidate of psychological sciences Frolova, Svetlana Valerievna

  • Pedagogical guidance of professional self-determination of high school students in the context of specialized education 1995, candidate of pedagogical sciences Zaruba, Natalya Andreevna

  • Forming the readiness of high school students for professional self-determination in innovative educational institutions 2010, candidate of pedagogical sciences Timeryanova, Liliya Nikolaevna

Conclusion of the dissertation on the topic “General pedagogy, history of pedagogy and education”, Popovich, Alexey Emilievich

CONCLUSIONS ON CHAPTER FOUR.

The main goal of the experimental part of the study was to test the organizational and pedagogical conditions, which, as was established during the theoretical analysis of the problem, most contribute to the effectiveness of managing the professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized training.

The experimental study took place in four stages (stating, prognostic, formative, final), which reflected the real dynamics of the formation of readiness for professional self-determination among senior schoolchildren.

The complex of diagnostic methods, with the help of which one can study the formation of professional self-determination of high school students, includes: E.A. Klimov’s differential diagnostic questionnaire (DDI); a method for identifying the leading motives of professional activity, a repertoire method for diagnosing the professional orientation of students; Questionnaire of Terminal Values ​​(OTeV) (author I.G. Senin), methodology “Structure of Interests” by V. Henning; methodology for identifying graduates’ awareness of the “world of professions”, assessing their professional prospects, professional readiness,

The model for managing professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education is an integrative scientific and theoretical structuring of the process of comprehensive support for professional self-determination of high school students, built on the principles of a systems approach (integrity, the presence of connections between elements, orderliness of the system, feasibility of functioning), including functions, components, educational environment, results and criteria for the effectiveness of pedagogical management, reflecting the specifics of specialized education as an option for creating optimal conditions that promote professional self-determination of high school students.

We understand a comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for the professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education as a set of measures that ensure the professional self-determination of students in the form of prompt assistance in choosing the optimal professional field, taking into account individual abilities, capabilities, the socio-economic situation in the labor market, involving the joining of efforts all subjects of the educational space and representatives of the social environment, the goal of which is to develop in students the ability to make a conscious, independent and responsible choice of profession, the ability to project an image of a professional future, to be aware of their professional, educational and personal capabilities necessary for the practical implementation of the choice and determination of professional growth paths through the development of reflection.

In the process of conducting experimental work on developing the readiness of high school students for professional self-determination in the experimental group, changes and increments occurred in their consciousness, due to the development of self-analysis skills, the ability to analyze educational and professional activities; accumulation of pre-professional, and in some cases, professional experience acquired in professional tests. As a result of experimental work, an individual’s ability to choose an educational and professional field that corresponds to his interests, capabilities, inclinations and demands of the modern labor market has been formed. This ability is considered as a dynamic characteristic of professional self-determination and measuring it allows one to predict the success of adaptation in the profession, and for the high school student himself to identify the adequacy of his own capabilities to the characteristics of professional activity. The personality of a senior school student is considered as a subject of future professional activity.

Thus, as a result of the work carried out, high school students of experimental classes expanded the information field and formed an objective idea of ​​​​their capabilities in the field of professional interests. The motives for conscious

372 choice of a professional career, a responsible position of the individual, an adequate assessment of oneself and one’s social connections. The solution to these issues largely determines the effectiveness of social and professional adaptation. The use of not traditional methods, but creative forms, including group interaction (simulation and business games), made it possible to enrich the social experience of high school students in group joint activities, broaden their horizons, and contribute to the development of the individual as a whole.

Management of professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school will be effective if pedagogical support for this process is implemented under the following organizational and pedagogical conditions: professional self-determination of high school students is considered as one of the main goals of the educational process;

A model for managing the professional self-determination of high school students has been developed and implemented into the school’s pedagogical process;

A diagnostic toolkit has been developed that can provide control over the management of the process of professional self-determination in order to predict and correct it, since the specified organizational and pedagogical conditions, implemented on the basis of the laws and principles of the holistic educational process, combine all its elements: goal setting, content development, design and planning, organization of educational space, pedagogical and diagnostic analysis.

CONCLUSION

The theoretical analysis carried out as part of our dissertation research showed that professional self-determination of the individual is an important characteristic of the socio-psychological maturity of the individual, his need for self-realization and self-actualization and is considered as part of the professional development of the subject of labor, is its most important manifestation and represents an independent, conscious construction of prospects for one’s professional development is manifested in multiple acts of choice and decision-making, which have different content at different stages of professional development.

We consider professional self-determination in the study as a process of education, development and formation of personal maturity, manifested in the independent process of planning one’s professional future, responsibility for making decisions about choosing a profession, based on an assessment of one’s abilities, interests, inclinations, requirements of professional activity and socio-economic conditions that would provide the opportunity for personal and professional development of the individual.

The main goal of professional self-determination is the gradual formation in a high school student of internal readiness to independently build, adjust and realize the prospects for his development (professional and personal), the readiness to consider himself developing over time and to independently find personally significant meanings in specific professional activities.

As a starting point in the professional self-determination of an individual, the core of which is the conscious choice of a profession, taking into account one’s characteristics and capabilities, the requirements of professional activity and socio-economic conditions, researchers

375 traditionally considers adolescence, which is characterized by making responsible decisions that determine a person’s entire future life, finding one’s place in life, determining the meaning of life, forming a worldview and developing a life position.

Based on the essence of professional self-determination, we can identify the main means of its formation: professional information and education; development of interests, inclinations and abilities; professional tests; professional consultation; professional selection; socio-professional adaptation.

We can highlight the main priorities in the professional self-determination of high school students that correspond to the current situation:

1. Gradual formation in high school students of the ability to predict the development of modern chosen professions in the near future; refusal to unconditionally focus on fashion in relation to a rather limited number of professions (lawyer, economist, fashion model, manager, bodyguard, etc.).

2. Help in finding personal meaning not only in relation to attractive chosen professions, but also in relation to professions that have to be chosen contrary to the initial desire.

The key point of professional self-determination is the readiness for a person’s conscious independent choice of profession, ensuring the manifestation and disclosure of his individual characteristics, interests and inclinations of the individual, focused on the immediate prospect of personal and professional development.

The concept of “readiness to choose a profession, professional self-determination” in pedagogical science is considered as:

A stable state of the student’s personality, which is based on a dynamic combination of certain properties, including the orientation of interests and inclinations, his practical experience and knowledge of his characteristics in connection with the choice of profession;

Inner conviction and awareness of the factor in choosing a profession, awareness of the world of work, what physical and psychological demands the profession places on a person;

The ability to recognize individual characteristics (the image of “I”), analyze professions and make decisions based on a comparison of these two types of knowledge, i.e. ability to consciously choose a profession.

We consider readiness for professional self-determination as a stable characteristic of an individual, which specifies their goals and preferences, being a solution focused on the near future, and including personal-target, information-gnostic and reflexive-evaluative components that meet the requirements of the content and conditions of the future. professional activity.

Readiness for professional self-determination among senior schoolchildren occurs most effectively in the process of purposeful activities of general education institutions as an integral part of the holistic educational process. At the same time, a very important emphasis can be highlighted - the student is assigned the status of a subject of education and his own life, possessing individuality, the right to choose, reflection, self-actualization, which is the most important basis for students to make a balanced choice of quality education that meets their needs and abilities, the trajectory of personal development, and priorities in work. sphere, value orientations and individually expressed goals related to the further method of obtaining education and future profession.

In this context of modern education, specialized training can be considered as an innovative model for obtaining education, which is focused on students’ deeper study of individual subjects (with full mastery of basic disciplines), preparation for work in higher professional education programs; development of adaptive ability to modern market conditions; differentiation of the educational process of high school students based on their interests, abilities and capabilities and the construction of flexible individual educational programs, etc. In addition, specialized education as a cultural process is built taking into account the search for personal meanings, dialogue and cooperation of its participants, it can be filled with socially approved models modern life, focus on values ​​that are significant for students, which gives this process internal attractiveness and activity. Profile training also seems to us to be a process in which the pedagogical potential of creativity, personal and professional self-development, and long-term expectations is determined.

In modern pedagogy, specialized education is considered as a multilateral comprehensive means of improving the quality, efficiency and accessibility of general education, which allows, through changes in the structure, content, organization of the educational process and differentiation, to take into account the interests, inclinations and abilities of students to a greater extent, and to create opportunities for the orientation of education high school students in accordance with their professional interests and intentions regarding continuing education. At the same time, the possibilities for students to build an individual educational trajectory are significantly expanded, and a higher level of preparation is ensured for continuing their education in their chosen direction.

In our study, specialized education in a general education school is understood as a system of organizing the educational process that ensures successful specialized and professional self-determination of students by means of variability and individualization of the educational process, expanding the social situation of development, involving the professional context, and on this basis, preparing students for further professional education and professional activity in the chosen profile, the distinctive features of which are:

Creation of classes of a certain profile, starting from the 8th grade, the leading academic subjects in which have a fairly clear professional orientation; inclusion in the curriculum of elective training courses that reveal the content of a specific area of ​​professional activity;

Establishing a connection between the labor training of high school students and the profile of their education;

Cooperation of high school with institutions of primary, secondary and higher vocational education.

For the professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education, the following areas of psychological and pedagogical work are most relevant: providing information about the features of choosing a profile of study in high school, as well as about all possible ways to continue their education and training in their chosen profession after graduating from primary school; preparing students for drawing up a primary professional plan (start); developing an optimistic attitude towards your professional future; fostering a respectful attitude towards different types of professional work as socially equivalent; positive influence on the holistic development of students’ personality, namely on the formation

379 such qualities and skills as the ability for self-knowledge and self-change, independence, self-confidence, the ability to make choices and take responsibility for them, focus, self-criticism, competence, sociability, independence, emotional (behavioral) flexibility, mobility, willpower; providing students with opportunities for deep self-knowledge of their temperament, interests, abilities, inclinations, type of thinking, needs, value orientations, etc.; turning students into subjects interested in self-development and capable of it, intensifying the search for their own path to mastering a profession; development of self-awareness, increased self-esteem and level of aspirations; the assimilation by older teenagers of the most important social values ​​(civil and moral); the formation of a set of motives for choosing a profession that would optimally combine: self-realization and self-affirmation, the desire to benefit the family and loved ones (society), earn a living (satisfying material needs), etc.; students’ acquisition of deep and comprehensive knowledge on the problem of choosing a profession: about the world of professions, about themselves and about the personnel needs in their region, the main prospects for its development.

Taking into account the potential opportunities for specialized training, the implementation of national security ideas in education; adaptation of education to current and future needs of the labor market; use of a flexible profile system; development of competencies of high school students; students’ comprehension and testing of social roles; creation of an individual educational trajectory; realizing the potential of elective courses as support for the profile and intra-profile specialization; development of value orientations of high school students as a condition for regulating the behavior and activities of graduates; inclusion of active pedagogical technologies in the educational process) there is a need to develop pedagogical foundations for managing the process of professional

380 self-determination of high school students, which, on the one hand, would integrate diagnostics, counseling, psychological and pedagogical support, etc., on the other hand, would include all subjects in the model for managing the process of professional self-determination of high school students: students, parents, teachers, significant peers and met the requirements of the Concept of Education Modernization.

The pedagogical foundations of managing the professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education include the theoretical aspect (modeling the management of professional self-determination) and the organizational and pedagogical aspect (the operational and procedural side of specialized training in the context of the process of professional self-determination of high school students using didactic forms, methods and means of pedagogical interaction, capable of modeling the subject and social content of future professional activities of high school students).

Psychological and pedagogical management of the process of professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education is understood by us as a system of organizational, diagnostic, training and developmental activities for teachers, students, parents, and administration, aimed at creating optimal conditions for the professional self-realization of students.

It is possible to effectively manage the professional self-determination of students only on the basis of certain indicators that characterize it as a process that involves the development of the individual as a subject of his future professional activity: student awareness; the formation of socially significant motives for choosing a profession; formation of professional interests; presence of pronounced special abilities for

381 specific type of professional activity; practical experience in the chosen work activity; formation of professional intentions; real level of professional aspirations; health status.

The process of professional self-determination during specialized training is influenced by various, including microsocial factors, including the socio-economic living conditions of people, public organizations, the media, the cultural, educational and professional level of the family, etc. To successfully manage the process of professional self-determination of high school students during specialized training, it is necessary to know and take into account not only the factors themselves, but also the connections between them, their interaction and interdependence, trends and development prospects, that is, the study of factors influencing professional self-determination makes it possible to make this process manageable.

The model for managing professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education is an integrative scientific and theoretical structuring of the process of comprehensive support for professional self-determination of high school students, built on the principles of a systems approach (integrity, the presence of connections between elements, orderliness of the system, feasibility of functioning), including functions, components, educational environment, results and criteria for the effectiveness of pedagogical management, reflecting the specifics of specialized education as an option for creating optimal conditions that promote professional self-determination of high school students.

We understand a comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for the professional self-determination of high school students in the process of specialized education as a set of measures that ensure the professional self-determination of students in the form of operational assistance in

382 choosing the optimal professional field, taking into account individual abilities, capabilities, the socio-economic situation in the labor market, which involves combining the efforts of all subjects of the educational space and representatives of the social environment, the goal of which is to develop in students the ability to make a conscious, independent and responsible choice of profession, the ability to design an image of a professional future, to be aware of one’s professional, educational and personal capabilities necessary for the practical implementation of choice and determination of paths for professional growth through the development of reflection.

We carried out work on developing readiness for professional self-determination among high school students through the content of educational and extracurricular activities (seminars, laboratory and practical classes, a credit system, business games, research work, excursions, theoretical conferences and personal contacts with university teachers), methods of its organization ( the use of individual, group, frontal forms of work, the creation of problem situations, mutual assistance and mutual verification, etc.); through establishing collaborative relationships between teachers and students.

In the process of conducting experimental work on developing the readiness of high school students for professional self-determination in the experimental group, changes and increments occurred in their consciousness, due to the development of self-analysis skills, the ability to analyze educational and professional activities; accumulation of pre-professional, and in some cases, professional experience acquired in professional tests. As a result of experimental work, an individual’s ability to choose an educational and professional field that corresponds to his interests, capabilities, inclinations and demands of the modern labor market has been formed. This ability is considered as a dynamic characteristic

383 professional self-determination and its measurement allows one to predict the success of adaptation in the profession, and for the high school student himself to identify the adequacy of his own capabilities to the characteristics of professional activity. The personality of a senior school student is considered as a subject of future professional activity.

Thus, as a result of the work carried out, high school students of experimental classes expanded the information field and formed an objective idea of ​​​​their capabilities in the field of professional interests. The motives for the conscious choice of a professional career, the responsible position of the individual, and an adequate assessment of oneself and one’s social connections were formed. The solution to these issues largely determines the effectiveness of social and professional adaptation. The use of not traditional methods, but creative forms, including group interaction (simulation and business games), made it possible to enrich the social experience of high school students in group joint activities, broaden their horizons, and contribute to the development of the individual as a whole.

Data from experimental work indicate that managing the process of professional self-determination can be most effective when taking into account organizational and pedagogical conditions, implemented on the basis of the laws and principles of the holistic educational process, combining all its elements: goal setting, content development, design and planning , organization of educational space, pedagogical and diagnostic analysis: professional self-determination of high school students is considered as one of the main goals of the educational process;

The resource capabilities of the pedagogical process of an educational institution have been updated to manage the professional self-determination of high school students;

A model for managing the professional self-determination of high school students has been developed and implemented into the school’s pedagogical process;

A comprehensive program of psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination in the system of specialized education has been developed and implemented, ensuring the adequacy of the subsequent professional choice of high school students;

The operational and procedural side of specialized education has been developed in the context of the process of professional self-determination of high school students with the help of didactic forms, methods and means of pedagogical interaction that can model the subject and social content of the future professional activities of high school students;

Diagnostic tools have been developed that can provide control over the management of the process of professional self-determination in order to predict and correct it.

At the same time, it should be noted that there remains a number of undeveloped essential aspects of the formation of professional self-determination of high school students. A promising direction for its solution is to strengthen integrative and competency-based approaches in the process of forming professional self-determination of high school students; development and testing of tools for optimizing the management of the process of forming professional self-determination of high school students at different stages of pre-professional and specialized education. In addition, the problem of psychological and pedagogical support for the process of professional self-determination during specialized training requires in-depth research. The scientific development of these and a number of other problems in the pedagogical aspect will contribute

385 effective professional self-determination of high school students in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school.

List of references for dissertation research Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences Popovich, Alexey Emilievich, 2012

1. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya K.A. Life prospects of the individual // Personality psychology and lifestyle. M.: Nauka, 1988. - pp. 137-145.

2. Averichev Yu.P., Polyakov V.A. Application of didactic principles in labor and vocational training // School and production. -1994.-No. 3,- P. 6-13.

3. Averkin V.N. Methodological foundations of innovative administrative management of the territorial educational system // Theoretical problems and technologies of innovative management in education. Veliky Novgorod, 2000. - pp. 3-9.

4. Averkin V.N., Prusak M.M., Soroka V.V. Education is the main factor of socio-economic transformations // Bulletin of Novgorod State University. - 1999. - No. 6.

5. Adamsky A. To the present in profile, to the future with your back: The seductive simplicity of profile // First of September. - 2002. - No. 3. - P. 1.

6. Adamsky A. Model of network interaction. On the website: http://www. 1 september.ru/ru/upr/2002/04/2.htm

7. Akinfieva N.V., Vladimirova A.P. State-public management of municipal educational systems. Saratov, 2001.

8. Acmeological dictionary. Second edition / Under general. Ed. A.A. Derkach. M.: Publishing house RAGS, 2005. - 161 p.

9. Aksenova E.A. Profile training in secondary schools in France // Profile school. 2004. - No. 1. - P. 48-53.

10. Yu. Alekseeva R.M. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for managing the quality of education at the municipal level: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sciences, - M., 2004.-168 p.

11. P.Amirov A.F., Amirova L.A., Borisov V.A. Pedagogical foundations of adult education. Ufa, 2007.

12. Ananyev B.G. Man as an object of knowledge. L.: Leningrad State University, 1986.

13. I. Andreeva L.I. Pedagogical technologies in a multicultural educational space focused on professional self-determination of schoolchildren: a practice-oriented monograph. - Togliatti: TSU, 2009. 179 p.

14. Anisimov V.V., Grokholskaya O.G., Korobetsky I.A. Managing the development process of a modern educational system. M., 2000.- 105 p.

15. Anisimova S.G. The impact of social institutions on the professional self-determination of youth: Dis. . Ph.D. sociol. nauk.-M., 2001.-128 p.

16. Antipova V.M., Zembitsky D.M., Khlebunova S.F. Monitoring the educational system of a modern school. Rostov n/d., 1999.

17. Antonova L.N. Regional programs for the development of education: history and modernity. M.: Sfera, 2001. - 86 p.

18. Anyanova N.G. Individual curriculum as the basis for self-determination of a senior student. Karagay, 2010.

19. Arefiev I.P. Preparing teachers for specialized training for high school students // Pedagogy. 2003. - No. 5. - P. 49-55.

20. Artyomova L.K. The profile of training is dictated by the regional labor market // People's education. 2003. - No. 4. - pp. 84-88.

21. Artyomova L.K. Profile training: experience, problems, solutions // School technologies. 2003. - No. 4. - P. 22-31.

22. Arshinov V.I., Danilov Yu.A., Tarasenko V.V. Network thinking methodology: the phenomenon of self-organization. On the website: http://www.iph.ras.ru/~mifs/rus/adtmet.htm

23. Atutov P.R. Polytechnic education of schoolchildren: bringing together the general education and vocational schools. M.: Pedagogika, 1986. 175 p.

24. Afanasyev V.G. Program-target planning and management. M: 1990-432 p.

25. Afanasyeva T.P., Nemova N.V. Profile training: pedagogical system and management: in 2 books. Toolkit. M.: APK and PRO, 2004.-136 p.

26. Afonina M.V. Formation of readiness of high school students for independent activities during specialized training: Abstract of thesis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Izhevsk, 2006. - 15 p.

27. Babansky Yu.K. Optimization of the educational process (Methodological principles). -M.: Education, 1982.

28. Baglaev G. P. Pedagogical foundations of managing an innovative educational institution of primary vocational education: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2000. - 196 p.

29. Bagutdinova N., Novikov D. Quality management of education // Standards and quality. 2002. - No. 9. - P. 68-73.

30. Balashova Z.V. Formation of value-semantic professional self-determination of teachers in the conditions of a change in the educational paradigm: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Maykop, 2005. -160 p.

31. Balashova N. Scientific pedagogical and psychological-pedagogical support of specialized training // Library at school. 2002. -No. 12.

32. Barannikov A.B. Main directions of educational reforms and changes in legislation in the field of education // Standards and monitoring. 1999. - No. 6. - P. 11-33.

33. Baskaev R.M. On the way to a specialized school // Teacher. 2002. - No. 6. -WITH. 18-20.

34. Baskaev R.M. Current state and prospects for updating the structure and content of education system management. M.: IOO Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, 2005. - 144 p.

35. Baskaev R.M. Theoretical, organizational and pedagogical conditions for updating the structure and content of the management of the regional education system. M.: IOO Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, 2005. - 158 p.

36. Batoroev K. B. Analogies and models in cognition. - Novosibirsk, 1981. - 319 p.

37. Batrakova I.S., Bordovsky V.A. Public and public management in the modernization of education. In: Modernization of teacher education in Siberia: problems and prospects: collection. scientific articles. Part I. - Omsk: Omsk State Pedagogical University Publishing House, 2002. - P. 16-22.

38. Batyreva M.V. The process of professional self-determination of urban youth: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. social Sci. Tyumen, 2003.-25s.

39. Bezdenezhnykh T. Profile training: real experience and questionable innovations // School director. 2003. - No. 1. - P. 711.

40. Bezrukova B.S. Pedagogy. Projective pedagogy. Ekaterinburg: Business book, 1996. - 342 p.

41. Bekarevich T.A. Pedagogical conditions for early professional self-determination of schoolchildren in the system of general and additional education: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sciences Nizhny Novgorod, 2003.

42. Belikov V.A. Philosophy of personality education: Activity aspect: Monograph. M.: Vlados, 2004. 357 p.

43. Berdonosov S.S. Early specialization in school - problems that await their solution // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). - M.: NIIRO, 2003. - P. 267-270.

44. Beskina R.M., Chudnovsky V.E. Memories of the future school: Book. for the teacher. -M.: Education, 1993. -223 p.

45. Bespalko V.P. Components of pedagogical technology. -M., 1989.

46. ​​Bespalko V.P. Elements of the theory of learning process management. Parts I, II. -M., 1971.

47. Bibler B.C. School of dialogue of cultures. - M., 1993.

49. Bim-Bad B.D. Education in the context of socialization. M., 1996.

50. Bityanova M.R. Organization of psychological work at school. M.: Perfection, 1998.

51. Blinkov A.D., Lovi O.V. A multidisciplinary school operating in an innovative mode, and the specifics of its management: (From the experience of school No. 218 Moscow): // Urban experimental sites. M., 1997. - Issue 3. - P. 46-54.

52. Blinova T.M. Prospects for the future in the experiences and thoughts of high school students and their parents. // Materials of the 4th city scientific and practical conference. -M., 2005.

53. Blonsky P.P. Pedology in primary school. M.: Shalva Amonashvili Publishing House, 2000. - pp. 104-161.

54. Bobkova N.D. Professional self-determination of adolescents when studying natural sciences in a secondary school: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Kurgan, 2000. - 156 p.

55. Bobrovskaya A.N. Professional self-determination of a high school student in project activities: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Volgograd, 2006. 24 p.

56. Bogdanova E.A. Didactic system for preparing students for designing the educational process within the framework of the school component of specialized education: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Samara, 2006. - 176 p.

57. Bogolyubov L.N. Problems of social science training in specialized classes // Teaching history and social science. -2003.-No.6.-S. 31-34.

58. Boguslavsky M.V. 20th century of Russian education. M.: PER SE, 2002.-319 p.

59. Boguslavsky M.V. Essays on the history of domestic education of the 19th-20th centuries. M.: Publishing house MKL No. 1310, 2002. - 96 p.

60. Bodrov V. A. Psychology of professional suitability. M., 2001. -511 p.

61. Bokareva G.A. Methodological foundations of career-oriented pedagogical systems // News of the Baltic State Academy of Fishing Fleet: Psychological and pedagogical sciences: Scientific journal. Kaliningrad: BGA RF, 2006. - No. 2. - P. 12-25. - With. 15.

62. Bolotina G.K. Fundamentals of profiling natural science subjects // Prospects for creating a system of continuous education: material, interregion, interbranch. n.-pr. conf. January 10, 2000 Tyumen: TOGiPRO, 2000. - pp. 108-111.

63. Bolotova E.J1. Interaction between school and pedagogical university on the path of development of specialized education for high school students // Science and school. 2002. -№3.

64. Bolotova E.L. Management of specialized training for high school students in the process of interaction between school and pedagogical university: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 1999.- 18 p.

65. Bondarenko S. V. Modeling complex system-activity objects in psychological and pedagogical research. http: //www.bestreferat.ru/referat-89699.html)

66. Borisova E.M. Professional self-determination: personal aspect: Author's abstract. dis. Doctor of Psychological Sciences. M., 1995.

67. Bortsova S.A. Professional self-determination in the system of training students of a technological college: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Chita, 2009. - 20 p.

68. Bochkarev V.I. State-public management of education: what should it be like? // Pedagogy. 2001. - No. 2. - P. 9-13.

69. Bochkarev V.I. and others. The concept of democratization of general education management in Russia. M: IOSO RAO, 2002. - 55 p.

70. Bochkarev V.I. Theoretical foundations for the democratization of general education management in Russia. Democratic, state-public management of general education: theory and practice. -M: IOSO RAO, 2003. 172 p.

71. Bronevshchuk S.G. Profile differentiation of training in rural schools. M.: Arkti, 2000.

72. Bronevshchuk S.G. Profile training at school. Issues of organization and content. M., 2004.

73. Budanov M.M., Krivosheee V.F., Kiselev N.V., Taktashov E.V., Volenko O.V. Managing the modernization of education in the Russian Federation: trends and prospects. M: IOO MO RF, 2003. - 82 p.

74. Bulgakova N.F. Preparing schoolchildren for professional self-determination in the process of educational and work activities: Abstract of thesis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 1984. - 18 p.

75. Bulin-Sokolova E., Dneprov E., Lenskaya E., Loginova O., Lyubimov L., Pinsky A. (project manager), Rachevsky E., Semenov A., Sidorina T., Tsukerman G. Aspects of modernization Russian school. M., State University-Higher School of Economics, 2002.- 163 p.

76. Burkov V.N., Irikov V.A. Models and methods of managing organizational systems. M: Nauka, 1994. - 270 p.

77. Burov M.V. Model of profile space // Changes, 2003, No. 2. -S. 135-160.

78. Burtseva L.P. Pedagogical management of the development of professional self-determination of students of a pedagogical university: Diss. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Omsk, 2005.

79. Buyanova T.A. Formation of professional intentions of high school students taking into account the needs of a specific economic region: Abstract of thesis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Kemerovo, 1971. -25 p.

80. Byzov V.M. Psychological and pedagogical conditions of social and professional adaptation of students in a school-lyceum: Abstract of thesis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Bryansk, 1993. - 19 p.

81. Bykov A.S. Content and organization of professional self-determination of adolescents in an orphanage: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2000. - 23 p.

82. Vaganov A. The school was turned into profile. Digest // School management. -2002. -No. 43.

83. Vazina K.Ya., Kopeikina E.Yu. Management of innovative processes in the education system: (Concept, experience) N. Novgorod, 1999. - 155 p.

84. Weisburg A.A. Organization of career guidance work in schools, vocational schools, enterprises: A manual for teachers / Ed. M.I. Makhmutova. M.: Education, 1986. - 128 p.

85. Weisburd M.JI. Profiling and standard // Profile school. -2004. -No.2.-P.32-34.

86. Vasilevskaya E.V. Development of a network organization of a municipal methodological service: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2004. -21 p.

87. Vasiliev Yu.V. Pedagogical management at school: methodology, theory and practice. -M.: Pedagogy, 1990. 139 p.

88. Vasilyeva N.V. New strategy for UK specialized schools. In: Foreign experience of specialized training in rural schools: collection. scientific article / ed. E.A. Aksyonova. M.: ISPS RAO, 2005. - pp. 19-32.

89. Vdovina S.A. Individual educational trajectories as a means of implementing subject-subject relationships in the educational process of a modern school: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. - Tyumen, 2000. 19 p.

90. Verbicheva E.A. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the transition of rural schools to specialized differentiated education: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Novokuznetsk, 2004. - 25 p.

91. Vershinin S.I. Profile school of Moscow: vectors of development // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M.: NIIRO, 2003. - pp. 5-8.

92. Vilyunas V.K. Psychological mechanisms of human motivation. M., 1986.-206 p.

93. Vinogradova N.F. Individualization of education in primary and specialized schools: paradoxes of interaction // Profile school. -2003. No. 2.-S. 13-17.

94. Bethlehemsky A. Profiling: who and how will pay for this transformation

95. School director. 2003. - No. 5. - P. 83-89.395

96. Volokitin K.P. Modern information technologies in education quality management // Informatics and education. -2000.-No.8.-S. 32-36.

97. Voronina G.A. Principles of selection of educational material in specialized classes // School. 2002. - No. 2.- P. 68-69.

98. Voronina G.A. Profile classes: solving didactic problems in the practice of secondary schools // School. 2001. - No. 6.

99. Voronina E.V. Profile training: models of organization, management, methodological support. M.: Five for knowledge, 2006. -251 p.

100. Voronina E.V. Development of a model for specialized training of students as a direction for updating the content of general education // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems of prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M: NIIRO, 2003.-S. 56.

101. Vybornova V.V., Dunaeva E.A. Updating the problems of professional self-determination of young people. M., 2008.

102. Gavrikova T.B. Professional self-determination of students in US educational institutions: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2006.-203 p.

103. Gadzhieva JI.A. Monitoring the quality of education of students in the conditions of specialized education: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Perm, 2003.-22 p.

104. Yu8.Gazieva A.M. Formation of readiness for professional self-determination among high school students as a psychological and pedagogical problem // Journal of scientific publications of graduate students and doctoral students.-2008.

105. Gaponenko A.B. Pedagogical conditions for professional self-determination of high school students in specialized education: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2003. - 22 p.

106. Gerasimov G.I., Rechkin N.S. Transformation of management culture in the municipal education system. Rostov n/d., 1998.

107. Ginzburg M.R. Psychological content of personal self-determination // Questions of psychology. 1994. No. 3. - P. 24-37.

108. Gladkaya I.V., Ilyina S.P., Rivkina S.B. Fundamentals of specialized education and pre-vocational training. SPb.: KARO, 2006.

109. Glebkin V.V. Integrative approaches to specialized education using the example of a humanitarian profile // Specialized education in the city of Moscow: Experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. (May 14-15, 2003): Part II. -M: NIIRO, 2003. pp. 56-62.

110. Glinsky B.A., Baksansky O.E. Methodology of science: cognitive analysis. M., 2001.

111. Glushchenko E.V., Zakharova E.V., Tikhonravova Yu.V. Control theory. M., 1997.

112. Golovakha E.I. Life prospects and professional self-determination of youth: Author's abstract. . Doctor of Philosophy, Science. Kyiv, 1989.-34 p.

113. Gonchar M. Project for organizing specialized training in educational institutions of the Kaliningrad region // School Management: appendix. to gas "First of September." 2003. - No. 8. -Insert.

114. State educational standards in the general education system. Theory and practice / ed. B.C. Ledneva, N.D. Nikandrova, M.V. Ryzhakova. M., 2002. - 63 p.

115. Gran R.Y. Education reforms and high school. M., 2003.

116. Gribov B.S. Studying history: from in-depth to specialized // Profile school. 2003. - No. 3. - P. 16-23.

117. Grigorieva N.V. Didactic models for the formation of a student’s individuality: Dis. . Ph.D. pedagogical sciences Kaliningrad, 2009.-25s.

118. Grinshpun S.S. Determination of criteria for the labor development of schoolchildren at the stage of choosing a profession: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. nauk.-M., 1978.-22 p.

119. Gromov E.V. Profile training as a factor in the socialization of rural school graduates: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Saransk, 2009. 18 p.

120. Gromyko Yu.V. Problems of educational policy in the Russian Federation. Tyumen: Tyumen Regional State Institute for the Development of Regional Education, 2000. -205 p.

121. Gromyko Yu.V. Design and programming of educational development. -M., 1996. 545 p.

122. Gromyko Yu.V., Davydov V.V. Education as a means of forming and cultivating the practice of social and regional development // Russia-2010. 1993. - No. 1.

123. Gross A.B. Managing the professional self-determination of students in the university system: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. social Sci. -M., 2005.-27 p.

124. Gubanova M.I. Formation of professional intentions of high school students in the context of specialized education: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Novosibirsk, 1994. - 20 p.

125. Guzeev V.V. Profile high school and primary vocational education can be combined into one system // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M.: NIIRO, 2003. - pp. 37-43.

126. Guzeev V.V. Contents of education and specialized training in high school // National education. 2002. - No. 9. - P. 113-123.

127. Gusinsky E.N. Building a theory of education based on an interdisciplinary systems approach. M.: School, 1994. - 184 p.

128. Danilova M.M. Professional self-determination of students in the field of tourism in the process of pre-university preparation: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. nauk.-M., 2002.-140 p.

129. Danyushnekov V.S., Korshunova O.V. Integrative-differentiated approach to organizing specialized education in rural schools: concept, models // Profile school. 2005. - No. 2.-S. 15-24.

130. Dakhin A.N. Current problems of optimal management of the educational process // Pedagogist. 1999. - No. 7. - P. 47-52.

131. Dakhin A.N. Modeling in pedagogy: an attempt to comprehend. -http://www.bestreferat.ru/referat-78582.html)

132. Dashkovskaya O. What should a textbook be for a specialized school? // Textbooks: adj. to gas "First of September." 2002. - No. 59. - P.1.

133. Dashkovskaya O. Pre-profile training: new songs about the old. “Pre-vocational training is a patching up of the Soviet career guidance system,” experts say // Textbooks: appendix. to gas "First of September." - 2003. - No. 68. - P. 1-2.

134. Dashkovskaya O. Specialized school at the crossroads // School management. 2002. - No. 15.- P. 4.

135. Dashkovskaya O. Country of Councils for specialized training. In each region and municipality, three structures will be created responsible for the introduction of specialized education. So far this is the main result of the experiment // First of September. 2003. - No. 77. - P. 2.

136. Demin A.N. Features of a person’s experience of crises of his employment // Questions of psychology. 2006. - No. 3. - P. 87 - 96.

137. Democratization of education management. Part 2 / JI.H. Kulieva, E.M. Muravyov. Tver, Chu Do, 2003. - 86 p.

138. Demchenko A.R. Profile training in the general education system of Germany and Russia: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Novosibirsk, 2008. 160 p.

139. Derkach A.A. Acmeological foundations of professional development. -M.: Publishing house of the Moscow Psychological and Social Institute; Voronezh: NPO "MODEK", 2004. 752 p.

140. Dzyatkovskaya E.H., Dyakova M.B. Taking into account the individual characteristics of schoolchildren in preparation for specialized education // Profile school. 2004. - No. 2. - pp. 24-26.

141. Didkovskaya Ya.V. Professional self-determination of youth: sociological analysis. Ekaterinburg: State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education USTU-UPI, 2004. - 69 p.

142. Diary of professional self-determination / Authors-compilers: T.M. Volchenkova. M.S. Gutkin, T.F. Mikhalchenko, A.B. Pond. S.N. Chistyakova head // School and production. -1993.-No.5.-S. 67-75.

143. Dneprov E.D. Educational standard is a tool for updating the content of general education / Temporary scientific team “Educational Standard” of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.-M., 2004.- 104 p.

144. Dobrynin M.A. Formation of professional orientation of high school students in the system of interaction between school, family and the public: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 1970. -22 p.

145. Let's catch up and overtake! Moscow craves specialized training without fear of anything // School Management. 2003. - No. 19. - P. 5.

146. Drevnitskaya H.JI. Organizational model of differentiation of training for students in specialized classes of a general education school // Pedagogical research: hypotheses, projects, implementation. -Kurgan, 2001. -No. 1(7). pp. 60-63.

147. Dudnikov V.V. Educational management. Samara, 1994.

148. Dyachenko M.I., Kandybovich JT.A. Psychological problems of readiness for activity. Minsk: BSU Publishing House, 1976. - 176 p.

149. Evladova E.B. Additional education as a space for additional self-determination of schoolchildren // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems of prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M: NIIRO, 2003. - P. 89.

150. Ekimova T.P. Professional self-determination of high school students when studying fiction: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Kurgan, 2000. - 171 p.

151. Eremeeva H.JL Profile education at Municipal Educational Institution Lyceum 6

153. Ermolaev V.N., Rodionova J1.H. Two models of social management // Society and people: ways of self-determination. Vol. 1. - St. Petersburg, 1994.-68 p.

154. Ermolaeva E.P. Psychology of the professional marginal in socially significant types of work // Psychological Journal. 2001. T. 22.-№5.-S. 69-78.

155. Efimova JI.A. Pre-profile preparation of students at the State University-Higher School of Economics based on the “school-university” model // Profile school. 2004. - No. 3. - P. 42-45.

156. Zhafyarov A. Zh. Option for an eleven-year specialized school // Pedagogy. 2000. - No. 9.- P. 46-49.

157. Zhukov V.I. Russian education: problems and prospects for development. M., 1998.

158. Zhuravlev V.I. Pedagogical problems of life self-determination of high school graduates: Author's abstract. dis. Dr. ped. Sci. JL, 1973. - 37 p.

159. Zhurin A.A. Using Internet resources for information and reference support of specialized courses // Profile school. 2004. - No. 1. - P. 30-36.

160. Zhurkina A.Ya. Profile training in an additional education institution, a mechanism for self-determination of its students // Additional education. - 2003. - No. 3. - P. 1619.

161. Zagvyazinsky V.I. Design of regional educational systems // Pedagogy. 1999. - No. 5.402

162. Zagorsky V.V., Mendeleeva E.A. Profile training - a complete education for the elite? // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). -M.: NIIRO, 2003. P. 270-272.

163. Foreign experience of specialized training in rural schools: collection. scientific article / ed. E.A. Aksyonova. M.: ISPS RAO, 2005. - 79 p.

164. Zasypkina E.S. The situation of success-failure as a factor of professional self-determination of students of a pedagogical college: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Ekaterinburg, 2004. - 177 p.

165. Zakharov N.H., Simonenko V.D. Vocational guidance for schoolchildren. M.: Education, 1989. - 192 p.

166. Zakharov Yu.A., Kasatkina N.E., Nevzorov B.P., Churekova T.M. Theory and practice of forming professional self-determination of youth in the conditions of continuous education. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1996. - 160 p.

167. Zakharova T.B. Differentiation of the content of education is the main means of implementing specialized training // Profile school. 2003. - No. 1. - P. 32-35.

168. Zakharova T.B. Profile differentiation of computer science teaching at the senior level of school: monograph. M., 1997. -212 p.

169. Zeer E.F. Professionally oriented logical-semantic model of personality // World of Psychology. 2005. - No. 1 - P. 141 - 147

170. Zeer E.F. Psychology of professions. M.: Academy, 2003. - 320 p.

171. Zeer E.F., Taranova O.V. Career management. // School psychologist. No. 16. - 2000, Publ. House "First of September"

172. Zilberberg N.I. Models of specialized training // Profile school. 2003. - No. 2. - P. 39-48.

173. Zilberberg N.I. Profile training: problems and solutions. -Pskov, 2003.-65 p.

174. Zimovina O.A. Features of the formation of professional intentions of high school students: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 1977.- 18 p.

175. Zinchenko V.P. Affect and intelligence in education.- M.: Trivola, 1995.-P. 6-62.

176. Zueva E.S. Organizational and managerial support for professional self-determination of adolescents in the pedagogical process of an education center: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Smolensk, 2005.-216 p.

177. Ivanushkina S. A. High school students’ perception of the events of their own life path and professional self-determination: Dis. . Ph.D. psycho. Sci. -M., 1997. 134 p.

178. Idilova I.S. Profile training as a factor in preparing schoolchildren to continue their education at a university: using the example of the subject “Foreign Language”: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Ryazan, 2007. -20 p.

179. Izvolskaya JT. B. Psychological and pedagogical conditions for professional self-determination of high school students. 2010 URL: http://pedsovet.su/index/8-l

180. Ilyin E.P. Motivation and motives. St. Petersburg, 2000.

181. Isaev I.F. Life self-determination of schoolchildren: work motivation, readiness: textbook. Belgorod: BelSU Publishing House, 2006.-267 p.

182. Isaev I.F. School as a pedagogical system: Fundamentals of management. Belgorod, 1997.

183. Kabanova-Meller E.H. Educational activities and developmental training. -M.: Pedagogy, 1981. 150 p.

184. Kazantseva T. A., Oleinik Yu.N. “The relationship between personal development and professional development of student psychologists”//

185. Psychological journal. 2002.- Volume 23. - No. 6.- P. 51-59.404

186. How to determine the profile of schoolchildren // Public education. 2000. - No. 6. - pp. 158-160.

187. How to organize a specialized productive class at school // School technologies. 2003. - No. 2. - P. 32-40.

188. How to prepare a school for specialized training: materials of the scientific and practical conference “Professional training in Moscow: experience, problems, prospects” // Public education. 2003. - No. 7. -S. 106-115.

189. How to build a specialized school: A manual for heads of general education institutions (series “Profile training”). -SPb.: Branch of the publishing house “Enlightenment”, 2005. 159 p.

190. Kalney V.A., Shishov S.E. Technology for monitoring the quality of teaching in the “teacher-student” system. M.: Pedagogical Society of Russia, 1999.-86 p.

191. Kamyshnikov A.I. Management in distributed educational systems: monograph. Barnaul: Altai University Publishing House, 2001. - 247 p.

192. Kasatkina N.E. Theory and practice of forming professional self-determination of youth in the conditions of continuous education: Dis. . Dr. ped. Sci. M., 1995. -351 p.

193. Kasprzhak A.G., Mitrofanov K.G. and others. New requirements for the content and methodology of teaching in the Russian school in the context of the results of the international study R18A-2000. -M., 2005.

194. Kasprzhak A.G. Organization and content of elective courses as an integral part of pre-profile training // Profile training in the city of Moscow: Experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. (1415 May 2003): Part I. -M: NIIRO, 2003. P. 78-80.

195. Kataeva L.I., Polozova T.A. On the question of the essence of professional self-determination in the space of formation of a new Russian society // World of Psychology. 2005. - No. 1 - p. 147 -156.

196. Kibakin S.V. Management of the process of pedagogical support for professional self-determination of high school students (At the municipal level): Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Moscow, 2002.

197. Kiriy N.V. Intra-school management of the process of professional self-determination of students: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Belgorod, 1998.-259 p.

198. Clarin M.V. Innovative models of teaching in modern foreign schools // Pedagogy. 1994. - No. 5. - pp. 104-109.

199. Klenova N. How to prepare a school for specialized training: materials of the scientific and practical conference “Professional training in Moscow: experience, problems, prospects” // Public education. -2003.-№7.-S. 106-114.

200. Klimov E.A. Introduction to occupational psychology. M.: Culture and Sports, UNITY, 1998 - 350 p.

201. Klimov E.A. Psychology of a professional. M.: Publishing house "Institute of Practical Psychology"; Voronezh: NPO "MODEK", 1996. -400 p.

202. Klimov E.A. Psychology of professional self-determination: Textbook. Rostov n/d, 1996.

203. Klimova I.K. Professional self-determination of students of secondary educational institutions of agricultural profile: Author's abstract. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Kazan, 2004. - 22 p.

204. Knyazev A.M. The role of pedagogical science in the formation of civic qualities as a condition for self-determination and self-realization of the individual // World of Psychology. 2005.- No. 3. - P. 205 - 216.

205. Kobazova Yu.V. Gender socialization of senior schoolchildren in the process of professional self-determination: Author's abstract. dis. Ph.D. pskh. Sci. M., 2009. - 16 p.

206. Kovalev S.M. Education and self-education. M., 1992.406

207. Kovaleva G.S. The state of Russian education (according to the results of international research) // Pedagogy. 2000. - No. 2.-S. 80-88.

208. Kodzhaspirova G.M., Kodzhaspirov A.Yu. Pedagogical dictionary. - M.: Publishing Center "Academy", 2000.

209. Kozhevnikova M.E. Methodology for developing schoolchildren’s readiness for professional self-determination in the context of specialized education: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Togliatti, 2003.-20 p.

210. Kolarkova O.G. Professional self-determination of foreign students in a university environment: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Nizhny Novgorod, 2010. - 25 p.

211. Kolosova JI.A. Pedagogical foundations of vocational guidance for schoolchildren in labor family associations: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Dr. ped. Sci. M., 1995. - 31 p.

212. A set of interdepartmental measures for the implementation in 2002-2005 of the Concept of modernization of Russian education for the period until 2010 // Teacher’s Newspaper. 2002 - No. 31.

213. A comprehensive methodology for studying personality in order to identify a student’s abilities for professional self-determination / Scientific supervisor S.N. Chistyakova. Yaroslavl, 1993. - 187 p.

214. Kon I.S. Psychology of early adolescence: Book. for the teacher. M.: Education, 1989. - 225 p.

215. Konarzhevsky Yu.A. Pedagogical analysis as the basis of school management. Chelyabinsk, 1978.

216. Kondakov I.M., Sukharev A.B. Methodological foundations of foreign theories of professional development // Questions of psychology. 1989.- No. 5. - pp. 158-164.

217. Kondakov N.I. Logical dictionary reference book. - M.: Science, 1975.-717 p.-P.361

218. Kondakova M.L., Podgornaya E.Ya., Rychagova T.V. Designing the educational process using distance learning technologies in the context of network interaction of educational institutions and organizations. M., 2005.

219. Kondratyeva M.A. The formation and development trends of schools in the RSFSR with in-depth study of academic subjects: (late 50s - second half of the 80s): Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. / Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the USSR, KII of Theory and History of Pedagogy. M., 1990. - 21 p.

220. Kondratov P.E. Modernization of education as a task of social management. -M, 2002.

221. Kononenko I.Yu. Psychological determinants of the success of professional self-determination of university students: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. psycho. Sci. Stavropol, 2008. -21s.

222. Konopkin O. A. Psychological mechanisms of activity regulation. M.: Nauka, 1980. - 355 p.

223. The concept of modernization of Russian education for the period until 2010 (order of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 29, 2001, No. 1756-r) // Modernization of Russian education: documents and materials. M, 2002.-S. 236-282.

224. Concept of educational electronic publications and information resources. On the website: http://www.rnmc.ш/old/New/Ru/education/fes.htm

226. The concept of specialized training at the senior level of general education (Order of the Ministry of Education of Russia dated July 18, 2002, No. 2783) // Didact. 2002. - No. 5.

227. The concept of labor training in the system of continuing education // School and production. 1990. - No. 1. - P. 12-18.

228. Korbanovich T.V. Formation of professional and labor values ​​among high school students in the process of specialized education: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2007. - 26 p.

229. Korolev Yu.V. Professional self-determination of students in specialized public associations in economics and management: Dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Kazan, 2008. -218 p.

230. Korsunova O. Cocktail “Profile School” // First of September. 2003. - No. 59. - S.Z.

231. Kostyukova T.A. Professional self-determination of a future teacher in traditional Russian spiritual values: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Tomsk, 2002. - 363 p.

232. Kotlyarov V.A. Experience in organizing individual educational trajectories for students // Physics at school. 2006. - No. 6.-S. 34-37.

233. Kotsar Yu.A. Topical issues of organizing scientific research work in a specialized school // Methodist. 2003. - No. Z.-S. 49-50.

234. Kravtsov S.S. Theory and practice of organizing specialized training in schools of the Russian Federation: Dis. . Dr. ped. Sci. -M., 2007.-447p.

235. Kravchuk L.A. Professional self-determination of high school students in the educational process of the pre-university training system: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Khabarovsk, 2008.- 27 p.

236. Kraevsky V.V. Methodological foundations for constructing a theory of the content of general secondary education and its main problems // Theoretical foundations of the content of general secondary education. M, 1983.-S. 40-48.

237. Craig G., Bokum D. Developmental psychology. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2005. -940 p.

238. Krasnova S. Management of a multidisciplinary institution of additional education for children // Public education. 2003. -№8.-S. 81-84.

239. Criteria and indicators of schoolchildren’s readiness for professional self-determination: Methodological manual / Ed. S.N.Chistyakova, A.Ya.Zhurkina. M.: Philology, IOSO RAO, 1997.

240. Krichevsky V.Yu. On some directions of development of the theory of school management // Abstracts. report Intl. seminar "Management in Education". St. Petersburg, 1996.

241. Krylova N.B. How to organize a specialized productive class at school // School technologies. 2003. - No. 2. - P. 32-39.

242. Krysanova O.P. Organizational and methodological approaches to modernizing the content of education in the transition period to a specialized school: educational method. allowance / O.P. Krysanova, G.S. Pokas, I.L. Pshentsova. Surgut: UNCDO SurGU, 2005. - 37 p.

243. Kryagzhde S.P. Psychology of formation of professional interests. Vilnius: Mokslas, 1981. - 196 p.

244. Kudryavtsev T.V., Shegurova V.Yu. Psychological analysis of the dynamics of professional self-determination of the individual // Questions of psychology. 1983.- No. 2. - p. 51-59

245. Kuznetsov A.A. Basic and specialized courses: goals, functions, content // Standards and monitoring in education. 2003. - No. 5. -S. 30-33.

246. Kuznetsov A.A. About the basic curriculum of the senior level of school // Profile school. 2003. - No. 3. - P.29-31.

247. Kuznetsov A.A., Pinsky A.A., Ryzhakov M.V., Filatova J1.0. Profile training. Answers to basic questions. M.: Publishing house "Russian Journal", 2004. - 128 p.

248. Kuznetsov A.A., Pinsky A.A., Ryzhakov M.V., Filatova JI.O. The structure and principles of forming the content of specialized education at the senior level. M.: RAO, State University Higher School of Economics, 2003. - 224 p.

249. Kuznetsov A.A. Profile training and curricula for senior school // Standards and monitoring in education. 2003. -№3. - pp. 54-59.

250. Kuznetsov A.A., Ryzhakov M.V. Some aspects of developing the content of education at the senior level of school: profile differentiation // Standards and monitoring in education. 2003. -№1. - P. 40-47.

251. Kuznetsov A.A., Filatova JI.O. The new basic curriculum is the basis for the implementation of specialized education in senior secondary schools. M., 2004 - 56 p.

252. Kuznetsov A.A., Filatova JI.O. Profile training and curricula for senior school // Profile school. 2003. - No. 1. - P. 27-32.

253. Kuznetsov A.B. Professional self-determination of the individual in the conditions of pre-profile training in an institution of additional education: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Ulyanovsk, 2004. -23s.

254. Kuzmina N.V. Professionalism of the personality of the teacher and master of industrial training. -M., 1990.

255. Kurdyumova I.M. Methodological work in a multidisciplinary school // Pedagogy. 1994. - No. 5. - P. 49-52.

256. Kurysheva I.G. Interactive teaching methods as a factor of self-realization of high school students in educational activities when studying natural sciences: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Nizhny Novgorod, 2010. - 25 p.

257. Kustova N.V. Pedagogical technology for managing the professional self-determination of students to become teachers: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Ekaterinburg, 1994.411

258. Kustova S.B. Activation of professional self-determination of high school students by means of a foreign language: Dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Barnaul, 2004. - 197 p.

259. Kukharchuk A.M., Tsentsiper A.B. Professional self-determination of students. Minsk, 1976. -218 p.

260. Lazarev V.S., Afanasyeva T.P., Eliseeva I.A., Pudenko T.I. Management of the teaching staff: models and methods / Ed. ed. V.S. Lazarev. M., 1995.

261. Lapteva E.G. Professional self-determination of schoolchildren: Method, recommendations. Astrakhan: Publishing house Astrakh, state. ped. University, 2000.-25s.

262. Lebedev O.E. Management of educational systems. Vel. Novgorod, NRCRO, 1998.-91 p.

263. Lebedev S. The government has only yet approved the experiment on a specialized school. And the Ministry of Education is already preparing for the mass introduction of specialized training // First of September. 2003. - No. 47. - SL.

264. Lednev B.S. Standards of general education: from idea to implementation // News of the Russian Academy of Education. 1999.

265. Leontyev D.A., Shelobanova E.V. Professional self-determination as the construction of images of a possible future // Questions of psychology. 2001. - No. 1. - pp. 57-66

266. Lerner P. S. Bifurcations of the pedagogical paradigm in specialized education of high school students // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems of prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M: NIIRO, 2003. - pp. 10-26.

267. Lerner P.S. Model of self-determination of graduates of specialized classes of secondary schools // School technologies. 2003.-№4.-S. 50-61.

268. Lerner P.S. Plateau of effectiveness of profile education for high school students // Profile education in the city of Moscow: Experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. (May 14-15, 2003): Part II. M: NIIRO, 2003. - pp. 86-101.

269. Lerner P.S. High school profiling as a bifurcation of pedagogical tradition // News of the Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences. Vol. 9. 2005. - p. 466.

270. Lerner P.S. Profile education: interaction of opposites // School technologies. 2002. - No. 6.

271. Lesnyanskaya Zh.A. Time perspective of rural school seniors, its development and impact on professional self-determination: Dis. . Ph.D. psycho. Sci. Irkutsk, 2008. - 168 p.

272. Likhachev B.T. Reformism in Russian education: projects and results // Pedagogy. 1996. - No. 6. - P. 18-24.

273. Lukina A.K. Career guidance work with teenagers who find themselves in difficult life situations: Krasnoyarsk State. Univ. Krasnoyarsk, 2004. - 236 p.

274. Lukina A.K. Regional model of specialized education for rural schoolchildren: Krasnoyarsk version: monograph. M.: Publishing house ISPS RAO, 2005. - 73 p.

275. Lyakh V.I. Profile self-determination of students at the stage of pre-professional education: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Krasnoyarsk, 2005.-216 p.

276. Mayorov A.N. Monitoring and problems of information support for education management // School technologies. -1999.-No. 1.-S. 26-31.

277. Makarenko A.S. Choice of profession // Op. M.: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the RSFSR, 1958. - T. 5. - P. 392-394.

278. Makarchuk A.B. Profile training in a rural small school (02/01/2003). On the website: http://bank.ooipkxo.ru/Text/t4324.htm

279. Maksimova V.N. Structure and principles for selecting the content of specialized educational programs // Profiling of schools: development of curricula: material. Intl. seminar. St. Petersburg, 1996. -S. 83-93.

280. Maluchiev G.S. Professional self-determination as the main factor in the socialization of high school graduates: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Makhachkala, 2003. - 145 p.

281. Manaenkova O.A. Activation of creative activity of students in pre-professional classes of a basic school in the conditions of integrated education: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Yelets, 2004.-256 p.

282. Markova M. V. Analysis of concepts and models of quality management in educational activities // Fundamental Science. No. 12.-2008.-p. 54.

283. Martynova A.B. The influence of school psychological education on the professional self-determination of schoolchildren: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. psycho. Sci. St. Petersburg, 2005. - 164 p.

284. Maslennikova Yu.V. Early professional self-determination of schoolchildren in the school-university system: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Nizhny Novgorod, 2002. 22 p.

285. Maslow A. Motivation and personality. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2003. - 352 p.

286. Matveeva O.V. Project activity in teaching as a teaching technology in a specialized school // Moscow specialized school: experience, problems, prospects: material, scientific and practical. conference in Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M.: NIIRO, 2003. - pp. 229-230.

287. Materials of the Republican seminar “Activities of the class teacher in the conditions of specialization of the school”, November 19, 2004, Zelenodolsk. Zelenodolsk, 2004.

288. Sailor D.Sh., Polev D.M., Melnikova N.H. Education quality management. M.: Ped. Society of Russia, 2001. - 128 p.

289. Melekhova V.E. Professional self-determination of future social work specialists in a university environment: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. St. Petersburg, 2006.- 243 p.

290. Meltonyan J1.J1. Activation of cognitive activity of high school students in the system of specialized education: Author's abstract. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Chelyabinsk, 2008. - 23 p.

291. Merzlyakov I.V. Professional self-determination of senior schoolchildren in extracurricular activities: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Voronezh, 2004. 224 p.

292. Meskon M. X. Fundamentals of management: translation from English. / M. Meskon, M. Albert, F. Khedouri. Academician adv. household under Govt. RF. Higher school international business. M.: Delo, 2002. - 701 p.

293. Methodology for identifying the readiness of high school students to choose a profile of study / Author. comp. L.P. Ashikhmina, S.O. Kropivyanskaya, O.V. Kuzina et al.; edited by S.N. Chistyakova. - M., 2003. - 83 p.

294. Mitina L.M. Personal and professional development of a person in new socio-economic conditions // Questions of psychology. -1997.-No. 4.-S. 28-38

295. Mikhailov I.V. The problem of professional maturity in the works of D.E. Supera // Questions of psychology. - 1975. - No. 5 P. 27 - 39.

296. Mikheev V.I. Modeling and methods of measurement theory in pedagogy. M.: Higher. school, 1987. - 206 p.

297. Mogilev A.B., Pak N.I., Henner E.K. Informatics: Textbook. manual for higher students ped. textbook institutions studying the specialty “Informatics” M.: Academy, 2004. - 840, 1. e.; ill., table.

298. Moiseev A.M., Kravtsov S.S. Determining readiness for the introduction of specialized training: region, municipality, school. M.: Gothic, 2005.-251 p.

299. Model of profile space // Changes. 2003. - No. 3. -S. 73-95.

300. Modernization of education at the turn of the century. St. Petersburg, RGPU, 2001.

301. Modernization of Russian education. Documents and materials. M: State University Higher School of Economics, 2002. - 331 p.

302. Youth and professional career: Educational and methodological set / Scientific. ed. S.N. Chistyakova, A.Ya. Zhurkina. M.: Institute of Professional Self-Determination of Youth, 1993. - 27 p.

303. Monakhov V.M. Pedagogical design, modern tools for didactic research // School technologies. -2001. - No. 5. - P.75-89.

304. Monitoring the quality of education of students in specialized classes in the school-university system // Standards and monitoring in education. -2002.-No.3.-S. 41-47.

305. Mordovskaya A.B. Implementation of pedagogical conditions that promote successful life and professional self-determination of high school students // Science and Education. 2000. -No. 4. - P. 46-48.

306. Moskvin V.G. Psychological support for professional self-determination of students during pre-professional training: problems and possible solutions // Psychological and pedagogical journal. 2003. - No. 4. - P. 13-18.

307. Moturenko N.V. Profile training as a condition for the development of the pedagogical system of a secondary school: Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2009. - 202 p. 416

308. My professional career: A manual for students. / Scientific ed. S.N. Chistyakova, A.Ya. Zhurkina. M.: Institute of Professional Self-Determination of Youth, 1993. - 77 p.

309. Mudrik A.B. Time for searches and solutions, or for high school students about themselves. M., 1990.

310. Mudrik A.B. The role of the social environment in the formation of a teenager’s personality. M.: Knowledge, 1979. - 175 p.

311. Muratova A.A. Professional self-determination of a teenager in the process of pre-vocational training in an institution of additional education for children: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. Orenburg, 2008. -18 p.

312. Nemova N.V. Management of the introduction of a system of pre-professional education for ninth-graders: educational and methodological manual. M.: APK and PRO, 2003.-68 p.

313. Nikitin A.A. About specialized training in secondary schools. (03/19/2004). On the website: http://teacher.fio.ru/news.php?n=27607&c=l

314. Nikiforova A.B., Bushenkova I.A., Ivanova N.A. Model of multidisciplinary lyceum No. 11 (experimental program) // Profile school. 2003. - No. 2. - P. 32-39.

315. Novikov P.M., Zuev V.M. Advanced professional education: Scientific and practical manual. M.: RGATiZ., 2000 266 p.

316. Novikova T.G., Prutchenkov A.S., Pinskaya M.A. Recommendations for constructing various models and using portfolios for students of primary and secondary schools // Profile school. 2005. - No. 1. -S. 4-12.

317. Novikova T.G., Prutchenkov A.S., Pinskaya M.A., Fedotova E.E. Folder of personal achievements of a schoolchild “portfolio”: theory of the issue and practice of implementation. - M.: APK and PRO, 2004. - 112 p.

318. Ovcharova P.B. School psychologist's reference book. M.: Education, 1996. - pp. 276-335.

319. Ozhegov S.I. Dictionary of the Russian language. M: State Publishing House of Foreign and National Dictionaries, 1953. - 848 p.

320. On measures to introduce specialized training: Information from the Ministry of Education of Russia and the Russian Academy of Education // Official documents in education. 2003. - No. 34. - P. 48-52.

321. Orlov V.A. Educational standard in the context of specialized education: problems and solutions // Profile school. 2004. - No. 1. -S. 15-17.

322. Orlyanskaya N.I. Professional self-determination of high school students in cultural and leisure activities: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -M., 1999. 196 p.

323. Ososova M.V. Psychological and pedagogical support for professional self-determination of adolescents in the educational process. Ekaterinburg, 2007.

324. Ostapenko A.A. Modeling multidimensional pedagogical reality: theory and technology. M.: Public Education, 2009. -383 p.

325. Ostapenko A.A., Skopin A.Yu. Ways to implement the concept of specialized education // Rural school. 2003. - No. 4. - P. 18-25.

326. Pavlova I.V. Conference “Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems of prospects” // Profile school of Moscow: experience, 418problems of prospects: scientific and practical materials. conference in Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). -M: NIIRO, 2003. pp. 261-266.

327. Pavlyutenkov E.M. Management of vocational guidance in secondary schools. Vladivostok: Far Eastern University Publishing House, 1990. - 176 p.

328. Parkhomenko E.I. Professional self-determination of students in grades 5-7 in the process of creative project activities: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Bryansk, 2001. - 150 p.

329. Pashkovskaya I.N. Professional self-determination of a teacher in a humanistic perspective. St. Petersburg : St. Petersburg. state Institute of Service and Economics, 2001. - 147 p.

330. Peresypkin V.N. Professional self-determination of senior schoolchildren in extracurricular activities: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Kemerovo, 2005. 233 p.

331. Pinsky A.A. Models of a portfolio of educational achievements of schoolchildren // Profile school. 2003. - No. 3. - P. 9-12.

332. Pinsky A.A. Preparing the transition of high school to specialized education // School management: appendix. to gas "First of September." 2003. - No. 8. - P. 2-8.

333. Pinsky A.A. Pre-profile preparation in ninth grade: on the threshold of experiment // Profile school. 2003. - No. 1. - P.41-48.

334. Pinsky A.A. Pre-profile preparation: beginning of the experiment. M.: Alliance Press, 2004. - 312 p.

335. Pinsky A.A., Kravtsov S.S. and others. Problems of the relationship between labor markets and school education in the context of the introduction of specialized training: materials, seminar / Ed. A.A. Pinsky, N.F. Rodichev, S.S. Kravtsov. M.: Alliance-press, 2004. - 44 p.

336. Pisareva S.A. Profile training as a factor in ensuring accessibility of education: Russian vision: Recommendations based on the results of scientific research / ed. G.A. Bordovsky. -SPb.: Publishing house RGPU, 2006. 83 p.

337. Pischik A.M. Project activity as a way of professional self-identification for high school students // Changes. 2003. - No. 3. - P. 95-103.

338. Platonov K.K. Structure and development of personality. M.: Mysl, 1986.-254 p.

339. Podgornaya E.Ya. Profile training and socialization of the individual // Standards and monitoring in education. 2003. - No. 3. - P. 42-46.

340. Training of teaching staff for the introduction of pre-profile training: method, manual. M.: APK and PRO, 2003. - 120 p.

341. Potapova A. S. Profile as a quality factor // Education. 2002. - No. 5 .- P. 19-25.

342. Pre-profile preparation: (Materials of the experiment on modernizing the content and structure of general education) // Moscow profile school: experience, perspective problems: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M: NIIRO, 2003. - P. 273307.

343. Pre-vocational training for ninth grade students in general education institutions. Results of the experiment and prospects for further development: materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. -M.: Alliance-press, 2004. 160 p.

344. Pre-profile preparation of primary school students: curricula for elective courses in natural and mathematical disciplines / Comp. A.Yu. Pentin. M.: APKiPRO, 2003. - 156 p.

345. Problems of content and technology for preparing students for work in the transition to market relations: Abstracts of reports and messages at a scientific and practical conference. Bryansk: BGGSh, 1993. - 150 p.

346. Prokofieva E.A. Educational technologies in a profile school // Moscow profile school: experience, perspective problems: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M: NIIRO, 2003. - P. 187189.

347. Professional and personal self-determination of orphans: Method, manual: To help managers, educators, and children’s specialists. houses and boarding schools / J1. V. Bayborodova and others. Yaroslavl, 1999. -65 p.

348. Professional self-determination and professional career of youth / Scientific. ed. S.N. Chistyakova, A.Ya. Zhurkina. M.: Institute of Professional Self-Determination of Youth RAO, 1993. - 90 p.

349. Professional self-determination of personality as an object of diagnosis: Method, recommendations / Author: Efimova S. A., Kuznetsova S. A. - Samara: Profi, 2002. 64 p.

350. Professional self-determination of subjects: acmeological approach: textbook. allowance / Derkach A.A. (responsible editor) and others - M.: Publishing house Ros. acad. state services, 2004. 121 p.

351. Professional self-determination of schoolchildren: Textbook. allowance / V. D. Simonenko, T. B. Surovitskaya, M. V. Retivykh, E. D. Volokhova. -Bryansk: Bryansk Publishing House. state ped. Institute, 1995. 99 p.

352. Profile and pre-professional training at school. In the book: School changes. Scientific approaches to updating general secondary education / ed. Yu.I. Dika, A.B. Khutorskogo. M.: ISOSO RAO, 2001.- 86 p.

353. Profile training in high school (LIR://\¥L¥du.rgoy1e-edu.ru).

354. Profile training in high school in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: regional experience 2007 / V.V. Verzhbitsky, Yu.Yu. Vlasova, A.S. Mikhailova, etc. / Ed. Yu.Yu.Vlasova. M.: Education-region, 2007. - 256 p.

355. Profile and professional self-determination of high school students: theory and practice: materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference, December 17-18, 2008 / edited by. ed. O. G. Krasnoshlykova. Kemerovo: Publishing house KRIPKIPRO, 2009.

356. Profile training. Experiment: improving the structure and content of general education / ed. A.F. Kiseleva. -M.: Humanite. ed. VLADOS center, 2001. 512 p.

357. Profile classes: solving didactic problems in the practice of educational institutions // School. 2001. - No. 6. - pp. 84-86.

358. Pryazhnikov N.S. Activating questionnaires of professional and personal self-determination. Moscow-Voronezh, 1997. - 79 p.

359. Pryazhnikov N.S. Methods for activating professional and personal self-determination. M.: Publishing house of the Moscow Psychological and Social Institute; Voronezh: NPO "MODEK", 2002. - 400 p.

360. Pryazhnikov N.S. Professional and personal self-determination. M.: Publishing house "Institute of Practical Psychology"; Voronezh: NPO "MODEK", 1996. - 256 p.

361. Pryazhnikov N.S. Professional self-determination: theory and practice: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions studying in the direction of "Psychology" and psychological specialties. Moscow: Academy, 2008. - 318 p.

362. Pryazhnikov N.S. Career guidance in school and college: games, exercises, questionnaires M.: VAKO, 2006. - 236 p. 422

363. Personality psychology in the works of domestic psychologists. Reader / Comp. L.V.Kulikov. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2000. - P. 3-71.

364. Pugachev V.P. Management of the organization's personnel. M.: Aspect Press. - 2000. - P. 135.

365. Pushkina O.V. Professional self-determination of schoolchildren in the context of specialized education. Bulletin of TTTGU, 2009. - Issue 1(79).

366. Pyankova G.S. Specifics of reflexive management of the process of vocational education. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after. V.P. Astafieva. -2009.

367. Rabinovich O.T. Socio-professional self-determination of “at-risk” adolescents. Murom: Murom Institute (phil.) Vladimir State. Univ., 2004. - 193 p.

368. Rassadkin Yu. Profile school: in search of a basic model // School director. 2003. - No. 5. - P. 11-18.

369. Rachevsky E.L. Profiling is the acquisition of personal meaning // School Director. - 2003. - No. 6. - P. 59-61.

370. Rean A.A. Human psychology from birth to death. St. Petersburg: Prime-EVROZNAK, 2002. - 656 p.

371. Rezapkina G.V. Me and my profession. Professional self-determination program for teenagers. Educational and methodological manual for school psychologists and teachers. - M., 2000. 127 p.

372. Remorenko I. M. “Social partnership” in education: concept and activity // New city: education for changing the quality of life. M.; St. Petersburg: Yugorsk, 2003.

373. Remschmidt X. Adolescence and adolescence. Problems of personality development. M., Mir, 1994. - 345 p.

374. Rogacheva T.B. Professional self-determination of personality as a social problem: Author's abstract. dis. Ph.D. philosopher, scientist Sverdlovsk, 1991.-23 p.

375. Rodichev N.F. Profile orientation of schoolchildren - a meaning-forming element of pre-professional training // Profile school. 2003. - No. 2. - P. 20-23.

376. Rodichev N.F. Resource map of a schoolchild’s educational and professional route in the context of the specialization of a high school // Profile school. 2005. - No. 3. - P. 11-19.

377. Rodichev N.F., Chistyakova S.N. On the creation of a concept for organizing a system of career guidance in institutions subordinate to the Moscow Department of Education. 2010

378. Romanova A.A. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the profiling of schoolchildren: (experience of gymnasium No. 1 in Balashikha) // School. 2003.- No. 6.-S. 39-40.

379. Romanovskaya M.B. Profile school: ways of becoming a problem (materials of one study) // School director. -2003.-№7.-S. 12-20.

380. Romanovskaya T.I. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for creating specialized classes for high school students with a low level of training: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Samara, 2003. - 20 p.

381. Rubinstein S.L. Fundamentals of general psychology: In 2 vols. M., 1989.

382. Ryzhakov M.V. Profile training in foreign countries // Profile school. 2003. - No. 1. - P. 49-56.

383. Ryagin S.N. Designing the learning process for high school students based on specialized competence: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Omsk, 2001. - 21 p.

384. Ryagin S.N. Designing the content of specialized education in high school // School technologies. 2003. - No. 2. - pp. 121-129.

385. Savina E.B. Pedagogical conditions for the formation of professional self-awareness of high school students: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 1991. - 18 p.

386. Savchenko M.Yu. Managing the process of self-determination of 9th grade students: profile orientation. M., 2006.

387. Sazonov I.E. Social and professional self-determination of schoolchildren in labor associations: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Orenburg, 1999. 143 p.

388. Sazonova E.V. Profile training for secondary school students: formation of graphic-analytical skills: Abstract of thesis. dis. Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2006.-23 p.

389. Salikhov A. V. Standards of general education: regional component, implementation and management: scientific publication. Kaliningrad: Yantar. Skaz, 2001. - 217 p.

390. Saltseva S.B. Theory and practice of professional self-determination of schoolchildren in institutions of additional education: Dis. Dr. ped. Sci. M., 1996. - 335 p.

391. Samoilik G. Russian school on the way to introducing a system of specialized education // Moscow specialized school: experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M.: NIIRO, 2003.-P. 47-53.

392. Samoukin A.I., Samukina N.V. Choosing a profession: the path to success. Dubna, 2000. - 188 p.

393. Sarzhevsky Yu.N. Implementation of specialized training: Preparing students for higher universal education, creative, intellectual work, active work // School. 2002.1 .- P. 42-47.

394. Safin V.F., Nikov T.N. Psychological aspect of personality self-determination // Psychological Journal. 1984.- No. 4. -T. 5.-S. 23-25.

395. Selevko T.K. Find your way: a textbook for pre-professional training. M.: Public Education, 2006.

396. Sergeev A.B. Professional self-determination of a future specialist in the conditions of a multi-level educational complex of a technical university: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Penza, 2007. - 181 p.

397. Sergeev I.S., Zapekina L.I., Trushin S.B. Analytical note on the results of monitoring specialized training in the regions of the Russian Federation (October-December 2009). M.: Institute of Educational Management of the Russian Academy of Education, 2009.

398. Serpetskaya S.B. The system of specialized education for schoolchildren in the USA. In: Foreign experience of specialized training in rural schools: collection. scientific article / ed. E.A. Aksyonova. M.: ISPS RAO, 2005. -S. 33-39.

399. Sidorenko E.V. Methods of mathematical processing in psychology. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2004. - 350 p.

400. Sidorenko S.A. Professional and personal self-determination of students in the conditions of pre-professional pedagogical education: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Vladikavkaz, 2004. - 189 p.

401. Simoneko V.D., Surovitskaya T.B., Retivykh M.V., Volokhova E.D. Professional self-determination of schoolchildren: Textbook. -Bryansk: Publishing house BSPI, 1995.- 100 p.

402. Skosyreva N.D. Professional self-determination of youth in the conditions of the formation of market relations: (Compare, analysis, state, trends): Dis. . Ph.D. Philosopher Sci. -M., 1993. 120 p.

403. Slastenin V. A. General pedagogy: textbook. manual for students: in 2 hours / E. N. Shiyanov, I. F. Isaev, V. A. Slastenin; ed. V. A. Slastenin. -M.: Vlados, 2002,

404. Slastenin V.A. Formation of professional culture of teachers. M.: Pedagogy, 1993. - 213 p.

405. Smakotina H.J1. On the social effectiveness of conducting an experiment on pre-vocational training of students (based on the results of sociological research) // Profile school. -2005. No. 1. - P.27-34; No. 2. - pp. 34-39.

406. Smotrova T.N. Professional self-determination and personality development: socio-psychological aspects: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Balashov: Fomichev, 2006. -54 p.

407. Soviet encyclopedic dictionary. / Ed. A.M. Prokhorova. -M.: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1980. 1599 e., ill., map., 5 l. kart.

408. Solovyova O.Yu. Technological support for personal self-determination in the process of specialized education of schoolchildren: Abstract of thesis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Nizhny Novgorod, 2008. - 26 p.427

409. Solovyova Yu.N. Professional self-determination of students in the process of specialized tourism education: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -M, 2007.- 140 p.

410. Solotina E.V. Professional self-determination of adolescents from disadvantaged families in a rehabilitation institution: Author's abstract. Ph.D. psycho. Sci. Tambov, 2007. - 23 p.

411. Sorokina N.V. Problems of the formation of professional self-determination in early youth at the present stage of development of society // Sat. scientific tr. teachers, graduate students and students of TSPU named after. L.N. Tolstoy. Tula: TSPU Publishing House, 2002. - pp. 142-145

412. Social education and professional self-determination of youth in modern Russian society: scientific method. manual / S.I. Grigoriev et al. - Barnaul; Kemerovo: AzBuka, 2005. 218 p.

413. Social and professional self-determination of students: Didact. materials / Automatic comp. Volokhova E. D. et al. Bryansk: Bryansk Publishing House. state ped. Univ., 1995. 169 p.

414. Stepanov E.H. Theory and technology of modeling the educational system of an educational institution. Author's abstract. . doc. ped. Sci. Yaroslavl, 1999. - 38 p.

415. Sukhanova N.A. Preparing high school students for professional self-determination in the context of specialized education: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Vladikavkaz, 2008. -21 p.

416. Sukhodolsky G.V. Structural-algorithmic analysis and synthesis of activities. L.: Leningrad State University, 1976. - 120 p.

417. Sukhomlinsky V. A. Labor is the basis of comprehensive human development // Izbr. ped. Op. In 5 volumes. Kyiv: Rad. school, 1980. - T. 5 - P. 154-169.

418. Symanyuk E.E. Strategies for professional self-preservation of the individual // World of Psychology. 2005. - No. 1 - P. 156 - 162

419. Tarasova N.V. Professional self-determination of students in choosing a study profile in the context of interaction between a general education school and a college: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2005.- 165 p.

420. Tarlavsky V.P. Design and implementation of specialized technological training in the process of preparing school graduates for vocational education: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Voronezh, 2004.- 18 p.

421. Terentyeva E.V. System-targeted management of the development of legal specialized education of students at school: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. M., 2006. - 22 p.

422. Comrade FD. Formation of professional orientation of rural high school students in the conditions of specialized education: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Yakutsk, 2000. - 18 p.

423. Toropov P.B. Psychological and pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of the formation of professionally important qualities in high school students (using the example of the teaching profession): Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Khabarovsk, 1992. - 17 p.

424. Training for the development of life goals. /Ed. E.G. Troshchikhina.-S.-Pb., 2002.-215 p.

425. Tretyakov P.I., Shamova T.P. Quality management of education is the main direction in the development of the system: essence, approaches, problems // Head of studies. - 2002. - No. 7. - S, 67-72.

426. Turutina T.F. Professional self-determination of secondary school students in the process of specialized education: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Ekaterinburg 2004. - 186 p.

427. Education quality management: practice-oriented monograph and methodological manual / ed. MM. Potashnik. M.: Pedagogical Society of Russia, 2000. - 448 p.

428. Management of educational systems / Ed. T.P. Shamovoy M.: Vlados, 2002. - 319 p.

429. Management of the educational process: method, materials / Comp. T. A. Kuznetsova, A. P. Klemeshev, I. Yu. Kuksa. Kaliningrad: 2000. - 69 p.

430. Teacher and student: opportunity for dialogue and understanding. Volume 2. Under general. Ed. L.I. Semina. M.: Publishing House "Bonfi", 2002. - 408 p. - P.95.

431. Ushinsky K.D. Labor in its mental and educational meaning // Izbr. ped. Op. in 2 volumes. M.: Pedagogy, 1974. - T. 1. - P. 124-144.

432. Federal target program for the development of education for 2006 -2010. //Pedagogical magazine “Teacher”. No. 3, May-June 2006

433. Fedosova N.A., Solovyov V.N. Profile training in the system of continuous education // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems, prospects: material, n.-pr. conf. Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). M.: NIIRO, 2003. - pp. 112-119.

434. Filatova L.O. Continuity in general and vocational education: new opportunities in the context of the introduction of specialized education in high school // Additional education. 2003. -No. 10. - P. 12-16.

435. Filatieva L.V. Design of management processes for a regional system of advanced training for education workers: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Tambov, 2001. - 24 p.

436. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. M.: INFRA-M, 1998.-576 p.

437. Frolov I.T. Epistemological problems of modeling biological systems // Questions of Philosophy. 1961. - No. 2. - P. 39-51.

438. Frolova S.B. Psychological features of professional self-determination of high school students: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. psycho. Sci. -M., 2009.- 19 p.

439. Khafizova A. M. Pedagogical management as a special type of management activity // Fundamental research. No. 3. - 2005 - p. 93

440. Heckhausen X. Psychology of achievement motivation. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2001.-210 p.

441. Khlebunova S.F. Theory and practice of additional professional education of teaching and management personnel in the context of the introduction of specialized training: Dis. . doc. ped. Sci. M., 2006. - 404 p.

442. Khlebunova S.F., Taranenko N.D. Management of a modern school. Vol. IV. Profile training: new approaches. Pract. village -Rostov-n/D: Publishing house “Teacher”, 2005. 96 p.

443. Khomenko A.N. Social and professional self-determination of schoolchildren: (Book for teachers). M.: Egves, 2002. - 92 p.

444. Khukazova O.V. Profile training in rural schools: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Pyatigorsk, 2005. - 266 p.

445. Khutorskoy A.B., Andrianova G.A. System of distance profile training // Profile training in the context of modernization of school education: collection. scientific works / Ed. Yu.I.Dika, A.V.Khutorskogo M.: IOSO RAO, 2003. - P.259-268.

446. Tsukerman G.A., Masterov B.M. Psychology of self-development. M.: Interprax, 1995. - P. 77-381.

447. Chashchina E.S. Comprehensive support for professional self-determination of high school students: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. psycho. Sci. -Chita, 2008.-23s.

448. Chashchina E.S. Choosing a profile of education in high school // Sociocultural problems of modern man: Materials of the III international scientific and practical conference (April 22-26, 2008). Novosibirsk: NSPU, 2008. - Ch. II. - pp. 152-156.

449. Chernyshev A.A. Structure and content of specialized education in secondary schools. M., 2002. - 20 p.

450. Chernyavskaya A.P. Psychological counseling for vocational guidance. M.: Publishing house VLADOS-PRESS, 2001. -96 p.

451. Chechel I.D. Pedagogical foundations of professional self-determination of students in innovative educational institutions. Author's abstract. dis. . Dr. ped. Sci. M., 1996. - 37 p.

452. Chechel I.D. Preparation of teaching and management personnel for the introduction of specialized training // Profile school. -2003.-No.2.-S. 17-20.

453. Chigir T.I. Methodological work in a school practicing the model of a multidisciplinary gymnasium // Methodist. 2002. - No. 4. - P. 3031.

454. Chistyakov N.H., Zakharov Yu.A., Novikova T.N., Belyuk L.V. Vocational guidance for youth. Tutorial. -Kemerovo: KSU, 1988. 85 p.

455. Chistyakova S. N. Pedagogical support for professional self-determination of schoolchildren / S. N. Chistyakova, P. S. Lerner, N. F. Rodichev, E. V. Titova. M.: New School, 2004.

456. Shabanova S.M. Pedagogical support of professional self-determination of pupils of a rural orphanage: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Vladikavkaz, 2008. -23 p.

457. Shavir P.A. Psychology of professional self-determination in early youth. M., 1981. - 152 p.

458. Shadrikov V.D. Philosophy of education and educational policies. -M.: Logos, 1993. 181 p.

459. Shakurov P. X. Social and psychological problems of teaching staff management. M., 1982.

460. Shakurov R.Kh. Social and psychological foundations of management: manager and teaching staff. M., 1990.

461. Shalavina T.P. Theory and practice of personality-oriented preparation of a future teacher for professional self-determination of schoolchildren: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Dr. ped. Sci. M., 1995. - 31 p.

462. Shamaeva A.M. Pedagogical specifics of specialized training in secondary schools: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -Elets, 2005.-22 p.

463. Shamionov R.M. Personal maturity and professional self-determination in adolescence and youth: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. psycho. Sci. St. Petersburg, 1997. - 19 p.

464. Shevandrin N.I. Social psychology in education. M.: Pedagogy, 2001. - 375 p.

465. Shepeleva E.V. Self-determination of high school students under the influence of the media: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Nizhny Novgorod, 2006. - 21 p.

466. Shestakov A.P. Profile training in computer science in senior high school: Using the example of the course “Computer mathematical modeling”: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Omsk, 1999. -183 p.

467. Shesternikov E. Profile school is the individualization of education and freedom of choice // School Director. - 2003. - No. 2. - P. 1417.

468. Shilo JI.J1. Profile is a promising direction for the modernization of education // Profile school of Moscow: experience, problems of prospects: materials of the scientific and practical conference of Moscow (May 14-15, 2003). -M: NIIRO, 2003. - pp. 75-78.

469. Shirshina N.S. Socio-professional self-determination of personality: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. philosopher, scientist Nizhny Novgorod, 1995.-26p.

470. Shitoeva T.G. Creating a model for managing student self-determination through specialized and vocational training // ordroo.raid.ru/mer/ak02/muk.htm

471. Shishlov A.N. Professional self-determination of students as a problem of managing a multidisciplinary educational institution: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -M., 2002. -216 p.

472. Shkarupa N.V. Distance learning as a condition for the development of profile differentiation in secondary schools: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -M., 2003. 18 p.

473. Shklyaev B.JI. Professional self-determination of students in additional education institutions: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. -M., 2000. 130 p.

474. Schmidt V.R. Class hours and discussions on career guidance for high school students: grades 8-11. - M.: TC Sfera, 2006. 128 p.

475. Schmidt V.R. Career guidance in conditions of unfreedom. M, 2006. -134 p.

476. Shtoff V.A. Modeling and philosophy. M., Nauka, 1966. - 300 p.

477. Experiment. Model. Theory: Collection of articles M.: Nauka, 1982. -333 p.

478. Ergardt O.R. Methodological support for specialized training for high school students in rural schools: Abstract of thesis. dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Magnitogorsk, 2009. - 25 p.

479. Ergardt O.R. The transition to specialized education is one of the conditions for improving the quality of education // Education in the context of systemic changes: collection. scientific tr. / answer ed. V.Ya. Nikitin. - St. Petersburg. : IPK SPO, 2008. - Issue. 2. - pp. 91-96.

480. Ergardt O.R. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of methodological support for specialized education of high school students: materials of the scientific and practical conference “Znamenskie Readings”. Surgut: SurGPU. - 2008

481. Yadov V.A. Sociological research: Methodology. Program. Methods. M.: Science. - 239 p.

482. Yaroshenko V.V. School and professional self-determination of students. Kyiv: Glad. school, 1983. - 113 p.

483. Yarushina E.V. Professional self-determination of students when studying general professional disciplines: Dis. . Ph.D. ped. Sci. Chelyabinsk, 2006. - 172 p.

484. Yasvin V.A. Educational environment: from modeling to design. -M: Smysl, 2001. 364 p.

485. Bernal Alemany, Rafael. Estudio-trabajo: una innovación pedagogika // Pedagogia, 86. Temas generales. Habana, 1986. -p. 43-78.

486. Caldas, José Castro; Coelho, Helder. The Origin of Institutions: socioeconomic processes, choices, norms and conventions, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 2, no. 2, 1999, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk

487. Carley, Kathleen M. Organizational Change and the Digital Economy:435

488. A Computational Organization Science Perspective. In Erik Brynjolfsson and Brian Kahin, Eds., Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, Research, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

489. McGinn N. The impact of supranational organizations on public education/International journal of educational development, No. 4, Vol 14, No. 3, pp. 289-298.

490. Peter F. Druker. "A New Discipline", Success! January-February 1999, p. 18

491. Super D.E "Career and life development" San Francisco yni. Josseys-Bass Poblishers 1987

492. Westera W. Competence in Education // J. Curriculum Studies. 2001. -V.33.-N1.-P. 75-88.

493. White Paper on Education and Training Teaching and Learning Society. Strasbourg, 1995.

494. World Class Education: the Virginia Common Core of Learning. Richmond. 1993.

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for informational purposes only and were obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). Therefore, they may contain errors associated with imperfect recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

June 15 at MSUTU. K.G. Razumovsky held the Interuniversity Scientific and Practical Conference “Interaction between Higher Schools and Employers in the Organization of Project-Based Training in Food Science Universities.” The event was opened by the rector of MSUTU. K.G. Razumovsky Valentina Ivanova, executive director of the Association of Interregional Socio-Economic Cooperation “Central Federal District” Nikolai Konstantinov and scientific director of the Research Institute of Bakery Industry, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Anatoly Kosovan.

Valentina Ivanova opened the event, saying that project activities are the problem that the employer is struggling with. The inclusion of the student, the inclusion of the university, teachers and the consideration of these projects should strengthen the connection with employers, which the Government, the Ministry and business representatives have long been talking about, who say that after university it is still necessary to further educate students. “We know all these negative positions. But now higher education is being rebuilt, and food technology universities are raising the bar of requirements for students and teachers. And at today’s conference we will discuss with you the technology of interaction with those for whom we train our specialists,” Valentina Ivanova greeted the conference participants.

According to Nikolai Konstantinov, it is necessary that our universities prepare students in such a way that they can create enterprises themselves and become drivers of economic growth. “We don’t have enough personnel, personnel are trained at the university, but today the university is preparing a person who knows a lot, but can do little. Today, 100% of citizens know what needs to be done. And only 10% know how. These are scientists, professors, teachers...And only 4% do. Doing something is a colossal amount of work. And the entrepreneurs who appear in the country are like passionaries. These are the cream of society who know how to take risks and have the desire to do something, overcoming all obstacles. They can put all their energy, all their heart into a business and build this business. There are only 2% of such people. And the task of all universities, especially universities in the food industry, is to grow this layer of young entrepreneurs. And we started this work at MSUTU. K.G. Razumovsky,” said Konstantinov.

As Anatoly Kosovan said, today it is extremely necessary to create conditions for the formation of the ability of young scientists for scientific activity and production management.

After the opening, discussion platforms were held on the university premises, moderated by university teachers and invited experts. The discussion platform “Baking, confectionery and meat and dairy industries: innovative technologies and new personnel” was led by Anatoly Anatolyevich Slavyansky, director of the Institute of Food Product Technologies, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor. The platform “Food Industry: A Guide to Medium and Small Businesses” was moderated by Yuri Ilyich Sidorenko, lecturer at MSUTU. K.G.Razumovsky (PKU), Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor. Popovich Alexey Emilievich, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Institute of System Automation, Information Technologies and Entrepreneurship at Moscow State University of Technology. K.G. Razumovsky (PKU), was the main one at the site entitled “Modern automation and robotization of food production - a promising direction for import substitution.” “The state concept of supporting student entrepreneurship.” Nikolai Nikolaevich Konstantinov, executive director of the Association for Interregional Socio-Economic Cooperation “Central Federal District,” moderated the platform “State Concept for Supporting Student Entrepreneurship.” The platform entitled “Aquaculture and fisheries in the economic development of territories” was led by Alexey Lvovich Nikiforov-Nikishin, director of the Institute of Biotechnology and Fisheries, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor.

At the end of the event, a plenary session was held, at which the experts came to the conclusion that the leader should be the person who owns the technology.

480 rub. | 150 UAH | $7.5 ", MOUSEOFF, FGCOLOR, "#FFFFCC",BGCOLOR, "#393939");" onMouseOut="return nd();"> Dissertation - 480 RUR, delivery 10 minutes, around the clock, seven days a week and holidays

240 rub. | 75 UAH | $3.75 ", MOUSEOFF, FGCOLOR, "#FFFFCC",BGCOLOR, "#393939");" onMouseOut="return nd();"> Abstract - 240 rubles, delivery 1-3 hours, from 10-19 (Moscow time), except Sunday

Popovich Alexey Emilievich. Formation of readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school: Dis. ...cand. ped. Sciences: 13.00.01: Moscow, 2004 189 p. RSL OD, 61:04-13/2836

Introduction

Chapter 1 . Theoretical foundations for the formation of readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in a secondary school

1.1. The essence of shaping senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession 14

1.2. The uniqueness of developing readiness for choosing a profession in older schoolchildren 32

Chapter 2 Fundamentals of methods for developing readiness for choosing a profession in older schoolchildren

2.1. Characteristics of the model of the system for developing readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school 54

2.2 Experience in an experimental study of the formation of readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in a comprehensive school 75

2.3. Pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of shaping senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession in a comprehensive school 100

Conclusion 139

Bibliography 143

Applications 156

Introduction to the work

Modernization of Russian education requires an active search for new forms, methods, means of training and education, aimed at improving the pedagogical process, preparing the younger generation for life and work in a market economy.

In the conditions of an intensive search for ways to “economically develop the country, combining the functioning of market relations and government regulation, young people have a need for the development of social activity, civic initiative, entrepreneurship and the ability to determine their future. A special role in the formation of such personality qualities belongs to general educational institutions.

Increased demands of society for the quality of education in general, the level of educational preparation of schoolchildren and readiness to choose a profession, for personal development, determine the purpose and content of the educational process in school.

In the current situation, school graduates are taking the choice of a profession of the new century more seriously, and the issue of self-determination in modern socio-economic conditions is more pressing.

The school is designed to ensure readiness to choose a profession, develop professional interests and inclinations of the individual. At the final stage of schooling, high school students should be prepared to choose a profession and continue receiving education.

However, as research shows, schoolchildren are poorly prepared to choose a profession, about 50% of them (11, p. 92).

Such uncertainty leads to the fact that random people who do not strive to master their chosen profession to perfection often enter vocational educational institutions.

To this end, schools have actively begun to introduce specialized training. However, the analysis of the state of practice indicates that providing the necessary knowledge does not solve the problem of schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession and to adapt to the dynamic socio-economic conditions of our reality.

The potential capabilities of today's school, the social environment, do not allow students to have a sufficient level of sufficient knowledge and are of a purely theoretical nature - divorced from reality. Modern schoolchildren will not be able to resist the negative phenomena of the market environment. In this regard, the problem arose of the formation of such values ​​that contribute to the moral stability of schoolchildren to the negative phenomena of a market economy. Therefore, the formation of readiness to choose a profession among schoolchildren in the context of moral development acquires special significance and requires effective pedagogical guidance in the formation of this process. Thus, a contradiction arose between: the requirement of society for students to be ready to choose a profession and the conservatism of the school as a social institution; the need to develop and implement effective forms and methods of new technologies that increase the effectiveness of shaping schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession and the predominance of traditional approaches in school; the changing content of humanities subjects, the need to use a variety of programs in schools according to educational profiles and the insufficient preparedness of teaching staff for this type of educational activity. These contradictions give rise to a problem consisting in the need to develop pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of forming readiness for choosing a profession in senior schoolchildren in the educational process of a comprehensive school.

In the 70-80s of the XX century, a harmonious system was developed
vocational guidance for schoolchildren, today

General education schools are in dire need of developing and implementing new approaches to developing the readiness of senior schoolchildren to choose a profession.

The theoretical understanding of various aspects of the problem of choosing a profession was facilitated by the works of various scientists. The importance of its research was noted in their works by famous Russian teachers P.P. Blonsky, A.V. Lunacharsky, A.S. Makarenko, V.A. Sukhomlinsky, ST. Shatsky.

The social aspect of the problem of choosing a profession by young people was analyzed by scientists I.N. Nazimov, M.N. Rutkevich, M.Kh. Titma, V.N. Shubkin.

The psychophysical and medical-biological foundations of choosing a profession are presented in the works of V.G. Ananyeva, I.D. Kartseva, E.A. Klimova, I.D. Levitova, N.S. Leitesa, A.N. Leontyeva, K.K. Platonov.

The choice of a profession on a polytechnic basis in the process of combining the training and education of students with productive work was considered in their works by P.R. Atutov, K.Sh. Akhiyarov, A.F. Akhmatov, S.Ya. Batyshev, A.A. Vasiliev, A.A. Kyveryalg, V.A. Polyakov, V.D. Simonenko and others.

Pedagogical conditions and guidance in the process of choosing a profession are summarized and presented in the works of Yu.P. Avericheva, L.V. Botyakova, E.D. Varnakova, Yu.K. Vasilyeva, A.E. Golomshtok, N.N. Zakharova, A.Ya. Naina, V.L. Savinykh, A.D. Sazonova, G.N. Serikova, S.N. Chistyakova and others.

As is known, there have been changes in priorities in the values ​​and goals of education, the transition from a technocratic approach to the implementation of its cultural and humanistic essence has dictated the change in the nature of preparing schoolchildren for choosing a profession. Academician P.R. Atutov noted that it is necessary to “recognize labor training as the leading developmental function,” “a radical change in the goals, objectives

5 "

career guidance" (12, p. 3). The doctoral dissertations of N.E. are aimed at developing a personality-oriented concept of professional self-determination. Kasatkina, N.S. Pryazhnikova, SV. Saltseva, I.D. Chechel, T.I. Shalavina.

However, so far the formation of readiness to choose a profession among senior schoolchildren in the educational process has not been sufficiently studied, and its main pedagogical conditions have not been identified.

The relevance of the problem and its insufficient development determined the topic of our study, “Formation of readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school.”

The contradiction we identified between the needs of mass practice and the state of the field of pedagogical science we are studying allowed us to formulate it as follows: problem of this research: What are the pedagogical conditions for the formation of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school?

Purpose of the study: identify, theoretically and experimentally substantiate the pedagogical conditions for the formation of readiness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren.

Object of study: holistic educational process in a secondary school.

Subject of study: formation of readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school.

As a hypothesis, it was suggested that: the effectiveness of the formation of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession in the educational process is predetermined by two groups of hierarchically interrelated conditions: a) general conditions for the effectiveness of a holistic and at the same time multifaceted educational

a process that also influences the effectiveness of developing readiness among older schoolchildren to choose a profession; b) private conditions that directly affect the process of developing readiness to choose a profession. The implementation of these two groups of conditions in their organic relationship can ensure the effectiveness of the process we are studying if a model is developed and implemented for the formation of readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in a secondary school.

Taking into account the problem, purpose, object and subject of the study, its objectives were determined:

    To consider the essence of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school.

    To explore the uniqueness of the formation of readiness for choosing a profession in older schoolchildren.

    To develop a model (goal, objectives, factors, contradictions, patterns, principles, content, forms, methods, means, pedagogical conditions, result) for the formation of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school.

    To identify, theoretically and experimentally substantiate the pedagogical conditions (general and specific) for the effectiveness of developing readiness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren.

Methodologicalbasisresearch are:

materialistic dialectics and the systems approach as its most important facet and the general methodological principle of science (V.G. Afanasyev, I.V. Blauberg, V.N. Kuzmin, I.V. Yudin, etc.); the implementation of activity-based, cultural approaches, the ideas of humanism and democratization of society and education, the position of the unity of theory and practice, the doctrine of the creative and activity-based essence of the individual, the laws of its formation, the leading role of activity and communication in the development of the individual.

Theoretical basis of the study served as: psychological theory of personality (B.G. Ananyev, L.S. Vygotsky, A.N. Leontiev, K.K. Platonov, S.L. Rubinstein); theory of professional guidance and professional self-determination (E.A. Klimov, I.N. Nazimov, E.M. Pavlyutinkov, O.G. Maksimova, V.D. Simonenko, S.N. Chistyakova, etc.); modern concepts of education (E.V. Bondarevskaya, L.I. Novikova, Yu.P. Sokolnikov, G.N. Volkov, N.I. Shchurkova, B.T. Likhachev).

Research methods. The central place among them was occupied by the author, as the head of a general education institution, organizing a holistic pedagogical experience and conducting experimental work on it. Along with them, to realize the goals and objectives of the study, the following methods were used: theoretical analysis of philosophical, psychological, pedagogical literature, analysis of educational documentation and statistical data, generalization of advanced pedagogical experience in developing readiness for choosing a profession in senior schoolchildren, observation, questioning, testing , conversations with students, teachers and parents, modeling of the pedagogical process.

The research was carried out in several stages.

Stage 1 (1993-1995) - accumulation and comprehension of personal
pedagogical experience in the activities of a comprehensive school,
theoretical analysis of psychological, pedagogical and methodological
literature, legislative and regulatory acts on issues
research, as well as studying the experience of formation among older schoolchildren
in the context of a secondary school. Focus on
At this stage, we turned to determining the initial parameters
research and its general hypothesis.

Stage 2(1996-2000) - understanding the holistic pedagogical
the experience we have accumulated in secondary school and the formation in
on the readiness of older schoolchildren to choose a profession.

Improving this experience based on the general hypothesis we have developed. Organization of experimental work aimed at testing the proposed hypothesis.

Stage 3 (2000-2004) - completion of experimental work aimed at testing the general research hypothesis. Determination of criteria and levels of preparedness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession.

The model developed by the author for shaping senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession was introduced into the practice of secondary schools. Formation of conclusions and recommendations of the study. Preparation of abstract and dissertation for defense.

The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that:

    The essence of the readiness of senior schoolchildren to choose a profession and the uniqueness of their formation in the educational process are clarified.

    A model for developing readiness for choosing a profession in a secondary school among senior schoolchildren has been developed and experimentally tested.

    Two groups of pedagogical conditions (general and specific) have been identified, theoretically and experimentally substantiated for the effectiveness of shaping senior schoolchildren's readiness to choose a profession in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school.

The theoretical significance of the study is as follows: the existing theoretical ideas about the essence of high school students’ readiness to choose a profession have been expanded, a model has been developed for the formation of high school students’ readiness to choose a profession in the pedagogical process of a comprehensive school, and pedagogical conditions have been identified that ensure the effectiveness of the formation of readiness to choose a profession, which represent new knowledge and will be widely used by researchers of this problem, primarily in

developing new approaches to developing readiness for choosing a profession among high school students.

Practical significance of the study is that the conclusions and recommendations contained in the dissertation can be used in schools. They can be used in the preparation of manuals on pedagogy and in advanced training courses for teaching staff.

Validity and reliability of the research results are provided by a scientifically based methodological approach based on a systemic understanding of pedagogical reality, the adequacy of the research methodology to the tasks set, a variety of complementary research methods, the central place among which was occupied by experimental work and holistic pedagogical experience, the representativeness of experimental data, the thoroughness of the analysis of the obtained results.

Testing and implementation of research results was carried out during the organization of a holistic educational process in schools No. 1977, 936. The main results of the study were discussed and received a positive assessment.

Approbation and implementation of the research results: the research results were discussed at meetings of the school’s pedagogical council, methodological associations of teachers, school parent meetings, and at seminars for deputy teachers. directors and principals of Moscow schools (2001, 2002, 2003), dedicated to the formation of the readiness of senior schoolchildren to choose a profession, at the annual meetings of the laboratory of the Center for a Systematic Approach to Education of the Association “Education”, at the annual conferences of teachers and graduate students of the Moscow State Pedagogical University named after. M.A. Sholokhov, at interuniversity conferences in Moscow (2002), at meetings of the laboratory of the IEO MO RF.

The following are submitted for defense:

1. Characteristics of the essence of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose
professions in the educational process of secondary schools, as well as
the uniqueness of its development in high school age.

2. Characteristics of the model of formation of readiness among senior schoolchildren
to the choice of profession (components, models - goals, objectives, factors,
contradictions, patterns, principles, content, forms, methods, means
a, pedagogical, conditions, result).

3. Theoretical and experimental justification of pedagogical
conditions for the effectiveness of the formation of senior schoolchildren’s readiness for
choosing a profession in the educational process of secondary general education
schools. The first group of conditions are general pedagogical conditions that influence
on the effectiveness and integrity of the educational process, as well as on
formation of readiness to choose a profession among older schoolchildren:

Performing by a comprehensive school of functions, both general and

specific, inherent only to one or another educational

institution.

Organization and optimal functioning of educational teams of secondary schools as forms of functioning of educational systems.

Ensuring a high level of educational process and helping every senior student achieve academic success.

Combining the teaching of older schoolchildren with a variety of extracurricular activities and creating on this basis conditions for their comprehensive development.

The second group of conditions are private conditions that directly affect

to develop readiness for choice in older schoolchildren

professions:

Systematic professional diagnostics and career guidance

senior schoolchildren.

Systematic inclusion of students in a varied and consistently developing work, subordinated to the tasks of forming in older schoolchildren readiness to choose a profession, to demonstrate creativity in work, - the use of game technologies to form among older students

schoolchildren's readiness to choose a profession.

Community of schools in the formation of older schoolchildren

readiness to choose a profession with professional educational

institutions, with the leading role of the school.

Individual approach to senior schoolchildren in the formation

they are ready to choose a profession.

Structure of the dissertation. The dissertation consists of an introduction, two chapters, a list of references and an appendix.

The introduction substantiates the relevance of the research, characterizes its main parameters, methodological foundations and methods, its main stages, the hypothesis, the process of testing and enriching it, the scientific novelty and theoretical significance of the research, its practical significance, substantiates the reliability of its results, shows their testing and implementation, the provisions submitted for defense are set out.

The first chapter, “Theoretical foundations for the formation of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession in a comprehensive school,” reveals the essence of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession, the uniqueness of the formation of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession, criteria and levels.

In the second chapter, “Fundamentals of methods for developing readiness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren,” based on an analysis of holistic pedagogical experience, organized on the basis of his experimental work theoretically and experimentally

the model of readiness of senior schoolchildren to choose a profession is substantiated; pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of its formation. The conclusion of the dissertation presents the findings of the study.

The essence of shaping senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession

Solving the problem posed in our study required us, first of all, to formulate clear initial theoretical positions. The need to develop them forced us to pay attention to the analysis of the essence of the concept of formation of “readiness to choose a profession.” In the course of developing the initial theoretical positions - this dissertation research, first of all, let us turn to the analysis of the essence of the concept of “readiness”. As you know, the concept of “readiness” does not have an unambiguous interpretation. Some researchers define readiness as a condition for the successful performance of an activity, as a selective activity that tunes the body and personality to future activity (31, p. 41). There is also this definition: “Readiness for a particular type of activity is a purposeful expression of a personality, including its beliefs, views, attitudes, motives, feelings, volitional and intellectual qualities, knowledge, work skills and abilities” (54, p. 41). In the course of the analysis of the works, we can conclude that readiness for activity -0 is a personal quality, an integral expression of all substructures of the personality. Readiness has a structural structure and is multi-level in nature. M.I. Dyachenko notes that readiness is a fundamental primary condition for the successful implementation of any activity. He emphasizes that the emergence of a state of readiness for activity begins with setting a goal based on needs and motives (or a person’s awareness of the task assigned to him). Next comes the development of a plan, settings, models, and schemes for upcoming actions. Then the person begins to embody the emerging readiness in objective actions. In creating, maintaining and restoring a state of readiness, the decisive role is played by the fact that it is associated with various aspects of the personality. Without really existing connections with other characteristics of mental activity, the state of readiness loses its content (41, p. 38). B.G. Ananyeva notes that the definition of readiness for activity cannot be limited to the characteristics of experience, skill, labor productivity, and its quality at the moment when the corresponding activity is performed; It is no less important when assessing readiness to determine the internal strengths of an individual, her potentials and reserves that are essential for increasing the productivity of her professional activities in the future (4, p. 168). The analysis of psychological and pedagogical literature on the problem of readiness allows us to conclude that most studies are based on activity theory, to the development of which domestic scientists contributed (B. G. Ananyev, A.N. Leontyev, A.V. Petrovsky, S.L. Rubinstein, V.D. Shadrikov and others) (4.79, 106, 124, 158). In the psychological and pedagogical literature, “readiness” has a number of interpretations when studying various problems and is defined as: - psychological attitude (D.N. Uznadze) (141); - a socially fixed attitude that characterizes the social behavior of an individual (E.S. Kuzmin, V.A. Yadov, etc.) (75, 174); - presence of abilities (B.G. Ananyev, S.L. Rubinstein) (4.124); - personality quality (K.K. Platonov) (107); - state of preparedness (M.I. Dyachenko, L.A. Kandybovich, V.A. Krutetsky, etc.) (41, 73); - a person’s ability to set a goal, choose ways to achieve it, exercise self-control, build plans and programs of activity (Yu.N. Kulyutkin, G.S. Sukhobskaya) (77). Research notes that in addition to readiness as a mental state, a person often manifests readiness as a stable personality characteristic. It does not need to be formed, it operates constantly. Such readiness presupposes successful activity. It refers to long-term or sustainable readiness, having a certain structure: a positive attitude towards the type of activity, including professional activity, character traits, abilities, temperament, motivation, adequate to the requirements of professional activity, as well as the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities. We can generalize a variety of approaches to characterizing the concept of readiness and highlight three main directions: - readiness as a special state of the individual, which manifests itself at the functional level; - readiness as an integrative manifestation of personality, that is, at the personal level; - a special psychological state of the individual, which can manifest itself both at the functional and personal levels. Let's consider the narrower concept of “readiness to choose a profession,” under which researchers consider: - a stable state of a student’s personality, which is based on a dynamic combination of certain properties, including the orientation of interests and inclinations, his practical experience and knowledge of his characteristics in connection with the choice of profession ( 155, p. 79); - internal conviction and awareness of the factor in choosing a profession, awareness of the world of work, what physical and psychological demands the profession places on a person (88, p. 7); - the ability to understand individual characteristics (the image of “I”), analyze professions and make decisions based on a comparison of these two types of knowledge, i.e. ability to consciously choose a profession (154). Researchers note that to determine the essence of readiness to choose a profession, both types of readiness should be taken into account: temporary and long-term, since preparing and choosing a profession is a combination of mental and practical activities. The processes of planning, putting forward alternatives, and hypotheses should be classified as mental, and the development and training of qualities and skills necessary for professional choice should be classified as practical actions. It can be noted that long-term readiness to choose a profession is a stable system of professionally important personality qualities (a positive attitude towards the chosen type of professional activity, organization, self-control, etc.), its experience, necessary skills, abilities, knowledge. V.A. Polyakov and S.N. Chistyakov note that readiness to choose a profession is formed with the help of special forms and methods of career guidance work in socially useful, productive work. N.S. Pryazhnikov notes that the result of the process under consideration is the formation of the student’s “internal readiness to consciously and independently construct, adjust and realize the prospects for his development (professional, life and personal), readiness to consider himself developing over time and independently find personally significant meanings in a specific professional activities." The formation of such readiness will be the main result of professional advisory assistance (121, p. 30). A.D. made a certain contribution to solving the problem of readiness to choose a profession. Sazonov.(126) His position - readiness to choose a profession is part of the formula for choosing a profession: - I want (choice of the subject and purpose of work, tools of production, determination of personal capabilities); - I can (professional interests, inclinations, abilities, health status, performance, necessary knowledge, abilities, skills); - necessary (civic maturity, sense of duty, etc.). “CAN” in this case is psychological readiness for professional self-determination, and “MUST” is an analysis (introspection) of readiness to choose a profession (knowledge, abilities, skills, interests, inclinations, abilities, vocation) (59). From the perspective of the personal-activity approach, one can consider readiness to choose a profession as a personal education, with a formed professional interest and, accordingly, with high motivation for choosing an educational and professional field. Of great importance in understanding the essence and readiness to choose a profession is the study of the motives for choosing a professional field. They reflect the influence of the objective world on a person through his consciousness and his relationships. The value orientation of the activity depends on the motive - to prepare for a future profession or to satisfy one’s needs in everyday activities. Several motives can be identified: 1) interest in the profession in general. With this motive, there is a lack of awareness of one’s interests. 2) interest in practical activities. Students are fascinated by the process of mastering techniques, abilities, and skills. 3) interest in knowledge and theories. This motive encourages students to engage in theoretical issues.

The uniqueness of the formation of readiness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren

In characterizing the characteristics of the formation of readiness to choose a profession at high school age in a comprehensive school, we proceed from the recognition that personal development is a complex, long-term, multi-stage process. At the same time, like the personality itself, its development is a process that is both holistic and multifaceted.

As is known, each personality in its development goes through certain stages that are qualitatively different from each other. The most general periodization of life, covering it as a whole, comes down to identifying three very long segments of the life path: 1) growing up - up to 30 years; 2) maturity - up to 60 years; 3) old age - until the end of life.

Educational psychology, which studies the features of human development during the period of its formation and identifies the following stages: infancy, early childhood, preschool age, primary school age, adolescence, adolescence. Adolescence is divided into younger adolescence and older adolescence.

As is known, personal development is a gradual accumulation of imperceptible quantitative changes and their transition at some stage into qualitative ones. Accordingly, the age-related characteristics of individual stages of development do not exist as static for a given stage and change only with the transition of the individual to the next stage. It can be noted that the age-related characteristics of each stage of personality development exist as certain trends.

In their activities, teachers must use the opportunities of each age period in the formation of personality; what was lost in childhood can never be returned to the years of youth and especially in adulthood. This rule applies to all areas of a student’s life and especially the stage of formation of readiness to choose a profession. An indicator of its development is the emergence of a sense of “adulthood,” which is the central formation of adolescence, since it “is the new formation through which a teenager identifies, compares himself with adults, comrades, finds role models, builds relationships with other people and rebuilds his activity" (5).

It should be remembered that the social situation of adolescence is such that it is at this age, due to the level of development achieved by the pupils, that new opportunities arise in order to direct their activities for the benefit of society. But at the same time, at this age there are increasing opportunities for labor and other activities to be organized by the pupils themselves. In this consistently more complex, developing activity of adolescents, their self-awareness is formed. Awareness of one’s “I” and one’s relationship to the environment acts as a single process, the sides of which mutually penetrate and intertwine.

It has been established that a teenager’s awareness of his relationship to the surrounding reality is one of the prerequisites for the emergence of a social development situation of high school age, which is characterized by the formation of a worldview, beliefs, and the development of indirect needs (24). At this age, there is a transition from the rather conscious, unstable and, often not correlated with the requirements of society, motives of younger schoolchildren to the formation of a certain moral orientation in older schoolchildren.

Science has established that the characteristics of the education of high school students are largely determined by the specifics of adolescence. Let's give it a brief description.

At this age, senior schoolchildren find themselves at the stage of entering an independent life. They are characterized by a focus on the future. It inevitably leaves an imprint on the entire behavior and psyche of boys and girls. Their self-awareness grows, the need for self-determination and the choice of a future profession develops, the role of self-esteem increases, and their worldview is intensively formed. It should be noted that the process of forming the readiness to choose a profession for girls and boys is largely predetermined by the state of the economy of modern society and the organization of work on their upbringing in the pedagogical systems in which they find themselves included - in the family, school, and institutions of additional education. Deficiencies in career guidance and educational work in general lead to the manifestation of infantilism in the formation of readiness for professional activity, lack of education in professional interests, and unpreparedness for choosing a profession by older schoolchildren. A massive study of senior schoolchildren's readiness to choose a profession during experimental work showed that the levels of readiness are different. There are three levels - low, medium and high. The ascertaining stage of the experiment we conducted showed that usually the majority of high school students have a low level of readiness to choose a profession. Summarizing the materials of the mass study of students, we came to the conclusion: the reason for this is that high school students are not included in professional tests, which contain creative components of different types of professional activities from the idea to the final result. Forming readiness to choose a profession and interest in a variety of activities will generally be effective when a senior student participates in a variety of activities.

As psychologists note, the leading activity at this age continues to be learning, but along with it, labor and professional activities, usually going beyond the boundaries of school and institutions of additional education, play an increasingly important role in the life of a student. An important factor in the moral development of a high school student’s personality and the development of his readiness to continue his education after graduating from school is work. The interests of high school students, in comparison with teenagers, become more selective and stable; they experience the development of interest in the subject into interest in science.

Characteristics of the model of the system of formation of readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school

The solution to the problem posed in the study required the development of a model of a system for developing readiness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren. As is known, the modeling method is used to study the processes and phenomena of the surrounding reality; it allows a deeper understanding of the relationships that arise within the subject of study. The works of philosophers B.A. are devoted to modeling as a scientific method. Glinsky, B.S. Gryaznova, B.S. Dynina, E.P. Nikitina, V.A. Shtoff, and teachers A.I. Arkhangelsky, A.P. Belyaeva, V.P. Bespalko, V.I. Zhuravleva, A.A. Kirsanova, V.V. Kraevsky, I.I. Loginova et al. Analyzing the purpose of the modeling method, B.A. Glinsky notes that its simplest function is to reproduce the properties and relationships of objects and processes. At the same time, as its specific feature as a method of scientific knowledge, the author emphasizes its research role. V.V. Kraevsky considers modeling as cognitive reflection based on concepts, principles and patterns. Based on the model, the properties and relationships of the surrounding world are learned. The word “model” comes from the Latin word modus, modulus (measure, image, method) and its original meaning was associated with construction. V.A. Shtoff understands a model as a mentally or practically created structure that reproduces one or another part of reality in a simplified (idealized or schematized) and visual form. (166, 212) O.B. Kornetov considers the model as “a generalized mental image that replaces and displays the structure and functions (taken in dynamic unity, in a broad sociocultural context) of a specific typologically reproducible way of carrying out the educational process.” (67, 34) N.G. Salmin highlights two characteristics of the model: 1) the model is a substitute for the object being studied; 2) the model and the object being studied are in states of correspondence: the model is not identical to the original, it only reflects the object being studied. “The model appears in the form of a set of concepts and schemes. It expresses the pedagogical process not directly in the complex, vast unity of all its diverse manifestations and properties, but in a generalized way, focusing attention on mentally identified properties.” A model is a system that reflects a certain phenomenon or object in such a way that it provides new information about it. Model - an image, including a conventional or mental one (image, description, drawing, graph, plan, map, etc. ), or a prototype of an object or system of objects (the “original” of a given model), used in certain conditions as a “substitute” or “representative.” In pedagogical research, modeling is used at different stages: in the process of testing a scientific hypothesis, implementing research results . In order to obtain a means of studying and improving reality in pedagogy, models are constructed; to test or demonstrate a new system, idea or method; obtaining a forecasting tool; to analyze the processes under study; to introduce new achievements of pedagogical science and innovation into educational practice. The following models have been identified and identified: lesson model, technology model, information and development model, curriculum model, objective mathematical model, teacher activity model, self-development model, educational institution model, structural-functional learning model. Objective modeling capability, B.A. Glinsky believes that there is a natural connection between the elements included in integral objects. The elements included in the object must naturally agree with each other, at the same time, the elements and relationships that make up the model must correspond to the elements and relationships belonging to the original. The original is an object that is directly of interest to the researcher and is replaced by a model; however, the original is understood as “not an integral object in its qualitative and quantitative specificity in all the wealth of various properties, connections and relationships, namely those that are directly of interest to the research.” The object of our modeling is the system of developing senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession in the educational process of a comprehensive school. To build the selected model, you first need to determine its type. We chose a structural model that imitates the internal organization of the structure of the original. The need to choose this type of model is due to a number of circumstances. First, to identify the essence of any object, it is necessary to reveal its structure. Secondly, structural models have different levels of abstraction, generality and applicability. Thirdly, several structural models can be created for the same original, which makes it possible to study different levels of the structure of the object. When considering the epistemological nature of the modeled object, the correct organization of the modeling process and awareness of the role of each stage are of particular importance. Stages of the modeling process V.V. Kraevsky considers the entire pedagogical research through the sequence of procedures.

Experience in an experimental study of the formation of senior schoolchildren’s readiness to choose a profession in a comprehensive school

Solving the problem posed in our study required special experimental work. Its task was to identify and experimentally substantiate the pedagogical conditions for the effectiveness of developing readiness to choose a profession among senior school students, and to test the reliability and effectiveness of the model we developed for the system of developing readiness to choose a profession among senior schoolchildren. The main content of the experimental work was the experimental verification of the general hypothesis of the study as a preliminary solution to its problem. The starting points in its preparation and organization were those leading ideas of our research that were outlined in the previous chapter. To obtain more accurate research results, we sought to implement a number of measures laid down in the hypothesis, which, in our opinion, would allow us to increase the level of readiness to choose a profession among older schoolchildren. This determined the logic of the organization and the research methodology. The experimental study took place in three stages, which reflect the real dynamics of the formation of readiness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren. At the ascertaining stage, the following was carried out: - justification, study and selection of criteria and levels of readiness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren; - determining the initial level of readiness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren before conducting the formative experimental stage of experimental work; - study of the state of readiness to choose a profession among older schoolchildren. At the prognostic stage, an experimental program was developed, which involved: - specification of the object and subject of research; - setting the goals and objectives of experimental work and its decomposition into tasks; - determination of the experimental base; - selection of criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the results of experimental work; - predicting its positive results and negative consequences, as well as correcting the latter. At the formative stage, the following was carried out: - implementation in the educational process of a comprehensive school of a model of a system for developing readiness to choose a profession among senior schoolchildren; - tracking the results of experimental work; - adjustment of readiness levels for choosing a profession among older schoolchildren. The final stage combined processing of the data obtained, comparison of the established results with the set goal, qualitative and quantitative analysis, adjustment of the hypothesis, description of the progress and results of the experiment. In the course of our research, more than 250 high school students were studied in secondary schools No. 141, 1976, 1977. Our experimental work was carried out in all of the listed secondary schools. In order to obtain reliable results, the research work involved 8 experimental classes in secondary school No. 1977 and 6 control classes in secondary schools No. 141, 1976. In preparation for the experimental work, two groups of research documents were created: 1. Documents programming the experimental work, its tasks, content and organization. Two such documents were developed, these are “Methodological recommendations for developing readiness to choose a profession among senior schoolchildren” and “Program-characteristics of developing readiness among senior schoolchildren to choose a profession in secondary school No. 1977.” If the first of these documents set out in detail recommendations on the main areas of developing readiness to choose a profession among senior schoolchildren, then in the “Program-Characteristics” these recommendations were presented in extremely brief abstracts. These theses served as easy-to-understand guidelines in the experimental work; at the same time, possible levels of their implementation were also given here. In this form, the “Characteristic Program” performed two functions: a) acted as a unique program for each participant in the experimental work; b) acted as a means of recording the degree of implementation of each item of the program - by selecting and emphasizing at the end of each quarter the level at which teachers managed to complete this program. 2. A document that allows you to program a study of the level of readiness for choosing a profession among school students and record the results of this study for statistical and mathematical processing. This is a “Questionnaire for assessing the level of preparedness for choosing a profession among senior schoolchildren.” During the ascertaining stage of the experimental work, we studied the state of readiness to choose a profession. We obtained the following conclusions.

A.E. Popovich

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Deputy Head of the Education Department of the South-Eastern Administrative District of Moscow *

On the issue of professional self-determination of graduates

secondary schools

In the context of an intensive search for ways to further economic development of the country, combining the differentiation of market relations and government regulation, young people have a need to develop social activity, civic initiative, entrepreneurship and the ability to determine their future. In the current situation, school graduates take their choice of profession more seriously, since they are faced with the acute question of self-determination in modern socio-economic conditions. A special role in the formation of such personality qualities belongs to general educational institutions.

In the pedagogical encyclopedia, self-determination is understood as the formation of personal maturity, a person’s conscious choice of his place in the system of social relations, which confirms that an individual has achieved a level of development that allows him to set goals to take his own position in the structure of various connections between people, including professional ones1.

Self-determination can be considered as a process of a person’s mastery of various social roles. This requires a certain maturity of the motivational sphere of the individual, which is formed under the influence of upbringing. A.G. Asmolov, for example, believes that personal self-determination is due to the fact that “the individual masters the role (social - A.P.), using it as a tool for restructuring his behavior in

* Popovich Alexey Emilievich, e-mail: [email protected]

1 See: Russian Pedagogical Encyclopedia: In 2 vols. M., 1999, vol. 2, p. 307.

various situations"1.

Self-determination is a complex, multi-stage process of human development. All types of self-determination - personal, life, social, professional, family - constantly interact.

The object of our research is the process of professional self-determination of graduates of secondary schools, which occupies a special place in the formation of a mature personality.

Professional self-determination is the initial link of professional development and the first stage in a person’s professional career, from which it follows that preparing students for professional self-determination should be a priority task of a general education institution.

There are different approaches to determining the essence of professional self-determination. Representatives of psychological science (E.A. Klimov, T.V. Kudryavtsev, V.V. Chebysheva, P.A. Shavir, etc.) believe that professional self-determination plays a special role in the overall process of personality development. So, E.A. Klimov emphasizes: “The stage of professional self-determination of a growing person is an organic link in the holistic process of his development”2.

In pedagogical works (V.A. Polyakov, S.N. Chistyakova, T.I. Shalavina, etc.), professional self-determination is defined as “the process of formation by an individual of his attitude towards professional work

sphere and the ability of its self-realization”, “the process of forming an individual’s attitude towards himself as a subject of future professional activity”4, a system of personal attitudes (cognitive, evaluative, motivational) in relation to a specific profession.

1 Asmolov A.G. Psychology of Personality. M., 1990, p. 335.

2 Klimov E.A. Psychological and pedagogical problems of professional consultation. M., 1983, p. 72-73.

3 Pryazhnikov N.S. Professional self-determination. Theory and practice: Textbook. allowance. M., 2008, p. 33.

4 The concept of a system of vocational guidance for students in secondary schools / Scientific. hands S.N. Chistyakova. Yaroslavl, 1993, p. 37.

Professional self-determination is based on the choice of profession, but does not end there, since throughout life a person is constantly faced with the need for professional choices in the process of training, advanced training, loss of ability to work or place of work, etc.

N.S. Pryazhnikov identifies the following types of professional self-determination: a) in specific labor functions, operations, when a person is significantly limited by the scope of his activity; b) within the framework of a certain labor process, where the possibilities for self-realization are somewhat expanded; c) with self-realization within a specialty, which allows a person to choose not only specific places of work, but also various organizations while maintaining his main specialty; d) when choosing a profession that allows a person to maneuver within related specialties"1.

The tasks of professional self-determination become more complex as students grow older. In this regard, teachers are faced with the task of using the opportunities of each age period in the formation of a growing personality. As is known, the social situation of adolescence is such that it is during this period that, due to the level of development achieved by the pupils, new opportunities arise in order to direct their activities for the benefit of society. It has been established that a teenager’s awareness of his relationship to the surrounding reality is one of the prerequisites for the emergence of a social development situation of high school age, which is characterized by the effective formation of a worldview, beliefs, and the development of indirect needs.

High school students are at the stage of clarifying their socio-professional status. With the students of these classes, based on the previous stages of training, professional training is carried out

1 See: Pryazhnikov N.S. Psychological meaning of work. M. - Voronezh, 1997, p. 83-84.

activities based on in-depth study of academic subjects in which they have developed strong interests; focuses on the formation of professionally important qualities, control and correction of professional plans using various methods of assessing labor results. Social and professional adaptation of high school students is purposefully carried out.

We conducted a survey of high school students in the South-Eastern Administrative District of Moscow, “What guides you when choosing a profession?” The following motives were named in the responses: interest in the profession - 29%; opportunity to apply their knowledge and abilities - 16%; ease of acquiring a profession - 4%; opportunity to earn good money - 51%. As a result, we identified a certain distortion of value systems associated with mercantile considerations. The possibility of creative work and becoming a master of their craft, the presence of practical experience in this profession, romance, the opportunity to win respect and honor were not indicated by any of the students surveyed. The survey data indicate the need to stimulate self-knowledge and personal self-realization, as well as create a basis for searching for a strategy for students’ professional and personal self-determination.

Based on the study of various studies, we have identified different approaches to determining the levels of readiness of schoolchildren to choose a profession. So, S.N. Chistyakova identifies three levels of professional self-determination according to the following characteristics: knowledge about the chosen type of work activity; formation of interests, inclinations, abilities, mental processes; correspondence of personal qualities and character traits to the chosen profession; confidence in the right choice of profession; presence of adequate self-esteem; activity in socially useful work. Depending on the depth and degree of formation of these characteristics, it distinguishes high, medium and low levels of professional

self-determination1. There are also more complex gradations of these levels.

We have identified the following criteria for the formation of professional self-determination, taking as a basis those formulated by S.N. Chistyakova: a) ideological and moral criterion, which presupposes the presence of socially significant motives for choosing a profession, awareness of duty to society, the desire to bring as much benefit to it as possible with one’s work; b) a general labor criterion, showing the presence of interests and respect for working people and any work, the need for work activity, the formation of general labor skills; c) a practice-oriented criterion, indicating an inclination and ability for a specific type of work activity, the presence of an adequate self-assessment of the compliance of personal qualities and character traits with the requirements of the chosen profession, and the conviction of the need to choose this particular profession.

Based on the analysis of data obtained during the research work, we came to the conclusion that the entire population of students surveyed can be conditionally classified into three levels of development of professional interests.

High school students with a high level are characterized by the presence of a well-formed motivational basis for choosing a profession, a positive attitude towards the situation of professional choice, an active position in choosing a profession, and the presence of a well-founded plan for professional self-determination, including backup options for choosing a profession; the presence of an adequate understanding of individual characteristics, knowledge of the requirements imposed by the profession on a person, the ability to analyze and compare them with each other. The choice of profession is made by them independently and usually does not diverge from the recommendations of parents and teachers.

The average level of professional self-determination is characterized by incomplete formation of the motivational basis for choosing a profession; Students at this stage have unclear

1 See: Concept of a system of vocational guidance for students in secondary schools / Scientific. hands S.N. Chistyakova.

an idea of ​​one’s future professional activity due to a lack of information about one’s qualities and the world of professions; do not always adequately evaluate and define their professionally significant qualities and inclinations; Irregularly, from time to time, information about professions and characteristics of a person is replenished. Fuzzy goals do not allow them to have a well-founded professional plan; they do not think about alternative options for choosing a profession and cannot always correctly assess their qualities and the requirements of the profession, as well as correlate them with each other.

BAZELYUK V.V., ROMANOV E.V., ROMANOVA A.V. - 2015

  • Taking into account the individual characteristics of school graduates in the process of professional self-determination

    POPOVIC ALEXEY EMILIEVICH - 2011

  • The Institute of “System Automation, Information Technologies and Entrepreneurship” (SAITiP) was formed as a result of the merger of the institutes of SAI and IITP (formerly RGUITP) of Moscow State Technical University named after K.G. Razumovsky (PKU) by order of September 11, 2015.

    IITP (formerly RGUITP) was formed in accordance with the order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated December 31, 1999, signed by V. Putin.

    The Institute provides its students with great opportunities to participate in scientific work from their junior years. This is facilitated by the active work of the faculty’s scientific schools and the modern equipment of the departments’ laboratories.

    The formed institute SAITiP included 3 graduating departments:“Information systems and technologies”, Department of Automated Control Systems, and “Quality and Innovation Management”, as well as one not releasing:"Chemistry, physics and mathematics."

    Composition of the institute

    Methodists:

    1. Alkhimova Anna Olegovna (supervises 1st, 3rd, 4th year students of correspondence courses)

    2. Anokhina Tatyana Vladimirovna (supervises all full-time students and 2nd year part-time students)

    3. Belyakova Anna Andreevna (responsible for career guidance work, supervises all master’s students)

    4. Boyko Oksana Igorevna (responsible for drawing up the schedule, supervises all part-time and part-time students)

    Departments
    Institute for applicants

    The Institute announces admission to the following areas of training:

    • Department of Information Systems
      • Bachelor's degree:
        • 09.03.02 Information systems and technologies
          Profile: network technologies of information systems.
        • 09.03.03 Applied computer science
          Profile: applied computer science (in economics)
          Computer science, mathematics, Russian language
        • 09.03.01 Informatics and computer technology
          Computer science, mathematics, Russian language
        • 03/38/05 Business informatics
          Profile: e-business
          Social studies, mathematics, Russian language
      • Master's degree:
        • 09.04.02 Information systems and technologies
        • 09.04.03 Applied computer science
          Interdisciplinary exam
    • Department of Innovation Management
      • Bachelor's degree:
        • 03/27/05 Innovation
          Profiles: innovation management by industries and areas of the economy; innovative entrepreneurship in the field of Internet technologies.
          Computer science, mathematics, Russian language
      • Master's degree:
        • 04/27/05 Innovation
          Interdisciplinary exam
    • Department of “Quality Management of Innovative Science-Intensive Productions”
      • Bachelor's degree:
        • 03.27.02 Quality management
          Profile: quality management in technological systems.
          Computer science, mathematics, Russian language
      • Master's degree:
        • 04/27/02 Quality management
          Interdisciplinary exam
    • Department of Information Technologies
      • Bachelor's degree:
        • 03/15/04 Automated information processing and control systems
    • Department of Automation and Control in Technical Systems
      • Bachelor's degree:
        • 03.27.04 Management in technical systems
          Physics, mathematics, Russian language
        • Automation of technological processes and production
          Physics, mathematics, Russian language
        • Innovation
          Physics, mathematics, Russian language
      • Master's degree:
        • Management in technical systems
          Automation of technological processes and production
    Institute employers

    Students have the opportunity to undergo educational, industrial and pre-diploma internships at leading industry enterprises with the prospect of further employment.

    Our partners:

    • JSC "Research Institute "Argon"
    • "Schneider-Electric"
    • Physical Institute of the Academy of Sciences
    • Individual entrepreneur "Emelyanov A.A."
    • Individual entrepreneur "Danshin S.V."
    • OJSC "Serpukhov Electromechanical Plant"
    • OJSC "Ilim Group"
    • LLC "Energia-98"
    • Municipal Unitary Enterprise "IRC Peresvet"
    • LLC "Kopak.ru"
    • LLC "LTStroy"
    Contacts

    Address:

    Telephone:

    8-495-640-54-36, ext. 4461

    Dean's office opening hours:

    Monday 10.00 - 18.00 lunch 13.00 - 14.00

    Tuesday - NOT ACCEPTABLE DAY

    Wednesday 10.00 - 18.00 lunch 13.00 - 14.00