In the 2018-2019 academic year, 9th grade graduates in all regions of the Russian Federation will be examined in 5 subjects, of which two will be compulsory (Russian language and mathematics), and the choice of the remaining three will be given to the students themselves and their parents.
In 2018, literature was in last place among the optional subjects of the OGE, because only 3% of ninth-graders decided to take this subject. Today, as the moment of choosing subjects for graduates of 2019 approaches, many children and parents have a question: is it worth taking the OGE in literature in 9th grade and, if so, is it difficult to prepare for it? Let's try to understand the intricacies of the subject, the features of CMMs and the secrets of preparing for this exam.
the date of the
Students who will graduate from 9th grade in 2019 will take the OGE at the end of the school year. But, as in previous seasons, students will be given the opportunity to take the test early, or try again if they fail to pass the minimum threshold the first time.
The following days are reserved for the literature exam in 9th grade:
Early period |
|
Main day | Reserve day |
Main period |
|
Main day | Reserve days 28.06.19 / 02.07.19 / 03.07.19 |
Autumn retake |
|
1 retake | 2 retake 19.09.19 / 21.09.19 |
Format and features of the literature exam
Literature will be chosen as one of the 2019 OGE exams by students who want to continue their studies in philological classes, because to successfully pass the test it is necessary:
- know the biographies of writers and poets;
- thoroughly study the works included in the school curriculum;
- be able to analyze and compare texts, draw up portraits of heroes, evaluate their actions;
- express your own opinion beautifully, concisely and competently.
The main feature of the OGE in literature from other exams taken by ninth-graders in 2019 is the fact that the ticket contains no tests with answers. The 2019 exam paper will consist of 2 parts:
Ninth-graders undergo final certification at their school.
Examinees are given 235 minutes (3 hours 55 minutes) to complete the work.
Part 1 (text analysis)
Before you begin completing the tasks of Part 1, you need to familiarize yourself with the two proposed options and choose for analysis only one, the closest and most understandable.
Important! You cannot do both options at once.
The length of the detailed answer should be approximately:
Do not use overly complex speech structures. Let the text be concise, but at the same time readable and filled with deep meaning.
Part 2 (essay)
Most of all, graduates, accustomed to simply answering tests during tests in various subjects, are afraid of the essay, which is an integral part of the 2019 OGE in literature.
In fact, the majority of graduates completing 9th grade pass the second part of the OGE in literature without any problems, and in 2019, examinees also have nothing to fear. It is also worth knowing that:
- in the process of writing an essay, it is allowed to use the full text of the work of art;
- The length of the essay must be 200 words (works of less than 150 words are not assessed);
- your judgments must be argued using fragments from the text;
- When analyzing a work, it is important not to distort the author’s position.
Work evaluation
The OGE 2019 works on literature do not contain a test part, and therefore are fully assessed by independent experts. To determine the final score, each work will be checked by two teachers. As a result, the following scenarios are possible:
- The assessments agreed - everything was excellent, the score was determined and it was entered into the documentation.
- In the assessments of two experts there is a difference not exceeding 2 points - the arithmetic average is given.
- Expert assessments differ by more than 2 points - a third specialist is involved, whose opinion will be decisive.
The grade received by a ninth-grader on the OGE in literature in 2019 will affect the certificate score. When converting test scores for a given subject into grades, a special correspondence table is used:
Thus, if the preparation for the OGE in literature in 2019 was weak, and the graduate’s goal was to overcome the minimum passing threshold, then it will be enough for him to get only 7 test points. If the subject was chosen for the purpose of entering a specialized class or college, you will need to score at least 15 test points, which already corresponds to a grade of “4”.
Since the OGE in literature has its own specific specifics, graduates of 2019 need to start preparing for the exam as early as possible, because they will need to read a fairly large amount of literature (the list of works is given below) and work on the main topics of the essays.
Where to begin?
Step 1. Familiarize yourself with the requirements for the examination paper by familiarizing yourself with the codifier and specifications.
Step 2. We read the works given in the list. Naturally, it is better to read the full text in the original, but if there is no time for this, then it is worth reading the abridged version and criticism, which can be found in special collections or on the Internet.
We bring to your attention a complete list of literature for the 2019 OGE in literature with questions that need to be answered while reading the work.
Step 3. Taking notes. You should not rely on the capabilities of human memory; unfortunately, they are not limitless. While reading, take the time to write down in your notebook the basic information you will need to answer questions and write essays.
Step 4. Let's practice completing the tasks of the first part. The demo version of the OGE in literature 2019 will help with this, as well as the tickets that were offered at the exams to graduates of the 2018-2018 academic year.
Step 5. We practice writing an essay, observing the basic requirements for the text.
It would be a good idea to listen to the advice of experienced teachers, read the analysis of the demo version and recommendations for writing an essay. We invite you to watch one of these video tutorials right now:
Tasks 1.1.3, 1.2.3 and criteria for their verification and
assessments
The last task of part 1 (1.1.3 or 1.2.3) is a task of an increased level of complexity and requires writing, based on the texts given in the work, a detailed coherent answer of 5–8 sentences (the indication of volume is conditional).
The task involves comparing two texts (fragments of texts) in the specified direction, independently extracting information from the material proposed for comparison, finding grounds for constructing a comparative analysis within the framework of the angle specified in the task.
Before completing this task, you must carefully read the text proposed for comparison and understand its connection with the main text. Task 1.1.3 (1.2.3) aims the examinee at transformative reproduction or some interpretation of the information contained in the texts.
Completion of task 1.1.3 (1.2.3) is assessed according to the following universal generalized criteria, independent of the content of specific texts.
Criteria for checking and assessing the completion of comparative tasks 1.1.3 and 1.2.3, requiring writing a coherent answer of 5–8 sentences
The indication of volume is conditional; the assessment of the answer depends on its content (if the examinee has deep knowledge, he can answer in a larger volume; with the ability to accurately formulate his thoughts, the examinee can answer quite fully in a smaller volume). If, when checking the task of the specified group, the expert gives 0 points according to the first criterion, the task is considered unfulfilled and is not assessed according to other criteria (0 points are given in the answer verification protocol).
Criteria | Points |
1. The ability to compare works of art | |
a) the examinee compares texts in the direction specified in the task analysis, knows how to build a comparative characteristic | |
b) the examinee compares texts in the direction specified in the task analysis, but allows violations in the construction of comparative characteristics | |
c) the examinee, when comparing texts, does not follow what is specified in the task direction of analysis; and (or) does not demonstrate the ability to build a comparative characteristic | |
2. The depth of the judgments made and the persuasiveness of the arguments | |
a) the examinee gives a direct, coherent answer to the question, based on the author’s position (when analyzing poems, taking into account the author’s intention), if necessary, formulates his point of view, argues his points, confirms his thoughts with text, without replacing analysis with retelling of the text; There are no factual errors or inaccuracies | |
b) the examinee understands the essence of the question, But does not give a direct answer to it; and (or) is limited to expressing his point of view; and/or does not provide arguments for all theses; and (or) partly replaces analysis with a retelling of the text; and/or makes 1–2 factual errors | |
c) the examinee fails to cope with the task: does not answer the question; and (or) replaces analysis with a retelling of the text; and (or) makes more than 2 factual errors | |
3. Following speech norms | |
a) no more than 2 speech errors were made; | |
b) more than 2 speech errors were made | |
Maximum score |
Thus, the graduate must be able to:
1. Compare texts byin the direction indicated in the task analysis.
2. Build a comparative characteristic.
3. Know the content and problems of the work as a whole (or the features of the poet’s work).
4. Understand the problems of the text proposed for comparison.
5. Provide meaningful justification for comparison.
6. Make convincing arguments.
8. Formulate your own well-founded position (if the specifics of a particular task require it).
9. Do not replace reasoning with a retelling of the text.
10. Master theoretical and literary concepts.
11. Formulate the answer in accordance with speech norms.
Examples of wording for task 1.2.3.
- Compare the poem “The Sea” by V.A. Zhukovsky with the poem below by F.I. Tyutchev "Sea and Cliff". How is it different?sea imagein these works?
- Compare the poem by A.S. Pushkin “To the Sea” with a poem by A.N. Apukhtin “Farewell to the Village”, given below. In both works it sounds theme of farewell. What is the difference between these goodbyes?
- Compare the poem by M.Yu. Lermontov “No, it’s not you I love so passionately...” with the poem below by A.K. Tolstoy “With a gun over his shoulders, alone, in the moonlight...”. WhichI bring motifs and images closer togethert these poems?
- Compare the poem by A.S. Pushkin “To Chaadaev” with a poem by M.Yu. Lermontov "Farewell, unwashed Russia...". What do you seedifferences in the mood of lyrical charactersthese works?
- Compare the fable of I.A. Krylov “Donkey and Nightingale” with the poem below by A.S. Pushkin "The Poet and the Crowd". Whichissues uniteboth works?
- Compare the poem by V.A. Zhukovsky “The Inexpressible” with a poem by F.I. Tyutchev "Silentium". Which ideas bring people together these poems?
- Compare the poems of M.Yu. Lermontov “Death of the Poet” and F.I. Tyutchev “January 29, 1837”, dedicated to the death of A.S. Pushkin. Howconceptualization differstwo poets of the essence of the tragedy that happened?
Basic theoretical and literary concepts:
topic, problem, idea, comprehension, presentation of the author; motive, image; lyrical hero, state of mind of the lyrical hero, mood of the lyrical hero.
Work algorithm
- Read the assignment carefully.
- Highlight the main words in the formulation.
- Remember the literary concepts that are required to complete the assignment.
- Find reasons for comparison in the texts.
- Construct a comparative characteristic.
Example.
Compare the poem by M.Yu. Lermontov “The Poet” with the poem below by F.I. Tyutchev "Poetry". How do authors’ ideas about the purpose of a poet and poetry differ?
Codifier of content elements and requirements for the level of training of students for the main state exam in LITERATURE.
The codifier of content elements and requirements for the level of training of students for the main state exam in literature (hereinafter referred to as the codifier) is one of the documents that determines the structure and content of the OGE KIM. (hereinafter referred to as KIM). The codifier is a systematic list of requirements for the level of training of graduates and tested content elements, in which each object corresponds to a specific code. The codifier is compiled on the basis of the standard of basic general education in literature (order of the Ministry of Education of Russia dated 03/05/2004 No. 1089 “On approval of the Federal component of state standards of primary general, basic general and secondary (complete) general education”).
Demonstration version of control measuring materials for conducting the main state exam in LITERATURE in 2019.
When reviewing the 2019 demo version, please be aware that the tasks included in the demo version do not reflect all content elements that will be tested using the CMM options in 2019. A complete list of controlled content elements is provided in the Content Elements and Requirements Codifier to the level of preparation of students for the main state exam, posted on the website: www.fipi.ru.
The demo version is intended to enable any exam participant and the general public to get an idea of the structure of the future examination paper, the number and form of tasks, as well as their level of difficulty. The demo version also provides criteria for checking and assessing the completion of tasks with a detailed answer.
This information gives graduates the opportunity to develop a strategy for preparing for the literature exam in 2019.
Download and read OGE 2019, Literature, grade 9, Demo version
Specification of control measuring materials for the main state exam in LITERATURE in 2019.
The purpose of the examination work is to assess the level of general education training in literature of graduates of IX grades of general education organizations for the purpose of state final certification of graduates. The exam results can be used when admitting students to specialized classes in secondary schools.
The OGE is carried out in accordance with the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ “On Education in the Russian Federation”.
The examination paper is compiled in accordance with the Federal component of the state standard of basic general education in literature (Order of the Ministry of Education of Russia dated March 5, 2004 No. 1089).
Download and read OGE 2019, Literature, 9th grade, Specification, Codifier, Project
The codifier is a systematic list of requirements for the level of training of graduates and tested content elements, in which each object corresponds to a specific code. The codifier is compiled on the basis of the standard of basic general education in literature (order of the Ministry of Education of Russia dated 03/05/2004 No. 1089 “On approval of the Federal component of state standards of primary general, basic general and secondary (complete) general education”).
A text fragment (or a poem, or a fable) is accompanied by a system of written tasks (three tasks for each option) aimed at analyzing the problems of a work of art and the main means of revealing the author's idea. Each of the first two tasks requires a written response of approximately 3–5 sentences and is worth a maximum of 3 points.
The third task (1.1.3 or 1.2.3) involves not only thinking about the proposed text, but also comparing it with another work or fragment, the text of which is also given in the examination paper (approximate volume - 5-8 sentences).
Part 2 of the examination paper contains four essay topics that require extensive written argumentation. The examinee chooses one of four topics proposed to him (the student is asked to spend 115 minutes to create an essay). In an essay on lyrics, the examinee must analyze at least two poems (their number can be increased at the discretion of the examinee). Examinees are recommended to have a volume of at least 200 words (if the essay contains less than 150 words, then such work is considered incomplete).
The essay is assessed with a maximum of 12 points.
Scale for converting points to grades:
"2"– from 0 to 6
"3"– from 7 to 13
"4"– from 14 to 18
"5"– from 19 to 23
System for assessing the performance of individual tasks and the examination work as a whole
The assessment of the completion of the examination work tasks is carried out on the basis of special criteria developed for the three specified types of tasks that require a detailed answer in different volumes.
For completing each of the two tasks of a basic level of complexity (1.1.1, 1.1.2; 1.2.1, 1.2.2), the examinee can receive a maximum of 3 points (2 points for the content criterion and 1 point for the verbal format of the answer).
Completion of a task of an increased level of complexity (1.1.3 or 1.2.3) is assessed according to three criteria: “The ability to compare works of art”; “The depth of the judgments made and the persuasiveness of the arguments”; “Following speech norms.” The first criterion is the main one: if the expert gives 0 points on it, the task is considered unfulfilled and is not assessed according to other criteria (0 points are given in the answer verification protocol). The examinee can receive a maximum of 5 points for completing task 1.1.3 or 1.2.3.
Completion of the task in Part 2 (essay) is assessed according to five criteria: “The depth of disclosure of the topic of the essay and the persuasiveness of judgments” (maximum – 3 points); “Level of mastery of theoretical and literary concepts” (maximum – 2 points); “The validity of using the text of the work” (maximum – 2 points); “Compositional integrity and consistency of presentation” (maximum – 2 points); “Following speech norms” (maximum – 3 points). Thus, the examinee can receive a maximum of 12 points for the essay. The first criterion is the main one: if the expert gives 0 points on it, the task is considered unfulfilled and is not assessed according to other criteria (0 points are given in the answer verification protocol). When evaluating an essay, its length is also taken into account. A minimum length of 200 words is recommended for examinees. If the essay contains less than 150 words (the word count includes all words, including function words), then such work is considered incomplete and is scored 0 points.
235 minutes are allotted to complete the examination work.
In 2018, the first part of the OGE in literature will remain unchanged. Graduates choose one of two options and write detailed answers to assignments based on the text. Volume – 5–8 sentences.
Below you have two options for a detailed answer for the three tasks of part one as an example of answers to the first three tasks of the OGE in literature. Topics concern Gogol’s “Dead Souls” and Tyutchev’s poem “There is in the primordial autumn...”.
Open the demo version of the OGE in Literature 2017 and read the tasks and text for it.
Let's look at option 1
Task 1.1.1
What properties of Chichikov’s nature manifested themselves in his internal monologue?
Answer to task 1.1.1
Internal monologue is one of the means that Gogol resorts to to characterize his character. In this fragment, such traits of Chichikov as prudence, attentiveness and coldness are revealed to the reader: “But our hero was already middle-aged and of a prudently cool character.” Emotional impulses and recklessness in behavior are alien to him. Chichikov is a typical cynic, subordinating his impulses to reason, which makes him think first and then act. The same traits of the hero can be found in chapter 4, where the hero’s nature is revealed through a conversation with Nozdryov.
Task 1.1.2
Answer to task 1.1.2
The mention of a twenty-year-old boy is given to indicate the contrast between the behavior of the young man and the behavior demonstrated by Chichikov. At twenty years old, young men are still a little naive, impressionable and ready for rash actions, “forgetting themselves, and service, and the world, and everything that is in the world.” Their behavior is guided by strong emotional impulses, and the mind always gives way to the heart. This behavior completely contradicts the prudence of the “middle-aged” Chichikov.
Task 1.1.3.
Compare fragments of the poem by N.V. Gogol's "Dead Souls" and the comedy of D.I. Fonvizin "Undergrowth". In what ways is Skotinin similar to Chichikov, who thought about the “young stranger”?
Excerpt of text from task 1.1.3
Skotinin. Why can't I see my bride? Where is she? There will be an agreement in the evening, so isn’t it time to tell her that they are marrying her off?
Mrs. Prostakova. We'll make it, brother. If we tell her this ahead of time, she may still think that we are reporting to her. Although by marriage, however, I am related to her; and I love that strangers listen to me.
Prostakov (to Skotinin). To tell the truth, we treated Sophia like an orphan. After her father she remained a baby. About six months ago, her mother, and my in-law, had a stroke...
Mrs. Prostakova (shows as if she is baptizing her heart). The power of the god is with us.
Prostakov. From which she went to the next world. Her uncle, Mr. Starodum, went to Siberia; and since there has been no rumor or news of him for several years now, we consider him dead. We, seeing that she was left alone, took her to our village and look after her estate as if it were our own.
Mrs. Prostakova. Why are you so spoiled today, my father? My brother might also think that we took her in for fun.
Prostakov. Well, mother, how should he think about this? After all, we can’t move Sofyushkino’s real estate estate to ourselves.
Skotinin. And although the movable has been put forward, I am not a petitioner. I don’t like to bother, and I’m afraid. No matter how much my neighbors offended me, no matter how much loss they caused, I did not attack anyone, and any loss, rather than going after it, I would rip off from my own peasants, and the ends would go to waste.
Prostakov. It’s true, brother: the whole neighborhood says that you are a master at collecting rent.
Mrs. Prostakova. If only you could teach us, brother father; but we just can’t do it. Since we took away everything the peasants had, we can’t take anything back. Such a disaster!
Skotinin. Please, sister, I will teach you, I will teach you, just marry me to Sophia.
Mrs. Prostakova. Did you really like this girl that much?
Skotinin. No, it's not the girl I like.
Prostakov. So next door to her village?
Skotinin. And not the villages, but the fact that it is found in the villages and what my mortal desire is.
Mrs. Prostakova. Until what, brother?
Skotinin. I love pigs, sister, and in our neighborhood there are such large pigs that there is not a single one of them that, standing on its hind legs, would not be taller than each of us by a whole head.
(D.I. Fonvizin. “Undergrowth”)
Answer to task 1.1.3
Chichikov and Skotinin have a number of common traits, such as prudence, selfishness, and lack of romantic impulse. Chichikov is a typical “acquirer”, in whom Gogol saw the new evil of Russia: quiet, diligent, but enterprising. He cares only about his own benefit, and only “two thousand two hundred dowry” can make a young girl a “tidbit” in his eyes. The landowner Skotinin's main characteristic is already contained in his last name. He is also concerned about his own benefit, but it does not even find expression in money. After all, the main passion of this hero is pigs. He wants to marry Sophia, but only because his favorites are found in her village. Both Chichikov’s cold prudence and Skotinin’s selfish ignorance are similar in their lack of interest in everything that does not directly lead to the satisfaction of their self-interest.
Let's look at option 2
Task 1.2.1
What mood is imbued with the poem “In the original autumn...”?
Answer to task 1.2.1
Tyutchev's poem creates a mood of peace and solemnity. To do this, the poet uses expressive epithets: “in the original autumn”, “wonderful time”, “pure and warm azure”, etc. The feeling of understatement and languor in the poem is given by frequently occurring ellipses, which symbolize that the time of violent emotions has ended with the summer. Autumn is a time of leisurely reflection and relaxation.
Task 1.2.2.
What role do epithets play in the poem “There is in the original autumn...”?
Answer to task 1.2.2.
Epithets are especially important when describing nature. After all, they allow not just to describe objects, but to convey the author’s attitude to what he writes about. Even the most ordinary words, used as epithets, can create vivid images. “A vigorous sickle”, “a web of thin hair”, “a short time”, “on an idle furrow”, “a crystal day” - all these combinations create the mood of the poem, conveying Tyutchev’s feelings caused by early autumn.
Task 1.2.3
How do the autumn pictures created in the poems of F.I. differ? Tyutchev “There is in the original autumn...” and N.A. Nekrasov "Before the Rain"?
Excerpt of a poem for task 1.2.3
BEFORE THE RAIN
The mournful wind drives
I'm flocking clouds to the edge of heaven,
The broken spruce groans,
The dark forest whispers dully.
To a stream, pockmarked and motley,
A leaf flies after a leaf,
And a dry and sharp stream
It's getting cold.
Twilight falls over everything;
Hitting from all sides,
Spinning in the air screaming
A flock of jackdaws and crows.
Over the passing tarataika
The top is down, the front is closed;
And went!" - standing up with a whip,
The gendarme shouts to the driver...
(N.A. Nekrasov. 1846)
Answer to task 1.2.3.
Tyutchev’s poem describes early autumn, which the author himself calls “a wonderful time.” The work is permeated with peace and admiration for the beauty of nature. This is the moment when both the earth and people rest: “Where the cheerful sickle walked and the ear fell // Now everything is empty - space is everywhere...”. Autumn is represented as a beautiful, solemn time, when the cold weather is still far away and you can indulge in thoughts and gentle sadness. Nekrasov presents a completely different autumn: it is unfriendly and unmerciful to the traveler. “Clean and warm azure” gives way to “a mournful wind,” and “radiant evenings” to “a twilight falling over everything.” The autumn described by Nekrasov evokes a mood of anxiety and sadness. Two poems personify two opposing pictures of autumn, familiar to everyone.