On April 24, 1915, on a front line near the city of Ypres, French and British soldiers noticed a strange yellow-green cloud that was rapidly moving towards them. It seemed that nothing foreshadowed trouble, but when this fog reached the first line of trenches, the people in it began to fall, cough, suffocate and die.
This day became the official date of the first massive use of chemical weapons. The German army, on a six-kilometer-wide front, released 168 tons of chlorine towards enemy trenches. The poison affected 15 thousand people, of which 5 thousand died almost instantly, and the survivors died later in hospitals or remained disabled for life. After using the gas, the German troops went on the attack and occupied enemy positions without losses, because there was no one left to defend them.
The first use of chemical weapons was considered successful, so it soon became a real nightmare for soldiers on the opposing sides. All countries participating in the conflict used chemical warfare agents: chemical weapons became a real “calling card” of the First World War. By the way, the city of Ypres was “lucky” in this regard: two years later, the Germans in the same area used dichlorodiethyl sulfide against the French, a blister chemical weapon called “mustard gas.”
This small town, like Hiroshima, has become a symbol of one of the worst crimes against humanity.
On May 31, 1915, chemical weapons were used against the Russian army for the first time - the Germans used phosgene. The gas cloud was mistaken for camouflage and even more soldiers were transferred to the front line. The consequences of the gas attack were terrible: 9 thousand people died a painful death, even the grass died due to the effects of the poison.
History of chemical weapons
The history of chemical warfare agents (CWA) goes back hundreds of years. Various chemical compounds were used to poison enemy soldiers or temporarily incapacitate them. Most often, such methods were used during the siege of fortresses, since using toxic substances during a war of maneuver is not very convenient.
For example, in the West (including Russia) they used artillery “stinking” cannonballs, which emitted suffocating and poisonous smoke, and the Persians used an ignited mixture of sulfur and crude oil when storming cities.
However, of course, there was no need to talk about the massive use of toxic substances in the old days. Chemical weapons began to be considered by generals as one of the means of warfare only after toxic substances began to be obtained in industrial quantities and they learned how to store them safely.
Certain changes were also required in the psychology of the military: back in the 19th century, poisoning one’s opponents like rats was considered an ignoble and unworthy thing. The British military elite reacted with indignation to the use of sulfur dioxide as a chemical warfare agent by British Admiral Thomas Gokhran.
Already during the First World War, the first methods of protection against toxic substances appeared. At first these were various bandages or capes impregnated with various substances, but they usually did not give the desired effect. Then gas masks were invented, similar in appearance to modern ones. However, gas masks at first were far from perfect and did not provide the required level of protection. Special gas masks have been developed for horses and even dogs.
The means of delivering toxic substances did not stand still either. If at the beginning of the war gas was easily sprayed from cylinders towards the enemy, then artillery shells and mines began to be used to deliver chemical agents. New, more deadly types of chemical weapons have emerged.
After the end of the First World War, work in the field of creating toxic substances did not stop: methods of delivering chemical agents and methods of protection against them were improved, and new types of chemical weapons appeared. Tests of combat gases were carried out regularly, special shelters were built for the population, soldiers and civilians were trained to use personal protective equipment.
In 1925, another convention was adopted (the Geneva Pact) prohibiting the use of chemical weapons, but this in no way stopped the generals: they had no doubt that the next big war would be a chemical one, and were intensively preparing for it. In the mid-thirties, German chemists developed nerve gases, the effects of which are the most lethal.
Despite their lethality and significant psychological effect, today we can confidently say that chemical weapons are a passed stage for humanity. And the point here is not in the conventions prohibiting the poisoning of one’s own kind, or even in public opinion (although it also played a significant role).
The military has practically abandoned toxic substances, because chemical weapons have more disadvantages than advantages. Let's look at the main ones:
- Strong dependence on weather conditions. At first, poisonous gases were released from cylinders downwind in the direction of the enemy. However, the wind is changeable, so during the First World War there were frequent cases of defeat of own troops. The use of artillery ammunition as a delivery method solves this problem only partially. Rain and simply high air humidity dissolve and decompose many toxic substances, and air updrafts carry them high into the sky. For example, the British lit numerous fires in front of their defense line so that the hot air would carry enemy gas upward.
- Unsafe storage. Conventional ammunition without a fuse detonates extremely rarely, which cannot be said about shells or containers with explosive agents. They can cause massive casualties, even from deep behind the lines in a warehouse. In addition, the cost of their storage and disposal is extremely high.
- Protection. The most important reason for abandoning chemical weapons. The first gas masks and bandages were not very effective, but soon they provided quite effective protection against chemical agents. In response, chemists came up with blister gases, after which a special chemical protection suit was invented. Armored vehicles now have reliable protection against any weapon of mass destruction, including chemical weapons. In short, the use of chemical warfare agents against a modern army is not very effective. That is why in the last fifty years, explosive agents have been used more often against civilians or partisan detachments. In this case, the results of its use were truly terrifying.
- Inefficiency. Despite the horror that gases caused soldiers during the Great War, analysis of casualties showed that conventional artillery fire was more effective than firing chemical weapons ammunition. A projectile filled with gas was less powerful, and therefore did a worse job of destroying enemy engineering structures and barriers. The surviving fighters quite successfully used them in defense.
Today, the greatest danger is that chemical weapons could end up in the hands of terrorists and be used against civilians. The toll in this case can be horrific. A chemical warfare agent is relatively easy to produce (unlike a nuclear agent), and it is cheap. Therefore, threats from terrorist groups regarding possible gas attacks should be taken very carefully.
The biggest disadvantage of chemical weapons is their unpredictability: where the wind will blow, whether the air humidity will change, in which direction the poison will flow along with the groundwater. In whose DNA the mutagen from the combat gas will be embedded, and whose child will be born crippled. And these are not theoretical questions at all. American soldiers crippled after using their own Agent Orange gas in Vietnam are clear evidence of the unpredictability of chemical weapons.
If you have any questions, leave them in the comments below the article. We or our visitors will be happy to answer them
Poison gas was first used by German troops in 1915 on the Western Front. It was later used in Abyssinia, China, Yemen, and also in Iraq. Hitler himself was a victim of a gas attack during the First World War.
Silent, invisible and in most cases deadly: poison gas is a terrible weapon - not only in a physical sense, as chemical warfare agents can kill huge numbers of soldiers and civilians, but perhaps even more so in a psychological sense, as fear facing the terrible threat contained in the inhaled air inevitably causes panic.
Since 1915, when poison gas was first used in modern warfare, it has been used to kill people in dozens of armed conflicts. However, precisely in the bloodiest war of the 20th century, in the struggle of the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition against the Third Reich in Europe, both sides did not use these weapons of mass destruction. But, nevertheless, in those years it was used, and occurred, in particular, during the Sino-Japanese War, which began already in 1937.
Poisonous substances have been used as weapons since ancient times - for example, warriors in ancient times rubbed arrowheads with irritating substances. However, the systematic study of chemical elements began only before the First World War. By this time, police in some European countries were already using tear gas to disperse unwanted crowds. Therefore, there was only a small step left to take before using deadly poisonous gas.
1915 - first use
The first confirmed large-scale use of chemical warfare gas occurred on the Western Front in Flanders. Prior to this, attempts had been made several times - generally unsuccessful - to push enemy soldiers out of the trenches with the help of various chemicals and thus complete the conquest of Flanders. On the eastern front, German gunners also used shells containing toxic chemicals - without much consequence.
Against the backdrop of these “unsatisfactory” results, the chemist Fritz Haber, who later received the Nobel Prize, proposed spraying chlorine gas in the presence of a suitable wind. More than 160 tons of this chemical by-product were used on April 22, 1915 in the Ypres area. The gas was released from approximately 6 thousand cylinders, and as a result, a poisonous cloud six kilometers long and one kilometer wide covered enemy positions.
There is no exact data on the number of victims of this attack, but they were very significant. In any case, on the “Day of Ypres” the German army managed to break through the fortifications of the French and Canadian units to a greater depth.
The Entente countries actively protested against the use of poison gas. The German side responded to this by stating that the use of chemical munitions is not prohibited by the Hague Convention on the Conduct of Land War. Formally, this was correct, but the use of chlorine gas was contrary to the spirit of the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907.
The death toll was almost 50%
In the following weeks, poisonous gas was used several more times in an arc in the Ypres area. Moreover, on May 5, 1915, at Hill 60, 90 of the 320 soldiers there were killed in the British trenches. Another 207 people were taken to hospitals, but for 58 of them no help was needed. The death rate from the use of poisonous gases against unprotected soldiers was then approximately 50%.
The Germans' use of poisonous chemicals broke the taboo, and after that other participants in the war also began to use poisonous gases. The British first used chlorine gas in September 1915, while the French used phosgene. Another spiral of the arms race began: more and more new chemical warfare agents were developed, and our own soldiers received more and more advanced gas masks. In total, during the First World War, 18 different potentially lethal toxic substances and another 27 chemical compounds with “irritant” effects were used.
According to existing estimates, between 1914 and 1918, about 20 million gas shells were used, in addition, more than 10 thousand tons of chemical warfare agents were released from special containers. According to calculations by the Stockholm Peace Research Institute, 91 thousand people died as a result of the use of chemical warfare agents, and 1.2 million were injured of varying degrees of severity.
Hitler's personal experience
Adolf Hitler was also among the victims. On October 14, 1918, during a French mustard gas attack, he temporarily lost his sight. In the book “My Struggle” (Mein Kampf), where Hitler sets out the foundations of his worldview, he describes this situation as follows: “Around midnight, some of the comrades were out of action, some of them forever. In the morning, I also began to feel severe pain, increasing every minute. At about seven o'clock, stumbling and falling, I somehow made my way to the point. My eyes were burning with pain.” After a few hours, “my eyes turned into burning coals. Then I stopped seeing."
And after the First World War, the accumulated, but no longer needed in Europe, shells with poisonous gases were used. For example, Winston Churchill advocated their use against “savage” rebels in the colonies, but he made a reservation and added that it was not necessary to use lethal substances. In Iraq, the Royal Air Force also used chemical bombs.
Spain, which remained neutral during the First World War, used poison gas during the Rif War against the Berber tribes in its North African possessions. The Italian dictator Mussolini used these types of weapons in the Libyan and Abyssinian wars, and they were often used against civilians. Western public opinion reacted to this with indignation, but as a result it was possible to agree only on taking symbolic retaliatory actions.
An unequivocal ban
In 1925, the Geneva Protocol prohibited the use of chemical and biological weapons in warfare, as well as their use against civilians. Nevertheless, almost all states of the world continued to prepare for future wars using chemical weapons.
After 1918, the largest use of chemical warfare agents occurred in 1937 during Japan's war of conquest against China. They were used in several thousand individual incidents and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Chinese soldiers and civilians, but precise data from those theaters of operations is not available. Japan did not ratify the Geneva Protocol and was not formally bound by its provisions, but even at that time the use of chemical weapons was considered a war crime.
Thanks also to Hitler’s personal experience, the threshold for using toxic chemicals during World War II was very high. However, this does not mean that both sides were not preparing for a possible gas war - in case the opposite side started it.
The Wehrmacht had several laboratories for the study of chemical warfare agents, and one of them was located in the Spandau Citadel, located in the western part of Berlin. Among other things, highly toxic poisonous gases sarin and soman were produced there in small quantities. And at the factories of I.G. Farben, several tons of the nerve gas tabun were even produced using phosphorus. However, it was not applied.
The first known case of the use of chemical weapons was the Battle of Ypres on April 22, 1915, in which chlorine was used very effectively by German troops, but this battle was not the only one and far from the first.
Having switched to a positional war, during which, due to the large number of troops opposing each other on both sides, it was impossible to organize an effective breakthrough, the opponents began to look for other solutions to their current situation, one of them was the use of chemical weapons.
Chemical weapons were first used by the French; it was the French who used tear gas, the so-called ethyl bromoacenate, back in August 1914. This gas itself could not lead to death, but it caused enemy soldiers a strong burning sensation in the eyes and mucous membranes of the mouth and nose, due to which they lost orientation in space and did not provide effective resistance to the enemy. Before the attack, French soldiers threw grenades filled with this toxic substance at the enemy. The only drawback of the ethyl bromoacenate used was its limited amount, so it was soon replaced by chloroacetone.
Use of chlorine
Having analyzed the success of the French resulting from their use of chemical weapons, the German command already in October of the same year fired at the British positions at the Battle of Neuve Chapelle, but missed the concentration of the gas and did not get the expected effect. There was too little gas, and it did not have the desired effect on the enemy soldiers. However, the experiment was repeated in January in the battle of Bolimov against the Russian army; the Germans were practically successful in this attack and therefore the use of toxic substances, despite the statement that Germany had violated international law received from Great Britain, was decided to continue.
Basically, the Germans used chlorine gas against enemy troops - a gas with an almost instantaneous lethal effect. The only disadvantage of using chlorine was its rich green color, because of which it was possible to carry out an unexpected attack only in the already mentioned Battle of Ypres, but later the Entente armies stocked up with a sufficient number of means of protection against the effects of chlorine and could no longer fear it. The production of chlorine was personally supervised by Fritz Haber, a man who later became well known in Germany as the father of chemical weapons.
Having used chlorine in the Battle of Ypres, the Germans did not stop there, but used it at least three more times, including against the Russian fortress of Osovets, where in May 1915 about 90 soldiers died instantly, and more than 40 died in hospital wards . But despite the terrifying effect that followed from the use of gas, the Germans failed to take the fortress. The gas practically destroyed all life in the area, plants and many animals died, most of the food supply was destroyed, the Russian soldiers received a terrifying form of injury, and those who were lucky enough to survive had to remain disabled for the rest of their lives.
Phosgene
Such large-scale actions led to the fact that the German army soon began to feel an acute shortage of chlorine, so it was replaced by phosgene, a gas without color and a strong odor. Due to the fact that phosgene emitted the smell of moldy hay, it was not at all easy to detect, since the symptoms of poisoning did not appear immediately, but only a day after use. The poisoned enemy soldiers successfully fought for some time, but without receiving timely treatment, due to basic ignorance of their condition, they died the next day in dozens and hundreds. Phosgene was a more toxic substance, so it was much more profitable to use than chlorine.
Mustard gas
In 1917, near the same town of Ypres, German soldiers used another toxic substance - mustard gas, also called mustard gas. In addition to chlorine, mustard gas contained substances that, when contacted with human skin, not only caused poisoning, but also caused the formation of numerous abscesses. Externally, mustard gas looked like an oily liquid with no color. The presence of mustard gas could be determined only by its characteristic smell of garlic or mustard, hence the name mustard gas. Contact of mustard gas in the eyes led to instant blindness, and the concentration of mustard gas in the stomach led to immediate nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. When the mucous membrane of the throat was damaged by mustard gas, the victims experienced immediate development of edema, which subsequently developed into a purulent formation. A strong concentration of mustard gas in the lungs led to the development of inflammation and death from suffocation on the 3rd day after poisoning.
The practice of using mustard gas showed that of all the chemicals used in the First World War, it was this liquid, synthesized by the French scientist Cesar Depres and the Englishman Frederick Guthrie in 1822 and 1860 independently of each other, that was the most dangerous, since there were no measures to combat poisoning she didn't exist. The only thing the doctor could do was to advise the patient to rinse the mucous membranes affected by the substance and wipe the areas of skin in contact with mustard gas with wipes generously soaked in water.
In the fight against mustard gas, which, when it comes into contact with the surface of skin or clothing, can be transformed into other equally dangerous substances, even a gas mask could not provide significant assistance; to remain in the mustard gas action zone, soldiers were recommended no more than 40 minutes, after which the poison began to penetrate through protective equipment.
Despite the obvious fact that the use of any of the toxic substances, be it the practically harmless ethyl bromoacenate, or such a dangerous substance as mustard gas, is a violation not only of the laws of war, but also of civil rights and freedoms, following the Germans, the British and French began to use chemical weapons and even Russians. Convinced of the high efficiency of mustard gas, the British and French quickly established its production, and soon it was several times larger in scale than the German one.
Russia first began producing and using chemical weapons before the planned Brusilov breakthrough in 1916. Ahead of the advancing Russian army, shells containing chloropicrin and vensinite were scattered, which had a suffocating and poisonous effect. The use of chemicals gave the Russian army a noticeable advantage; the enemy left the trenches en masse and became easy prey for artillery.
It is interesting that after the First World War, the use of any means of chemical influence on the human body was not only prohibited, but also charged with Germany as a major crime against human rights, despite the fact that almost all toxic elements entered mass production and were very effectively used by both warring parties.
Chemical weapons are one of the main ones in the First World War and in total about the 20th century. The lethal potential of the gas was limited - only 4% of deaths from the total number of victims. However, the proportion of non-fatal incidents was high, and gas remained one of the main dangers for soldiers. Because it became possible to develop effective countermeasures against gas attacks, unlike most other weapons of the period, its effectiveness began to decline in the later stages of the war and it almost fell out of use. But because poisonous substances were first used in World War I, it was also sometimes called the Chemical War.
History of poison gases
1914
In the early days of the use of chemicals as weapons, the drugs were tear irritants and not lethal. During World War I, the French pioneered the use of gas using 26 mm grenades filled with tear gas (ethyl bromoacetate) in August 1914. However, the Allies' supplies of bromoacetate quickly ran out, and the French administration replaced it with another agent, chloroacetone. In October 1914, German troops fired shells partially filled with a chemical irritant against British positions at Neuve Chapelle, even though the concentration achieved was so small that it was barely noticeable.
1915 Widespread use of deadly gases
On May 5, 90 people immediately died in the trenches; of the 207 who were taken to field hospitals, 46 died on the same day, and 12 after prolonged suffering.
On July 12, 1915, near the Belgian city of Ypres, Anglo-French troops were fired at by mines containing an oily liquid. This is how Germany used mustard gas for the first time.
Notes
Links
- De-Lazari Alexander Nikolaevich. Chemical weapons on the fronts of the World War 1914-1918.
Special Topics | Additional Information | Participants of the First World War | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crimes against civilians: |
Simultaneous conflicts: |
Entente |