The architectural appearance of Ancient Egypt changed rapidly during the Old Kingdom. Mastabas - stone foundations - were replaced by pyramidal complexes. The evolution of construction took several centuries.
The life of the pyramid builders of Ancient Egypt
Construction pyramids in ancient Egypt was preceded by the creation of a mastaba - a platform at ground level, made of high-quality granite or marble. Under the site, underground tunnels, a burial chamber and rooms for storing things and food were previously built.
In the last pyramids of Egypt of the fifth dynasty, the chamber where the sarcophagus with the body of the pharaoh was kept was mounted from marble or granite blocks at a level above the ground with an entrance at a height of 10-20 meters. This made it possible to save on excavation work.
Giza Plateau. Pyramid of Cheops (Khufu). 80s of the last century. Photo.
During the earthworks, the builders lived in nearby temporary structures or underground structures, that is, not far from the construction site of the pyramids.
The burials of ordinary workers and employees were carried out in the area of the construction of the funeral complex in a designated place.
Part of the local population, mostly women, prepared food and baked bread, and brought water in jugs from the Nile River or from canals built specifically to supply water to the village of craftsmen. Food was prepared not only for hired workers, but also for slaves.
At the same time, up to 10 thousand workers and employees were working on the pyramid, and the same number were preparing blocks in limestone and marble quarries, both near the pyramid and hundreds of kilometers away.
Most of the marble and granite blocks were supplied along the Nile from the stone quarries of Kom Ombo and finishing materials from Syria and Libya.
Pyramid of Ancient Egypt in section
If we examine the internal contents of the pyramid in cross-section, then it is easy to determine the place for installing a sarcophagus - a burial chamber, somewhere in the center of the pyramid, with the installation of five to seven ventilation ducts and hatches of different sections with an inclination of 45 degrees.
From above, the sarcophagus is protected by a tent-type canopy made of multi-ton marble slabs, which strengthens the fastening and protection of the sarcophagus from the weight of the ceiling, the subsidence of the masonry blocks of the pyramids of ancient Egypt from above, which in early projects led to its destruction.
Work on the construction of the burial chamber, underground passages, grottoes, false passages, lighting and ventilation shafts, tunnels, dead ends, anti-vandal bolts, corner fastenings, wastewater discharge systems and storm water drainage systems were carried out before the construction of the pyramid, the so-called zero construction cycle.
The question: “How was a multi-ton sarcophagus carried through such narrow tunnels?” is fundamentally incorrect. It was installed in place before the start building a pyramid in ancient Egypt, on a pre-built mastaba or below it at a depth of 20-60 meters!
The embalmed body of the pharaoh was carried into the sarcophagus along the corridors after the construction of the main building was completed. With him they brought food and clothing that could be useful to him in the other world. Upon completion of the loading of the burial chamber and sarcophagus, the entrance and ventilation tunnels were covered with multi-ton granite slabs. Small holes were left in them for the passage of air and communication between the pharaoh and the world.
Neither marble valves nor deep shafts saved the tombs from robbery.
Everything that was built above the mastaba level, such as ventilation shafts, was carried out while laying stone blocks.
Compared to the processing of tunnels and passages with a simple copper chisel with a poor surface quality, the walls of the burial room were made with special care - polished and painted with hieroglyphs.
Construction of the pyramids of Ancient Egypt Assembling blocks during the construction of the ancient pyramids of Egypt
No one lifted blocks of 20 tons to the height of the pyramid; they were prepared locally in formwork from Egyptian cedar boards, on polymer concrete with additives of marble and granite chips from stone quarry waste. The solution was mixed on the spot, and water, boards and building materials were brought up the ramp. The larger the stone block was planned, the less expensive wood was needed for the formwork.
In earlier pyramids, the space between the burial chamber and the outer contour was filled with rubble and waste from quarries. The pyramid was lined with polished lime slabs and blocks on top.
There are almost no stone blocks inside - they were used only for fastening tunnel passages, shafts, supports and guy wires.
Pyramids of Ancient Egypt: Photos Material for the construction of the pyramids of Egypt
The lack of stone blocks was made up for in almost all pyramids with raw bricks, which are still produced in large quantities for the construction of housing.
There was also a construction quarry near the pyramids, but the limestone here was of low quality with a high sand content. A visit to the passages of the pyramids and opening of the collapses indicates a weak fastening of the internal ligament of the body of the pyramid, consisting of fragments and pieces left over from the processing of limestone blocks and slabs, which were used for the external finishing of the surface and installation of the pyramid.
This method of economical use of materials is still used in construction today; the outer surface is made of high-quality brick, and the inner part is filled with waste and filled with polymer mortar on cement.
The procedure for making blocks of polymer concrete is shown in one of the pyramid drawings, and is no different from the modern one - wooden formwork and mortar.
Pyramid of Egypt Pharaoh Teti and Djoser The foundation for the multi-ton pyramid was not built; the base was taken from the strong limestone of the base of one of the natural hills - the plateau.
The project for the construction of the ancient pyramid of Egypt provided for the burial area of the relatives and wives of the pharaoh, sometimes next to small ones.
The lack of geodetic research of the soil and the presence of groundwater, as a rule, led to the premature destruction of the pyramid, but this happened rarely. In the floodplain of the Nile's water meadows, the construction of pyramids was not carried out, and the foothill area occupied by burials did not have underground groundwater.
The pyramids, washed away by the high water level of the Nile during the flood years, were destroyed almost to the ground.
Hundreds of millions of years ago, in the area where the pyramids were located, there were mountain ranges that collapsed from the waters of the ancient sea in the river valley, the sun and heat - turning into sand and rubble.
Pyramids of Ancient Egypt video
The content of the article
FUNERAL CUSTOMS AND RITES. Everywhere and at all times within our knowledge, after the death of an individual member of society, established customs come into play. The usual procedural actions associated with the disposal of a corpse and the behavior of the deceased's relatives are ritual not only to the extent that they are inherited and socially sanctified, but also to the extent that they contain a certain symbolism and lack purely practical calculations. Customs that provide for the burial of a body simply for reasons of sanitation or other practical reasons cannot qualify as rituals because they lack the context of sacredness. This kind of context may not be strictly religious or magical if it contains feelings, values and beliefs that go beyond the utilitarian. However, with rare exceptions limited to modern urban civilizations, customs and ceremonies regarding death belong ultimately to the realm of religion. For this reason, such rituals and customs turn out to be symbolically loaded and have significance only in relation to the culture within the boundaries of which they arise and receive their expression.
A number of anthropologists have analyzed the functions of funeral rites. For the deceased, the funeral is one of the rites of the life cycle, like other rites of the same cycle performed on the occasion of puberty, marriage and similar events, and mark the transition from one status to another. This life cycle rite should create the best conditions for such a transition.
Despite their obvious focus on the individual, funeral rites are social in their function, since they have an impact specifically on the living. Through these rites, those mourning the deceased are given a means of achieving stability. According to analysis by American anthropologists Eliot Chapple and Carleton S. Coon, death causes social imbalance because relationships between members of the institutions in which the deceased participated are temporarily disrupted. To achieve the balance so necessary for social life, it is necessary to restore a stable system of relationships, which would include predictable relationships of rhythmic and stable interaction. Life cycle rites serve as a means to achieving this goal.
Since there is no consensus among theorists regarding the origin of ambivalent attitudes and rituals, we will instead have to turn to explanations supported by practical evidence.
Attitudes towards the deceased may be determined by the specific circumstances of their death. Thus, for example, those who die as a result of illness, accident or murder may be considered hostile or vindictive towards the living, while those who lived their entire allotted life and died peacefully may be considered friendly or at least indifferent.
Customs such as blindfolding the deceased, carrying the body out of the home through a special door, which is then sealed, carrying the body to the grave in a roundabout way, scattering thorns along the road from the grave to the village - all these are ways to confuse the spirit of the deceased and prevent him from returning to inflict harm. The complete destruction of the property of the dead can be interpreted as a way to prevent their return, since they will have no home, no tools, no utensils, no clothing. The body may be dismembered or otherwise mutilated to prevent its return. Loud noise and disgusting odors can serve the same purpose. The purpose of burying the dead in secret and inaccessible places may be the desire to prevent their awakening by any intruder. The widespread taboo of pronouncing the name of the deceased may be explained by the desire not to attract his attention.
A completely different attitude occurs when the bodies of the dead are preserved and given a certain amount of attention out of a sense of respect and love for them on the part of the living. Embalming, drying, and even cremation can be considered motivated by these kinds of feelings. The same applies to funerary goods, food offerings, decorations, portrait statues and images, monuments and memorial services.
In any society, therefore, the elements of fear, reverence, respect, deference and love are present mixed in varying proportions depending on the circumstances. Some tribes, especially in Australia, allow the simultaneous expression of sadness and hostility, since they endow the deceased with two souls - one friendly, the other hostile. Many societies throughout Malaysia respect the good, i.e. to the soul located on the right, and expel the evil one, i.e. the soul located on the left.
Antiquity of funeral rites.
The findings of archaeologists regarding the antiquity of funeral customs and rites indicate that, apparently, already in the Pleistocene, the modeled attitude towards the dead was prevalent in various parts of the world.
The most ancient evidence comes from China, where during the Lower Paleolithic period (early Stone Age), about half a million years ago, Sinanthropus practiced ritual cannibalism.
The skulls of at least fourteen individuals, as well as the teeth and jaws of many others, indicate that the bodies of the deceased were posthumously beheaded and then buried until complete decomposition. After this, the heads were deliberately preserved. The nature of the cranial injuries suggests that the brains were eaten, probably during a cannibal feast, the purpose of which was to acquire a certain life-giving element from the spiritual substance living in the head.
A Neanderthal man found in 1939 in the grotto of Monte Circeo in Italy had his skull cut so that his brain could be removed. The cave in which the skull was found may have been a sanctuary (bone repository), since the skull was located inside a circle of stones in a small inner chamber, along the wall of which the bones of various mammals were stacked. The bones date from c. 70 thousand to 100 thousand years ago.
A later parallel to the cult of skulls was the cult of the dead, which began in the Paleolithic. His principal aim appears to have been not to try to extract the power or good qualities of the dead by eating their bodies, but to have a connection with them after they had entered the afterlife. This would require both an attempt to give the dead an afterlife and an attempt, not necessarily independent of the first, to prevent the return of the dead who could bother the living.
Neanderthal skeletons found in France indicate the care taken when burying bodies. The tools and food placed in the graves, as well as the position of the bodies of the dead, indicate the measures taken to ensure the afterlife of the dead.
Later, with the appearance of Homo sapiens in the Upper Paleolithic, evidence of attempts to maintain the existence of the departed in the afterlife becomes more numerous and obvious. The famous burials, discovered near the village of Grimaldi on the Italian Riviera, consist of the burials of a sixteen-year-old teenager and an adult woman. The young man's legs were bent back under the hip bones, and the heels were located in the pelvis. The woman's legs were also bent, but in the opposite direction so that her knees were close to her shoulders. The reasons for the crouched position of the bodies remain unclear. In addition to the associated artifacts, it should be noted that the youth's skeleton was painted red using hematite, a red ironstone. The boy and woman belonged to an early type of Homo sapiens known as Cro-Magnons, and the artifacts associated with them are identified as belonging to the widespread Aurignacian cultural type of the Upper Paleolithic. Skeletons of Cro-Magnons were also discovered in a number of other caves on the Riviera. Some of them were buried in an extended position, some in a crouched position, but always together with jewelry or tools and usually with animal bones and red ocher. The example of the "Red Woman of Paviland" in South Wales shows that throughout north-west Europe the custom of burying the dead in red iron ore deposits was widespread.
In the Mesolithic or Middle Stone Age cultures of Europe, starting around the 12th millennium BC, the previous funerary traditions did not undergo any major changes. In the Mesolithic cave site Ofnet near Augsburg in Bavaria, a burial of 27 human skulls was excavated: facing west, they lay in a layer of ocher. Six more skulls were found nearby. All thirty-three skulls were deliberately buried, and since only cervical vertebrae accompanied them, it is believed that these individuals were previously decapitated. There is good reason to believe that they were considered trophies. Some wore necklaces made from snail shells, others from deer teeth. Tardenoise burials (the Tardenoise culture was a Mesolithic culture of hunters and fishermen centered in the Mediterranean) were discovered near Teviec in French Brittany, as well as on the island of Hoedic; in both cases, some of the skeletons were decorated with deer antlers. Other Tardenoise burials have been found in Portugal, Spain and Belgium.
The Maglemose cultures (named after the Mesolithic settlement near the Danish city of Mullerup) of hunters and fishermen in the forest region of northern Europe did not find any signs of ritual burials. However, the Mesolithic Ertebolle people, who lived on the Baltic coast, buried their dead in shell middens during the period when new agricultural crops invaded central Europe.
The Neolithic (New Stone Age) "revolution", marked by the transition from a gathering economy to a productive economy, began in the Middle East. In addition to ordinary burials, megalithic crypts of massive size began to appear in caves and graves, especially in the Nile Valley. Pit burials were characteristic of the predynastic Neolithic cultures of the Upper Nile (Nile Valley) Badarian, Amratian and Herzian, dating back to approximately the 4th millennium BC. The graves were lined with mud bricks and had wooden ceilings covered with sand or stones. Sometimes these burials were located outside the settlements, and sometimes near hearths inside dwellings.
For the First Egyptian Dynasty, the beginning of which dates back to approximately 32nd–29th centuries. BC, were characterized by royal tombs, which replaced the simple tombs of the past. Over time, the architecture of Egyptian tombs underwent a number of changes, going from a simple mastaba tomb, built of stone over a mummy's chamber carved into the rock, to the royal pyramids at Giza, built c. 2690 BC during the Fourth Dynasty. The construction of both early and late tombs was based on the belief that the lives of the dead continued in them.
Pre-funeral preparations.
Rituals on the eve of death. In cases where it becomes apparent that a person is dying, he and members of his community may perform a number of prescribed rites. Relatives may be required to be present at the bedside of the dying person not only for sentimental reasons, but also to obtain official recognition of certain rights and status. Ulithians (one of the peoples of Micronesia) must be present to hear the dying person's formal disposition regarding property and usufruct (the right to use, but not to own). The Bawenda of the northern Transvaal region of south-east Africa gather at the bedside of a dying person to avoid being suspected of complicity in death.
Among the Murngin and the aboriginal people of northern Australia, the living refuse all moral and physical support to the dying person, doing everything possible to send him to the land of the dead. The living see a terminally ill person as a danger, since he is halfway between the land of the living and the land of the dead. They also seek to hasten and facilitate his transformation into a fully spiritual being.
The unction of a dying person by a Roman Catholic priest is the clearest example of a ritual performed before death.
Its purpose is to transmigrate the soul from the mundane, material world to the sacred, spiritual world. A prayer is recited over the dangerously ill or wounded, and his eyes, ears, nose, mouth, hands and feet are anointed with olive oil blessed by the bishop in the hope of restoring his health. At the same time, the patient is given the opportunity to repent of his sins and receive forgiveness for them.
Rituals between death and funeral. In the period between the death of a person and his funeral, society usually takes a number of urgent actions. European customs include stopping the clock in the deceased's home, turning mirrors to face the wall, pouring water from vessels, opening doors and windows, and removing one tile from the roof. The explanations given for the reasons for these actions are so varied that it is impossible to say with certainty how they appeared.
Before burial, the body is usually carefully prepared. It may be washed, anointed, shaved, combed, or coated with ocher, turmeric, or other dye. Various orifices of the body are often blocked - the mouth, nose, urethra and rectum. Internal organs may be removed and replaced with plant fiber or other materials. Early Christians commonly anointed the body with incense to commemorate the spices and spices in which Christ's body was wrapped. The eyes of the deceased are almost invariably covered with some kind of weight, which is sometimes placed on the eyelids so that the deceased does not look at the living. The body may be left naked or covered with a veil, and jewelry or other adornment may be added to this. In medieval England, the poor were buried almost naked, but those who could afford it were covered with linen. The Chinese dressed their dead according to their social rank - a nobleman could be dressed in numerous rich clothes.
Lamentation for the dead can be spontaneous or a matter of individual emotion, but more often it is an organized form of controlled lamentation and funeral songs. Crying for the dead usually expresses grief, praise, doubt about the truth of what is happening, or compensatory emotions and can be accompanied by frantic actions. Professional mourners (usually women) were used in both the ancient and modern worlds. Their duties include piercing screams, beating their chests, tearing out their hair, tearing their clothes, and even self-mutilation. The ancient Greeks and Romans used the services of such paid mourners, and until recently, for example, the Chinese, Ethiopians, Welsh, Irish, Corsicans and Eastern Jews did the same. There is evidence of the existence of hired mourners even among such indigenous peoples as the Mandan Indians of the North American plains (from the Sioux group) and the Gros Ventres and Chiriguanos of eastern Bolivia. Mourning can be expressed in chants, often reaching a high poetic and musical sound. The funeral service is sometimes accompanied by ritual dancing, which often takes on greater significance than the sobs and lamentations themselves.
In some societies, constant vigil near the body of the deceased is considered mandatory. There are various motives for such vigils, including the hope of bringing the deceased back to life. Jews sometimes hire professional attendants. Irish wakes arose from the medieval custom of sitting with the deceased, filling the sitting hours with an activity called “rousing the ghost.” Among peoples with a tribal organization, the solemn observance of such vigils has several explanations. Some Australian aborigines protect the body of the deceased from spirits, while others remain near it in the hope of identifying the sorcerer responsible for his death.
Funeral customs.
The root causes of the emergence of various burial methods are usually unknowable, so we can only judge them tentatively. In general, it seems possible that there is a dual need – to protect the living and to help the dead. The living want to get rid of the “infection” of death and the threats generated by spirits; the dead should be provided with all possible assistance in finding peace and quiet. Both of these goals are reflected in the very basis of most rituals. Refusal to perform traditional rituals refers to cases where an individual does not have the appropriate social status or when it is believed that by his behavior in life he has not earned due respect. For example, infants, ordinary members of the community or slaves, criminals, suicides, victims of violence or illness, and heretics can be buried without ceremony or according to special rites.
Commitment to the earth.
Interment of the body is the most common method of burial. The burial site may be chosen at random or determined by factors such as prophecy (depending on omens), the presence of traditional cemeteries, the place of death of the deceased (he may be buried there), or the wishes expressed by the dying person. Wealth, age and other conditions may play a role in determining burial location. Sometimes the burial place is kept secret for fear of aggression from sorcerers and sorcerers. Children were often buried in or nearby their mothers' homes, probably to encourage rebirth. Many West Africans bury their chiefs and dear relatives under the floors of their huts. Probably out of fear of the dead, some peoples bury their dead far from their habitats. Many prehistoric North American Indians routinely buried their dead in garbage pits.
Christians believe it is necessary to bury the dead in consecrated ground. They oppose cremation because it is contrary to Christian and Jewish tradition, and believe that the practice of cremation was initiated by anti-Christians with the express purpose of destroying belief in the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body.
In ancient Israel, interment of the body was considered the proper method of burial, and the practice remains a common custom among Jews.
Cave burials.
Burial in caves is an ancient and widespread custom. Usually this is one of the options for burial, since the body is usually buried in it, but this method is classified separately based on the characteristics of the place. The voids created by nature have proven to be an invaluable source for the study of human history, since the dryness of the caves ensured the excellent preservation of human remains.
Cave burials, as we have already noted, are characteristic of many prehistoric peoples of the Old World. Reports of their existence in the modern period concern areas of Malaysia, Melanesia and Polynesia, Madagascar and Africa, as well as the indigenous Indian cultures of western North America.
Air burials.
There is speculation that the earliest method of burial was simple air burial, but we cannot be sure of this. In any case, this is not a very common method even among the wildest tribes of our time. Air burials usually take place on the surface of the ground, with the body of the deceased wrapped or placed in a box, although the Maasai of East Africa had a custom of simply throwing the bodies of ordinary community members directly onto the ground after death. The ancient Zoroastrians of Persia used the method of air burial, believing that corpses should not be allowed to desecrate the sacred elements - fire, earth or water. According to Zoroastrian tradition, air burials were performed in “towers of silence,” which were walled open-air platforms so that vultures could quickly destroy the soft flesh. Modern Zoroastrians bury their dead in graves filled with concrete, believing that in this way the corpse does not come into contact with earth, water or fire.
Where the ground remains frozen for most of the year, air burial was resorted to as an alternative to interring the body. The Yakuts of Siberia often used rough platforms. Platforms are also used in warmer areas, such as among the Indians of the northwest coast of North America. The platforms were used by many Plains and Great Lakes Indian tribes in the upper Mississippi not only to protect the body of the deceased from wild animals, but also to allow it to dry.
Water burials.
Water burials include burials in water and air burials on the surface of the sea. Water burials appear to have two motives. This simplest method of disposing of a body is especially often used in cases where the deceased has a low social status. Water burial can also be seen as a precautionary measure, since some peoples consider water a magical barrier for the dead. Burial at sea was common among the Polynesians and is still practiced in some areas of Micronesia where the custom was widespread in the past. In cases where the body of the deceased is set adrift on a raft or boat, the usual motives are concepts of respect and honor.
Cremation.
Burning a body is an ancient and widespread custom. It first appeared in Europe during the New Stone Age and remained the predominant form of burial throughout the Bronze Age, losing ground with the rise of Christianity. This is the normal method of burial among Hindus, and due to Hindu influence in Indonesia, it often occurs on these islands. Some North American Indian groups practiced cremation selectively. The practice of burning corpses is also known in some regions of Africa and southeast Asia.
This method of burial appears to have been motivated by many considerations: the reluctance on the part of the nomads to leave their dead behind them; fear of the return of the dead; the desire to free the soul for a journey to the other world; protection from wild animals or evil spirits; providing the deceased with warmth and comfort in the other world.
Cannibalism.
Funeral cannibalism appears to be an extremely ancient method of burying the dead. In historical times, it was common among the Luiseño Indians of Southern California, who substantiated it with a myth in which the murdered demiurge Wiyot was eaten by Coyote. The Australian Dieri aborigines ate the fat of the deceased in order to gain his virtue and strength. The main function of funerary cannibalism was probably to unite the living and the dead through a kind of communion, comparable to the Christian ritual of partaking of the body of Christ in the form of bread or wafer.
Secondary burial. The exhumation and reinterment of the bones of the dead is a phenomenon that seems to be not uncommon in ancient times. The bones could be processed in different ways: they could be smoked over a fire, painted with red dye, or wrapped in tree bark. After this, they were usually buried again or stored in some container. Secondary burial is often the privilege of the rich or noble, although among some peoples, including some of the Aboriginal people of Australia, secondary burial is the rule for all.
GRAVE COMPLEX
Being essentially the houses of the dead, graves exhibit a corresponding attitude towards themselves. The very word “cemetery,” which comes from a Greek word meaning to put to bed, conveys the feeling that the dead are buried here. Graves also serve as social symbols, reflecting status and cultural values.
Shapes of graves.
Graves are often dug deep enough to prevent moisture infiltration and to protect against animals and robbers. The traditional depth of European graves is approximately 1.8 m. Sometimes the trunk of the grave is made deep and a side niche is dug at the bottom to accommodate the body of the deceased.
Some prehistoric cultures were characterized by collective burials. Some of the most notable examples of this practice include the megalithic tomb complex that spread throughout Europe from the eastern Mediterranean in the 2nd millennium BC; the tholos of Cyprus, the vaulted tombs of Crete, the vestibule graves of Iberia, Brittany, Ireland and Denmark, and the long mounds of Britain all represent this complex. In the New World, the Ohio River Valley region suggests that during the periods known as Burial Mounds I and II (c. 100 BC–500 AD), group burial was favored, especially in Native American cultures. Adena (c. 900 BC – 100 AD) and Hopewell (100 BC – 500 AD). The Hopewell Indians had a primordial cult of the dead, with the construction of large ritual centers along the rivers and streams on which their villages were located. Their mounds were usually large, and the burials of the dead were accompanied by a large number of skillfully made jewelry, weapons and tools.
Body orientation.
The remains of the deceased are usually oriented in some traditional direction. The position of the body is usually related to the location of the other world and indicates the path along which the deceased will travel. The favorite direction is west, towards which the face of the deceased can be turned. The western direction may be chosen, perhaps, to emphasize the completion of life, since it is there that the sun “dies,” while the east, where the sun rises, may be chosen to emphasize the moment of renewal of life. The Mandan Indians of the Great Plains of North America laid their dead on a platform with their feet facing southeast, in the direction in which the spirits were believed to travel to the Heart River and where the ancestors once lived. Some Christians bury their dead with their feet in the direction of Jerusalem so that they can meet Christ there on Judgment Day.
In addition to the direction, each position given to the body - lying on the back, prone, on the side or sitting - also has a symbolic meaning. For example, there was an ancient English belief that burying a first-born baby face down deprives the mother of any further opportunity to have children. In the Punjab region of India, a similar provision is used in the case of sweepers (members of one of the lower castes), whose spirits are much feared and believed that such a position will not allow them to free themselves.
The question of the reasons for the crouched position that we talked about when discussing Paleolithic time remains debatable. The Grimaldi woman had her knees pulled up to shoulder level. The position of the body with the legs drawn up to the chest and the arms crossed is considered to represent the womb, as if the dead were lying in it in their graves awaiting rebirth. However, it seems more plausible to assume that the strongly crouched position of the body is explained by the fact that it was tied in order to avoid the dead from pestering the living. Such an assumption would explain why the legs are sometimes bent backwards. Modern peoples with a tribal organization provide many examples of the fact that the dead are connected precisely for this reason.
Preservation of the bodies of the dead.
In contrast to the usual practice of burial for the sole purpose of disposing of the body, an entirely different purpose is often pursued, namely, to preserve it in its most complete state. The most famous custom of mummification was among the ancient Egyptians. At first, mummification was carried out using natural means. The hot, dry desert sand in which the bodies of the dead were placed slowed down the decomposition process, especially when sodium nitrate was present in the soil. Natural mummification was probably the beginning of the tradition practiced by the Egyptians beginning in the Dynasties. Early mummies were usually treated with raw sodium carbonate and wrapped in linen. The entrails were usually removed. The full development of mummification did not occur until the period of the Fifth Dynasty, when the elaborate cult of the dead was already in full bloom.
The desiccation and mummification of the bodies of the dead were not alien to the American Indians. In Arizona and New Mexico, centuries-old bodies have been discovered, swaddled in a mummy-like manner or placed in a solid adobe sarcophagus. Mummies were also found in saltpeter caves in the lower Mimbres valley in the south of the country. The skin was usually intact, and decorations made of shells and wicker straw were preserved on the body. Mummification is also known from several saltpeter caves in Kentucky, where the process of mostly natural drying took place, but the bodies of the dead were carefully swaddled, decorated and coated with clay without removing the entrails. There are reports of archaeological finds involving the practice of desiccation or mummification of the bodies of the dead from burials in the Aleutian Islands, along the coast of Alaska and Virginia, as well as in Peru (700–800 AD) and other parts of the New World.
Among the peoples of Oceania, there is a sporadic recourse to the practice of removal of entrails and artificial embalming, especially in Samoa, New Zealand, Mangaia (Cook Islands) and Tahiti.
Funeral goods.
Weapons, utensils, jewelry, furniture, food, and the like very often accompany the dead. This expresses the widespread and very ancient idea that the dead will find them useful and pleasant in their subsequent life; they seem to the relatives of the deceased to be the best way to provide for the material needs of the people who have passed away. It is quite possible that all these things were intended to pacify the dead and prevent them from committing evil.
The Middle Paleolithic monuments testify to the great antiquity of the grave goods. Thus, in the Le Moustier cave in southwestern France, a young Neanderthal was found, next to his left hand there was an ax and a scraper belonging to the Acheulean culture, and under his head there was a pillow made of flint fragments. At a site in the town of Solutre in France, which gave its name to the Solutrean culture, shells with holes made in them, engraved images of animals and pierced bones of deer legs were found in hearth burials.
Neolithic Upper Nile burials at El Badari, El Amrah and Gerzeh contain utensils, tools, amulets and food remains. In Neolithic tombs of Mesopotamia, ceramic and stone vessels, copper beads, emmer wheat, barley and many other objects were discovered. The richest burial goods in composition are associated with the royal tombs of the Mesopotamian city of Ur in the 3rd millennium BC. Not only luxurious vessels, tables, chariots, jewelry, etc. were found there, but also the remains of the accompanying people.
The monuments of the ancient civilizations of Elam and Balochistan, located, respectively, north and southeast of the Persian Gulf, as well as the monuments of Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa of the Indus Valley - all of them were rich in a variety of funerary goods, like the megalithic burials of Neolithic Europe. Rich grave goods are also characteristic of ancient Peru.
Among modern peoples, grave goods are believed to be needed by the dead, and sometimes objects are “killed” by breaking them, presumably so that their spirits can follow the dead to serve them. But sometimes another explanation is given: objects are broken so that the dead do not come back for them. There is no doubt that the most common reason why tools, utensils, personal belongings, and the like are placed in graves is the desire to make the afterlife convenient for the dead.
With a broad definition of grave goods, we can also include sacrifices buried with the dead. Rich families in ancient China buried dogs, horses, and people with their dead. In the burials of some of the kings of this country there were from one hundred to three hundred human victims, intended to serve the kings in the next world. This practice continued until the Zhou era (11th century BC–3rd AD), but paper substitutes were gradually introduced. In ancient Egypt, wives and servants went to the next world along with the deceased man.
Graves as symbols.
Graves are visual social symbols in the sense that they reflect many of a society's values and attitudes regarding death and community life. Even a modern American cemetery in this sense is no less symbolic than a cemetery of a people with a tribal organization. In American cemeteries, men often have larger headstones in better locations. Spatially, the father occupies a central position, although often the mother may share this position or even occupy it herself. Children are given secondary places, which subconsciously expresses the subordinate position assigned to those whose social personality has had less time to develop. The family plot is sometimes enclosed, which emphasizes the importance Americans place on the small family of mother, father and their children, as opposed to the large family. After a person's death, competition for that person can arise between two categories of families - between the one into which the person was born, and the one that he helped create through marriage and childbearing.
Catholics, Jews, Protestants have their own separate cemeteries.
Mourning.
With few exceptions, in all societies there is some period of formal expression of grief following the death of a person. Such a phenomenon as crying and wailing has already been mentioned. Those present at a funeral are usually relatives, but sometimes they may just be friends, and in some cases mourning is required by all members of the community, regardless of personal emotions. When a tribal leader or president dies, mourning may be observed by the community as a whole. The duration of the mourning period can vary in different societies and even within the same society, since much depends on the importance of the person of the deceased and on the cohesion of his relatives or friends. In any case, the duration of mourning is usually determined by custom rather than by individual preference.
The ways of expressing mourning are very varied. Participants in mourning may refuse certain types of food, jewelry or entertainment, and resort to sexual abstinence. They may refuse the usual hygiene procedures - washing or combing their hair. It is the custom of some peoples with a tribal organization to inflict deep wounds on their bodies and even mutilate themselves by cutting off a finger joint. Whatever the specific manifestation, its function is usually to distinguish people in mourning from others. If the hair is usually cut, it is left to grow; If they are usually allowed to grow long, then they are cut short. Clothes may be exchanged for rags or abandoned altogether, and then the mourners walk naked.
It is likely that all mourning customs arose from spontaneous expressions of emotion, and only over time acquired the variety of forms that we know today. The apparent purpose of formal expressions of grief may be to appease the deceased or throw them off track because of the threat they pose to the living, or to show the deceased that the living feel a deep sense of loss and can only assuage their grief through self-denial. Each of these motives is based on the idea of sacrifice, although, in fact, they are not mutually exclusive.
Another purpose, conscious or unconscious, of mourning is to protect the community from those who have been in contact with death. Those involved in mourning are often considered defiled and therefore must be isolated. Mourning clothing probably arose as special clothing to be discarded after the threat of infection had disappeared. Among the Polynesians, this attitude is included in the concept of taboo, which implies not only prohibition, but also a certain state of life. A state of taboo or ritual contamination may be transmitted to those who were in contact with the body of the deceased or otherwise involved in funerary rites. The ancient Avesta, a collection of sacred books of the Zoroastrians, emphasizes the supernatural nature of the corpse and its ability to exert a polluting influence dangerous to those who touch it.
As a consequence of this attitude, many societies observe quarantine, during which those who were closely associated with the deceased must live and sleep separately, avoid common roads, refrain from touching other people and their utensils, and not eat food that can be shared with others. Personal belongings of the deceased should be avoided or destroyed due to their polluting influence.
Where such arrangements exist, formalized measures are envisaged to neutralize the contamination of those who have been contaminated. Purification rites may take many forms, including fasting, smearing with mud or paint, bathing, bloodletting, cutting off hair, changing clothes, and animal sacrifices. Each of these forms has its own explanation, but behind all of them there is a belief that they cleanse from filth.
Modern tendencies.
Modern trends in relation to the dead are characterized by desacralization (elimination of the quality of supernaturalism) and deritualization (elimination of ritual qualities). These trends are especially noticeable in urbanized societies.
One of the signs of desacralization is the partial replacement of a religious figure with the figure of a doctor or funeral home owner. This statement is especially true of Protestants, where the priest is increasingly secularized and has fewer and fewer external symbols of sacralization to support his authority. He has to compete with the doctor in preparing the family when one of its members is dying, and with the undertaker in the funeral process. The role of the priest remains unshakable mainly in the field of the funeral eulogy, which, as one of the rites of the life cycle, is intended to convince the audience of the transformation of the deceased into a spiritual being, as well as to simultaneously convince the living that immortality is a true reality. Even the lawyer took on some of the functions traditionally performed by the priest.
Professionally trained people have appeared who are now engaged in satisfying most of the needs that arise upon the death of a person. They replaced relatives and friends in preparing the body for burial, possessing the skills of embalmers, cosmetologists and costume designers. They often organize funerals, providing transport, music and chapel if necessary. But despite the fact that these people are increasingly borrowing sacred symbols, rituals and the language of religion today, they remain entrepreneurs outside the ideological sphere of the latter.
Recently, an interesting new aspect of burial customs has emerged that has received significant commercial incentive and support, especially in the United States. It consists of transferring the funeral complex to domestic animals, especially dogs and cats, which are buried in large cemeteries specially designated for them. The corresponding attitudes and rituals imitate the practices of Christian religious sects, but do not find sanction in traditional theological doctrine regarding death.
The process of deritualization of funeral customs in the urban countries of Europe and the United States has gone so far today that the younger generation knows about the practice that took place only a few decades ago only by hearsay. The custom of vigil at the bedside of the deceased is gradually disappearing, and the body of the deceased often rests not at home, but in a special funeral hall. The ritual of church funerals is preserved, but church processions and last hymns are extremely simplified. With the expansion of the practice of cremation, less and less attention is paid to the ritual aspects of burial.
External manifestations of mourning quickly decline and almost completely disappear. For example, in the USA, where quite recently it was mandatory to wear black clothing, a black armband, handkerchiefs with a black border, notepaper with a mourning frame, crepe veils, etc., these mourning symbols are now used much less frequently. There are no longer black crepe ribbons or flowers hanging on the doors. Funeral processions, and with them magnificent hearses, can now only be seen at the funerals of significant persons - political leaders or national heroes or favorites, such as very popular actors and musicians. Messages expressing condolences and sympathy became brief.
Excessive displays of grief and grief are seen as attempts to evoke sympathy and are therefore considered bad manners. In contrast to the sentimental epitaphs on the tombstones of the past, the modern epitaph contains only the essentials. The period of mourning has been shortened and is sometimes not observed at all, except among very close relatives, who in any case can determine the duration of mourning at their own discretion.
Moscow State University named after. Lomonosov
Branch of Moscow State University in Sevastopol
Department of History and International Relations
on the history of the Ancient East
GREAT PYRAMIDS
Completed by Golovko D.Yu.
Teacher Ushakov S.V.
Sevastopol - 2015
INTRODUCTION
The Egyptian pyramids are the greatest architectural structures of their time, which amazed Greek and Roman authors with their size and geometric precision, which amaze us too - contemporaries of the age of high technology.
In order to fully understand the enormity and immeasurable creative power of these great buildings, it should be reported that the ancient Egyptians did not possess all the achievements of progress that modern builders use, creating the great architectural structures of our time, such as, for example, explosives, iron and, even more so , steel tools, they did not know diamond and corundum, there were no powerful machines for mining and transporting stone and construction itself.
Goal and tasks
The main purpose of this work is to describe the pyramid complex at Giza - the great pyramids that would be called a wonder of the world by the ancient Greeks. Describe the development of thought that led to the construction of such monuments from the earliest tombs to the latest pyramids.
The main objective of this work is to characterize the construction technology of the Egyptian pyramids in general and to describe the Great Pyramids at Giza, which became the main monuments of the entire ancient Egyptian civilization.
As already indicated, in times preceding the era of the great pyramids, other pyramids were built. I consider it necessary to review earlier royal burial structures, starting from the so-called mastabas to the direct predecessors of the great pyramids.
Egyptian masons had at their disposal only simple means of transport and tools made of stone, copper and wood. So what technologies were used in this ancient monumental construction?
It is well known that pyramids are funerary structures, so the ancient Egyptian funeral rite should be described.
Review of sources and literature
In order to answer the stated goal and fulfill the objectives of this work, one cannot help but resort to the writings of the ancient Egyptians themselves. In the Pyramid Texts and Sarcophagi Texts, representatives of this ancient civilization left a wealth of material for the study of funeral rites and religion, which should not only be deciphered, but also understood, because the thinking of the Egyptians is different from the thinking of modern people.
Ancient authors also left a lot of evidence, from which I took the great work of Herodotus “History”. Their works are traditionally considered sources, despite the fact that two millennia separate the “father of history” from the Egyptian Ancient Kingdom. Herodotus left important material, which, however, should be treated with caution when correlating his data with other types of sources.
Hilda Augustovna Kink, an outstanding Soviet Egyptologist, left an excellent description of the technique of building pyramids in her book “How the Egyptian Pyramids Were Built,” using Djoser’s pyramid as an example.
The books by Jean-François Lauer “The Mysteries of the Great Pyramids” and Vojtech Zamarovsky “Their Majesties Pyramids” summarize knowledge on the problem of the great pyramids.
The article by the outstanding Soviet Egyptologist Militsa Edvinovna Mathieu, “The Pyramid Texts - a funeral ritual,” is necessary for understanding the Pyramid Tests as a description of the religion and funeral rites of the ancient Egyptians.
I consider the selection of sources, despite their seeming outdatedness, to be adequate to achieve the purpose of the work and complete the assigned tasks.
1. Early royal tombs and Pyramid of Djoser
2. Great Pyramids of Giza
Later pyramids
Technologies for the construction of the great pyramids
Ancient Egyptian burial rites
1. EARLY ROYAL TOMBS AND THE PYRAMID OF JOSHER
Let's first look at the first burials of the pharaohs, which are not yet amazing, but allow us to consider the development of ancient Egyptian engineering, without which it is impossible to build even the simplest barn. Relatively large, royal tombs were built for the pharaohs already at the beginning of the dynastic period in the history of Ancient Egypt.
The burials of the pharaohs of the first and second dynasties were discovered near the village of Abydos. Not far from this place was the homeland of the kings of the first two dynasties - the city of Tinis, after which these dynasties are often called Tinis. The tombs in Abydos were looted, but still tablets with the names of the pharaohs and many other things give reason to claim that these are the first royal tombs. Later, royal tombs were discovered in Saqqara, which were created for the same pharaohs.
What were the first burial structures? The tomb was a flat top rectangular structure with sloping walls, resembling a bench 3 to 6 m high. In Arabic, a bench is “mastaba”, hence the name of such tombs. The mastaba was built from raw brick, sometimes lined with stone slabs, and later it was made of stone. The main part of the tomb was the room for the coffin, while the storerooms were located deep under the mastaba, carved into the rock.
Mastaba was also a tomb for the nobility, so Pharaoh Djoser - the founder of the third dynasty - wanted to create for himself something that would single him out and place him after death over all his subjects, no matter how noble they were.
This funeral complex included the mortuary temple of the pharaoh and many other buildings. Inside the pyramid, the architects placed a central chamber. A stone, usually granite, sarcophagus or coffin with the mummified body of the pharaoh is either here or in a shaft under the pyramid, as was done in the pyramid of Djoser. In it, as in the mastabas, the entire family of the king was buried. As can be seen in the diagram (see Appendix 1), initially a grandiose mastaba was built for the pharaoh, then several more steps were built and on top of the first they built an even more grandiose step pyramid with a height of 62 m and with base sides of 115 m and 125 m. The pharaoh himself was buried in a narrow chamber at a depth of 26 m.
Next to the pyramid of Djoser, there once stood the unfinished pyramid of his son Sekhemkhet, of which ruins now remain; the side of its base is 125 m. An alabaster sarcophagus was already found in it
Based on the above, the pyramids at Giza are not something extraordinary. They are an indicator of the power of the pharaohs of the Ancient Kingdom, who each time built monuments to themselves higher and higher into the sky.
GREAT PYRAMIDS AT GIZA
A few kilometers from Cairo is the main target of many historians-Egyptologists and my unassuming essay. The great pyramids have enormous value for history, for architecture, for all art. What is striking is not only their height, like high mountains in the middle of a dry sandy desert, but the simplicity and genius of their forms, not to mention their size, which eyewitnesses could not comprehend either with their eyes or with their minds. These majestic buildings stand on an artificially leveled site. The Giza pyramid complex consists of the Cheops pyramid, which has three satellite pyramids (built for the wives of the pharaoh), more than 100 mastabas are adjacent to the royal tomb on each side of the world. Next in height and size is the Pyramid of Khafre, which is initially only three meters lower than the Pyramid of Cheops. And the pyramid of Menkaure closes.
The complex is crowned by a monumental statue that protects the peace of sleep of the pharaohs: the Great (or large) Sphinx - a reclining lion with a human head. It was first described by the Roman historian Pliny. According to a number of historians, the Sphinx is the embodiment of a god and a lion with the face of Pharaoh Khafre, who guards his pyramid, but it is not yet known whether this statement can have a right to exist. The length of the statue from the front paws to the tail is 51 m, the height is 20 m, the face is 5 m high, and the width is 2 m. What can be said most accurately is that the Sphinx is the oldest monumental sculpture.
Of all the Egyptian pyramids, the most impressive is the tallest and grandest, the so-called “Great Pyramid” of Pharaoh Cheops near Giza. This necropolis took thirty years to build, of which the pyramids themselves took twenty years to build, as Herodotus writes. The architect of this complex was the architect Hemiun. Its height reaches 146.6 meters; in ancient times it was a little higher, but now its top has crumbled and weathered. 2,300 thousand blocks of stone were used for its construction, each weighing at least two and a half tons. And there are also blocks whose weight reaches thirty tons. The length of each side of the base is 233 meters, so it covers an area of more than five hectares.
Near the pyramid there are three pyramids of the wives of Cheops, (Hetepheres, Meritites and Henutsen) located to the east of the pyramid, as if in height. Each of them had funeral chapels and burial chambers with galleries, into which a steep shaft led.
There are also stone mastaba tombs that belonged to the Egyptian nobility: courtiers, officials, priests. The burial complex also included two mortuary temples, of which only the ruins of the upper temple have survived. The pyramid was surrounded by a grandiose stone fence
There are three chambers inside the Great Pyramid, built at different stages of construction. The first, at a depth of 30 m, is carved into the rock approximately in the middle of the pyramid. The second is 20 m above the base, it is what is called the “queen’s tomb.” These chambers were left unfinished. The completed third chamber became the king’s tomb, and it was in it that the sarcophagus was found. The royal refuge was built at a height of 42 m. The chamber itself is 6 m high, with a ceiling built above it, the blocks of which weigh 400 tons. Above the ceiling are five unloading chambers with a total height of 17 m, which are designed to transfer the load of tons of stone blocks from the tomb to the base of the pyramid. All cells contain rooms called "hallways" by V. Zamarovsky, which are connected by corridors or shafts, some of which lead to dead ends. The original entrance to the pyramid was located on the north side 25 m above the base, and now the entrance to the pyramid is located 15 m below. It was cut through by robbers.
The Great Gallery is as outstanding an architectural structure as the entire Cheops Pyramid. Its length is 47 m. Its walls are skillfully lined and form an angle of inclination of 26 degrees. Behind it is a burial chamber in which stands a sarcophagus carved from brown-gray granite without any signature.
Following Cheops, Khafre, the son or brother of Cheops, built a pyramid for himself. This pharaoh was sickly, so a more modest burial complex was initially built. It is “Urt-Khafra” (the ancient Egyptian name of the monument, meaning “Revered Khafra”). It is this pyramid that dominates the complex, as it is located on a hill and has a steeper slope. The height of this pyramid is 136.4 m, the sides of its base are 210 m, the angle of inclination is greater than that of the Cheops pyramid and is equal to 52 degrees. The complex of this pyramid included a mortuary temple, a companion pyramid for the pharaoh’s wife, and the Great Sphinx guarding the peace of this particular pharaoh. The blocks weigh on average 2 tons, and the temple has granite blocks weighing 45 tons.
The mortuary temple stood east of the pyramid. It contained 12 sculptures of the king and five chapels. Half a kilometer along the road stood the lower temple, to the north-west of which the Sphinx still guards the peace of the pharaohs. In its central hall there were 23 throne statues of the king. To the south of the pyramid there once stood a small satellite pyramid, where the pharaoh’s wife was probably buried, but its above-ground part was not preserved, and the underground part was plundered.
The internal structure of Khafre's pyramid is simple. There are two entrances on the north side: one at the base level, the second at a height of 15 m. The corridor from them leads to the burial chamber. It is hewn out of the rock, and only the arch rests on the stone mass of this monument. There is a granite sarcophagus there. There are no other buildings inside the pyramid.
The southernmost and lowest Pyramid of Menkaure, the son of Khafre, became the last great pyramid. The Egyptians called her "Divine Menkaure". The construction plan was changed three times. Height 66 m, sides of the base - 102 m and 104 m, angle of inclination - 51 degrees. During its construction, the largest stone blocks were used, but the pyramid began to be built from stone, and then switched to brick at the direction of the son of Mikerin, Pharaoh Shepseskaf.
Next to the pyramid there were two mortuary temples, the lower one was even later expanded and restored during the sixth dynasty. To the south of the royal pyramid there were three satellite pyramids, two of which were unfinished and stepped in shape. Each of them had a mortuary temple.
The entrance to the pyramid is located above the scar left by the Mamelukes. The burial chamber is relatively small, the ceiling is made up of two blocks, creating a kind of vault, and the layout of all the passages and rooms is quite complex. There was found a richly painted granite sarcophagus, now lost, which belongs to a later time - the Sais revival.
The next pharaoh Shepseskaf, the last pharaoh of the fourth dynasty, did not leave behind a pyramid, limiting himself to the construction of a large mastaba. Why this king did not build a pyramid is not known for certain, however, they continued to build smaller pyramids.
LATER PYRAMIDS
As was said, the Egyptian pharaohs continued to build pyramids to perpetuate their memory. These monuments are no longer as grandiose as those of Gizeh, but they also deserve attention, because they allow us to observe the fading stage of an entire era.
The first after the burial of Mikerin was the pyramid of King Userkaf, the founder of the fifth dynasty, which was built in the very center of the necropolis in Saqqara. It was built very carelessly, without proper processing of the stone blocks and is now a pile of stones. The original side of the base of the pyramid is 70 m, the height is 45 m, that is, this pyramid is smaller than any one built before it. The entrance, which had long been filled in, was located on the north side of the monument. The burial chamber is 10 m below the base. To the south of the pyramid there was a mortuary temple, to the west there were two companion pyramids, one of which belongs to the main wife of the pharaoh and has a height of 25 m, and the other with a height of 22 m performed a ritual function.
In Abusir there is a necropolis, built during the new economic rise of Egypt during the sixth dynasty. It included the pyramids of Sahur, Nnuser, Neferikara, the unfinished pyramid of Neferefre and the mastaba of the nobleman Ptahshepses. Each pyramid forms a complex. A detailed description of the Abusir necropolis will take a lot of time and space, so we will move on to a description of the technologies used in the construction of the great pyramids.
ancient egyptian monumental architectural funerary
4. TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE GREAT PYRAMIDS
In terms of technology and tools, the construction of the great pyramids dates back to the Eneolithic period - the Copper-Stone Age. At this time, the only metals present were gold and copper; by the end of the Old Kingdom era, bronze would appear.
The main building materials in the 5th-4th millennium BC. there were stems of marsh plants, wood and clay. Already in the first half of the 4th millennium, the ancient Egyptians learned to make mud bricks of the correct shape. At this time they had developed construction techniques
We will consider the technique of building great pyramids using the example of the ancient pyramid of Djoser, which was built according to the design of the talented architect Imhotep in Saqqara. It is on it that one can trace the development of Egyptian architecture, because the technologies begun during its construction during the construction of the following pyramids were only improved.
Several types of tools were used in the construction of the pyramids. To process the stone, they used diorite sledgehammers or hammers, adzes, copper hatchets and chisels with a one-sided blade. A sand saw was also used - a method of sawing with a metal blade (in our case, copper) through crushed quartz grains moistened with water. Wood was used to make handles for copper and stone tools used in the construction of pyramids, as well as in the work of lifting, lowering and installing large stone blocks and slabs as levers and beams for ropes. Raw brick has also found use.
The stone was transported to the construction site in unprocessed form using drags. Masons and stonemasons, previously engaged in the production of stone vessels, cut stone blocks first with sledgehammers made of hard stone (diorite and quartzite), then with copper chisels. The stone was laid in the same way as raw brick - in regular rows with alternating pokes and spoons. For loading and rigging work, large beams, rollers, levers, ropes, embankments made of unbaked bricks and drags were used, into which people were harnessed.
As the organization of work improved, the weight of the stone blocks increased. The blocks of Khafre's pyramid, when peak success was achieved, reached a mass of 150-180 tons with a volume of 50-60 m 3, and in the thickness of the lower temple of the complex of this pyramid a block weighing 500 tons with a volume of 170 m 3 was discovered.
The most time-consuming part of the construction was lifting the blocks onto the pyramids, which became higher each time. Herodotus wrote that the ancient Egyptians used wooden mechanisms for this, with the help of which the blocks were lifted from ledge to ledge. The second version was expressed by another ancient author, Diodorus Siculus, who argued that the Egyptians, who did not have machines, used a system of embankments to lift blocks.
The hypothesis of the German engineer Kroon became widespread. He argued that to ensure the lifting of the drags to the new stage, the masonry increased the height and length of the embankment, the width of the roadway, but also covered the slopes of the embankment with new layers of brick each time. Jean-Philippe Lauert improved this hypothesis. In his opinion, the bases of the embankment slopes were immediately given the maximum required width and later, as the embankment was increased, they were given the required height.
BURIAL RITE OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS
You can learn about the ancient Egyptian burial rites and their ideas about the afterlife from the Pyramid Texts, which give us an idea of their faith and the structure of the afterlife.
The main goal of the entire ancient Egyptian burial rite was the magical resurrection of the deceased, and the entire funerary cult was to maintain the deceased in a resurrected state.
Mummification occupied an important place in the burial ritual. This rite has been practiced since approximately 2400 BC. and up to the Hellenistic period. The whole process or ritual was described by Herodotus: “A possible amount of brain was removed through the nostrils with an iron hook; what remained after extraction was dissolved with special mixtures. Then, a narrow slit was made in the side... and all internal organs were removed. The abdominal cavity was thoroughly cleaned and washed... After This, the belly was filled with crushed myrrh, cassia and other aromatic substances, except incense. Then the incision was stitched up, and the body was covered with soda and left for 70 days, no more. When the storage period... came to an end, the body was washed and then shrouded from the feet up to the head in bandages, cut into shreds and moistened with rosin, which was usually used by the Egyptians as glue."
The entire burial ritual was accompanied by the reading of prayer texts from the Book of the Dead, which were supposed to help the deceased get into the afterlife. The pyramid texts, which provided a huge amount of information about the religion of the ancient Egyptians, consist entirely of mortuary tests.
Since ancient times, the Egyptians placed household items in burials: kitchen utensils, ceramics, stone vessels, other household items and food. Sarcophagi initially had a rectangular shape, and already during the New Kingdom - an anthropomorphic shape. The sarcophagi depicted scenes from the daily lives of the dead. During the Middle Kingdom, fewer and fewer household items began to be left in the tombs, and ritual objects appeared: ushabti figurines, scarabs and other magical items designed to protect the deceased from evil in the afterlife. In addition, there were funeral boats. The funeral boat found near the Cheops pyramid is the oldest ship in the world. It itself has been perfectly preserved and is now located in the pavilion near the pyramid. Its length is 36 m, and it is built of cedar.
CONCLUSION
Whole generations of Egyptologists began to explore the pyramids, and a huge number of scientific works were written. I believe that I was able to illuminate only a small part of this problem. Even in the history of the great pyramids there are blind spots; it is impossible to talk about the complete study of this complex.
The importance of the pharaohs and the abilities of science and technology of the ancient Egyptians made the construction of such structures possible. It’s hard to imagine, but even with the simplest copper, stone and wooden tools, representatives of this civilization were able to build pyramids that have stood for thousands of years, despite looting, war, sand and wind.
The technologies used in the construction of the great pyramids are simply amazing at the level of organization of work and at the same time do not give rise to conspiracy theories, because such grandiose monuments are brilliant in their simplicity.
The religion of the ancient Egyptians with its rituals and divine pantheon is very complex. And we are back to where we started. There is no doubt that the pyramid complex at Giza is the greatest architectural structure, construction of all time, which testified to the enormous depth of human thought even in those ancient times.
I believe that the purpose of this work has not been fully achieved, because within the framework of this format it is very difficult to talk about such complex and comprehensive things that the great pyramids are, not only from the point of view of architecture, but also as religious and funerary structures.
LIST OF SOURCES AND REFERENCES
1. Texts of the Pyramids
2. Texts of Sarcophagi
Herodotus "History"
Kink H.A. How the Egyptian pyramids were built - M.; "Science" 1967
Lauer J.F. Mysteries of the Egyptian pyramids - M.; "Science" 1966
Zamarovsky V. Their Majesties Pyramids, M.; "Science" 1986
Mathieu M.E. Pyramid Texts - funeral ritual (On the order of reading the Pyramid Texts) - M; "Bulletin of Ancient History" No. 4; 30 s. 1947
APPENDIX A
Pyramid of Djoser
Pyramid of Djoser in section
The Pyramid of Cheops
Schematic representation of the Cheops pyramid complex
Pyramid of Cheops in section
Great Sphinx
Pyramid of Menkaure
Pyramid of Khafre
1. Indicate the differences between the state and tribal organization of public life. List the characteristics of a state.
In a tribe, just like in a state, there is power, but it is based on authority. In a state, in addition to authority, the government also has a coercive apparatus, as a rule, including armed forces separated from the rest of society.
The characteristics of a state that distinguish it from pre-state societies include the following:
Division of society into the governed and the managers;
The presence of a management apparatus, designed in the form of special institutions;
The presence of an apparatus of coercion of the governed;
The presence of armed forces, formalized as a special institution;
Availability of judicial institutions;
Replacement of customs and traditions with laws.
2. In what regions of the world did the first state formations develop? How did climatic and natural conditions influence the formation of ancient states? Give examples.
The first states arose in the subtropics in the valleys of large rivers. These rivers once surrounded plains with a lot of game, so many tribes roamed there. Then the climate became increasingly arid, which drove people to the river itself, where the entire population of previously vast territories ended up. The threat of famine forced people to switch to agriculture and cattle breeding. But at the same time, the river valleys were not ideal for agriculture: a significant part of them remained swampy. To drain swamps, people developed irrigation systems. Gradually they began to be used in reverse for irrigating agricultural fields. Irrigation required the organization of labor of a large number of people and accurate calculations and knowledge. It was thanks to this that the first states based specifically on irrigation agriculture appeared. To understand the veracity of this theory, it is enough to remember where the most ancient civilizations arose: in the interfluves of the Tigris and Euphrates (Mesopotamian civilization), the Indus and the now dry Saraswati (the so-called Harappan civilization), the Yangtze and Yellow River (Ancient Chinese civilization), in the Nile Valley (Ancient Egyptian civilization ).
3. Why was an extreme form of social inequality (slavery) inherent in all ancient states? What was the situation of slaves in Ancient Egypt? Identify the sources of slavery.
All ancient civilizations had similar farming conditions (irrigated agriculture), therefore the same phenomenon became widespread in all of them - patriarchal slavery. In all of these civilizations, including Ancient Egypt, slaves were considered part of a large family group (patriarchal household) and often performed the same jobs as free family members. Prisoners of war, or debtors who failed to pay on time (or the children of such debtors) became such slaves.
5. Think about why the rulers of eastern states were proclaimed living gods. What place did priests occupy in the social hierarchy? Why was the construction of pyramids and other funeral rites given great importance in Ancient Egypt?
When a person took up farming, he encountered new problems unknown to himself. Previously, only a long series of unsuccessful hunts could lead to famine, but a farmer's harvest can be destroyed by one brief event, such as a flood. The attitude towards many natural phenomena has changed. The hunter could simply move away from many of them to more favorable places, but the farmer was tied to his field, so many things really became a disaster. Based on all this, ideas have developed about omnipotent, formidable deities who must be prayed for mercy, who must be served in order to earn this mercy.
New religious systems gave new answers to the main question of human existence - the existence of his soul after earthly life. Ancient Egyptian ideas required such structures as pyramids, mortuary temples, etc. for these purposes.
The priests, on the one hand, were intermediaries between people and these terrible all-powerful gods, they helped to earn mercy. But at the same time, the priests also accumulated practical knowledge; it was they who organized irrigation work that required precise calculations.
The prosperity of ancient civilizations depended on high yields, which were obtained thanks to irrigation agriculture. In order for irrigation systems to work harmoniously, a unified leadership was required, a strong authority, which ideally no one should contradict. That is why the ruler was considered one of those terrible gods - so that he had absolute power, which no one dared to contradict.
6. Tell us about the cultural achievements of Ancient Egypt.
The ancient Egyptians are known primarily for their architecture, especially associated with the cult of the dead. The great pyramids, rock-cut tombs, and mortuary temples still amaze the imagination, even though they have not reached us in their original form.
Also, their writing systems (hieroglyphic and hieratic), medicine, etc. played a big role in the history of mankind.
It is usually divided into three periods. In the IV-II millennia BC. The first state formations arise (the period of the early Ancient World). At the end of the 2nd-1st millennia BC. The period of flourishing of ancient states begins. In the first half of the 1st millennium BC. These states are entering a period of decline (the period of late antiquity), the role of new states that arose on the periphery of the Ancient World - ancient Greece and Ancient Rome - is increasing.
Prerequisites for the emergence of the state
In the Neolithic era, all the main issues of the life of the tribe were resolved directly by its members. When disputes arose, a solution was found on the basis of tradition and custom. The opinion of elders who had extensive experience was especially respected. In clashes with other tribes, all men, and sometimes women, took up arms. The role of leaders and sorcerers, as a rule, was limited. Their power extended over a narrow range of issues and was based on the power of authority, not coercion.
The emergence of the state meant that the rights to make and execute decisions were transferred to those specially created for this purpose. Customs and traditions are replaced by law, the enforcement of which is ensured by armed force. Conviction is supplemented or even replaced by coercion. Society is divided along a new basis - into the governed and the managers. A new group of people is emerging - officials, judges, military personnel, personifying power and acting on its behalf.
The material foundations for the creation of the state were laid with the transition to metal processing. This increased labor productivity and provided a sufficient surplus of products to support the apparatus of power and coercion.
There are various explanations for the reasons for the emergence of the state. Among them, the following stand out: the interest of the wealthy tribal elite in strengthening their power and protecting wealth from their poor fellow tribesmen; the need to keep the subjugated in obedience tribes, enslaved; the needs of organizing large-scale general works for irrigation and protection from nomadic tribes.
The question of which of these reasons was the main one must be considered in relation to specific situations. It is also important to take into account that early states developed, and over time they acquired new functions.
The first state formations arose in the subtropics, in the valleys of such rivers as the Nile, Tigris and Euphrates, Indus, and Yellow River.
The abundance of moisture and exceptional soil fertility, combined with a warm climate, made it possible to obtain several rich harvests per year. At the same time, in the lower reaches of the rivers, swamps encroached on the fields; upstream, the fertile lands were swallowed up by the desert. All this required large-scale irrigation works, the construction of dams and canals. The first states arose on the basis of tribal unions that needed a clear organization of the labor of the masses of people. The largest settlements became centers not only of crafts, trade, but also administrative management.
Irrigation work in the upper reaches of rivers influenced the conditions of agriculture downstream, and fertile land became valuable. As a result, a fierce struggle developed between the first states for control over the entire course of the river. In the 4th millennium BC. In the Nile Valley, two large kingdoms emerged - Lower and Upper Egypt. In 3118 BC. Upper Egypt was conquered by Lower Egypt, the capital of the New state became the city of Memphis, the leader of the conquerors Men (Mina) became the founder of the 1st dynasty of pharaohs (kings) of Egypt.
In Mesopotamia, between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers (it is sometimes also called Mesopotamia), where related tribes of the Sumerians lived, several cities laid claim to supremacy (Akkad, Umma, Lagash, Um, Eridu, etc.). A centralized state emerged here in the 24th century BC. The king of the city of Akkad Sargon (reigned 2316-2261 BC), the first in Mesopotamia to create a standing army, united it under his rule and created a dynasty that reigned for a century and a half.
At the turn of 111 - 11 millennia BC. The first state formations arise in India, China, and Palestine. Phoenicia(located in what is now Lebanon) became the main center of Mediterranean trade.
Slavery and social relations in ancient states
In conditions of the tribal system, prisoners were either killed or left in the family community, where they worked together with everyone else as junior members of the family. Such slavery was called patriarchal. It was widespread, but did not have much significance for the life of the tribes.
With the emergence of the first states waging constant wars with each other, the number of prisoners increased significantly. Thus, during one of the wars between Upper Egypt and Nizhny, 120 thousand people were captured and enslaved. Slaves became the property of central and local authorities, nobility, temples, and artisans. The use of their labor became of great importance for irrigation work and the construction of palaces and pyramids. Slaves became a commodity, a “talking instrument” that was bought and sold. At the same time, slaves with skills in crafts, writing, and young women were valued higher. Campaigns to neighboring countries to capture new prisoners became regular. For example, the Egyptians repeatedly invaded Ethiopia, Libya, Palestine, Syria.
The conquered lands became the property of the temples, the pharaoh, and were distributed to their associates. Their inhabitants were either enslaved or remained formally free, but were deprived of their property. They were called hemu. They depended on the will of the pharaoh's officials, who sent them to public works, to workshops, or allocated them land.
The continued communal land tenure played a major economic role. The influence of consanguinity on ensuring the unity of the community gradually decreased. More important was the joint use of land and the fulfillment of common duties (paying taxes, serving in the pharaoh's troops during campaigns, performing irrigation and other work).
Belonging to a community gave certain privileges. The communal self-government left over from the times of the tribal system was preserved. Members of the community enjoyed her protection, and she was collectively responsible for the offenses they committed.
The highest power in Ancient Egypt belonged to the pharaoh, who was considered a living god, his will was the absolute law for his subjects. He owned a significant part of the lands and slaves. The pharaoh's governors were most often his relatives. They ruled the provinces and at the same time, owning the lands granted or belonging to them, were large owners. This gave Egyptian despotism a patriarchal character.
In Egypt there were strong traditions of matriarchy. Initially, the right to the throne was transmitted through the female line, and many pharaohs were forced to marry their own or cousins in order for their power to be recognized as legitimate.
A large role in the society of the Ancient One Egypt played by officials who collected taxes, directly managed the property of the pharaoh and his entourage, and were responsible for construction.
The priests enjoyed significant influence. They monitored the weather, solar and lunar eclipses, and the Axis considered their blessing necessary for any undertaking. In Ancient Egypt, special importance was attached to funeral rituals, which also ensured special respect for the priests. They were not only ministers of cults, but also keepers of knowledge. The construction of the pyramids, as well as the implementation of irrigation work, and calculations of the time of the Nile floods required rather complex mathematical calculations.
Social relations were of approximately the same nature in Ancient Mesopotamia, where kings were deified, and temples played a special role in the life of the state.
Culture and Beliefs in Ancient Egypt
The culture of Ancient Egypt gained the greatest fame thanks to the tombs of the pharaohs - the pyramids. Scientists believe that their construction began in the 22nd century BC. under Pharaoh Djoser.
The largest of the pyramids, Cheops, was considered in ancient times one of the wonders of the world. Its height is 146.6 m, the width of each side is 230 m, the total weight of the stone blocks from which the pyramid is built is about 5 million, 750 thousand tons. Inside the pyramids there was a complex system of passages leading to the tomb of the pharaoh. After his death, the body was embalmed, decorated with gold, silver, precious stones and placed in a sarcophagus in the burial chamber. It was believed that after death the soul of the pharaoh continues to live with the gods.
The pyramids are so large that even in the 20th century it seemed unthinkable to many that they could have been built by the ancient inhabitants of Egypt. Hypotheses about aliens were born, assumptions were made that the pyramids were built in modern times, and the entire chronology of the ancient world was erroneous. Meanwhile, given that each pyramid took two to three decades to build (work on it began with the accession of the new pharaoh and should have been completed by the time of his death), and the builders had all the resources of a fairly large state at their disposal, the creation of pyramids does not seem impossible.
The gigantic size of the pyramids, impressive even to people of the 21st century, overwhelmed contemporaries with their grandeur and scale; they served as a clear demonstration of the limitlessness of the power of the pharaohs. In the eyes of farmers and captive slaves, those by whose will such colossuses were erected must really have been akin to gods.
According to the beliefs of the Egyptians, a person consisted of a body (Het), a soul (Ba), a shadow (Khaybet), a name (Ren) and an invisible double (Ka). It was believed that if the soul after death goes to the afterlife, then it remains on earth and moves into the mummy of the deceased or his statue, continuing to lead a semblance of life and needing nutrition (sacrifices). With insufficient attention to him, how could he come out of the burial place and begin to wander among the living, causing them torment and bringing illness. Fear of the dead determined special attention to funeral rituals.
Belief in an afterlife was also reflected in the religious views of the ancient Egyptians. They believed in the existence of gods who personified various forces of nature, the main one being the sun god Ra. However, Osiris was the favorite god, who, according to Egyptian mythology, taught people agriculture, ore processing, and baking. The evil god of the desert Set, according to legend, destroyed Osiris, but he was resurrected and became the king of the underworld.
Separate temples were dedicated to each of the gods, and, depending on the upcoming affairs, they needed to offer a prayer and make a sacrifice. In addition, along with the gods who were revered throughout Egypt, individual provinces maintained their own local beliefs.
In the 14th century BC. under Pharaoh Amenhotep IV (Akhenaton), an attempt was made to reform cults and establish faith in a single god, but it met resistance from the priests and ended in failure.
Literacy was widespread, and the Egyptians used a hieroglyphic writing system (using separate characters to write each word).
The hieroglyphs of the ancient Egyptians are preserved on the walls of temples, tombs, obelisks, statues, papyri (paper scrolls made from reeds), buried in tombs. For a long time it was believed that the secret of this writing was lost. However, in 1799, near the city of Rosetta, a slab was found, where, next to the inscription in hieroglyphs, its translation in Greek was given.
The French scientist J. Champollion (1790-....1832) was able to understand the meaning of hieroglyphs, which gave the key to reading other inscriptions.
Medicine has achieved significant development in Egypt. Medicines of plant and animal origin and cosmetics were widely used. Knowledge was accumulated in the field of surgery and dentistry.
Navigation technology began to develop, although it was inferior to the Phoenician. The Egyptians knew how to build ships up to 50 m long, which were sailed and oared. They sailed not only along the Nile, but also on the sea, although due to the poor development of navigation they did not move far from the shore.
Questions and tasks
1. Indicate the differences between state power and tribal structure. List the signs of a state.
2. In what regions of the world did the first state formations take shape? How did climatic and natural conditions influence the formation of ancient states? Give examples.
3. Why was the extreme form of social inequality (slavery) inherent in all ancient states? What was the situation of slaves in Ancient Egypt? Identify the sources of slavery.
4. Think about why the rulers of the eastern states were proclaimed living gods. What place did priests occupy in the social hierarchy? Why was the construction of pyramids and other funeral rites given great importance in Ancient Egypt?
5. Tell us about the cultural achievements of Ancient Egypt.
Zaladin N.V., Simonia N.A. , Story. History of Russia and the world from ancient times to the end of the 19th century: Textbook for the 10th grade of educational institutions. - 8th ed. - M.: LLC TID Russian Word - RS., 2008.