Every graduate who wants to become a student at one of the Russian universities in 2018 faces the difficult task of successfully passing the Unified State Exam, as well as choosing the right educational institution and faculty for submitting documents. Most 11th graders and their parents are faced with the final exam grading system for the first time and often find it difficult to find answers to the questions that arise. Therefore, we decided to shed light on important points.
In 2017-2018, the basic rules for passing the Unified State Exam will not be significantly changed. This means that the 100-point assessment system for final tests will still be relevant for graduates.
How is everything going?
During the verification of examination papers, for each correctly completed task, the graduate is given so-called “primary points”, which upon completion of the verification of the work are summed up and converted into a “test score”, which is indicated in the Unified State Examination certificate.
Important! Since 2009, the scale for converting the primary and test scores of the Unified State Exam into the traditional five-point grades for schools has not been officially used, because in 2017 and 2018 the final exams are not included in the certificate.
Work verification is performed in two ways:
- automatically (using special programs and technical means);
- manually (the correctness of detailed answers is checked by two independent experts).
It is quite difficult to challenge the result of an automatic check. If the basic rules were not followed when filling out the answer table, the computer may not protect the result, and only the graduate himself will be to blame for this, for not following a number of mandatory rules.
If controversial issues arise during the expert review, a third specialist is involved, whose opinion will be decisive.
When can I expect results?
The following time frames apply by law:
- data processing (for compulsory subjects) in the RCIO should not last longer than 6 calendar days;
- RCIO is given 4 days to process data (elective subjects);
- verification at the Federal Testing Center should take no more than 5 working days;
- approval of results by the State Examination Commission - 1 more day;
- up to 3 days for distribution of results to Unified State Exam participants.
In practice, from the moment of passing the exam to receiving the official result, it can take from 8 to 14 days.
Converting Unified State Examination points into grades
Despite the fact that in 2018 the scale for converting points in Unified State Examination subjects into a five-point grade is not officially used, many still want to interpret their results in a more familiar “school” system. To do this, you can use special tables or online calculators.
Table for converting OGE test scores into grades
Russian language | ||||
Mathematics | ||||
Computer science | ||||
Social science | ||||
Foreign languages | ||||
Biology | ||||
Geography | ||||
Literature | ||||
The second method is a little simpler and more convenient than searching for the required values in the cells of a huge table. You just need to select a subject (mathematics, Russian language, chemistry, physics, history, English, social studies... and other subjects), enter the data and get the desired result in a matter of seconds.
We invite you to try how simple and convenient it is to use online calculators for the Unified State Exam score and its conversion into a 5-point score in practice.
Transferring points from primary to test
Converting Unified State Examination points into grades
Internet systems for applicants
The 2017-2018 academic year is over, the exam has been passed, the results are known, and even the interactive scale for converting primary scores showed that the Unified State Examination result is in a fairly good range... But is this enough to enter the desired university?
Assess the real chances of admission based on test scores and the minimum passing threshold set by the university.
Important! The minimum passing score is determined by the university itself. It will directly depend on the scores of applicants who apply in 2018. The more popular the specialty, the higher the passing score.
Often at TOP faculties, even 100-point results are not enough for admission to the budget. Only Olympiad winners who provide significant additional points have a chance to see their name on the list of applicants for such majors.
In 2018, the most popular services for selecting a university and monitoring the entrance score threshold for various specialties will be:
- Ucheba.ru
- Apply online
- Higher School of Economics calculator
- Postyplenie.ru
- Typical applicant
These services are very easy to find. Just enter their name into any search engine.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
EXAMINATION IN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN 11TH GRADE (USE)
For correct execution everyone tasks exam paper can be obtained as much as possible 55 primary points.
For correct execution everyone tasks parts 1 (except for tasks 7, 15 and 24) the graduate receives 1 point each. For an incorrect answer or lack thereof, 0 points are given.
For completion tasks 7 may be exhibited from 0 to 5 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to a number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (5 points: no errors; 4 points: 1 error made; 3 points: 2 errors made; 2 points: 2 digits indicated correctly; 1 point: correctly indicated only one digit; 0 points: completely incorrect answer, i.e. incorrect sequence of numbers or lack thereof). The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.
For completion tasks 15 may be exhibited from 0 to 2 points. For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the answer number, the examinee receives 1 point. If 2 numbers are given correctly, the examinee receives 2 points.
For completion tasks 24 may be exhibited from 0 to 4 points. For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of a term from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (4 points: no errors; 3 points: 1 error made; 2 points: 2 errors made; 1 point: only one number is indicated correctly; 0 points: a completely incorrect answer, i.e. an incorrect sequence of numbers or its absence.The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.
Maximum points, which can be received by a student who correctly completes the task parts 2, is 23 points.
Criteria for assessing an assignment with a detailed answer (essay)
Criteria for assessing the answer to task C1
Points
I
Contents of the essay
K1
Formulation of source text problems
The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text.
There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem
1
The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the source text.
0
K2
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. Factual errors associated with understanding the problem of the source text, no in comments
2
The problem formulated by the examinee was not commented on,or
there were more than 1 factual errors in the comments related to understanding the source text, or another problem not formulated by the examinee was commented on,or
a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as comments,
or
a large fragment of the source text is quoted as comments
0
K3
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem.
There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text
1
0
K4
Argumentation by the examinee of his own opinion on the problem
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature)
3
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge, life experience), or provided only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature
2
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge and life experience
1
The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the author’s position), but did not provide arguments, or the examinee’s opinion is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), or the examinee's opinion is not reflected in the work at all
0
II
Speech design of the essay
K5
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation:
– there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken;
– there are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work
2
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, But 1 logical error was made, and/or there is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work
1
The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent,
but more than 1 logical error was made,
and/or
there are 2 cases of violation of paragraph division of the text
0
K6
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts and the variety of grammatical structure of speech.
*The examinee receives the highest score for this criterion only if the highest score is obtained for the K10 criterion
2
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts, But the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, But there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thoughts
1
The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of grammatical structure of speech
0
III
Literacy
K7
Compliance with spelling standards
no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)
3
no more than 2 mistakes were made
2
3–4 mistakes were made
1
more than 4 mistakes were made
0
K8
Compliance with punctuation standards
no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)
3
1–3 mistakes were made
2
4–5 mistakes were made
1
more than 5 mistakes were made
0
K9
Compliance with language norms
no grammatical errors
2
1–2 mistakes were made
1
more than 2 mistakes were made
0
K10
Compliance with speech norms
no more than 1 speech error was made
2
2–3 mistakes were made
1
more than 3 mistakes were made
0
K11
Compliance with ethical standards
there are no ethical errors in the work
1
ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)
0
K12.
Maintain factual accuracy in background material
there are no factual errors in the background material
1
there were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material
0
Maximum points for all written work (K1–K12)
When assessing literacy (K7–K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150–300 words.
If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored zero points, the task is considered uncompleted.
When assessing an essay of from 70 to 150 words number of allowed errors four types (K7–K10) decreases.
2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 – no spelling errors (or 1 minor error was made);
K8 – no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error).
1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 – no more than 2 mistakes were made;
K8 – 1–3 mistakes were made;
K9 – no grammatical errors;
K10 – no more than 1 speech error was made.
Highest mark according to criteria K7–K12 for work of volume from 70 to 150 words Not is put.
If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten of the original text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is scored zero points.
If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee’s text, then only the number of words that belong to the examinee is taken into account when checking. Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.
GOOD LUCK TO YOU,
GRADUATES!
In the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are assessed, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are essays based on the text. Today, in test tasks you need to either write down words correctly (and not just find them), or find two correct answers from those proposed (task 1 and 15), or name numbers indicating the correct placement of commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where you need to correlate erroneous sentences with the rules according to which the errors were made.
|
1 point for a correct answer, 0 points for an incorrect answer |
From 0 to 2 points |
From 0 to 4 points |
From 0 to 5 points |
|
For correct completion of tasks 2–6, 8–14, 16–23 the examinee |
For completing tasks 1 and 15, you can score from 0 to 2 points. |
For completing task 24, you can score from 0 to 4 points. Faithful |
For completing task 7, you can score from 0 to 5 points. Faithful |
|
Maximum points |
|||
|
Minimum points |
|||
Essay evaluation criteria
|
Points |
||
|
Formulation of source text problems |
||
|
The examinee (in one form or another) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem. |
||
|
The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the source text. |
||
|
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text in the comments. |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on, no more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to understanding the source text. |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examinee was not commented on, more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to understanding the source text, another problem not formulated by the examinee was commented on, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as a commentary, A large fragment of the source text is quoted as comments. |
||
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text. |
||
|
Argumentation by the examinee of his own opinion on the problem |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature). |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge or life experience), conducted only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature. |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life or reading experience. |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the author’s position), but did not provide arguments, the examinee’s opinion is only formally stated (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), not reflected in the work at all. |
||
|
SPEECH DESIGN OF AN ESSAY |
||
|
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation: There are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; There are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, 1 logical error was made, There is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work. |
||
|
The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent, more than 1 logical error was made, There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph division of the text. |
||
|
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts and the variety of grammatical structure of speech. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts, the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced, the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thoughts. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of the grammatical structure of speech. |
||
|
LITERACY |
||
|
Compliance with spelling standards |
||
|
no spelling errors (or 1 minor error) |
||
|
1-2 mistakes were made |
||
|
more than 2-3 mistakes were made |
||
| more than 3 mistakes were made | 0 | |
|
Compliance with punctuation standards |
||
|
no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error) |
||
|
1-2 mistakes were made |
||
|
2-3 mistakes were made |
||
| more than 3 errors | 0 | |
|
Compliance with language norms |
||
|
no grammatical errors |
||
|
1-2 mistakes were made |
||
|
more than 2 mistakes were made |
||
|
Compliance with speech norms |
||
|
no more than 1 speech error was made |
||
|
2-3 mistakes were made |
||
|
more than 3 mistakes were made |
||
|
Compliance with ethical standards |
||
|
there are no ethical errors in the work |
||
|
ethical mistakes were made (1 or more) |
||
|
Maintain factual accuracy in background material |
||
|
there are no factual errors in the background material |
||
|
there were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material |
||
|
Maximum points for an essay |
When assessing literacy (K7–K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150–300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored 0 points, the task is considered uncompleted.
When counting words, both independent and functional parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “still” is one word, “still” is two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, “M.Yu. Lermontov” is one word). Any other symbols, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, “5 years” is one word, “five years” is two words).
If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and/or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and/or information about the author of the text.
When assessing an essay ranging from 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.
2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 – there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 – there are no punctuation errors (or one minor error was made).
1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 – no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 – one to three mistakes were made;
K9 – no grammatical errors;
K10 – no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to criteria K7–K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.
If the essay is a retelling or a complete rewrite of the original text without any comments, then such work in all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is scored 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee’s text, then only the number of words that belong to the examinee is taken into account when checking. Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.
In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205) “61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, the experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the Unified State Examination paper with a detailed answer... 62. In the event of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject. The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the examination work.”
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more primary points between the sums of points awarded by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment positions for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.
Document punctuation has been preserved.
| № | Criteria for assessing the answer to task C1 | Points |
I |
||
K1 |
Formulation of source text problems |
|
| The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem |
1 | |
| The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the source text. |
0 | |
K2 |
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text |
|
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples from the text read that are important for understanding the problem. |
3 | |
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave 1 example from the text read, important for understanding the problem. |
2 | |
|
The text problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text, But the examinee did not give a single example from the read text that was important for understanding the problem, or There was one factual error in the commentary related to understanding the problem in the source text |
1 | |
|
The problem formulated by the examinee was not commented on. or commented without reference to the source text, or there is more than one factual error in the commentary related to understanding the source text, or another commented, |
0 | |
K3 |
Reflection of the position of the author of the source text |
|
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. |
1 | |
| The position of the author of the source text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the source text is not formulated |
0 | |
K4 |
Argumentation by the examinee of his own opinion on the problem |
|
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature) |
3 | |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge, life experience), or provided only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature |
2 | |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge and life experience |
1 | |
| The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the author’s position), but did not provide arguments, or the examinee’s opinion is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), or the examinee's opinion is not reflected in the work at all |
0 | |
II |
Speech design of the essay |
|
K5 |
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation |
|
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation: |
2 | |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, |
1 | |
|
The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent, But more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph division of the text |
0 | |
K6 |
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
|
| The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts and the variety of grammatical structure of speech. *The examinee receives the highest score for this criterion only if the highest score is obtained for the K10 criterion |
2 | |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts, But the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, But there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thoughts |
1 | |
| The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of grammatical structure of speech | 0 | |
III |
Literacy |
|
K7 |
Compliance with spelling standards |
|
| no spelling errors (or 1 minor error) | 3 | |
| no more than 2 mistakes were made | 2 | |
| 3-4 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 4 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K8 |
Compliance with punctuation standards |
|
| no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error) | 3 | |
| 1-3 mistakes were made | 2 | |
| 4-5 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 5 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K9 |
Compliance with language norms |
|
| no grammatical errors | 2 | |
| 1-2 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 2 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K10 |
Compliance with speech norms |
|
| no more than 1 speech error was made | 2 | |
| 2-3 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 3 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K11 |
Compliance with ethical standards |
|
| there are no ethical errors in the work | 1 | |
| ethical mistakes were made (1 or more) |
0 | |
K12. |
Maintain factual accuracy in background material |
|
| there are no factual errors in the background material | 1 | |
| there were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material |
0 | |
| Maximum number of points for all written work (K1-K12) | 24 |
When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account 1.
1. The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150-300 words 2.
2. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored 0 points, the task is considered uncompleted.
When evaluating an essay ranging from 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7-K10) decreases.
2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor error was made). 1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 - one to three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to criteria K7-K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.
If the essay is a retelling or a complete rewrite of the original text without any comments, then such work in all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is scored 0 points.
If the work, which is a rewrite or retelling of the original text, contains fragments of text
the examinee, then the test takes into account only the number of words that belong to the examinee.
Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.
1 When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account.
Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “still” is one word, “still” is two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, “M.Yu. Lermontov” is one word). Any other symbols, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, “5 years” - one word, “five years” - two
words).
2 If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and/or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and/or information about the author of the text.
In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205)
"61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the Unified State Examination paper with a detailed answer...
62. If there is a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is defined in the assessment criteria for the relevant academic subject.
The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the scores assigned by the experts who previously checked the examination work.”
The developers of exam tasks answered the most frequently asked questions from graduates
Text: Natalya Lebedeva/RG
Photo: Alexey Malgavko/RIA Novosti
One of two compulsory exams (the other is mathematics) that all students take. This year, graduates will take the Russian language exam on A.S. Pushkin’s birthday, June 6. If the result is too low, you can try to retake the exam on a reserve day - June 26, or in an additional period - 4 September. What do you need to know about the exam to pass it with the maximum score the first time?
1. How many points can you get on the Unified State Exam in Russian?
For correct completion of all tasks of the examination paper, you can receive a maximum of 58 primary points. For a well-written essay you can get 24 points.
To receive a high school diploma, you must score a minimum of 24 points. And if an eleventh-grader plans to enter a university, no matter what specialty, the exam must be passed with at least 36 points.
2. How much time is given to complete all tasks?
210 minutes, or 3.5 hours, are allotted to complete the examination work in the Russian language.
3. What knowledge will be tested at the Unified State Exam in the Russian language?
The tasks of the examination work in the Russian language test knowledge of the norms of text construction, lexical, spelling, punctuation, grammatical norms of the modern Russian literary language, and the ability to create a text based on what has been read.
4. What tasks does the exam version consist of?
Each version of the Unified State Examination paper in the Russian language consists of two parts and includes 26 tasks that differ in form and level of difficulty.
Part 1 contains 25 short-answer tasks (open-type tasks for recording a self-formulated correct answer and tasks for choosing and recording one correct answer from the proposed list of answers).
The tasks of the first part test the examination participants' mastery of educational material at both basic and high levels of complexity: the latter type includes tasks that test mastery of grammatical norms (task 7), the ability to find means of connecting sentences in the text (task 24) and those used in the text linguistic means of expression (task 25).
Part 2 contains one task (task 26) - based on the text read. In completing this task, the examinee must demonstrate the ability to analyze the content and issues of the text read, comment on the problem of the source text, determine the position of the author of the text, express and argue his own opinion, consistently and logically express thoughts, use a variety of grammatical forms and lexical richness of the language in speech, formulate statements in accordance with the spelling, punctuation, grammatical and speech norms of the modern Russian literary language.
The essay can be written by the examinee at any level of complexity (basic, advanced, high).
5. This year a new task No. 20 appeared. What does it check?
Task No. 20 will test your knowledge of the lexical norms of the Russian literary language. The assignment will be worth 1 point.
The task will be given in two versions:
- as an exception, that is, it will be necessary to remove the extra word;
- in the form of a replacement, that is, the word will need to be replaced.
Execution algorithm: first you need to find a semantic (semantic) contradiction in the sentence, isolate the error and complete the task, correcting this error.
6. What is the difficulty of completing task No. 7?
The task sounds like this: “Make a correspondence between grammatical errors and the sentences in which they were made.”
There are three types, but only morphological and syntactic errors will need to be identified in the exam.
Morphological errors:
- incorrect use of the case form of a noun with a preposition;
- incorrect use of a numeral.
Syntax errors:
- disruption of the connection between subject and predicate;
- violation of aspect-temporal correlation of verb forms;
- error in constructing a sentence with homogeneous members;
- incorrect construction of sentences with participles;
- violation in the construction of sentences with a participial phrase;
- violation in the construction of a sentence with an inconsistent application;
- incorrect construction of sentences with indirect speech;
- error in constructing a complex sentence.
Before starting the task, the authors of the exam tasks advise you to carefully read all the sentences.
7. What is different about the essay in the Unified State Examination in the Russian language (task No. 26)?
To successfully write an essay based on the text you read, the developers advise adhering to the following plan:
- formulate one of the problems posed by the author of the text;
- write a commentary on this problem, including two example illustrations from the text read, which are important for understanding and arguing the problem;
- indicate the author's position;
- express your personal attitude to what you read, supporting your opinion with two literary arguments.
But it is not necessary to strictly follow this plan. In a good essay, thoughtful composition is important. You can limit yourself to three basic parts: introduction, main part and conclusion. You can also include other parts with their own micro-themes in each.
Tips from the developers:
- You need to think through the composition only after the problem raised by the author in the text has been identified. It is important not to confuse the topic and problem of the text.
- It is advisable to use works from .
- You can use modern and foreign literature as arguments.
- You can rely on non-classical genres of literature (detective or thriller), but the chosen argument must be presented precisely as an argument.
- A reference to a feature film is not a literary argument, even if it is a film adaptation.
- Popular science articles and books can be used as a literary argument.
8. How does the difficulty level of a task affect the final score?
Among the tasks of the basic level of complexity there are tasks with a low percentage of completion - you should pay special attention to them. These are tasks testing the spelling of -Н- and -НН- in various parts of speech (task 14), punctuation marks in a complex sentence with different types of connections (task 19), knowledge of functional and semantic types of speech (task 22).
9. What must be taken into account to get the maximum score?
In general, all the necessary advice and explanations are given in the instructions for performing the work before the CMM option. Therefore, you should carefully read the instructions for the option and the specific task. Following these tips will allow you to organize your exam work more efficiently. In addition to general instructions, each part of the work provides recommendations on how to write down the answer to tasks of one type or another. Before completing tasks, you should carefully read the instructions for each type of task.
10. How to fill out the exam form correctly?
Practice has shown that it is better to enter the answers first into the KIM, and then carefully transfer them to answer form No. 1 to the right of the number of the corresponding task, starting from the first cell, without spaces, commas and other additional characters. Answers to assignments are written without unnecessary additions (a term, concept, keyword or combination of words from the text is written, etc.).
It is better to first write down the answer to task 26 on a draft, and then rewrite it on form No. 2. The essay should be written clearly, in legible handwriting. Entries in drafts are not taken into account when processing and checking work.
Video consultation on the Unified State Exam in Russian from the exam developers:
Views: 0