Formation of the French Communist Party. Movement for the creation of the Popular Front

Huge armies were mobilized in the opposing camps: the Entente - 6179 thousand people, the German coalition - 3568 thousand people. The Entente artillery consisted of 12,134 light and 1,013 heavy guns, the German coalition had 11,232 light and 2,244 heavy guns (not counting fortress artillery). As the war progressed, opponents continued to increase their armed forces.

On Western European theater of operations German troops (seven armies and four cavalry corps) occupied a front of about 400 km from the Dutch border to the Swiss. The nominal commander-in-chief of the German armies was Emperor Wilhelm II; their actual leadership was carried out by the commander General Staff General Moltke Jr.

The French armies stood between the Swiss border and the Sambre River on a front of about 370 km. The French command formed five armies, several groups of reserve divisions; The strategic cavalry was united into two corps and several separate divisions. General Joffre was appointed commander-in-chief of the French armies. The Belgian army under the command of King Albert deployed on the Jet and Dyle rivers. The English expeditionary force, consisting of four infantry and one and a half cavalry divisions under the command of General French, concentrated in the Maubeuge area by August 20.

Expanded on Western European theater of war The Entente armies, consisting of seventy-five French, four English and seven Belgian divisions, had against them eighty-six infantry and ten cavalry German divisions. Almost none of the sides had the necessary superiority of forces to ensure decisive success.

Disposition of forces of the opposing camps on the eve of the First World War in 1914.

History of France:

The beginning of the First World War. French participation in the fighting of the First World War in 1914

Fighting on Western European theater began on August 4, 1914 the invasion of German troops into Belgium and the attack on the Belgian border fortress of Liege. Somewhat earlier, on August 2, the advanced units of the German army occupied Luxembourg. The German army violated the neutrality of these two countries, although at one time Germany, along with other European states, solemnly guaranteed it. Weak Belgian army after twelve days of stubborn defense, Liege fell to Antwerp. On August 21, the Germans took Brussels without a fight.

Having passed through Belgium, German troops, in accordance with the Schlieffen plan, invaded the northern departments of France with their right wing and began a rapid advance towards Paris. However French troops , retreating, put up stubborn resistance and prepared a counter-maneuver. The maximum concentration of forces on this strike sector of the front, planned according to the German plan, turned out to be impossible. Seven divisions were taken to besiege and guard Antwerp, Givet and Maubeuge, and on August 26, at the height of the offensive, two corps and one cavalry division had to be transferred to the Eastern European theater of operations, since the supreme Russian command, without even finishing the concentration of its forces, undertook offensive operations in East Prussia at the urgent request of the French government.

From September 5 to 9, a grand battle unfolded on the plains of France, between Verdun and Paris. Six Anglo-French and five German armies took part in it - about 2 million people. Over six hundred heavy and about 6 thousand light guns resounded with their cannonade along the banks of the Marne.

Just created French 6th Army struck the right flank of the 1st German Army, whose task was to encircle Paris and connect with German troops operating south of the capital. The German command had to remove the hulls from southern section his army and throw it to the west. On the rest of the front, German attacks were vigorously repulsed by French troops.

The German high command did not have the necessary reserves, and it actually did not control the course of the battle at that moment, leaving the commanders to decide separate armies. By the end of September 8, German troops had completely lost their offensive initiative. As a result, they lost the battle, which, according to the plans of the General Staff, was supposed to decide the fate of the war. The main reason The defeat was an overestimation by the German military command of its forces - a miscalculation that underlay the Schlieffen strategic plan.

The withdrawal of the German armies to the Aisne River occurred without much difficulty. The French command did not take advantage of the opportunities that presented themselves to further develop their success. The Germans tried to get ahead of the enemy and occupy north coast France, in order to complicate the further landing of British troops, but they also failed in this “flight to the sea”. After this, major strategic operations on Western European theater stopped for a long time. Both sides went on the defensive, marking the beginning of positional forms of warfare.

On September 14, 1914, Moltke resigned. General Falkenhayn was appointed his successor.

French participation in the fighting of the First World War in 1915

1915 Campaign began with the fact that at the end of winter and spring of 1915 the Anglo-French command undertook a series of strategically ineffective offensive operations. All of them were conducted with limited targets on narrow sectors of the front.

On April 22, 1915, near the city of Ypres, German troops attacked Anglo-French positions . During this attack, violating the terms of the international convention prohibiting the use of toxic substances, they carried out a massive balloon release of chlorine. 15 thousand people were poisoned, of which 5 thousand died. The tactical success achieved by German troops as a result of the use of a new weapon of war was very small. Nevertheless, later the use of chemical means of warfare by both warring parties became widespread.

Attacks by Entente armies in Artois in May and June, despite major losses also did not bring any serious results.

The indecisive, limited nature of the Entente's offensive operations allowed the German command to significantly increase its forces against Russia. The resulting difficult situation for the Russian armies, as well as fears that tsarism might withdraw from the war, forced the Entente to finally address the issue of providing assistance to Russia. On August 23, Joffre outlined to the French Minister of War the reasons prompting him to undertake an offensive operation. “It is more profitable for us to launch this offensive as soon as possible, since the Germans, having defeated the Russian armies, can turn against us.” However, under pressure from generals Foch and Petain, the attack was postponed until the end of September, when the fighting on the Russian front had already begun to subside.

September 25, 1915 French troops launched an offensive operation with two armies in Champagne and one army - together with the British - in Artois. Very large forces were concentrated, but it was not possible to break through the enemy front.

The main feature strategic situation at the turn of 1915 and 1916 was the increase in the military-technical power of the Entente. France and England, thanks to the shift in the center of gravity of military operations to the Russian front, received some respite and accumulated forces and means for a long struggle in the Western European theater. By the beginning of 1916, they already had an advantage over Germany of 75-80 divisions and had largely eliminated their backlog in the field of artillery weapons. The English and French armies had new types of heavy artillery, large stocks of shells and well-organized military production.

The leaders of the Entente countries recognized the need to seek solutions to the war in coordinated offensive operations in the main theaters, without scattering efforts on secondary ones. The dates of offensive operations were clarified: in the Eastern European theater of military operations - June 15, in Western Europe - July 1. The delay in the offensive was a significant flaw in this plan; it made it possible for the German coalition to once again seize the initiative.

The position of the German command when developing the plan for the 1916 campaign was very difficult. It was impossible to think about conducting decisive operations on both fronts at once; the forces were also insufficient to conduct an offensive on several sectors of one front. In his report to Kaiser Wilhelm at the end of December 1915, Chief of the General Staff Falkenhain admitted that for an attack on Ukraine the forces “are insufficient in all respects,” an attack on Petrograd “does not promise a decisive result,” and the movement on Moscow “leads us into the boundless region.” "

“For none of these enterprises,” Falkenhayn wrote, “we do not have sufficient forces. Therefore, Russia is excluded as a target for attacks.” It was not possible to defeat the main enemy - England - due to its island position and superiority English fleet. That left France.

Falkenhayn believed that “France, in its tension, has reached the limits of what is barely bearable” and that the task of defeating France can be achieved if it is forced to exhaust its forces in the fight for such an object, “for the protection of which the French command will be forced to sacrifice the last man.” Verdun was chosen as such an object.

Attack on the Verdun salient if successful, it would disrupt the entire defense system on the right wing of the French front and open the way to Paris from the east for the German armies. The Verdun region could be a convenient starting base for the advance of the French army north along the Meuse. The German command knew that the Entente had such a plan, and hoped to complicate it by taking Verdun.

History of France:

French participation in the fighting of the First World War in 1916

IN campaigns of 1916 in the Western European theater During the World War, two bloodiest and longest operations stood out - at Verdun and on the Somme. German troops at the end of February attempted to take Verdun with an accelerated attack, but were unable to break the French defense. General Galwitz, who took command of the western sector of the attack at the end of March, noted in his diary: “It seems that what I feared has happened. A major offensive has been launched with insufficient resources.”

July 1, 1916 French and English troops dealt a strong blow to the enemy on the Somme, and even earlier the Russian armies of the South western front broke through the Austro-German positions. Meanwhile, the German army continued its attacks near Verdun, but they gradually died down and completely stopped by September. In October - December, French troops, having carried out a series of powerful counterattacks, drove the enemy out of the most important positions in the fortress area. The battle cost both sides hundreds of thousands of lives.

Operation Somme was prepared by the Entente command as the main operation of the 1916 campaign. It was intended that a powerful group of troops consisting of more than 60 French and British divisions would break through German positions and defeat German troops. The German offensive at Verdun forced the French command to divert some of its forces and resources to this fortress. Despite this, the operation began on July 1, 1916. Huge material and technical resources were concentrated. Just as many shells were prepared for the 6th French Army operating here as were in stock in 1914 for all French troops.

After local battles, English and French troops launched a powerful attack in September. In these battles, the British command used a new means of fighting - tanks. Used in small numbers and still technically imperfect, they ensured the achievement of local successes, but did not provide general operational success. The operational art of Western European military leaders did not create ways to break through the front. The armies were stationed in heavily fortified positions located one after another to a depth of 10-20 km. Numerous machine guns swept away with their fire manpower advancing. The destruction of defensive positions by artillery required quite a long time, sometimes several days. During this time, the defending side managed to build new lines of positions and bring in fresh reserves.

October and November passed in heavy battles. The operation gradually came to a standstill. Its results boiled down to the Entente seizing 200 sq. km of territory, 105 thousand prisoners, 1,500 machine guns and 350 guns. The losses of both sides exceeded those of Verdun: both sides lost over 1,300 thousand people killed, wounded and captured.

Despite the failure to break through the front, operation on the Somme together with the breakthrough of the Austro-Hungarian front by Russian troops, not only forced German command abandon attacks at Verdun, but also created a turning point in the entire course of the campaign in favor of the Entente.

By the end of 1916, the armies of the states actively participating in the war numbered 756 divisions, whereas at the beginning of the war there were 363. Increased in number, significantly increasing their technical weapons, they, however, lost the most qualified and barracks-trained peacetime personnel. Under the influence of enormous losses and hardships, the chauvinistic frenzy of the first months of the war passed. The bulk of the soldiers were elderly reserves and young people on early conscription, poorly prepared in military-technical terms and insufficiently trained physically.

The military command of the Entente countries, forming its strategic plan for 1917 , again decided to defeat the German coalition with coordinated strikes in the main theaters of the war. At the end of 1916, General Nivelle was placed at the head of the French armies. It was planned to attack the English and French armies in the Arras-Bapaume sector, as well as between the Somme and Oise, to pin down German forces and carry out a sudden offensive on the Aisne River, between Reims and Soissons, with the aim of breaking through the German front.

French participation in the fighting of the First World War in 1917

1915 Campaign began when, from March 15 to March 20, 1917, the German command withdrew its troops from the dangerous Noyon salient to a pre-fortified position known as the “Siegfried Line.” Thus, the preparations carried out by the Anglo-French command for the main operation of the strategic plan of 1917 were largely in vain.

However, English and french army On April 16, 1917, this operation was launched, with the goal of defeating the enemy in the Western European theater of military operations. Its scope was enormous for that time. More than 100 infantry and 10 cavalry divisions, more than 11 thousand guns of all types and calibers, as well as up to a thousand aircraft and about 130 tanks were supposed to participate in it.

During the general attack of the Entente forces on April 16, 1917, the interaction of the infantry with the artillery was disrupted, the mobile artillery barrage broke away from the infantry, and German machine gunners began to shoot the attackers from their shelters. Only two corps managed to capture the second line. Tanks were thrown into the attack. They had to deploy under fire from enemy artillery (including special anti-tank artillery) on very uncomfortable terrain, pocked with shell craters. As a result, out of 132 tanks, 11 returned, the rest were destroyed or damaged. It was not possible to break through the positions of the German troops.

The next day, General Nivelle decided to continue the attack and regrouped his artillery for this purpose, but on most of the front almost all attacks remained ineffective. Then Nivelle brought new troops into battle. On April 18 and 19, the French corps occupied the southern slope of the Chemin des Dames ridge and Fort Condé, but were unable to advance further. At the insistence of the French government, the operation was stopped.

Nivelle's plan was a complete failure. English and french army paid dearly for this unsuccessful operation. The French army lost 122 thousand killed and wounded, including more than 5 thousand Russians from the 3rd Russian brigade, which fought as part of the 32nd French Corps, the British - about 80 thousand. The Germans also suffered heavy losses.

In connection with this senseless massacre organized by Nivelle, among French soldiers unrest began. At this time, the bourgeois-democratic revolution that took place in Russia began to influence them. The soldiers' performances were mercilessly suppressed by the command, but still the French and British governments, taking into account the mood of the mass of soldiers, were forced to abandon major offensive operations for a long time.

Until the end of 1917, the Anglo-French command carried out only a few operations of purely tactical significance. One of them was undertaken by British troops in the area of ​​Ypres with the aim of clearing North Flanders and the Belgian coast of the Germans. British maritime circles especially insisted on this, fearing that Germany would make even more widespread use of submarine bases on the Flemish coast.

The operation began with an attack on July 31, 1917. The attack was supported by powerful artillery - 2,300 guns (153 guns per kilometer of front) - and 216 tanks. For almost four months, the English troops, drowning in the mud of the Flemish swamps, slowly moved forward. The operation stopped in November. It was not possible to break through the German front. As a result of these battles, the British lost 400 thousand killed and wounded, and the Germans lost 240 thousand people.

Another operation was carried out by the French at Verdun. August 22 French troops , supported by powerful artillery, attacked German positions. 6 tons of shells were thrown onto a linear meter of the front. As a result of well-organized interaction between infantry, artillery and tanks, the offensive was successful.

Last operation The Entente armies in the Western European theater during the 1917 campaign carried out an operation at Cambrai. In it, the British command had in mind to test, in cooperation with other branches of the military, the combat value of tanks and with spectacular success to soften the heavy impression of failure in Flanders. In addition, the military leaders of the Entente hoped to pin significant forces of the German army to Cambrai and thereby alleviate the situation for the Italians. On the morning of November 20, unexpectedly for the Germans, without the usual artillery preparation, the British launched an attack.

Numerous aircraft attacked German artillery and headquarters. By noon, the German defensive line was broken through. Within 6-8 hours, the British army achieved a result that could not be achieved in a number of previous operations. However, she was unable to develop her success. On November 30, the German command, having concentrated large forces, also suddenly launched a counterattack and pushed the British back from most of the positions they had captured.

The operation at Cambrai was neither strategic nor operational result. But it confirmed the value of a new means of combat - tanks, and laid the foundation for tactics based on the interaction of infantry, artillery, tanks and aviation operating on the battlefield.

History of France:

Political situation in France during the First World War (1914-1918)

The outbreak of hostilities caused consolidation political forces in France . The coalition government cabinet of R. Viviani also included representatives of the socialists, including Jules Guesde, who had previously established himself as one of the most consistent opponents of the participation of socialists in bourgeois governments. The Ministry of Internal Affairs then canceled the secret “list B”, which included the names of thousands of SFIO and VKT activists who were to be arrested after the start of general mobilization. The nation was united by a patriotic impulse. However, as the war dragged on, the internal political situation in the country began to worsen. The emotional uplift was replaced by fatigue from DC voltage, dissatisfaction with deteriorating living conditions. Strikes have become more frequent. The strike movement began to acquire a political character. On this wave there was a rapid radicalization of leftist parties. A faction of “Mensheviks” (minoritaires) was formed in the SFIO, very influential despite its name, advocating the resumption of cooperation with German social democracy and support anti-war position Russian Bolsheviks. The events in Russia in 1917 caused great resonance in France.

At the beginning of the war, chauvinistic sentiments among the masses of the French people seemed very strong. The bourgeoisie and the leaders of the socialist party proclaimed slogan of "sacred unity" nation in the face of an external enemy. The government, headed by the former socialist Viviani, included representatives of various bourgeois parties and socialists. Guesde and Samba became ministers in the same government with Millerand. After some time, a third socialist, A. Toma, joined the government and took the important post of Minister of Military Supply. Anarcho-syndicalist trade union leaders, such as Jouhaux, took part in the leading government bodies involved in mobilizing industry and workers for the war effort.

The development of events at the front, the deterioration of the situation of the working people with the growing enrichment of the bourgeois strata, gradually opened the eyes of the masses to the true nature of the war. The beginning of the ferment was evidenced by the strike movement that swept through the city in 1915-1916. various layers of workers - railway workers, garment workers, tram operators, miners, bank employees. In 1916, the number of strikes more than tripled compared to 1915. The government introduced compulsory arbitration at defense industry enterprises, depriving workers of the right to strike, and created the institution of “workshop delegates,” which was supposed to promote cooperation between workers and entrepreneurs . But at the beginning of 1917 the strike movement reached even greater proportions. The mass of soldiers was also gripped by discontent. The soldiers began to understand who benefited from the imperialist war.

As the war dragged on and the ferment of the masses intensified, anti-war opposition in the socialist party and trade unions. Due to the small number of revolutionary Marxist elements in the French labor movement and the weakness of Marxist traditions, the opposition was dominated by centrists. J. Longuet and other leaders of the opposition in the Socialist Party justified the party’s behavior at the beginning of the war, its vote for war loans and defended the slogan of “defense of the fatherland.” They rejected revolutionary means of anti-war struggle and limited themselves to pacifist projects of “pressuring the government to make peace.” Representatives of this opposition took part in the events that took place in 1915 and 1916. international conferences of internationalists in Zimmerwald and Kienthal, supporting the centrist majority there. In the trade unions, the anti-war opposition was also led by centrist elements who were conciliatory towards the reformist policies of Jouhaux and other right-wing leaders of the General Confederation of Labor.

The activity of the left and the difficult situation at the front provoked increased disagreement among the Republican parties. If over the previous three years only two cabinets changed in power, then only in 1917 four followed. government crisis. By the end of the year, the socialists had practically gone into opposition. The country's slide into political chaos was stopped by education government cabinet of J. Clemenceau . Ignoring the threat of a split in the republican camp, Clemenceau harshly suppressed anti-war propaganda. Several editors of the socialist newspaper Bonnet Rouge were court-martialed. A show trial also took place over the famous politician from the radical party, J. Caillot, who was a member of many government cabinets in the pre-war years. With an “iron hand,” Clemenceau, practically without relying on parliamentary power, implemented a program of emergency measures that made it possible to prepare the decisive offensive in the 1918 campaign.

History of France:

Social economic situation France during the First World War (1914-1918)

Against the backdrop of escalating international tensions, nationalist and militaristic sentiments intensified extremely in France itself. In the summer of 1913, parliament passed a law extending the term military service up to three years. By 1914, military expenditure items already accounted for 38% of the state budget. Attitudes towards war became a determining factor in public life. The catalyst for further events was the provocative murder by monarchists on July 31, 1914 of the leader of the SFIO J. Jaurès. The death of a prominent politician was perceived as a clear threat to the republican system. Against the backdrop of a growing political crisis The government announced general mobilization. On the same day, August 1, 1914, Germany declared war on Russia. Using mobilization in France and border incidents as a pretext, Germany declared war on France on August 3.

Already during the first months of the war, the entire northeast of France became a front-line zone. French army bore the brunt of containing the German offensive on the Western Front. The hostilities became protracted. The 1916 campaign tipped the scales in favor of the Entente, but the war dragged on. The French economy was not ready for such a test. The increase in military production led to the formation of imbalances in the industrial structure. The national debt grew. Mobilization sharply reduced the number of people employed in agriculture, which caused a drop in food production and a crisis in the consumer market.

In the first months of the war, German troops occupied the most developed economically regions of France - ten northeastern departments, which were centers of French large-scale industry and the most intensive agriculture. The territory captured by the Germans provided 75% of production on the eve of the war coal and coke, 84% of cast iron, 63% of steel, 60% of metalworking industry products, etc. During the war, 3,256 French cities and villages and about 8 thousand kilometers of railways were destroyed. The sown area of ​​grain crops in the country was steadily declining, reaching in 1917 only 67% of the pre-war area, and the harvest of the most important food crops amounted to two-thirds to half of the pre-war level.

With the help of government subsidies in France, new enterprises were built and old ones were expanded in the Paris region, in the river basin. Loire, Marseille, Bordeaux, Toulouse. In these areas, new metallurgical, automobile, engineering and chemical plants were created, and the development of new coal deposits began. In the Alpine departments, the construction of hydroelectric power stations has developed greatly. The new industry worked entirely for the war.

Over 60% of the male part of the rural population and about half of the workers were drafted into the army. Then, when the government had to quickly develop the military industry, some of the mobilized workers were returned to the factories. These workers were treated as military personnel "assigned to the factories" and were subject to military discipline. At the slightest sign of discontent and disobedience, workers were sent to the front.

The distribution of military orders and huge government subsidies was concentrated in the hands of consortia headed by large capitalists. IN short term In France, a large layer of speculators arose who became rich from military supplies. The owners of military-industrial enterprises received fabulous incomes. The net profit of the Hotchkiss company, which manufactured machine guns, amounted to 65 million francs for two and a half years of war, the Creuzot company in 1915 - 55 million, in 1916 - 206 million francs. The Gnome and Ron Motor Society paid its shareholders all invested capital in the first year of the war and, in addition, received a net profit of about 10 million francs.

Large banks also received large profits by placing numerous domestic and external loans. These loans, which served as the main source of financing the war, led to a colossal increase in domestic public debt (from 34 billion francs in 1914 to 116 billion francs in 1918) and to the formation of a huge debt of France to the United States of America and England , amounting to $5.4 billion by the end of the war.


North, Jonathan.
H82 Soldiers of the First World War 1914-1918. Uniforms, insignia, equipment and weapons / Jonathan North; [transl. from English M. Vitebsky]. - Moscow: Eksmo, 2015. - 256 p. ISBN 978-5-699-79545-1
"Soldiers of the First World War" - complete encyclopedia stories military uniform and equipment for the armies that fought on the fronts of the “Great War”. Its pages show the uniforms of not only the main Entente countries and Triple Alliance(England, France, Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary), but in general all the countries involved in this terrible conflict.

F R A N C I A
CAVALRY

The French cavalry began the war fully equipped and in excellent uniform. But quickly suffering heavy losses, she switched to more practical types of uniforms.

Nominally, cavalry was still divided into heavy cavalry (whose task was to deliver crushing blows to the enemy on the battlefield; its representatives rode large, powerful horses and had heavier equipment) and light cavalry (intended for reconnaissance or performing the functions of highly mobile infantry). The first included cuirassiers and dragoons, the second - horse huntsmen (chasseursacheval) and hussars. In 1914, the French army consisted of 12 cuirassier regiments, 32 dragoon regiments, 21 regiments of mounted chasseurs (and six regiments of African chasseurs - chasseurs d.Afrique) and 14 hussar regiments. There were four more regiments of the so-called. spagi - cavalrymen from North Africa, commanded by European officers.

Cuirassiers
Cuirassiers considered themselves the elite of the cavalry and proudly went into battle in 1914, just as many of them had done in 1870. Officers were still required to have four sets of uniforms (dress uniform, casual uniform, full dress uniform and marching uniform ). The marching uniform consisted of a dark blue uniform (fastened with nine buttons) with a red collar with dark blue buttonholes on it (the emblem was a flaming grenade) and silver epaulettes, red breeches (with black stripes), black cavalry boots with spurs and nickel-plated cuirasses. The cuirassier's headdress was a leather helmet covered with silver, adopted in 1874. It was usually worn without a plume (the latter was supposed to be worn by staff officers, as well as during parades and on Sundays).

Cuirassiers also wore brown gloves (in full dress - white). A beige or brown cover was put on the helmet, and sometimes the cover was also put on the cuirass. The officers were armed with pistols and sabers, in addition, they had binoculars in a black leather case.
Ordinary cavalrymen wore the same uniform, but with red epaulets, and a steel cuirass. True, their shape was of poorer quality. Ordinary cuirassiers were armed with carbines. In 1915, squadrons of foot soldiers, created from former cuirassiers, appeared in some cuirassier regiments. They still wore helmets, but without a crest. By this time, most cavalry regiments had adopted blue-gray uniforms, which began to resemble infantry in many aspects. Cavalry breeches had blue piping.

Now the cuirassier could be distinguished by his red regimental numbers and two red stripes on his buttonholes. They switched to Hadrian's helmets, but continued to wear single-breasted cavalry greatcoats, which were longer than infantry ones. The collar had triangular buttonholes, also with regimental numbers and double red piping. This cut was approved in December 1914. Non-commissioned officers had silver piping, officers - gold. However, the officers soon also switched to silver edging. In July 1916, six regiments were officially designated as foot cuirassiers (4th, 5th, 8th, 9th, 11th and 12th) and therefore on their buttonholes, in addition to the double red edging, a single yellow. At the corner of the buttonhole the soldiers of these regiments had discs of different colors - black for the first battalion, red for the second, yellow for the third and green for the reserve company.
In January 1917, the triangular buttonhole was replaced by a diamond-shaped buttonhole. All six infantry cuirassier regiments received the right to wear the red and green cords of the Military Cross. These units relied primarily on pistols, knives and hand grenades rather than carbines or rifles. All regiments used leather leggings and windings.

Dragoons
The uniform of the French dragoons was similar to that of the cuirassiers. The 1874 model helmet with a gilded dome and front plate and metal scales was worn with or without a cover. Officers and enlisted men wore dark blue uniforms (officers were almost black) with nine silver buttons, a beige collar with dark blue buttonholes and red regimental numbers. The uniform was completed with red breeches and high leather boots, which were preferred in heavy cavalry. Ordinary dragoons were armed with carbines and pikes of the 1913 model. Officers used a heavy cavalry saber of the 1880 model. Dragoon regiments switched to a grayish-blue uniform and quickly ceased to stand out against the background of other branches of the army. The cavalry helmet was replaced by Hadrian's helmet with or without a crest. The cavalrymen changed into grayish-blue uniforms, greatcoats and breeches (now with blue piping). Now, white regimental numbers appear on the dark blue buttonholes with double piping. After 1915, dragoons continued to use the triangular-tipped pike with a steel shaft, but also used carbines. They used brown leather belts and pouches and often hung extra cartridge belts around the horse's neck. The gendarmes, responsible for maintaining law and order, had similar uniforms, but with white grenades on the buttonholes, and were armed with carbines to which bayonets could be attached. They wore breeches with white piping.

Light Cavalry
In 1914, the vast majority of mounted chasseurs (chasseurs a cheval) and hussars wore elegant shakos. However, it was believed that in 1913 a helmet similar to that of the dragoons and also made of steel was adopted for use by the light cavalry. There should have been an emblem on the helmet - a hunting horn for the huntsmen and a star for the hussars. The number of helmets for light cavalry remains unknown, but the 5th Regiment of Mounted Chasseurs, as well as the 10th and 15th, wore them, and the 8th and 14th Hussars received them on the eve of 1914. Another five regiments received helmets at the end of 1914. Those regiments that did not receive helmets were forced to make do with blue leather shakos with emblems in the form of a hunting horn for the huntsmen and a Hungarian knot for the hussars. The visor was black; for non-commissioned officers and officers it had a gilded edge. A colored pompom was attached to the shako - each squadron had its own (blue, red, green, light blue and yellow). The huntsmen wore light blue uniforms with a red collar and a white regimental number; instead of epaulettes, there were white shamrocks on the shoulders. The breeches were red with blue piping. Black leather cavalry boots (with spurs) served as footwear for horse huntsmen. Equipment belts were Brown. Like the dragoons, the chasseurs were armed with carbines without bayonets. The hussars wore almost the same uniform, but with a blue collar with red piping. The introduction of grayish-blue uniforms meant that Chasseurs and Hussars switched to using the same practical uniform that the Dragoons had switched to in 1915. Chasseurs were distinguished by their green regimental numbers and piping, while the Hussars had blue ones. At the same time, the blue breeches of both had dark blue piping.

Colonial cavalry
The African Chasseurs (chasseurs d.Afrique) began the war in a uniform reminiscent of that of the horse-chasseur regiments, but with characteristic tapering shakos (known as "taconnet") with a red crown and a light blue band. On the front was a traditional cockade in the shape of a hunting horn. The collar of the uniform was yellow.
Spahi cavalrymen wore an Arabian-style uniform with a turban and a red cloak, a red sash and a red uniform with dark blue patterns. In addition, they used sheshias like those of the Zouaves. The officers preferred a more European style - a cap, a red uniform, gray-blue breeches and a cape. Shoes were represented by brown boots or gaiters.
Although most of The French cavalry were dressed in a grayish-blue uniform, these African regiments in 1915 switched to a khaki uniform with a shako or sheshiya in a light brown cover. On the blue buttonholes of the uniforms of both African chasseurs and spagi were yellow regimental numbers. The edging on the buttonholes was also yellow. Cavalry breeches had dark blue piping. The Jaegers switched to khaki uniforms, but the Spags did not adopt them, preferring loose khaki jackets or capes with equipment worn on the outside.

Having defeated the main enemy - Germany, France (like England) became the leading country in Western Europe. She regained her highly developed industrial areas Alsace and Lorraine, gained control over German and partially Turkish possessions (Togo, Cameroon, Syria, Lebanon, etc.). But the war brought huge losses to France: 1.3 million people died, it turned from a creditor country into a debtor, the level of industrial production in 1921 was 55% compared to 1913.

France, together with England, the USA, and Japan, was one of the organizers of the intervention against Soviet Russia. Stay of French troops in Russia during 1918-1919. had a profound influence on soldiers and sailors, who, upon returning to France, contributed to the rise of revolutionary sentiment in their homeland.

In the parliamentary elections in November 1919, the parties of the National Bloc won, which acted with ultra-patriotic positions: strict adherence to the terms of the Versailles Treaty, protection of social peace and the republican system, restoration of the economy destroyed by the war, protection of the rights of veterans and disabled war veterans, and the like. These slogans corresponded to the sentiments of the majority of the country's population, frightened by the strike movement.

France's hopes for regular reparations payments from Germany were not justified, since due to the crisis in the economy and society, Germany could not and was in no hurry to pay for them. In January 1923, French troops, together with Belgian troops, occupied the Ruhr region of Germany. France hoped not only to achieve the payment of reparations, but also to establish its control over the German economy. However, this action was condemned by the world community, so the troops were withdrawn from the Ruhr.

during 1924-1926. The Left Bloc, led by E. Herriot, which included radical socialists and socialists, was in power. He unsuccessfully tried to reform the financial and tax systems, officially recognized the USSR, and suppressed uprisings in the colonies - Morocco and Syria.

In 1926, after the collapse of the Left Bloc, a coalition of right-wing parties came to power and proclaimed a policy of national unity. The government was headed by Raymond Poincaré. In terms of the rate of growth in industrial production, France is ahead of England and Germany. The heavy, steel-smelting, and automobile industries developed at a rapid pace in the Carpathians. However, this was interrupted by the global economic crisis, which in France became protracted. Thus, the decline in production, which began at the end of 1980, continued until mid-1935. The pace of stabilization was so slow that the level of 1929 was not reached in 1939. Foreign trade declined sharply.

An unprecedented economic crisis, rising unemployment and poverty caused discontent among large sections of the population; the authority of traditional right-wing parties fell - from 1929 to 1932, 8 governments changed. Extremist, fascist and pro-fascist organizations have become more active in the country ("Fiery Crosses", "Patriotic League", " French action"). Unlike the German and Italian fascists, the French extremists did not enjoy the support of the middle strata of the population - owners of small enterprises.

A significant part of the workers were oriented toward the communists. Under such conditions, the attempt of reactionary forces to organize a putsch in February 1934 in order to eliminate the republican system encountered resistance from left-wing forces. A wave of demonstrations and rallies swept across the country.

1934 representatives of the communist and socialist parties, who were subsequently joined by progressive radicals and figures of other liberal movements, agreed on joint actions against fascism. During the municipal elections in the spring of 1935, leftist forces achieved significant success. In the summer of 1935, communists, socialists, and radicals, united in the Popular Front, held a demonstration. 1936. The French press published the program of the Popular Front, which provided for state control over the development of the economy in order to stabilize prices and finances of the country, as well as expand social assistance to the population from the budget, guaranteeing democratic freedoms and prohibition fascist groups, active international activities to ensure peace in the world.

In the parliamentary elections of 1936, the Popular Front parties won the right-wing parties. The new government was formed by socialist leader Leon Blum. The National Assembly adopted more than 130 laws to implement the Popular Front program, but its implementation required a lot of funds at a time when budget revenues were declining. The government was forced to make large loans. The country's economy gradually destabilized. Blum's government demanded that he be given emergency powers, but the Senate refused.

French foreign policy was dominated by the desire to assert influence in post-war Europe and ensure the implementation of the Treaty of Versailles. France tried to limit Germany's revanchist aspirations by creating a system of collective security in Europe. An important step in this direction was the signing in Paris in 1928 of the Treaty of Paris prohibiting war as a means of national policy, condemning war and proposing only peaceful negotiations to resolve disputes. The pact provided for collective action on the part of its participants against any country that would take the path of aggression. French diplomacy in the early 1930s made an attempt to get closer to Germany, trying to maintain the status quo in Europe and limit German military spending, but Germany refused the deal. In 1932, a non-aggression treaty was signed between France and the USSR.

The French government unsuccessfully protested against the Anglo-German Naval Agreement (1935), under which Germany received the right to build a fleet. But France, like England, did nothing to force German troops to leave the Rhineland demilitarized zone. France recognized the Anschluss of Austria.

1935 an agreement was signed in Paris on mutual assistance between France and the USSR. The parties to the treaty pledged to immediately provide each other with support in the event of an attack by any European state. France and England, having proclaimed a policy of neutrality, actually contributed to the aggressive policy of Germany and Italy and their intervention in the civil war in Spain. France was a party to the Munich Agreement of 1938.

France and England, concerned about the unpredictable development of events, turned to the USSR with a proposal to provide guarantees of assistance to European states in the event of aggression from Germany. The USSR responded by proposing to conclude a mutual assistance pact between England, France and Soviet Union with the simultaneous provision of guarantees to all states bordering the USSR. However, no agreement was reached due to mutual distrust and the parties' reluctance to compromise. In the 40s, Germany was already ready for revenge.


Immediately after the end of the First World War, Prime Minister Clemenceau adopted a program to restore the French economy. As a result, by 1925 the regions most affected by the fighting had restored their economic power. In order to somehow compensate for the losses in the workforce caused by the death of millions of French at the front, more than 2 million foreign workers were invited to the country. The French government decided to receive funds from Germany to restore the destroyed economy. The slogan of the day was “The Germans pay for everything!” In 1921, the French calculated the full amount of reparations, which amounted to an absolutely fantastic figure - $33 billion. The British, realizing the unreality of paying such an astronomical sum to a war-drained Germany, proposed reducing it to a reasonable size, but the French remained adamant.

Already at the end of 1921, the British advocated reducing reparations from Germany, which was supported by Prime Minister Briand. This caused a storm in parliament, which removed Briand and appointed Poincaré in his place. In 1923, after Germany again failed to pay reparations, he occupied the Ruhr region. IN next year The Dowers Plan was adopted to restore German economy, so that she was able to pay off the former Entente, and French troops left the Ruhr.

However, in the same 1924, Poincaré was forced to cede power to the radicals led by Herriot, during a reign that included an unprecedented financial crisis. Thanks to this, already in 1926 Poincaré was again in power. He introduced wise economic policies that revived the French national currency. Poincaré was hailed as the "savior of the franc." When the prime minister retired in 1929 for health reasons, he was considered one of the most outstanding politicians of the Third Republic.

By the end of the 1920s, France was able to restore its pre-war level of economic development. Moreover, the prosperous country seemed to remain aloof from the general crisis that engulfed Europe in 1929. Thanks to high customs duties, France remained the only island of stability in a world plunged into chaos by depression. However, by 1931, the crisis had reached France, which was affected no less seriously than its neighbors.

According to the election results in 1932, right-wing parties lost their majority in parliament, losing power to radicals and socialists. At the very beginning of 1934, the reputation of the radical party was greatly damaged by a dirty political scandal in which a number of its leaders were involved. French fascist organizations took advantage of this to try to seize power into their own hands on February 6, 1934. A huge crowd gathered near the parliament building, which was dispersed by police. 15 rebels were killed and more than 1.5 thousand were wounded. Faced with a direct threat of beginning civil war Prime Minister Daladier resigned, giving up his post in favor of Gaston Doumergue, who formed the Cabinet of the National Union.

In 1935, the Popular Front was formed in France, headed by socialist leader Leon Blum.

In 1935, Doumergue's government collapsed due to the exorbitant ambitions of radical ministers. Doumergue was replaced by Pierre Laval, a former socialist who defected to the right. He tried to fight the crisis by cutting social spending and increasing taxes. This led to the fall of his government already at the beginning of 1936.

The Popular Front won the subsequent parliamentary elections. The Socialists gained a majority in parliament for the first time, but at the same time the share of the Communists increased, gaining 72 seats. Blum became prime minister. The Popular Front government decided to fight the crisis through sweeping social reforms, which did nothing to improve the country's economic situation. In France, an 8-hour working day, paid leave were introduced, and negotiations began between entrepreneurs and trade unions on working conditions. The Socialists tried to nationalize the banking system, but the Senate strongly opposed this. Blum's social reforms were a very expensive undertaking, which hit the ailing economy even harder. The actions of the Popular Front were least of all aimed at stimulating production and restoring the economy. Unemployment remained high, and the increase in wages was quickly eaten up by rising prices. Entrepreneurs began to take their capital out of France, which further fueled inflation.

Blum's reforms failed completely, and when he tried to raise taxes in June 1937, the Senate dissolved his cabinet. In April 1938, the radicals returned to power, and the socialists were again in opposition. The radical Edouard Daladier, who became the new prime minister, formed a cabinet in which the post of finance minister went to Paul Reynaud, who set about restoring the economy destroyed by the crisis and the reforms of the Popular Front.

Through Reynaud's efforts, it was only in 1938-1939 that the French economy reached the level of 1928, but this was achieved mainly due to feverish preparations for war. In March 1940, Paul Reynaud became Prime Minister of France.

On May 10, 1940, the Wehrmacht attacked France, and within weeks the fate of the campaign was sealed. On June 10, with the Germans rapidly approaching Paris, the government moved to Tours. After 4 days, the government left Tours and moved to Bordeaux. Reynaud insisted on continuing hostilities, and on June 16 he was replaced by Marshal Henri Philippe Pétain, a supporter of the truce. On June 22, 1940, a preliminary truce with the Germans was signed in the Compiegne Forest. The ceremony took place in the same carriage in which the French accepted the surrender of the Kaiser's army in November 1918.

After this, more than 30 prominent French politicians, including Daladier, fled to North Africa to form a government in exile there. However, upon arrival in Morocco, they were all arrested on the orders of Pétain. However, he emigrated to England former deputy The Minister of War, General Charles de Gaulle, already on June 18, 1940, addressed all the French on the radio, urging them to continue the fight. Soon he created the Free France movement in London, which set as its goal the fight against Nazi Germany.

On July 9, 1940, the remnants of parliament gathered in the resort town of Vichy to discuss the future of France. Pétain's deputy Pierre Laval was able to convince the deputies that Germany had won the war and would now reign supreme in Europe. At Laval's suggestion, parliament transferred all its powers to Pétain. III Republic ceased to exist.

Laval took a pronounced pro-German position, which is why Pétain dismissed him at the end of 1940. However, in April 1942, under pressure from Berlin, Laval returned to the government and remained in it until the collapse of the Vichy regime in 1944.

Meanwhile, during 1940-1942, with the help of the British, de Gaulle managed to win over to his side some commanders of colonial units in the Middle East and Indochina. However, during this period serious disagreements arose between the general himself and the British. The British government was not satisfied with the fact that de Gaulle campaigned based on the imperial interests of France and paid little attention to strengthening friendly relations between the British, American and French military. The problem was that the French colonial units did not like the Allies and were not very keen to help them in the fight against the Germans. But de Gaulle was unable to fulfill the role of a connecting link during this period.

Nevertheless, in August 1940, the administration of the colonies of Chad, Cameroon, French Congo and Ubangi-Shari (now the Central African Republic) came over to his side. In 1941, de Gaulle's units took part, together with the British, in operations against French units loyal to the Pétain government in Syria. However, due to the difficulties with the allies described above, de Gaulle's movement was not officially recognized by the United States, and therefore did not have much political weight. But the general continued to act.

During 1942, his people established contact with the bourgeois resistance groups operating in France and subordinated them to their leadership. With the help of General de Gaulle, these groups began to receive weapons, money, and radio stations from London. But at the same time, de Gaulle did not provide support to resistance groups of Marxist and socialist orientation leading an active struggle against the occupiers. However, this situation did not last long, and he soon managed to come to an agreement with some communists. Moreover, in December 1942, a meeting of representatives of both movements took place, at which it was decided to join forces in the fight against the Germans. Already in January 1943, a representative office of the Communist Party operated at the general’s headquarters in London.

Work continued in France itself. In May 1943, General Jean Moulin's representative founded the National Council of the Resistance (NCR), which included representatives of 16 different movements, including the Communist Party, the National Front, the CGT, Christian trade unions, and so on. Armed groups of various Resistance parties united at the beginning of 1944 into the French Internal Forces (FFI), and about half of their numbers were partisan units. The general management of the FFI units was carried out by the military commission of the NSS, the chairman of which was general secretary National Front, communist Pierre Villon. The communist General Joinville became the chief of staff of the FFI. General de Gaulle, who wanted to control the activities of the partisans, appointed General Koenig, who was in London, as commander of the FFI.

Meanwhile, in the summer of 1943, a unification of organizations led by de Gaulle and General Giraud took place. On July 3, 1943, the French Committee for National Liberation (FCNL) was formed in Algeria under the chairmanship of de Gaulle and Giraud, which effectively became the French Provisional Government in exile. A Provisional National Assembly was established under the FKNO, which performed the functions of parliament. During the same period, General de Gaulle established strong ties with the USSR, and thanks to them, on August 27, 1943, with very cold support from the USA and England, the FKNO was recognized by the international community. In 1944, communists entered this body for the first time.

In March 1944, NSS participants adopted unified program actions after the end of the war and the liberation of France. It pointed out the need to establish true democracy in France for all segments of the population and contained many socialist points. And very soon there was a chance to bring it to life.

Opening of the Second Front and landing allied forces in Europe served as a signal for the start of the uprising. On June 6, 1944, the PCF Central Committee ordered the start of military operations against the Germans throughout France, and on the same day, de Gaulle, speaking on the radio from London, called on all his supporters to begin a decisive battle with the Germans. After these calls, a huge number of volunteers joined the FFI units - their number increased 10 times and reached 500 thousand people. As a result, the uprising covered 40 of the 90 departments of France, and 28 of them were liberated from the Germans exclusively by Resistance forces. However, strengthening the communists was not part of de Gaulle's plans. He was afraid that France might turn red, and for this reason his representatives began to negotiate with representatives of the police and gendarmerie, especially in Paris, so that their units would come over to his side, and together they would prevent the communists from seizing power. De Gaulle sent his best and most combat-ready units to capture Paris in order to prevent its capture by communist units. Moreover, when an uprising began in Paris before the arrival of the Allied troops and de Gaulle’s units, the general’s representative took an unprecedented step: to sign a truce with the German commandant of Paris, but it was not supported by other fighting groups of the Resistance. Street fighting began in Paris, as a result of which on August 24 most of it was liberated by the rebels. On the same day, de Gaulle's units entered Paris.



Domestic policy of France, the emergence of a deep economic crisis in the country. The emergence of the Popular Front as a result of the powerful rise of the anti-fascist movement. Contents of the program, legislation and historical significance of the Popular Front.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

France between the two wars (1918-1939)

Plan

Introduction

1. Movement for the creation of the Popular Front

2. Popular Front Program

3. Legislation of the Popular Front

4. Disagreements in the Popular Front. The end of the Popular Front

Introduction

Domestic policy France in the 1920s was largely defined by the unresolved problems that arose after the end of the war. Two main areas were related to financial and foreign policy country led by Raymond Poincaré and Aristide Briand. High military expenses were covered by France through loans, which inevitably led to inflation. Poincaré counted on German reparations to keep the franc at least 1/10 of its pre-war value, cover the cost of rebuilding the destroyed areas and pay interest on loans to Great Britain and the United States. However, the Germans did not want to fulfill their obligations. Many generally doubted the possibility of Germany paying large reparations. Poincaré, who did not share these doubts, sent troops into the Ruhr region in 1923. The Germans resisted and capitulated only after emergency measures were introduced. British and American experts put forward the Dawes Plan to finance reparation payments, mainly through American loans to Germany.

In the first half of the 1920s, Poincaré enjoyed the support of a nationalist-minded parliament, elected in 1920. But in the next elections of 1924, despite the split of the left forces into warring communist and socialist parties (1920), the coalition of radical socialists and socialists (the union of the left) was able get the most seats. The new chamber rejected Poincaré's line, along with his firm monetary policy in France, and, in order to improve relations with Germany, brought to power first Edouard Herriot and then Briand. Briand's plans for peace in Europe apparently met with a favorable response from Gustav Stresemann, the Reich Chancellor and Foreign Minister of Germany. Stresemann was the initiator of the conclusion of the guarantee pact on inviolability state borders in the Rhine region and on maintaining the demilitarization of the Rhineland, which was reflected in the Locarno Treaties of 1925.

From the mid-1920s until his death in 1932, Briand led French foreign policy. He made skillful and tireless attempts to improve relations with Germany as a basis for maintaining peace under the auspices of the League of Nations, although he knew that Germany was rearming. Briand was confident that France would never be able to confront Germany on its own without the support of its former allies or the League of Nations.

In the early 1930s, France was gripped by a deep economic crisis. A massive massacre has unfolded in the country labor movement and at the same time the threat from Nazi Germany increased. Both the program of equal social security, which the working class insisted on, and the policy of effective rearmament to eliminate the threat from a remilitarized Germany rested on the need for an effective recovery of the French economy. Moreover, in the 1930s, when production was in decline throughout the world, France was unlikely to achieve genuine international cooperation, which alone could save the country's economy from collapse.

The world crisis and its most severe consequence - unemployment - manifested themselves in France in mid-1934. In the elections of 1936, the Popular Front won a decisive victory, partly because it seemed to be the only defense in the face of totalitarian right-wing forces, but mainly because of the promise to improve the economic situation and implement social reforms (similar to the New Deal in the USA). Socialist leader Leon Blum formed a new government.

Hitler's rise to power initially had little effect on events in France. However, his call for rearmament (1935) and the seizure of the Rhineland (1936) posed a direct military threat. This radically changed the French attitude towards foreign policy. The left could no longer support the policy of rapprochement between the two states, and the right did not believe in the possibility of military resistance. One of the few concrete foreign policy measures of this period was the mutual assistance pact with the USSR, concluded by Pierre Laval in 1935. Unfortunately, such an attempt to revive the long-standing Franco-Russian alliance to curb Germany was not crowned with success.

After the annexation of Austria (1938), Hitler demanded that Czechoslovakia transfer the Sudetenland to Germany. On Munich Conference France agreed to the division of Czechoslovakia. The French could take a decisive position at the conference, since it had non-aggression agreements with both Czechoslovakia and the USSR. However, the French representative Edouard Daladier took a position similar to that of the English Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.

1. Movement for the creation of the Popular Front

france popular front anti-fascist

The Popular Front in France arose as a reaction of democratic forces to the fascist rebellion, the reason for which was the case of Stavissky, who organized a fraudulent operation - the issuance of counterfeit bonds worth over 200 million francs! The fascists, putting forward the slogan “Down with the thieves!”, called for an end to corrupt parliamentarians and ministers, to liquidate the parliament and, in general, the “rotten regime” of the Third Republic. On February 6, 1934, the fascists tried to seize parliament by organizing a rebellion. Only on the night of February 6 did the police open fire and the Nazis retreated. The right accused the government, led by the radical socialist Daladier, of reprisals against demonstrators, and it decided to resign. The new government, headed by the right-wing radical Doumergue, included not only radicals, but also leaders of right-wing parties, including Tardieu, Laval and Marshal Petain.

The attempted fascist revolt shook the whole of France, causing a powerful upsurge of the anti-fascist movement and awakening a craving for unity. February 9, 1934 in Paris under the leadership Central Committee The FCP and the leadership of the UVKT held an anti-fascist demonstration, in which 50 thousand people took part and called on workers to hold a mass anti-fascist demonstration. On February 12, 1934, a general protest strike took place. against fascism, organized by the Communist Party, the Socialist Party, the CGT and the UVKT. In the main industries, 80-90% of workers went on strike. Many small traders and artisans joined them. IN total 4.5 million people stopped working. The general strike was accompanied by numerous rallies and demonstrations in almost all major cities of France. For the first time, communists, socialists, trade union members, and non-partisans participated jointly in demonstrations and strikes. The success of the demonstration and general strike on February 12, 1934 showed that a serious regrouping of class forces was taking place in France. French anti-fascists, alarmed by the tragic experience of Germany and the threat of a fascist coup, met with massive support from the French people. The Nazis did not achieve the cooperation of the army and police. A significant part of the population opposed them.

On July 27, 1934, the Communist and Socialist parties signed a pact of unity, which stated that their goal was:

a) Mobilize all workers against fascist organizations in order to achieve their disarmament and dissolution.

b) Protect democratic freedoms and demand proportional representation and the dissolution of the House.

c) Oppose military preparations...

f) Oppose fascist terror in Germany and Austria"

On behalf of the PCF, M. Thorez proposed creating a “People's Front for Freedom, Labor and Peace” facing the front of reaction and fascism. The organizing committee for the creation of the Popular Front included, along with the PCF and SFIO, radicals, other left-wing groups, trade unions, the League of Human Rights, etc. Thus, in the fall of 1934, the term “Popular Front” was first born to denote a broad coalition of socio-political forces united a platform for the anti-war and anti-fascist struggle, the struggle for improving the living conditions of workers.

Further rapprochement between communists, socialists and radicals was facilitated by the signing of the Franco-Soviet mutual assistance treaty on May 2, 1935. On July 14, 1935, a demonstration was organized in which for the first time all three main left parties - communists, socialists and radicals, both main trade union centers - the CGT and UVKT, as well as many other anti-fascist groups - officially agreed to participate. It ended with a grand meeting, the participants of which took a solemn oath: “On behalf of all parties and free groups, on behalf of the people of France throughout its territory, the authorized representatives, representatives or members people's assembly On July 14, 1935, inspired by the same will to give bread to the working people, workers, youth and peace to the whole world, they took a solemn oath to unanimously strive for the disarmament and dissolution of fascist unions, the protection and development of democratic freedoms and the provision of peace.” The Popular Front Oath served as the basis for his program. Organising Committee for the preparation of the demonstration was transformed into National Committee Popular Front. Popular Front committees began to be created locally.

2. Popular Front Program

In January 1936, the program of the Popular Front was published, in the development of which all its groups participated. In the political section of the program, demands were made for a general amnesty, to disarm and dissolve fascist organizations, to respect trade union freedoms and freedom of the press, to respect women’s right to work, to extend compulsory education until the age of 14, to ensure that everyone, both students and teachers, complete freedom conscience.

The section “Defense of Peace” provided for the establishment of international cooperation within the framework of the League of Nations in order to ensure collective security, as well as the limitation of weapons and the nationalization of the military industry. The program advocated the spread of mutual assistance pacts open to all "according to the principles of the Franco-Soviet treaty." IN economic section program contained the following requirements:

“Against unemployment and industrial crisis. Shortening the work week without cutting wages. Involvement of young people in the labor process as a result of the creation of a system for the transition of elderly workers to a pension in an amount sufficient to live on. Quick implementation of a wide-ranging work plan public importance in the city and in the countryside; for this purpose, to join local resources to the efforts of the state and individual groups.” Taking into account the difficult situation of the middle strata of the population suffering from the crisis, the Popular Front program proposed preventing a decline in the living standards of pensioners and employees, reducing fees for retail premises, and prohibiting the sale of property for debts. To alleviate the situation of the peasants, it was planned to introduce fixed prices for agricultural products and create a state intermediary bureau for the sale of grain.

The Popular Front's financial recovery program contained demands:

“Pursuit of wasteful spending of funds by civilian and military administrative authorities. Creation of a military pension fund. Democratic reform of the tax system, providing for the easing of the tax burden in order to create economic recovery, the creation of new resources through measures affecting large capitals (high progression of general tax rates on income exceeding 75 thousand francs, changes to the inheritance tax - taxation of the profits of monopolies, preventing the price of consumer goods from rising). Democratic tax reform that would ease the tax burden on working people and increase the tax burden on the rich. She proposed establishing state control over the French Bank."

The Popular Front program did not contain socialist demands. It was democratic, anti-fascist in nature and was feasible within the framework of the capitalist system. By bringing to the fore general democratic tasks, it made it possible to unite all opponents of fascism, war and big capital. In March 1936, a unifying congress of trade unions took place in Toulouse, formalizing the merger of the CGT and UVKT into a single organization that adopted the old name: the General Confederation of Labor.

3. Forlegislation of the Popular Front

In the spring of 1936, as a result of the elections, the Popular Front won, collecting the votes of 57% of voters. In accordance with the election results, the formation of the government was entrusted to the leader of the largest parliamentary faction - socialist Leon Blum. Blum invited all three main parties of the Popular Front to join the government: communists, socialists and radicals. Socialists and radicals agreed to take part in Blum's government, but the communists refused, because they believed that their entry into the government could be used by the reaction to intimidate voters with the “Red danger”. Without participating in Blum's government, the communists nevertheless decided to support him on the condition that he fulfill the Popular Front program.

The victory of the Popular Front aroused enormous enthusiasm among workers, who expected the speedy fulfillment of election promises. A few days after the elections, strikes spontaneously began at many enterprises. Their participants demanded higher wages, the introduction of paid holidays, and a reduction in working hours. The strike movement acquired unprecedented proportions. At the beginning of June 1936, about 2 million people went on strike. The workers occupied the largest enterprises and took them under guard.

The bourgeoisie, frightened by the unprecedented scale of the strike movement, hastened to make concessions. On June 7, 1936, at the government residence - Matignon Palace - agreements were signed between representatives of trade unions and entrepreneurs. Under the terms of the Matignon Agreement, wages increased by an average of 7-15%, and especially low wages increased by 2-3 times.

Law establishing annual paid leave in industry, commerce, liberal professions, domestic service and agriculture (June 20, 1936):

"St. 54f. Every worker, employee or apprentice...has the right, after one year of continuous service in the enterprise, to paid leave of a minimum duration of 14 days, including 12 working days.

Art. 54d. When setting remuneration, benefits for large families must be taken into account, as well as additional and in-kind payments that cannot be used during the continuation of the vacation.”

Law Establishing a Forty-Hour Workweek in Industrial and Commercial Organizations and Determining Hours of Work in Underground Mines (June 27, 1936):

"St. 6. In industrial, commercial and craft enterprises and cooperatives... the duration... of work of workers and employees, of both sexes and of any age, cannot exceed 40 hours per week.

Art. 8 In underground mines, the duration of each worker’s stay in the mine cannot exceed 38 hours 40 minutes per week.”

4. Disagreements in the People'sfront. The end of the Popular Front

The Popular Front's measures aimed at improving the financial situation of workers naturally required additional expenses and, consequently, increased the budget deficit. The Communist Party believed that in order to cover the budget deficit, it was necessary first of all to “force the rich to pay”, impose an emergency tax on them, and prohibit the export of capital abroad. In response, the financial oligarchy sabotaged the country's economy: in 1936-37 alone, over 100 billion francs were transferred abroad. “Capital flight” undermined the stability of the currency. The government of L. Blum that came to power (June 1936 - June 1937) did not take proper measures to suppress sabotage. Having devalued the franc by 30%, Blum in February 1937 announced the need for a “pause” in the implementation of the Popular Front program. In the field of foreign policy, the Blum government, in response to the outbreak of the civil war in Spain (1936-39) by the Francoists with the help of the fascist powers, declared the “neutrality” of France, banning to legitimate authorities The Spanish Republic imported weapons purchased by them across the Franco-Spanish border.

Blum's successors, the radicals Chautan (June 1937 - March 1938) and E. Daladier (April 1938 - March 1940, until October 1938 formally a government based on the Popular Front) increasingly deviated from his program. In October-November 1938 the radicals, and in May 1939 the socialists openly broke with the Popular Front. Having signed the shameful Munich Agreement of 1938, which handed over Czechoslovakia to arbitrariness Hitler's Germany By issuing a series of anti-people decrees on November 13, 1938 and brutally suppressing the protest movement against these decrees, the Daladier government opened the way for the return of the right to power. Soon the Franco-German Declaration of 1938 was signed in Paris, which actually crossed out the Franco-Soviet Pact of 1935.

The Munich Agreement led to the final collapse of the Popular Front. The Communist Party condemned Munich agreement and voted against him in parliament. However, all other parties, including the socialists and radicals, approved the Munich Agreement. Referring to the Communist vote against Munich, the leadership of the radical party officially announced its withdrawal from the Popular Front. This was the end of the Popular Front.

The Popular Front did not last long, but had great historical significance. His main merit was the successful fight against fascism. The Popular Front blocked the path of fascism, ensured the preservation and expansion of democratic freedoms, and brought real improvements in the lives of French workers. The social and economic legislation of the Popular Front, which was then the best of all major industrialized countries, was of great importance. During the years of the Popular Front, the influence of the working class and its political and trade union organizations increased significantly. However, it was not possible to consolidate and develop the influence of the working class due to the flight of capital abroad. The government was forced to follow the lead of entrepreneurs, devaluing the franc and curtailing socio-economic reforms.

Posted on Allbest.ru

Similar documents

    The main consequences of the First World War for France. The government of the "National Bloc", its foreign and domestic policy. French national debt. The economic crisis and its main consequences. The rise of the fascists and the creation of the Popular Front.

    presentation, added 03/03/2013

    Reasons for education national government in Great Britain in the 30s. XX century. Its economic and foreign policy. Parliamentary crisis and the threat of fascism in France. Activities of the Popular Front government. Political instability in France.

    abstract, added 05/20/2010

    Creation of the Second Front against fascist Germany in Western Europe during World War II. Tehran Conference 1943. Normandy operation, or Operation Overlord. Breakthrough of the front German defense. Offensive in Northwestern France.

    presentation, added 10/22/2015

    An attempt at justification national rights Germans in Czechoslovakia. The concept of “German popular socialism” led by ideologists W. Jaks and E. Franzel. Formation of the idea of ​​​​creating a single “national popular front”, with the goal of uniting all Sudeten Germans.

    abstract, added 08/26/2009

    Study of political events, trends in economic development of the USA and France in the first half of the 20th century. Characterizing America's Era of Economic Prosperity - Prosperity. The failure of Blum's reforms in France, features of participation in the Second World War.

    abstract, added 01/25/2010

    The 11th century was the time of the unification of medieval France, the emergence of a new type of state - the class monarchy (States General). Domestic policy of Louis IX. Central authority legislative and executive power - the royal curia. Hundred Years' War.

    test, added 12/26/2010

    Counterattack of the Southwestern Front on June 23-29 and the ensuing tank battle. The main attack is on Smolensk and Moscow. Leningrad blockade. The capture of Moscow as the main objective of the Barbarossa plan. The role of the people's militia as a form of patriotic movement.

    abstract, added 11/18/2013

    The opening of the Second Front as a solution to the contradictions between Russia, England and the USA in World War II. Political relations of the participants in the anti-Hitler coalition and the balance of forces at the fronts. The importance of military cooperation for the victory over fascism.

    abstract, added 07/23/2015

    Creation of a defensive line on the Dnieper. The position of the Red Army in the initial period of the Great Patriotic War. Participation of units and formations of the Western Front in the defense of the city of Mogilev. The role and place of the people's militia in organizing resistance to the enemy.

    course work, added 03/26/2012

    The history of the development of the Siberian economy on the eve of the war. Transfer of the national economy to serve the needs of the front, the importance of the rear. Evacuation of the largest factories during the war. Industrial development of Novosibirsk industry. Selfless work of townspeople in the name of Victory.